[Influence of drugs on urological diseases]. / Einfluss von Medikamenten auf urologische Krankheiten.

A number of drugs prescribed for the treatment of various diseases can induce urological symptoms as side effects. Antihypertensive drugs (particularly alpha blockers) can result in stress incontinence, whereas selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) can cause urge incontinence and estrogen promotes both forms. A wide range of drugs with anticholinergic activity, among them neuroleptics, tricyclic antidepressants and certain drugs used in airway disorders are associated with urinary retention. Only very few drugs bear a relevant risk for urolithiasis, i. e. the diuretic triamterene and protease inhibitors, such as indinavir; however, the widely used combination of calcium and vitamin D supplementation for prevention of osteoporosis may be an underdiagnosed cause of renal calculi. Drug-induced sexual dysfunction is a frequent side effect of antihypertensive treatment, particularly with beta adrenoceptor blockers and diuretics. The SSRI and some neuroleptics can also impair sexual function.

Adverse drug reactions in a complementary medicine hospital: a prospective, intensified surveillance study.

Background. Anthroposophic medicine is one of the widely used approaches of complementary and alternative medicine. However, few prospective studies have generated safety data on its use. Objectives. We aimed to assess adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by anthroposophical medicines (AMEDs) in the anthroposophical Community Hospital Havelhoehe, GERMANY. Study Design and Methods. Between May and November 2007, patients of six medical wards were prospectively assessed for ADRs. Suspected ADRs occurring during hospitalization were documented and classified in terms of organ manifestation (WHO SOC-code), causality (according to the Uppsala Monitoring Centre WHO criteria), and severity. Only those ADRs with a severity of grade 2 and higher according to the CTCAE classification system are described here. Results. Of the 3,813 patients hospitalized, 174 patients (4.6%) experienced 211 ADRs (CTCAE grade 2/3 n = 191, 90.5%, CTCAE grade 4/5 n = 20, 9.5%) of which 57 ADRs (27.0%) were serious. The median age of patients with ADRs (62.1% females) was 72.0 (IQR: 61.0; 80.0). Six patients (0.2%) experienced six ADRs (2.8% of ADRs) caused by eight suspected AMEDs, all of which were mild reactions (grade 2). Conclusion. Our data show that ADRs caused by AMEDs occur rarely and are limited to mild symptoms.

[Drug treatment of elderly patients]. / Pharmakotherapie alter Patienten.

Drug therapy in seniors needs to be adapted to the capacity of the aged organism. The dosages of a high number of drugs from several classes (e.g., antibiotics, low molecular weight heparins) have to be modified according to age or reduced renal function, which is a common feature in old age. Moreover, elderly patients due to their physiological alterations exhibit an increased response to drugs having an influence on renal function: diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and contrast media. The choice of drugs should consider their age-specific tolerability, i.e., fall-risk increasing drugs and those with strong anticholinergic side effects should be avoided. Analgesics, sedatives, and narcotics have to be selected according to the age of the patient and dosages should be adapted. Multimorbidity is often treated with polypharmacy, whereby it is not unusual that this is the cause for acute hospital admission. The necessity of all drugs prescribed has to be scrutinized and the drug burden should be reduced as clinically required.

[Prerequisites for a new health care model for elderly people with multiple morbidities: results and conclusions from 3 years of research in the PRISCUS consortium]. / Voraussetzungen für ein neues Versorgungsmodell für ältere Menschen mit Multimorbidität: Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerungen aus 3-jähriger Forschung im PRISCUS-Verbund.

BACKGROUND: The concurrent presence or manifestation of multiple chronic conditions, i.e. multimorbidity, poses a challenge to affected patients and their relatives, physicians, and practitioners, and to the health care system in general. Aiming to improve medical care for different chronic diseases, the Chronic Care Model also appears to be suited for multimorbidity. The established research consortium PRISCUS is trying to create some of the prerequisites for a new care model for multimorbid, elderly patients oriented along the lines of the Chronic Care Model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four out of seven subprojects of the research consortium provide an overview of some of their findings. Topics in a sports medicine subproject were the assessment of physical activity by means of a newly developed questionnaire and the development and feasibility testing of an exercise program for elderly people with chronic conditions and mobility impairment. Partners from family medicine implemented geriatric assessment in a primary care setting and evaluated its consequences. In a pharmacological subproject, potentially inappropriate medication as well as drug-drug interactions and dosing errors were addressed. The health economic subproject investigated quality of life impairment due to multiple chronic diseases and the effects of multimorbidity on costs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the PRISCUS research consortium allow a better description of consequences of multimorbidity and illustrate at least some new approaches towards prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of patients suffering from multimorbidity. Ongoing projects will test the efficacy of a physical activity program and a new complex intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medication in the elderly. With this, the research consortium will create some prerequisites for a new health care model for patients with multimorbidity comparable to the Chronic Care Model.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P)]. / Antibiotikaprophylaxe bei transurethraler Resektion der Prostata (TUR-P).

