Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; : e031427, 2023 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982222

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shock and preshock are defined on the basis of the presence of hypotension, hypoperfusion, or both. We sought to determine the hemodynamic underpinnings of shock and preshock noninvasively using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). METHODS AND RESULTS: We included Mayo Clinic cardiac intensive care unit patients from 2007 to 2015 with TTE within 1 day of admission. Hypotension and hypoperfusion at the time of cardiac intensive care unit admission were used to define 4 groups. TTE findings were evaluated across these groups, and in-hospital mortality was evaluated according to TTE findings in each group. We included 5375 patients with a median age of 69.2 years (36.8% women). The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 50%. Groups based on hypotension and hypoperfusion were assigned as follows: no hypotension or hypoperfusion, 59.7%; isolated hypotension, 15.3%; isolated hypoperfusion, 16.4%; and both hypotension and hypoperfusion, 8.7%. Most TTE variables of interest varied across these groups, with worse biventricular function, lower forward flow, and higher filling pressures as the degree of hemodynamic compromise increased. In-hospital mortality occurred in 8.2%, and inpatient deaths had more TTE parameter abnormalities. In-hospital mortality increased with the degree of hemodynamic compromise, and a marked gradient in in-hospital mortality was observed when the clinical classification of shock and preshock was combined with TTE findings reflecting worse biventricular function, lower forward flow, or higher filling pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in cardiac function are observed between cardiac intensive care unit patients with preshock and shock using TTE, and the combination of the clinical and TTE hemodynamic assessment provides robust mortality risk stratification.

2.
JACC Heart Fail ; 11(8 Pt 1): 903-914, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37318422

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The appropriate use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) in critically ill cardiac patients remains debated. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to characterize the current use of PACs in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) with attention to patient-level and institutional factors influencing their application and explore the association with in-hospital mortality. METHODS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter network of CICUs in North America. Between 2017 and 2021, participating centers contributed annual 2-month snapshots of consecutive CICU admissions. Admission diagnoses, clinical and demographic data, use of PACs, and in-hospital mortality were captured. RESULTS: Among 13,618 admissions at 34 sites, 3,827 were diagnosed with shock, with 2,583 of cardiogenic etiology. The use of mechanical circulatory support and heart failure were the patient-level factors most strongly associated with a greater likelihood of the use of a PAC (OR: 5.99 [95% CI: 5.15-6.98]; P < 0.001 and OR: 3.33 [95% CI: 2.91-3.81]; P < 0.001, respectively). The proportion of shock admissions with a PAC varied significantly by study center ranging from 8% to 73%. In analyses adjusted for factors associated with their placement, PAC use was associated with lower mortality in all shock patients admitted to a CICU (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.66-0.96]; P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the use of PACs that is not fully explained by patient level-factors and appears driven in part by institutional tendency. PAC use was associated with higher survival in cardiac patients with shock presenting to CICUs. Randomized trials are needed to guide the appropriate use of PACs in cardiac critical care.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Arteria Pulmonar , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Hospitalización , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Catéteres
3.
JACC Adv ; 2(2)2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence and post-surgical outcomes associated with cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) therapeutics among CICU patients referred for cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of CICU patients referred for cardiac surgery from the intensive care unit. METHODS: We analyzed characteristics and outcomes of CICU admissions referred from the CICU for cardiac surgery during 2017 to 2020 across 29 centers. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 10,321 CICU admissions, 887 (8.6%) underwent cardiac surgery, including 406 (46%) coronary artery bypass graftings, 201 (23%) transplants or ventricular assist devices, 171 (19%) valve surgeries, and 109 (12%) other procedures. Common indications for CICU admission included shock (33.5%) and respiratory insufficiency (24.9%). Preoperative CICU therapies included vasoactive therapy in 52.2%, mechanical circulatory support in 35.9%, renal replacement in 8.2%, mechanical ventilation in 35.7%, and 17.5% with high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. In-hospital mortality was 11.7% among all CICU admissions and 9.1% among patients treated with cardiac surgery. After multivariable adjustment, pre-op mechanical circulatory support and renal replacement therapy were associated with mortality, while respiratory support and vasoactive therapy were not. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 1 in 12 contemporary CICU patients receive cardiac surgery. Despite high preoperative disease severity, CICU admissions undergoing cardiac surgery had a comparable mortality rate to CICU patients overall; highlighting the ability of clinicians to select higher acuity patients with a reasonable perioperative risk.

