Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Clin Ter ; 174(4): 345-352, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378505

RESUMEN

Abstract: The incidence rate of prostate cancer (PCa) in many Western countries is high, contributing greatly to the cancer disease bur-den. In most cases, patients progress to metastatic disease defined as castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen deprivation (mCRPC) following primary treatment where the majority of patients receive first-line new-generation oral hormonal therapies (HT) such as Abiraterone Acetate (AA) and Enzalutamide (ENZ). Despite the importance of correct intake of these drugs, adherence in patients with mCRPC is still poorly investigated and managed with measures not specific to this population. A self-report questionnaire was developed and validated with women with breast cancer treated with oral HT (A-BET). Therefore, this study aims to test the psychometric properties of this instrument on patients with mCRPC treated with AA or ENZ. A prospective observational validation study. The questionnaire was completed by all participants and again after 7/10 days by a randomized subsample to assess stability. Sixty-six patients completed the study (mean age of 72.8 years) and 31 completed the re-test (mean age of 72.7 years). Content validity reported excellent results. Cronbach's alpha of each item showed a strong correlation. Validation of an instrument to measure adherence to HT in patients with mCRPC can be a valuable tool for health professionals involved in patient care. In addition, having a population-specific validated instrument allows to make comparisons between results from different observations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Psicometría , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acetato de Abiraterona/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico
2.
Clin Ter ; 173(4): 324-333, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35857049

RESUMEN

Purpose: To develop an Italian tool that measures the therapy adherence of women with breast cancer undergoing treatment with oral endocrine therapy. Methods: A two-phase study was conducted, which followed the guidelines of the European Statistical System for the development and validation of a questionnaire. In the first phase, the questionnaire was developed; in the second phase, a preliminary validation was carried out on patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment with oral hormonal therapies. Results: In its final version, the questionnaire presents 6 main items which aim to investigate the level of adherence, the degree of awareness of the nature of the drug taken and the reasons that may influence non-adherence. 82 patients were recruited in the validation study, with an average age of 56.4 years, while for the re-test 40 were selected with an average age of 57.3 years. Content validity reported excellent results. Cronbach's alpha of each item showed a strong degree of correlation. Conclusions: The creation of a tool for measuring adherence to endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients can be a valuable support for healthcare professionals involved in their care. Future studies should be aimed at using A-BET (Adherence - Breast Endocrine Therapy) on larger cohorts of patients in order to verify its validity / reliability more accurately and to be able to generalize the results.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Clin Ter ; 173(4): 384-395, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35857058

RESUMEN

Aim: To investigate whether and how ten ethical principles are mentioned within documents on critical care resources allocation during public health emergencies. Materials and Methods: We conducted a search of documents con-cerning critical resources allocation during public emergencies publicly available from Google and two specific international websites, up to November 2020. Each document was analyzed by two independent reviewers to assess whether a reference to any of the 10 key ethical principles indicated by the Northern Italy Ethical Committee could be found in the documents. Cohen's K statistic was used. Results: We obtained 34 documents, of which 19 were allocation frameworks, 15 crisis standards of care, 4 clinical triage protocol, 3 clinical guidelines and 2 public health emergency response plans. The principles most frequently mentioned as important for decision-making was "number of lives saved", followed by "transparency", "equity", "respect of person and their autonomy". The most cited tiebreakers were "younger first/life cycle" and "lottery". Conclusions: All documents aim to protect the life and health of the largest number of people and should be objective, ethical, transparent, applied equitably, and be publicly disclosed. It is plausible that short- and long-term prognostic tools can help allocate critical resources, but it remains strong that the decision-making process must be guided by a multi-principle ethical model that is not always easy to apply.