BACKGROUND: For patients undergoing urologic interventions, relevant aspects of antibiotic prophylaxis such as drug of choice and duration of prophylaxis are still discussed controversially. According to the current European and German guidelines, single-shot prophylaxis is recommended only in patients with risk factors. METHODS: Discussion of two published meta-analyses with regard to of recently published randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Two comprehensive meta-analyses concordantly revealed a significant reduction in bacteriuria and fever incidence without stratification according to preexisting risk factors. A single antibiotic dose ("single shot") of, for example, a cephalosporin or chinolone reduced the bacteriuria rate significantly. However, for the cephalosporines, the most frequently studied drug class, repeated dosing seems to be more effective. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the rates of bacteriuria and fever in patients without existing risk factors undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. The optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis and the drug of choice must be evaluated in further studies investigating clinically relevant endpoints.

[Chemotherapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma: applicability of data from clinical trials for the individual patient]. / Pharmakotherapie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: Ubertragbarkeit der Ergebnisse auf den individuellen Patienten.

Randomised, controlled clinical trials provide a valid foundation for evidence-based clinical guidelines. The representativeness of the patient population studied is one major aspect of external validity. With respect to the patient population enrolled in clinical trials studying the effects of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer, older patients are significantly underrepresented, i. e., they represent between 14 and 40 % of the study population, but approximately 70 % of the population concerned. The major reasons for the exclusion of older patients are comorbidities and functional status. Moreover, gender differences in pharmacokinetics and therapeutic effects of 5-fluorouracil are usually not considered. Although individualisation of therapy by means of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics may offer promising options, to date these methods are still not in routine use for colorectal cancer patients. Due to a lack of information about the relevant populations from randomised controlled trials, data from registries and observational trials are necessary to complement our knowledge.

[Adverse drugs reactions: diagnosis and assessment]. / Unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen Diagnostik und Bewertung.

Adverse drug reactions (ADR) occur in about 5% of all pharmacologically treated patients. Between 2% and 20% of all hospital admissions are caused by ADR, and approximately 10% of all hospitalized patients experience ADR during their hospital stay. Several thousand patients die due to ADR in Germany each year. ADR-associated drugs come predominantly from the class of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, anticoagulants, acetylsalicylic acid and cardiovascular drugs. Most ADR cases present as gastrointestinal bleeding and adverse cardiovascular effects. Apart from this, one or more drugs are withdrawn from the market each year because of unwanted but mostly rare side effects. In recent years the most prominent cases were rofecoxib, cisapride and cerivastatin. Physicians in Germany are obliged to report ADR. A substantial proportion of ADR, however, is not reported because it is deemed to be either too well known or the association between the drug and the adverse effect is too doubtful. In some cases, histopathological findings are needed to determine the diagnosis of ADR. Accordingly, physicians should inform the pathologist whether an ADR is suspected and which drugs may be responsible.

[Gender-related differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics]. / Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede in der Pharmakokinetik und -dynamik von Arzneimitteln.

Following the negative experience with thalidomide, women were excluded from participation in clinical trials with new pharmaceutical agents as far as possible, especially from phase I studies. However, in the early 1990s a body of evidence accumulated suggesting clinically relevant gender-related differences in the efficacy and safety of drugs. Gender-related differences have been shown for the metabolism and the effects of drugs. Gender differences have been described especially for the enzymes of the cytochrome P 450 family, but also for phase II reactions and most recently for P-glycoprotein. Most of these differences observed are only of minor clinical relevance, however may result in an increased rate of adverse drug reactions. Further differences may be based on different receptor/target sensitivities, e. g. the increased sensitivity for drug-induced torsade de pointes arrhythmia in women. In addition, in complex diseases such as heart failure, men and women may develop different mechanisms of counter- regulation requiring different therapeutic approaches. Population-based approaches demonstrate gender differences in the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

Interference of Uzara glycosides in assays of digitalis glycosides.

OBJECTIVE: Presentation of a case report and pharmacokinetic investigation in healthy volunteers on the potential interference between cardiac glycosides and glycosides of Uzara, a herbal antidiarrheal preparation. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic pilot investigation of apparent digitoxin and digoxin serum concentrations in 4 healthy volunteers after single-dose administration of 30 drops Uzara (approximately 1.5 ml approximately = 22 mg glycosides). RESULTS: Maximal apparent serum concentrations of digitoxin between 198.0 microg/l and 919.8 microg/l (therapeutic range: 10-25 microg/l) occurred at 4-8 hours after administration. The terminal half-life of the glycosides was 8.87 +/- 2.20 hours. For digoxin, maximal apparent serum concentrations ranged between 1.4 microg/l and 6.34 microg/l (therapeutic range: 0.9-2.0 microg/l) at 6 hours post dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a single dose of an Uzara preparation, an over-the-counter product, results in false high serum concentrations of digitoxin and digoxin. As described in the manufacturers Summary of Product Characteristics, this preparation should not be given to patients with cardiac failure or arrhythmia who require treatment with cardiac glycosides because of the demonstrated pharmacological actions of uzara glycosides.