4.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 8(7): 703-708, 2022 10 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36029517

RESUMEN

AIMS: The aims of the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) are to develop a registry to investigate the epidemiology of cardiac critical illness and to establish a multicentre research network to conduct randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with cardiac critical illness. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CCCTN was founded in 2017 with 16 centres and has grown to a research network of over 40 academic and clinical centres in the United States and Canada. Each centre enters data for consecutive cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admissions for at least 2 months of each calendar year. More than 20 000 unique CICU admissions are now included in the CCCTN Registry. To date, scientific observations from the CCCTN Registry include description of variations in care, the epidemiology and outcomes of all CICU patients, as well as subsets of patients with specific disease states, such as shock, heart failure, renal dysfunction, and respiratory failure. The CCCTN has also characterised utilization patterns, including use of mechanical circulatory support in response to changes in the heart transplantation allocation system, and the use and impact of multidisciplinary shock teams. Over years of multicentre collaboration, the CCCTN has established a robust research network to facilitate multicentre registry-based randomised trials in patients with cardiac critical illness. CONCLUSION: The CCCTN is a large, prospective registry dedicated to describing processes-of-care and expanding clinical knowledge in cardiac critical illness. The CCCTN will serve as an investigational platform from which to conduct randomised controlled trials in this important patient population.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Sistema de Registros
5.
ASAIO J ; 68(3): 325-332, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35213881

RESUMEN

Data on pre-implant hemodynamic optimization before continuous flow left ventricular assist device placement (CF-LVAD) with respect to patient-centered outcomes remain limited. Consecutive patients undergoing CF-LVAD implant between 2007 and 2017 were identified. Hemodynamic variables, trends, and laboratory studies were evaluated pre-LVAD implant in a logistic regression model to identify predictors of the primary composite endpoint: the need for right ventricular assist device therapy, the requirement for hemodialysis at 90 days, and 30-day mortality. Multivariate modeling identified three variables significantly associated with the primary endpoint: right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), right atrial pressure (RAP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN); all immediately pre-LVAD, p < 0.01. Optimal dichotomization points were 500 mmHg*ml*m-2, 12 mmHg, and 40 mg/dL. The three-component model identified an AUC of 0.77 (p < 0.0001) for the composite endpoint. Optimization of 2/3 parameters, 1/3, and 0/3 was associated with odds ratios of 3.5 (95% CI, 1.1-11.7), 7.2 (95% CI, 2.1-24.2), and 20.6 (95% CI, 5.3-80.6), respectively, relative to those patients who were fully optimized (3/3 parameters). The number of optimized parameters was also associated with 1-year overall survival (p = 0.02). Low RVSWI, high RAP, and high BUN were independently associated with adverse outcomes after the CF-LVAD implant, demonstrating a stepwise association with severe postimplant adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Diálisis Renal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Am Heart J ; 245: 149-159, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low cardiac power output (CPO), measured invasively, can identify critically ill patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including mortality. We sought to determine whether non-invasive, echocardiographic CPO measurement was associated with mortality in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients. METHODS: Patients admitted to CICU between 2007 and 2018 with echocardiography performed within one day (before or after) admission and who had available data necessary for calculation of CPO were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression determined the relationship between CPO and adjusted hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 5,585 patients (age of 68.3 ± 14.8 years, 36.7% female) were evaluated with admission diagnoses including acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 56.7%, heart failure (HF) in 50.1%, cardiac arrest (CA) in 12.2%, shock in 15.5%, and cardiogenic shock (CS) in 12.8%. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 47.3 ± 16.2%, and the mean CPO was 1.04 ± 0.37 W. There were 419 in-hospital deaths (7.5%). CPO was inversely associated with the risk of hospital mortality, an association that was consistent among patients with ACS, HF, and CS. On multivariable analysis, higher CPO was associated with reduced hospital mortality (OR 0.960 per 0.1 W, 95CI 0.0.926-0.996, P = .03). Hospital mortality was particularly high in patients with low CPO coupled with reduced LVEF, increased vasopressor requirements, or higher admission lactate. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic CPO was inversely associated with hospital mortality in unselected CICU patients, particularly among patients with increased lactate and vasopressor requirements. Routine calculation and reporting of CPO should be considered for echocardiograms performed in CICU patients.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogénico , Volumen Sistólico
7.
Shock ; 56(4): 522-528, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34524266