Asunto(s)
Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Salud Pública , Cuidados Críticos , Toma de Decisiones , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , Pandemias , Triaje
4.
Clin Ter ; 173(2): 164-173, 2022 Apr 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35385040

RESUMEN

Introduction: Pain is the most common and distressing medical symptom in hospitalized patients in all wards. Pain prevalence among hospitalized patients is an indicator of the quality of health care. Objective: The aim of this study is to describe pain prevalence in two Italian hospitals. Material and method: This is an observational study. It involved hospitalized patients of both sexes, able and unable to self-report. Descriptive analysis and multivariate analysis were applied. Results: A sample of 754 inpatients were included. In Terni Ho-spital (n = 255), pain prevalence was 80.8%. The mean pain severity was 5.2 (sd ± 3.33). At Rome's San Camillo Hospital (n=499), pain prevalence was 46.9%. Acute pain is more prevalent in women (OR= 0.65; CI 95% 0.43-0.99) and increases with age (OR= 0.97; CI 95% 0.96-0.99). Chronic pain is more prevalent in men (OR= 2.34; CI 95% 1.41-3.97) and increases with age (OR= 1.04; CI 95% 1.03-1.06). Discussion and conclusion.: San Camillo Hospital presents data showing reduced pain prevalence, and describing pain even in patients unable to self-report. It is reasonable to believe that pain control by the staff at San Camillo is better, even though both hospitals are equally important regional institutions.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Dolor , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Prevalencia
5.
Ann Oncol ; 31(12): 1746-1754, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866624

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Nevertheless, a remarkable interpatient heterogeneity characterizes immunotherapy efficacy, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB). KEAP1 mutations are associated with shorter survival in LUAD patients receiving chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the pattern of KEAP1 co-mutations and mutual exclusivity may identify LUAD patients unresponsive to immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: KEAP1 mutational co-occurrences and somatic interactions were studied in the whole MSKCC LUAD dataset. The impact of coexisting alterations on survival outcomes in ICI-treated LUAD patients was verified in the randomized phase II/III POPLAR/OAK trials (blood-based sequencing, bNGS cohort, N = 253). Three tissue-based sequencing studies (Rome, MSKCC and DFCI) were used for independent validation (tNGS cohort, N = 289). Immunogenomic features were analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD study. RESULTS: On the basis of KEAP1 mutational co-occurrences, we identified four genes potentially associated with reduced efficacy of immunotherapy (KEAP1, PBRM1, SMARCA4 and STK11). Independent of the nature of co-occurring alterations, tumors with coexisting mutations (CoMut) had inferior survival as compared with single-mutant (SM) and wild-type (WT) tumors (bNGS cohort: CoMut versus SM log-rank P = 0.048, CoMut versus WT log-rank P < 0.001; tNGS cohort: CoMut versus SM log-rank P = 0.037, CoMut versus WT log-rank P = 0.006). The CoMut subset harbored higher TMB than the WT disease and the adverse significance of coexisting alterations was maintained in LUAD with high TMB. Significant immunogenomic differences were observed between the CoMut and WT groups in terms of core immune signatures, T-cell receptor repertoire, T helper cell signatures and immunomodulatory genes. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that coexisting alterations in a limited set of genes characterize a subset of LUAD unresponsive to immunotherapy and with high TMB. An immune-cold microenvironment may account for the clinical course of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/genética , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Proteína 1 Asociada A ECH Tipo Kelch/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Mutación , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2 , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Microambiente Tumoral
6.
Ann Ig ; 32(1): 27-37, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31713574

