Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction and Anemia.

BACKGROUND: A strategy of administering a transfusion only when the hemoglobin level falls below 7 or 8 g per deciliter has been widely adopted. However, patients with acute myocardial infarction may benefit from a higher hemoglobin level. METHODS: In this phase 3, interventional trial, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction and a hemoglobin level of less than 10 g per deciliter to a restrictive transfusion strategy (hemoglobin cutoff for transfusion, 7 or 8 g per deciliter) or a liberal transfusion strategy (hemoglobin cutoff, <10 g per deciliter). The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction or death at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 3504 patients were included in the primary analysis. The mean (±SD) number of red-cell units that were transfused was 0.7±1.6 in the restrictive-strategy group and 2.5±2.3 in the liberal-strategy group. The mean hemoglobin level was 1.3 to 1.6 g per deciliter lower in the restrictive-strategy group than in the liberal-strategy group on days 1 to 3 after randomization. A primary-outcome event occurred in 295 of 1749 patients (16.9%) in the restrictive-strategy group and in 255 of 1755 patients (14.5%) in the liberal-strategy group (risk ratio modeled with multiple imputation for incomplete follow-up, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.34; P = 0.07). Death occurred in 9.9% of the patients with the restrictive strategy and in 8.3% of the patients with the liberal strategy (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.47); myocardial infarction occurred in 8.5% and 7.2% of the patients, respectively (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.49). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia, a liberal transfusion strategy did not significantly reduce the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or death at 30 days. However, potential harms of a restrictive transfusion strategy cannot be excluded. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; MINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02981407.).

Intracoronary beta brachytherapy as a treatment option for high-risk refractory in-stent restenosis; Compassionate use.

BACKGROUND: Vascular (VBT) has clearly been shown in multiple clinical trials to decrease restenosis rates for in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, patients enrolled in these randomized clinical trials represent a select group, and the efficacy of VBT in patients with ISR who were excluded from these controlled trials due to more complex coronary anatomy requires further investigation. This study sought to define the angiographic and clinical profile and outcomes of these high-risk patients with ISR who were excluded from the randomized clinical trials and who received VBTusing Strontium-90 (Sr-90) using the Novoste Beta-Cath System through a Compassionate Use Protocol (CUP). METHODS: The study was designed as a single center, prospective, open label registry trial evaluating the use of VBT on complex instent restenotic lesions in patients who were excluded from the START and START 40 trials. In general, these patients included those with saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions, long lesions (>35 mm), and patients with a history of more than three prior interventions. VBT using Sr-90 was delivered using the Novoste Beta-Cath System after successful angioplasty. The predetermined primary endpoint was freedom from target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 8 months, one and two years. The secondary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and TVR at 8 months, one year, and two years. RESULTS: Between September 4, 1998 and December 6, 2000, 32 patients were treated with VBT under the UCP protocol. The mean duration of follow up was 15.3 +/- 8.3 months. There were 9 major cardiac events at eight months including one death, one acute myocardial infarction and 7 TVR. Excluding the one patient who died, 33 lesions were available for follow-up. The rate of TVR in this high-risk patient population was 21.1% (n = 7/33 lesions). The method of revascularization included one bypass surgery and 6 repeat percutaneous coronary interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates that utilization of the Beta-Cath System using Sr-90 for the treatment of ISR in a patient population excluded from the randomized clinical trials due to unfavorable lesions characteristics is feasible appears to be associated TVR rates that compare favorably with the event rates of patients enrolled in other trials enrolling lower-risk groups.