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggests improved outcomes among cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients treated with norepinephrine, especially patients with severe shock. We aimed to describe the association between norepinephrine and mortality in CICU patients with severe shock, defined as those requiring high-dose vasopressors (HDV). MATERIALS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated Mayo Clinic CICU patients treated with vasopressors from 2007 to 2015. HDV was defined as a peak Cumulative Vasopressor Index of four for any vasopressor. Peak norepinephrine equivalent (NEE) dose was used to compare vasopressor doses. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of hospital mortality. RESULTS: We included 2,090 patients with a median age of 69 years (IQR 59-78), including 35% females; 44% of patients received HDV. Hospital mortality was higher among patients receiving HDV (42% vs. 16%, unadjusted OR 3.87, 95% CI 3.16-4.75, P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis in HDV patients, hospital mortality increased with rising peak NEE (adjusted OR 1.02 per 0.01 mcg/kg/min, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, P  < 0.01) and the use of NE was associated with lower hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.72, P < 0.01). After adjustment for illness severity, peak NEE and norepinephrine use were not associated with mortality among patients who did not require HDV. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality is high among CICU patients requiring HDV, and rises with increasing vasopressor requirements. Use of NE was associated with lower mortality among patients requiring HDV, but not among those without HDV, implying that patients with more severe shock may benefit from preferential use of NE.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Choque/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque/etiología , Choque/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
ASAIO J ; 67(4): 430-435, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769998

RESUMEN

Patients are admitted to the hospital for hemodynamic optimization before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of hemodynamic optimization using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in ambulatory heart failure patients before LVAD placement. This retrospective single-center study included 199 noninotrope-dependent patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation between January 1, 2007 and April 10, 2017. Invasive hemodynamic as well as the primary composite end-point of stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, right ventricular failure, and 30-day mortality were compared between patients with and without an IABP. Median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR], 57-71) years and 165 (82.9%) were male; 72 (36.2%) received an IABP. Patients treated with an IABP had worse baseline exercise capacity and hemodynamic parameters. Patients with an IABP had greater relative reduction in pulmonary artery mean pressure (-16% vs. -2%; p ≤ 0.001). The primary composite end-point was not different between patients who had an IABP and those who did not (20.8% vs. 20.5%; p = 0.952), as were each of the individual end-points. Despite worse baseline hemodynamic parameters and exercise capacity, ambulatory heart failure patients who received an IABP before LVAD implantation had more favorable reductions in pulmonary artery pressures without an increase in the composite end-point. These results suggest that IABP use before LVAD implantation may mitigate the risk of postoperative complications in ambulatory patients.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Combinada/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Femenino , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Shock ; 55(5): 613-619, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32496423

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lactate is a prognostic marker in critically ill patients, although currently available illness severity scores do not include lactate as a predictive parameter. We sought to describe the association between lactate and hospital mortality in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) with cardiac arrest (CA) and shock. METHODS: Retrospective observational analysis of Mayo Clinic CICU patients admitted from 2007 to 2018 with measured lactate on admission, including patients with and without CA or shock. We examined hospital mortality as a function of admission lactate in patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of hospital mortality. RESULTS: We included 3,042 patients with a median age of 70 years (IQR 60-80), including 41% females, 26% with CA, and 39% with shock. The median APACHE-IV predicted mortality was 24% (IQR 11-51%), and the median admission lactate was 1.8 mmol/L (IQR 1.1-3.0). Hospital mortality occurred in 23% of patients and rose progressively with higher admission lactate, including in patients with and without CA or shock. After multivariable adjustment for clinical characteristics, therapies, and illness severity, a higher lactate remained associated with increased hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.13 per mmol/L, 95% CI 1.06-1.20, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Admission lactate levels are strongly associated with increased hospital mortality among CICU patients, including those with and without CA or shock. The prognostic value of lactate levels is independent of established ICU prognostic scores and dependent on admission diagnosis, which may help inform clinicians caring for CICU patients.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco/sangre , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Choque/sangre , Choque/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(9): 975-988, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32314662