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The importance of nursing competence arises from its central role in influencing and determining care outcomes. The employment of adequately educated staff, able to base clinical decisions on the best scientific evidence, is one of the components required for delivering high quality nursing care in the oncological field. The aim of this study is to analyze - through the Nurse Competence Scale - the level of competence of nurses working in oncological settings. METHOD: A descriptive study was performed between March and September 2017. The participants were recruited among the nursing staff working in the Day Hospital and the Units of the IRCCS -Regina Elena National Cancer Institute in Rome. The confidentiality and the anonymity of the subjects involved in the study were guaranteed by submitting a socio-cultural data sheet -specifically designed to collect demographic and education data - and the Nurse Competence Scale. RESULTS: The sample included 65 nurses (93%) and 5 head nurses (7%), with a mean age of 41.8 years, predominantly female (80%), who had been working in oncology units for a mean of 17.2 years. The Nurse Competence Scale showed a high level of competence in all dimensions. Moreover, the Chi-Square test allowed to identify the presence of significant associations between the different dimensions of the Nurse Competence Scale and the work experience >15 years and the age > 40 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that, even if lacking specific oncology competence, nurses working in oncology care settings have developed a good level of clinical competences. Highlighting the importance of nursing care in the oncology area will increase the demand of both patients and organizations of high quality nursing care, consequently enhancing the nursing profession.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Rol de la Enfermera , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/normas , Enfermería Oncológica/normas , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Eur J Histochem ; 58(3): 2403, 2014 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25308844

RESUMEN

Human cardio-respiratory diseases are strongly correlated to concentrations of atmospheric elements. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals is strictly monitored, because of its possible toxic effects. In this work, we utilized the EDX microanalysis in order to identify the potential heavy metal accumulation in the lung tissue.  To this aim, we enrolled 45 human lung biopsies: 15 non-small cell lung cancers, 15 lung benign lesions and 15 control biopsies. Lung samples were both paraffin embedded for light microscopy study and eponepoxid embedded for transmission electron microscopy. EDX microanalysis was performed on 100 nm thick unstained ultrathin-sections placed on specific copper grids. Our results demonstrated that the EDX technology was particularly efficient in the study of elemental composition of lung tissues, where we found heavy metals, such as Cobalt (Co), Chromium (Cr), Manganese (Mn) and Lead (Pb). Furthermore, in malignant lesions we demonstrated the presence of multiple bio-accumulated elements. In fact, a high rate of lung cancers was associated with the presence of 3 or more bio-accumulated elements compared to benign lesions and control tissue (91.7%, 0%, 8.3%, respectively). The environmental impact on pulmonary carcinogenesis could be better clarified by demonstrating the presence of polluting agents in lung tissues. The application of EDX microanalysis on biological tissuescould shed new light in the study of the possible bioaccumulation of polluting agents in different human organs and systems.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Contaminantes Ambientales/análisis , Pulmón/química , Metales Pesados/análisis , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/química , Microanálisis por Sonda Electrónica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Ann Oncol ; 23(7): 1838-45, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22100694

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated pretreatment fasting glucose as a predictor of patients' important outcomes in breast and colorectal cancers undergoing targeted therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a historic cohort of 202 breast and 218 colorectal cancers treated with targeted agents from 1998 to 2009, we used the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test to estimate survival through tertiles of fasting glucose and the Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis stratified by primary site of cancer and including gender, age and body mass index. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 20 months (1-128). At 60 months, 65% of patients in the lowest tertile of fasting glucose did not experiment disease progression compared with 34% in the highest tertile (P=0.001). Seventy-six percent of females in the lowest tertile showed no progression compared with 49% in the top tertiles (P=0.015). In multivariate analysis, fasting glucose was a significant predictor of time to disease progression only in breast cancer patients in the first tertile compared with the third (P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of a predictive role of pretreatment fasting glucose in the development of resistance in breast cancer patients treated with targeted agents. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Glucemia , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Bevacizumab , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Cetuximab , Neoplasias Colorrectales/sangre , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Ayuno , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastuzumab , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Med Virol ; 82(11): 1921-7, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20872720

RESUMEN

HPV infection is a "necessary cause" of cervical cancer and it is sexually transmitted. Due to upcoming mass vaccination investigation on risk factors for infection is the basis to implement prophylactic strategy even in older women. The aim of the study was to evaluate predictors of high-risk (HR) HPV infection in adult women. Between 2006 and 2008, 100 women aged >18 years, with no previous treatment for cervical lesions, were screened for HR HPV infection in Rome, Italy. Risk factors for HPV infection were investigated through a questionnaire including: ethnicity, religion, education, marital status, sexual behavior, gynecological and obstetrical history, smoking and alcohol intake. Multivariate analysis identified the "never married-separated/divorced" status (OR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.14-10.12) as predictor of HPV infection, while having a higher age at the first sexual intercourse (FSI) shows a protective effect (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-1.00). A trend for the association between the infection and having more than three lifetime partners was also observed (OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 0.86-7.71). No significant association was found for other demographic characteristics investigated. These findings provide a contribution in the knowledge of an adult population defining a "high-risk" sexual behavioral profile and could be helpful to target prophylactic strategies in older woman.


Asunto(s)
Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Análisis Multivariante , Papillomaviridae/clasificación , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Sexual , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto Joven
10.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD006650, 2008 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18425959

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer increases the risk of thromboembolic events and the risk of recurrent thromboembolic events while on anticoagulation. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and ximelagatran) for the long term treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search was undertaken including a January 2007 search of electronic databases; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1). MEDLINE (1966 onwards; accessed via OVID), EMBASE (1980 onwards; accessed via OVID) and ISI the Web of Science. Hand search of the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and of the American Society of Hematology. Checking of references of included studies, relevant papers and related systematic reviews. Use of "related article" feature in PubMed; and (5) search of ISI the Web of Science for papers citing landmark studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing long term treatment with LMWH versus oral anticoagulants (VKA or ximelagatran) in patients with cancer and symptomatic objectively confirmed VTE. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Using a standardized data form we extracted data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest: survival, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, thrombocytopenia and postphlebitic syndrome. MAIN RESULTS: Of 3986 identified citations, eight RCTs were eligible and reported data for patients with cancer. Their overall methodological quality was moderate. Meta-analysis of six RCTs showed that LMWH, compared to VKA provided no statistically significant survival benefit (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14) but a statistically significant reduction in VTE (HR = 0.47; 95% (Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.32 to 0.71). There was no statistically significant difference between LMWH and VKA in bleeding outcomes (RR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.31) or thrombocytopenia (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.74). One RCT compared tinzaparin and dalteparin and showed no differences in the outcomes of interest. One RCT compared a six months extension of anticoagulation with 18 months Ximelagatran 24mg twice daily versus placebo. It showed a reduction in VTE (HR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.30) with no apparent effect on survival or bleeding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For the long term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer, LMWH compared to VKA reduces venous thromboembolic events but not death. The decision for a patient with cancer and VTE to start long term LMWH versus oral anticoagulation should balance the benefits and downsides and integrate the patient's values and preferences for the important outcomes and alternative management strategies.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Azetidinas/uso terapéutico , Bencilaminas/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores
11.
Prev Med ; 47(1): 133-5, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18420261

