If only they knew! A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing deceptive and open-label placebo in healthy individuals.

BACKGROUND: Placebo use is widespread in clinical practice. However, they are most often administered deceptively rather than openly. It is often suggested that open-label placebos (OLP) are less effective than deceptive placebos (DP). This study aimed to compare the use of DP and OLP treatments to reduce pain in healthy volunteers. METHODS: We conducted a non-inferiority, parallel, randomized, controlled trial, which also included a nested cross-over no-treatment condition. This study was conducted at a university clinic in France. RESULTS: We included 60 subjects and the main result shows that the OLP was not inferior to the DP by a margin of 10 mm. The mean difference between both groups regarding intensity of pain was 0.7 mm with a 95% compatibility interval (95% CI) of ]-∞; 5.4], and 97.5% CI of ]-∞; 6.3]. Secondary outcomes require cautious interpretation of the effect of placebo versus no treatment due to a time-treatment interaction. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that OLP may perform just as well as DP and could provide support for the use of OLP as an ethical alternative to DP when they are to be used in a clinical setting. If only patients knew about the placebo nature of some treatments they are receiving, unnecessary lies could be avoided while maintaining similar placebo effects. SIGNIFICANCE: This study is the first to show non-inferiority of placebos administered honestly, also called OLP, compared to DP in reducing pain. This suggests that OLP could be as effective as their deceptive counterparts while having the ethical advantage of not being required to lie. If deception is not a necessary condition for efficacy, OLP should be preferred over DP.

Risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19 in a French university hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Prevention strategies implemented by hospitals to reduce nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 sometimes failed. Our aim was to determine the risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case-control study was conducted (September 1, 2020-January 31, 2021) with adult patients hospitalized in medical or surgical units. Infants or patients hospitalized in ICU were excluded. Cases were patients with nosocomial COVID-19 (clinical symptoms and RT-PCR + for SARS-CoV-2 or RT-PCR + for SARS-CoV-2 with Ct ≤ 28 more than 5 days after admission); controls were patients without infection (RT-PCR- for SARS-CoV-2 > 5 days after admission). They were matched according to length of stay before diagnosis and period of admission. Analyses were performed with a conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 281 cases and 441 controls were included. In the bivariate analysis, cases were older (OR per 10 years: 1.22; 95%CI [1.10;1.36]), had more often shared a room (OR: 1.74; 95%CI [1.25;2.43]) or a risk factor for severe COVID-19 (OR: 1.94; 95%CI [1.09;3.45]), were more often hospitalized in medical units [OR: 1.59; 95%CI [1.12;2.25]), had higher exposure to contagious health care workers (HCW; OR per 1person-day: 1.12; 95%CI [1.08;1.17]) and patients (OR per 1 person-day: 1.11; 95%CI [1.08;1.14]) than controls. In an adjusted model, risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19 were exposure to contagious HCW (aOR per 1person-day: 1.08; 95%CI [1.03;1.14]) and to contagious patients (aOR per 1person-day: 1.10; 95%CI [1.07;1.13]). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to contagious professionals and patients are the main risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19.

Impact of a multifaceted prevention program on ventilator-associated pneumonia including selective oropharyngeal decontamination.

PURPOSE: We describe the impact of a multifaceted program for decreasing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) after implementing nine preventive measures, including selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD). METHODS: We compared VAP rates during an 8-month pre-intervention period, a 12-month intervention period, and an 11-month post-intervention period in a cohort of patients who received mechanical ventilation (MV) for > 48 h. The primary objective was to assess the effect on first VAP occurrence, using a Cox cause-specific proportional hazards model. Secondary objectives included the impact on emergence of antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic consumption, duration of MV, and ICU mortality. RESULTS: Pre-intervention, intervention and post-intervention VAP rates were 24.0, 11.0 and 3.9 VAP episodes per 1000 ventilation-days, respectively. VAP rates decreased by 56% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.65; P < 0.001] in the intervention and by 85% (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.08-0.27; P < 0.001) in the post-intervention periods. During the intervention period, VAP rates decreased by 42% (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87; P < 0.001) after implementation of eight preventive measures without SOD, and by 70% after adding SOD (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.72; P < 0.001) compared to the pre-intervention period. The incidence density of intrinsically resistant bacteria (to colistin or tobramycin) did not increase. We documented a significant reduction of days of therapy per 1000 patient-days of broad-spectrum antibiotic used to treat lower respiratory tract infection (P < 0.028), median duration of MV (from 7.1 to 6.4 days; P < 0.003) and ICU mortality (from 16.2 to 13.5%; P < 0.049) for patients ventilated > 48 h between the pre- and post-intervention periods. CONCLUSIONS: Our preventive program produced a sustained decrease in VAP incidence. SOD provides an additive value.