RESUMEN

Structural heart disease (SHD) emergencies include acute deterioration of a stable lesion or development of a new critical lesion. Structural heart disease emergencies can produce heart failure and cardiogenic shock despite preserved systolic function that may not respond to standard medical therapy and typically necessitate surgical or percutaneous intervention. Comprehensive Doppler echocardiography is the initial diagnostic modality of choice to determine the cause and severity of the underlying SHD lesion. Patients with chronic SHD lesions which deteriorate due to intercurrent illness (eg, infection or arrhythmia) may not require urgent intervention, whereas patients with an acute SHD lesion often require definitive therapy. Medical stabilization prior to definitive intervention differs substantially between stenotic lesions (aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction) and regurgitant lesions (aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, ventricular septal defect). Patients with regurgitant lesions typically require aggressive afterload reduction and inotropic support, whereas patients with stenotic lesions may paradoxically require ß-blockade and vasoconstrictors. Emergent cardiac surgery for patients with decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock carries a substantial mortality risk but may be necessary for patients who are not eligible for catheter-based percutaneous SHD intervention. This review explores initial medical stabilization and subsequent definitive therapy for patients with SHD emergencies.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia
13.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 111(6): 1961-1967, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058819

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incident liver dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation has been previously associated with adverse outcomes, yet data on perioperative risk markers are sparse. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implant between 2007 and 2017 at a single institution. Perioperative variables were evaluated by univariate modeling and adjusted for false discovery rate. Variables most significantly associated with incident Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support-defined liver dysfunction (INT-LD) were evaluated using logistic regression and optimal cutpoints were defined. One-year survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: We included 359 patients (79% male; mean age 59 ± 13 years; 46% ischemic; 64% destination therapy). Lower right ventricular stroke work index at the time of right heart catheterization, higher right atrial pressure 6 hours after right heart catheterization, higher preoperative total bilirubin, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and greater volume of intraoperative ultrafiltration were most strongly associated with incident INT-LD (adjusted P < .01 for each). Initial right ventricular stroke work index less than 460 mm Hg∗mL/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 9.4), 6-hour right heart catheterization 14 mm Hg or greater (OR 4.3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 8.8), cardiopulmonary bypass time longer than 137 minutes (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 6.2; P < .01 for all), ultrafiltration more than 2.95 L (OR 3.7; 95% CI, 2 to 6.8), and total bilirubin greater than 1.4 mg/dL (OR 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 5) were each strongly associated with risk of INT-LD, which was associated with decreased unadjusted 1-year survival (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular stroke work index, right heart catheterization, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and ultrafiltration were each more strongly associated with elevated risk of INT-LD after left ventricular assist device implant than total bilirubin. Therefore, optimization of right ventricular hemodynamics and minimizing cardiopulmonary bypass time and ultrafiltration could potentially reduce the risk of liver dysfunction, but these observations require prospective validation.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Hepatopatías/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Función Ventricular Derecha
14.
Am Heart J ; 223: 59-64, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32163754

RESUMEN

In the period between 2000 and 2014, 584,704 admissions with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction that received early coronary angiography (day zero) were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. In-hospital cardiac arrest was noted in 4349 (0.8%), of which ~47% were from ventricular arrhythmias and ~90% of occurred within ≤4 days. Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admissions with in-hospital cardiac arrest had higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without (61% vs. 1.6%) with an unchanged temporal trend of in-hospital cardiac arrest rates (adjusted odds ratio 1.29 [95% confidence interval 0.73-2.28]) in 2014 compared to 2000).


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Angiografía Coronaria , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Am Heart J ; 222: 8-14, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32006910

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of renal disease in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) is increasing, but little is known about the utilization, concurrent therapies, and outcomes of patients requiring acute renal replacement therapy (RRT) in this specialized environment. METHODS: In the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network, 16 centers submitted data on CICU admissions including acute RRT (defined as continuous renal replacement therapy and/or acute intermittent dialysis). RESULTS: Among 2,985 admissions, 178 (6.0%; interhospital range 1.0%-16.0%) received acute RRT. Patients receiving RRT, versus not, were more commonly admitted for cardiogenic shock (15.7% vs 4.2%, P < .01), cardiac arrest (9.6% vs 3.7%, P < .01), and acute general medical diagnoses (10.7% vs 5.8%, P < .01), whereas acute coronary syndromes (16.9% vs 32.1%, P < .01) were less frequent. Variables independently associated with acute RRT included diabetes, heart failure, liver disease, severe valvular disease, shock, cardiac arrest, hypertension, and younger age. In patients receiving acute RRT, versus not, advanced therapies including mechanical ventilation (55.6% vs 18.0%), vasoactive support (73.0% vs 35.2%), invasive hemodynamic monitoring (59.6% vs 29.2%), and mechanical circulatory support (27.5% vs 8.4%) were more common. Acute RRT was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (42.1% vs 9.3%, adjusted odds ratio 3.74, 95% CI, 2.52-5.53) and longer median length of stay (10.0 vs 5.3 days, P < .01). In conclusion, acute RRT in contemporary CICUs was associated with the provision of other advanced therapies and lower survival. CONCLUSIONS: These data underscore the risks associated with the provision of renal support in patients with primary cardiovascular problems and the need to develop standardized indications and potential futility measures in this specialized population.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 32(2): 64-69, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31841997