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sunburn, sun sensitivity factors and sun protection behavior in school-age children. METHODS: 2002 to 2004 survey of 2942 children in primary schools of Valencia, Spain, and their parents, using a self-administered questionnaire filled by the children with the help of their parents. RESULTS: Having a fair skin (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.38-3.04), light coloured eyes (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.12-1.68), freckles (OR: 1.32; 95% CI:1.12-1.56), and older age (OR: 2.34; 95% CI:1.96-2.80) were associated with occurrence of sunburns. Hair color, gender, use of sunscreens, wearing T-shirts and sunglasses were not. Wearing hats (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.54-0.75) was inversely associated. Parents were significantly more inclined to protect younger and fair-skinned children with sunscreen and T-shirts. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, phenotype is related to sunburns and appears to influence parent's sun protection behaviours.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Melanoma , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Responsabilidad Parental , Fenotipo , Pigmentación , Ropa de Protección , Protección Radiológica , Factores de Riesgo , Quemadura Solar , Protectores Solares/administración & dosificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (1): CD006649, 2008 Jan 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18254108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compared to patients without cancer, patients with cancer receiving anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism are more likely to develop recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of three types of anticoagulants (i.e. low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH), and fondaparinux) for the initial treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients including a January 2007 electronic search of : Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI the Web of Science. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing LMWH, UFH, and fondaparinux in patients with cancer and objectively confirmed VTE. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Using a standardized data form data was extracted in duplicate on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest that included all cause mortality, recurrent VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, thrombocytopenia and postphlebitic syndrome. MAIN RESULTS: Of 3986 identified citations, 26 RCTs including cancer patients as subgroups fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Cancer subgroup data was obtained for 15 of the 26 RCTs. Thirteen studies compared a LMWH to UFH while one study compared fondaparinux to UFH and one study compared dalteparin to tinzaparin. Meta-analysis of 11 studies showed a statistically significant mortality reduction in patients treated with LMWH compared with those treated with UFH (Relative risk (RR) = 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52 to 0.98). There was little change in the results after excluding studies of lower methodological quality (RR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.00). A meta-analysis of three studies comparing LMWH with UFH in reducing recurrent VTE was inconclusive (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.29 to 2.08). No data was available for bleeding outcomes, thrombocytopenia or postphlebitic syndrome. Compared to UFH, fondaparinux showed a non-statistically significant benefit for the outcome of death (RR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.05). The one study comparing dalteparin to tinzaparin showed a non-statistically significant mortality reduction with dalteparin (RR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.73). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the included trials, LMWH is likely to be superior to UFH in the initial treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. However, there is a need for more trials to better address this research question in cancer patients. Moreover, researchers should consider making the raw data of RCTs available for individual patient data meta-analyses.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fondaparinux , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Polisacáridos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidad
13.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 26(8): 1089-99, 2007 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17894651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of predictors of risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) could inform preventive efforts against this lethal cancer. While aspirin (ASA) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) might protect against several gastrointestinal cancers, their role in the development of PDAC remains unclear. AIM: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the relation between ASA/NSAIDs exposure and the risk of PDAC. Methods We searched Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane database of systematic reviews and reference lists of identified papers and included observational (cohort or case-control) studies and randomized controlled trials examining exposure to ASA and/or NSAIDs and the incidence or mortality of PDAC. We defined three categories (low, intermediate, high), based on exposure duration and dose. RESULTS: Eight studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria (four cohort, three case controls, and one randomized controlled trial studies) enrolling 6301 patients between 1971-2004; all but one study took place in the US. The pooled OR were 0.99 (0.83-1.19), 1.11 (0.84-1.47) and 1.09 (0.67-1.75) in the low, intermediate and high exposure groups respectively, with considerable heterogeneity (I(2) ranging 60-86%). Sensitivity analysis by ASA use only, study design or sex did not reveal additional important information. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show an association between ASA/NSAIDs and PDAC. The large baseline exposure in controls in North-America may have obscured an association. There is need for additional studies, especially in Europe, to clarify this issue.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo
14.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 26(2): 175-84, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17725096

RESUMEN

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in improving survival of cancer patients. We conducted in January 2007 a comprehensive search for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We extracted data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes using a standardized form. Five RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria and all compared warfarin to either placebo or no intervention. Their overall methodological quality was acceptable. The effect of warfarin on mortality was not statistically significant at 6 months (RR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.80-1.16), at 1 year (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.86-1.05), at 2 years (RR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.87-1.08) or at 5 years (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-1.01). In the subgroup of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), warfarin reduced mortality at 6 months (RR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.96) but not at 1 year (RR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.77-1.01). This 6 months mortality benefit was statistically significant in the subgroup of extensive SCLC (RR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.45-0.93) but not in the subgroup of limited SCLC (RR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.36-1.28). Warfarin increased both major bleeding (RR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.85-9.68) and minor bleeding (RR = 3.34; 95% CI 1.66-6.74). The evidence suggests a survival benefit from warfarin in patients with extensive SCLC, but not in other patient groups. This survival benefit should be weighed against the increased risk for hemorrhage.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/mortalidad , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de Supervivencia , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico
15.
Anticancer Res ; 27(2): 985-9, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17465231

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Local therapy with IL-2 may be very effective in the treatment of different forms of cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of IL-2 locoregional application in the treatment of colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty eight syngenic BDIX rats were utilized in this study. The rats were divided into two groups of fourteen animals: group T (treatment) and group C (control). All rats of both groups were injected, under the splenic capsule, with T 10(7) DHD/K2/ TRb neoplastic cells. Then, within and around the site of the previous inoculation, the T group was injected with 1 ml of glucosate solutions + 0.1% albumin (BSA) containing 2.5 x 10(6) IU of IL-2 ( Proleukin-Chiron), whereas the C group was injected with 1 ml of BSA alone. After three weeks, rats were sacrificed and the liver and spleen were removed. The following parameters were considered: volume and weight, neoplastic-non neoplastic tissue index of the spleen, mitotic index and vascular density of splenic and hepatic lesions. RESULTS: All the studied parameters showed statistically significant differences in treated and untreated animals. CONCLUSION: This study of a murine model demonstrated that IL-2 locoregional therapy may be effective in the treatment of colon cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Interleucina-2/farmacología , Animales , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas Experimentales/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hepáticas Experimentales/secundario , Ratones , Trasplante de Neoplasias , Ratas , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
16.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD006466, 2007 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17443622

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A number of basic research and clinical studies have led to the hypothesis that oral anticoagulants may improve the survival of patients with cancer through an antitumour effect in addition to their antithrombotic effect. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulation (including vitamin K antagonists and ximelagatran) as an intervention to improve survival of patients with cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients including (1) a January 2007 electronic search of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI the Web of Science; (2) hand search of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (starting with its first volume, 1982) and of the American Society of Hematology (starting with its 2003 issue); (3) checking of references of included studies; and (4) use of "related article" feature in PubMed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing vitamin K antagonist or ximelagatran to no intervention or placebo in cancer patients without clinical evidence of venous thromboembolism. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Using a standardized data form we extracted data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcome of interest that included all cause mortality, symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, major bleeding and minor bleeding. MAIN RESULTS: Of 3986 identified citations five RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Warfarin was the oral anticoagulant in all of these RCTs and it was compared to either placebo or no intervention. The overall methodological quality of these RCTs was acceptable. The effect of warfarin on reduction in mortality was not statistically significant at six months (Relative risk (RR) = 0.96; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.16), at one year (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.05) at 2 years (RR = 0.97; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.08) or at five years (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.01). In the subgroup of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), warfarin reduced mortality at six months (RR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.96) but not at one year (RR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.01). This six month mortality benefit was statistically significant in the subgroup of extensive SCLC (RR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.93) but not in the subgroup of limited SCLC (RR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.36 to 1.28). One study assessed the effect of warfarin on venous thromboembolism and showed a RR reduction of 85% (p = 0.031). Warfarin increased both major bleeding (RR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.85 to 9.68) and minor bleeding (RR = 3.34; 95% CI 1.66 to 6.74). Warfarin increased the risk of major bleeding (RR 5.46; 95% CI 3.04 to 9.81) and minor bleeding (RR 4.01; 95% CI 1.30 to 12.42) also in patients with SCLC. There was no evidence for a significant reduction in mortality in any other cancer subtype. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Existing evidence does not suggest a mortality benefit from oral anticoagulation in patients with cancer. In patients with SCLC, the evidence suggests a survival benefit at six months from warfarin particularly when the disease is extensive. The decision for a patient with extensive SCLC to start warfarin for survival benefit should balance that benefit with the downsides of increased bleeding risk in light of patient values for these outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/mortalidad , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Warfarina/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...