Long-term outcomes of cancer-related isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: the OPTIMEV study.

Essentials Clinical significance of cancer-related isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) is unknown. We studied patients with iDDVT, with and without cancer, and proximal DVT with cancer. Cancer-related iDDVT patients have a much poorer prognosis than iDDVT patients without cancer. Cancer-related iDDVT patients have a similar prognosis to cancer-related proximal DVT patients. SUMMARY: Background Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) (infra-popliteal DVT without pulmonary embolism [PE]) is a frequent event and, in the absence of cancer, is usually considered to be a minor form of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the clinical significance of cancer-related iDDVT is unknown. Methods Using data from the observational, prospective multicenter OPTIMEV cohort, we compared, at 3 years, the incidences of death, VTE recurrence and major bleeding in patients with cancer-related iDDVT with those in cancer patients with isolated proximal DVT (matched 1:1 on age and sex) and patients with iDDVT without cancer (matched 1:2 on age and sex). Results As compared with patients with cancer-related isolated proximal DVT (n = 92), those with cancer-related iDDVT (n = 92) had a similar risk of death (40.8% per patient-year (PY) vs. 38.3% per PY; aHR = 1.0, 95% CI[0.7-1.4]) and of major bleeding (3.8% per PY vs. 3.6% per PY, aCHR = 0.9 [0.3-3.2]) and a higher risk of VTE recurrence (5.4% per PY vs. 11.5% per PY; aCHR = 1.8 [0.7-4.5]). As compared with patients with iDDVT without cancer (n = 184), those with cancer-related iDDVT had a nine times higher risk of death (3.5% per PY vs. 38.3% per PY; aHR = 9.3 [5.5-15.9]), a higher risk of major bleeding (1.8% per PY vs. 3.6% per PY; aCHR = 2.0 [0.6-6.1]) and a higher risk of VTE recurrence (5.0% per PY vs. 11.5% per PY; aCHR = 2.0 [1.0-3.7]). The results remained similar in the subgroup of patients without history of VTE. Conclusion Patients with cancer-related iDDVT seem to have a prognosis that is similar to that of patients with cancer-related isolated proximal DVT and a dramatically poorer prognosis than patients with iDDVT without cancer. This underlines the high clinical significance of cancer-related iDDVT and the need for additional studies.

Long-term risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after isolated superficial vein thrombosis.

Essentials Long-term risk of recurrence of isolated superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) is under-studied. We analyzed data from a cohort of first SVT and proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) without cancer. The risk of recurrence as DVT or pulmonary embolism is twice lower in SVT patients. However, overall risk of recurrence is similar between SVT and proximal DVT patients. Click to hear Dr Decousus' perspective on superficial vein thrombosis SUMMARY: Background Isolated superficial vein thrombosis (iSVT) (without concomitant deep vein thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]) is a frequent event, but available data on long-term outcomes are scarce and retrospective. Therefore, we aimed to determine prospectively the risk and type of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence after iSVT and compare them with those of proximal DVT. Methods Using data from the prospective, multicenter, observational, OPTIMEV study, we assessed, at 3 years and after anticoagulants were stopped, the incidence and the type of VTE recurrence (iSVT/DVT/PE) of patients with a first objectively confirmed iSVT without cancer (n = 285), and compared these with those of patients with a first proximal DVT without cancer (n = 262). Results As compared with proximal DVT patients, iSVT patients had a similar overall incidence of VTE recurrence (5.4% per patient-year [PY] versus 6.5% per PY, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-1.6), but iSVT recurred six times more often as iSVT (2.7% versus 0.6%, aHR 5.9, 95% CI 1.3-27.1) and 2.5 times less often as deep-VTE events (2.5% versus 5.9%, aHR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9). Varicose vein status did not influence the risk or the type of VTE recurrence. Saphenian junction involvement by iSVT was not associated with a higher risk of recurrence (5.2% per PY versus 5.4% per PY), but was associated with recurrence exclusively as deep-VTE events. Conclusion In patients with a first iSVT without cancer, after stopping anticoagulants, the incidence of deep-VTE recurrence is half that of DVT patients, but the overall risk of recurrence is similar. Ssaphenian junction involvement seems to influence the risk of deep-VTE recurrence, whereas varicose vein status has no impact or a low impact on VTE recurrence.