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is indicated for the management of patients with cardiogenic shock or refractory cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of patients initiated on ECMO support in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients (>18 years old) initiated on ECMO support in the cardiac catheterization laboratory from 2010-2017. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, procedural details, and indication for ECMO support were reviewed. The outcomes assessed included 30-day mortality, blood product transfusion, vascular injury, prolonged respiratory failure, stroke, ischemic bowel, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and compartment syndrome. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2017, a total of 25 patients were cannulated for ECMO in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The mean age was 61 years and 56% of patients were men. Cardiac arrest was the most frequent indication for ECMO support (64%), followed by cardiogenic shock (28%). The 30-day mortality rate was 40%. The most frequent complications associated with ECMO were the need for vascular surgery (52%) and renal failure requiring hemodialysis (36%). The univariate predictors of 30-day mortality were age (P=.02; unit odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.15), history of tobacco use (P=.04; OR, 6; 95% CI, 1.01-35.91), and Apache IV score (P=.02; unit OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: ECMO should be considered early during the resuscitation attempts of selected patients with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation or refractory cardiogenic shock in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Paro Cardíaco , Choque Cardiogénico , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidad , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia
17.
JAMA Cardiol ; 4(9): 928-935, 2019 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31339509

RESUMEN

Importance: Single-center and claims-based studies have described substantial changes in the landscape of care in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Professional societies have recommended research to guide evidence-based CICU redesigns. Objective: To characterize patients admitted to contemporary, advanced CICUs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study established the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN), an investigator-initiated multicenter network of 16 advanced, tertiary CICUs in the United States and Canada. For 2 months in each CICU, data for consecutive admissions were submitted to the central data coordinating center (TIMI Study Group). The data were collected and analyzed between September 2017 and 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographics, diagnoses, management, and outcomes. Results: Of 3049 participants, 1132 (37.1%) were women, 797 (31.4%) were individuals of color, and the median age was 65 years (25th and 75th percentiles, 55-75 years). Between September 2017 and September 2018, 3310 admissions were included, among which 2557 (77.3%) were for primary cardiac problems, 337 (10.2%) for postprocedural care, 253 (7.7%) for mixed general and cardiac problems, and 163 (4.9%) for overflow from general medical ICUs. When restricted to the initial 2 months of medical CICU admissions for each site, the primary analysis population included 3049 admissions with a high burden of noncardiovascular comorbidities. The top 2 CICU admission diagnoses were acute coronary syndrome (969 [31.8%]) and heart failure (567 [18.6%]); however, the proportion of acute coronary syndrome was highly variable across centers (15%-57%). The primary indications for CICU care included respiratory insufficiency (814 [26.7%]), shock (643 [21.1%]), unstable arrhythmia (521 [17.1%]), and cardiac arrest (265 [8.7%]). Advanced CICU therapies or monitoring were required for 1776 patients (58.2%), including intravenous vasoactive medications (1105 [36.2%]), invasive hemodynamic monitoring (938 [30.8%]), and mechanical ventilation (652 [21.4%]). The overall CICU mortality rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 7.3%-9.3%). The CICU indications that were associated with the highest mortality rates were cardiac arrest (101 [38.1%]), cardiogenic shock (140 [30.6%]), and the need for renal replacement therapy (51 [34.5%]). Notably, patients admitted solely for postprocedural observation or frequent monitoring had a mortality rate of 0.2% to 0.4%. Conclusions and Relevance: In a contemporary network of tertiary care CICUs, respiratory failure and shock predominated indications for admission and carried a poor prognosis. While patterns of practice varied considerably between centers, a substantial, low-risk population was identified. Multicenter collaborative networks, such as the CCCTN, could be used to help redesign cardiac critical care and to test new therapeutic strategies.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cardiopatías/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 12(3): e005618, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30879324

