Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845306

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic capability of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting and classifying odontogenic cysts and tumors, with special emphasis on odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) and ameloblastoma. STUDY DESIGN: Nine electronic databases and the gray literature were examined. Human-based studies using AI algorithms to detect or classify odontogenic cysts and tumors by using panoramic radiographs or CBCT were included. Diagnostic tests were evaluated, and a meta-analysis was performed for classifying OKCs and ameloblastomas. Heterogeneity, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence were evaluated. RESULTS: Twelve studies concluded that AI is a promising tool for the detection and/or classification of lesions, producing high diagnostic test values. Three articles assessed the sensitivity of convolutional neural networks in classifying similar lesions using panoramic radiographs, specifically OKC and ameloblastoma. The accuracy was 0.893 (95% CI 0.832-0.954). AI applied to cone beam computed tomography produced superior accuracy based on only 4 studies. The results revealed heterogeneity in the models used, variations in imaging examinations, and discrepancies in the presentation of metrics. CONCLUSION: AI tools exhibited a relatively high level of accuracy in detecting and classifying OKC and ameloblastoma. Panoramic radiography appears to be an accurate method for AI-based classification of these lesions, albeit with a low level of certainty. The accuracy of CBCT model data appears to be high and promising, although with limited available data.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Quistes Odontogénicos , Tumores Odontogénicos , Humanos , Algoritmos , Ameloblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Ameloblastoma/clasificación , Ameloblastoma/patología , Neoplasias Maxilomandibulares/clasificación , Neoplasias Maxilomandibulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Quistes Odontogénicos/clasificación , Quistes Odontogénicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Odontogénicos/clasificación , Tumores Odontogénicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Panorámica
2.
Angle Orthod ; 92(1): 118-126, 2022 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34546287

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in skeletal sagittal malocclusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, LIVIVO and gray literature (OpenGrey, ProQuest, and Google Scholar) were electronically searched. Two independent investigators selected the eligible studies, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence (GRADE). One reviewer independently extracted the data and the second reviewer checked this information. Any disagreement between the reviewers in each phase was resolved by discussion between them and/or involved a third reviewer for final decision. RESULTS: Electronic search identified 5,132 studies, and 5 observational studies were included. Risk of bias was low in two studies, moderate in one, and high in two. The studies showed high heterogeneity. Mandibular asymmetry ranged from 17.43% to 72.95% in overall samples. Horizontal chin deviation showed a prevalence of 17.66% to 55.6% asymmetry in Class I malocclusions, and 68.98% in vertical asymmetry index. In Class II patients, prevalence of mandibular asymmetry varied from 10% to 25.5% in horizontal chin deviation, and 71.7% in vertical asymmetry index. The Class III sample showed a prevalence of mandibular asymmetry ranging from 22.93% to 78% in horizontal chin deviation and 80.4% in vertical asymmetry index. Patients seeking orthodontic or orthognathic surgery treatment showed greater prevalence of mandibular asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal Class III malocclusion showed the greatest prevalence of mandibular asymmetry. Mandibular vertical asymmetry showed a marked prevalence in all malocclusions. However, conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to use of convenience samples and low-quality study outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Maloclusión de Angle Clase III , Maloclusión Clase II de Angle , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Cefalometría , Asimetría Facial/epidemiología , Humanos , Maloclusión de Angle Clase III/epidemiología , Mandíbula , Prevalencia
3.
Aust Endod J ; 48(3): 515-521, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34939718

RESUMEN

Apical periodontitis shows radiographic signs such as widening of the periodontal ligament and periapical radiolucency, which differ in extent depending on the stage of the lesion. However, other lesions can be associated with or coincidental to the apical region, representing developmental lesions and benign or malignant tumours. This article describes three cases of malignant tumours, a central mucoepidermoid carcinoma (CMEC), a chondroblast osteosarcoma and an osteosarcoma of the jaw (OSJ) that presented as periapical lesions. Endodontists must be aware of unsuccessful treatment, persistent pain, signs of paraesthesia, a rapid growth rate and delayed response to therapy associated with atypical features. Complementary examinations, such as biopsy and computed tomography, can allow the early diagnosis of malignant tumours, leading to a better prognosis and thus increased survival rates and improvement in quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Osteosarcoma , Periodontitis Periapical , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Periodontitis Periapical/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteosarcoma/diagnóstico , Osteosarcoma/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA