Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hand Surg Glob Online ; 4(3): 181-183, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34977511

RESUMEN

The pathophysiology and treatment of COVID-19 have been at the forefront of medical research this past year. While great strides have been made in our knowledge of the disease, there is still much that is unknown. More than one-third of patients with COVID-19 present with symptoms involving the nervous system. The reason for this is unclear, although several theories have been postulated. In this case study, we present 3 patients with severe ulnar nerve dysfunction following treatment for COVID-19 in the intensive care unit. We discuss reasons why this may have occurred, the etiology of which is likely multifactorial. We are reporting these cases to inform and alert physicians to the possibility of ulnar nerve involvement in the presentation of patients with COVID-19.

2.
Int Orthop ; 42(11): 2675-2683, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29516238

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Nonunion is a highly morbid complication that exacerbates the pain, disability and financial burden of distal and diaphyseal femur fractures. This study examined the modern rates of healing, nonunion, and other complications requiring reoperation of different fixation methods for distal and diaphyseal femur fractures. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of all records from PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Review system was performed. Included studies had >20 acute, non-pathologic distal or diaphyseal femur fractures treated with primary internal fixation. Excluded were studies on abnormal patient/fracture populations, external fixation, or cement/bone graft use. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies with 2,829 femoral shaft fractures and 11 studies with 505 distal femur fractures were included. Distal fractures had a lower healing rate (86.6% vs. 93.7%) and a higher re-operation rate (13.4% vs 6.1%) than shaft fractures (p < 0.00001), primarily due to higher rates of mechanical failure (p < 0.00001). Nonunion was the most frequent complication, occurring in 4.7% of distal fractures and 2.8% of shaft fractures. There was no difference between plate and nail fixation of distal fractures in healing, nonunion, or other causes of re-operation. Shaft fractures developed nonunion in 6.6% of unreamed nails and 2.1% of reamed nails (p = 0.002). Nonunion occurred in 2.3% of antegrade nailed fractures and 1.5% of retrograde nailed fractures (p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one out of every eight distal fractures and one of every 16 shaft fractures requires re-operation. The most common cause of fixation failure is nonunion. Further research is needed to improve outcomes, particularly in distal femur fractures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas no Consolidadas/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas del Fémur/complicaciones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas no Consolidadas/etiología , Humanos , Fijadores Internos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología
3.
J Hand Surg Am ; 42(11): 930.e1-930.e4, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28899588

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Volar plating of distal radius fractures is an increasingly common procedure. Presterilized, single-use volar plate fixation sets have been purported to increase operating room efficiency and decrease cost. The purpose of this study was to compare the actual cost of using a conventional set compared with the projected cost of using its single-use counterpart. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30 consecutive cases of volar plate fixation in which conventional instrument sets were used. Hardware and processing costs were calculated for the conventional sets and compared with the projected cost of using single-use sets. RESULTS: The mean total cost of hardware and processing for the conventional sets was $2,728, whereas the projected cost for the single-use sets was slightly higher at $2,868. Twenty-three of the 30 cases would have required additional screws not available in the single-use set. The cost of the additional screws needed to supplement the single-use set would have added an average of $282/case. Overall, the combined hardware and processing cost was lower for conventional sets in 25 of the 30 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although the price of the single-use set is less than the mean charge for use of a conventional set, additional screws not available in the single-use set were required in 77% of cases and consequently rendered the conventional set cheaper in 83% of cases. Stocking the single-use sets with additional screws to reflect the most commonly used screw lengths could make these sets more cost effective in the future. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and decision analysis IV.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Muñeca/cirugía , Tornillos Óseos/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...