RESUMEN

Background Clinical investigations of shock in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) have primarily focused on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Few studies have evaluated the full spectrum of shock in contemporary CICUs. Methods and Results The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter network of advanced CICUs in North America. Anytime between September 2017 and September 2018, each center (n=16) contributed a 2-month snap-shot of all consecutive medical admissions to the CICU. Data were submitted to the central coordinating center (TIMI Study Group, Boston, MA). Shock was defined as sustained systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg with end-organ dysfunction ascribed to the hypotension. Shock type was classified by site investigators as cardiogenic, distributive, hypovolemic, or mixed. Among 3049 CICU admissions, 677 (22%) met clinical criteria for shock. Shock type was varied, with 66% assessed as cardiogenic shock (CS), 7% as distributive, 3% as hypovolemic, 20% as mixed, and 4% as unknown. Among patients with CS (n=450), 30% had AMICS, 18% had ischemic cardiomyopathy without AMI, 28% had nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 17% had a cardiac cause other than primary myocardial dysfunction. Patients with mixed shock had cardiovascular comorbidities similar to patients with CS. The median CICU stay was 4.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-8.1 days) for AMICS, 4.3 days (IQR, 2.1-8.5 days) for CS not related to AMI, and 5.8 days (IQR, 2.9-10.0 days) for mixed shock versus 1.9 days (IQR, 1.0-3.6) for patients without shock ( P<0.01 for each). Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were higher in patients with mixed shock (10; IQR, 6-13) versus AMICS (8; IQR, 5-11) or CS without AMI (7; IQR, 5-11; each P<0.01). In-hospital mortality rates were 36% (95% CI, 28%-45%), 31% (95% CI, 26%-36%), and 39% (95% CI, 31%-48%) in AMICS, CS without AMI, and mixed shock, respectively. Conclusions The epidemiology of shock in contemporary advanced CICUs is varied, and AMICS now represents less than one-third of all CS. Despite advanced therapies, mortality in CS and mixed shock remains high. Investigation of management strategies and new therapies to treat shock in the CICU should take this epidemiology into account.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Choque Cardiogénico/epidemiología , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , América del Norte/epidemiología , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Factores de Tiempo
19.
J Electrocardiol ; 51(6): 1103-1109, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30497739

RESUMEN

AIMS: Non-cardiologists (NCs) are often responsible for the preliminary diagnosis and early management of patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or supraventricular wide complex tachycardia (SWCT). At present, the Vereckei aVR and Brugada algorithms are the most widely recognized and frequently relied upon wide complex tachycardia (WCT) differentiation criteria by NCs. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic efficacy of the Vereckei aVR and Brugada algorithms when applied by NCs. METHODS: In a blinded fashion, three internal medicine residents prospectively interpreted WCTs using the Vereckei aVR and Brugada algorithms. The diagnostic performance of each method was evaluated according to their agreement with the correct rhythm diagnosis. RESULTS: Two-hundred sixty-nine WCTs (160 VT, 109 SWCT) from 186 patients were independently interpreted by each participant (807 separate interpretations per algorithm). The aVR and Brugada algorithms accurately classified 546 out of 807 (67.7%) and 622 out of 807 (77.1%) interpreted WCTs, respectively. Overall sensitivity and specificity of the aVR algorithm for VT was 92.1% and 31.8%, respectively. Overall sensitivity and specificity of the Brugada algorithm for VT was 89.4% and 59.0%, respectively. Both algorithms yielded modestly favorable overall positive predictive values (aVR 66.5%; Brugada 76.2%) and negative predictive values (73.3%; Brugada 79.1%). CONCLUSION: Non-cardiologist algorithm users correctly identified most "actual" VTs, but did not sufficiently revise VT probability to conclusively distinguish VT and SWCT. Newer WCT differentiation methods are needed to improve NC's ability to accurately differentiate WCTs.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
20.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 29(9): 309-313, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28706127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We present the indications for use, temporal trends, complications, and 1-year clinical outcomes after single-access percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device placement from years 2009-2015 at our institution. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella device placed in the catheterization suite between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2015 were included. There were a total of 778 patients in this study. The mean number of devices placed per year was 111. There was no statistically significant trend in total number of devices placed overall, but the rate of Impella placement declined over time (P=.02). There was a significant trend toward less use before high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (P=.04). The composite secondary endpoint occurred in 59.4% of patients, with no significant difference between patients treated with an IABP or Impella (P=.66). There were 37 device-related complications, which occurred more commonly with the Impella (12.5%) than with the IABP (3.7%; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant overall change in the total number of devices placed per year, but we did observe a decreased use of Impella support. There was a significant decrease in the utilization of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support prior to high-risk PCI, driven primarily by a decreased usage of the IABP. There were more complications related to the Impella device vs the IABP, with no improvement in the composite outcome.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...