Methods and systems to detect adverse drug reactions in hospitals.

Detection of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitals offers the chance to detect serious ADRs resulting in hospitalisation and ADRs occurring in hospitalised patients, i.e. patients with high comorbidity and receiving drugs that are administered only in hospitals. The most commonly applied methods involve stimulated spontaneous reporting of doctors and nurses, comprehensive collection by trained specialists and, more recently, computer-assisted approaches using routine data from hospital information systems. The different methods of ADR detection used result in different rates and types of ADRs and, consequently, in different drug classes being responsible for these ADRs. Another factor influencing the results of surveys is the interpretation of the term ADR, where some authors adhere to the strict definition of the World Health Organization and many others include intended and unintended poisoning as well as errors in prescribing and dispensing, thus referring to adverse drug events. Depending on the method used for screening of patients, a high number of possible ADRs and only few definite ADRs are found, or vice versa. These variations have to be taken into account when comparing the results of further analyses performed with these data. ADR rates and incidences in relation to the number of drugs prescribed or patients exposed have been calculated in only a few surveys and projects, and this interesting pharmacoepidemiological approach deserves further study. In addition, the pharmacoeconomic impact of ADRs, either resulting in hospitalisation or prolonging hospital stay, has been estimated using different approaches. However, a common standardised procedure for such calculations has not yet been defined. Although detection of ADRs in hospitals offers the opportunity to detect severe ADRs of newly approved drugs, these ADRs are still discovered by spontaneous reporting systems. The prospects offered by electronic hospital information systems as well as implementation of pharmacoepidemiological approaches increases the possibilities and the value of ADR detection in hospitals.

Pharmacokinetics of viral antibodies after administration of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations are derived from human pooled plasma and should fulfil high standards of purity and viral safety. Introduction of additional purification steps, however, may result in modulation of the biological properties of immunoglobulins. Since cleavage of the Fab-fragment leads to a significant decrease in half-life, the latter provides information about the integrity of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecules. Therefore, a pharmacokinetic study of a novel preparation is required to determine safety and disposition in the target population. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and 12 with multiple myeloma received intravenous infusions of IVIG containing antibodies against hepatitis B virus (anti-HBs; n= 15; 8960 IU), cytomegalovirus (anti-CMV; n = 9; 14,250 U) or varizella-zoster-virus (anti-VZV; n = 15; 6000 IU), respectively. Serum concentrations of viral antibodies were determined for 71 days during and after infusion. RESULTS: Maximum serum concentrations of anti-HBs, anti-CMV and anti-VZV were observed at about 4 h (median) after start of the infusion. Total body clearances came to 0.14 +/- 0.08 ml/min (anti-HBs), 0.10 +/- 0.02 ml/ min (anti-CMV) and 0.14 +/- 0.07 ml/min (anti-VZV). The terminal elimination half-lives were determined to be 25.34 +/- 8.34 days (anti-HBs), 24.66 7.28 days (anti-CMV) and 31.79 +/- 12.47 days (anti-VZV). Clinical chemistry parameters including C3- and C4-complement serum concentrations revealed no pathological changes, seroconversion for hepatitis B and C and HIV did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of the IgG antibodies calculated after administration of the novel IVIG preparations to patients with CLL and multiple myeloma are in close agreement with data obtained from healthy volunteers and with values of native IgG, suggesting that the production process did not impair clinically relevant characteristics of the viral antibodies.

[Pharmacotherapy of hypertension]. / Pharmakotherapie der Hypertonie.

A large variety of drugs is available for treatment of hypertension. Moreover, many randomised controlled trials with clinically relevant endpoints (morbidity, mortality, quality of life) do exist in the cardiovascular field, providing for sufficient evidence to choose the appropriate agent in most circumstances. For diuretics and betablockers a large body of evidence in terms of beneficial effects on outcome does exist, for ACE-inhibitors in some special indications only. These drugs are therefore recommended as first-line treatments. For calcium-channel blockers (with the exception of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly) and AT1-receptor-antagonists the results of endpoint-studies are still awaited. These results will have to be considered for revised versions of currently available guidelines.

Drug treatment in pregnancy.

When considering drug therapy in pregnancy, the risk of treatment for the embryo/fetus has to be weighed against the risk to the mother and the child of carrying out no treatment. This is of particular relevance in certain conditions like diabetes, epilepsy or AIDS, where the risk of embryopathy is increased when no treatment is carried out and the available drugs are potentially teratogenic. However, carefully selected drugs and close meshed monitoring may even decrease the risk for the child. In many instances, unintentional drug exposure occurs in the period before the pregnancy has been diagnosed. This may lead to additional diagnostic measures or even abortion of an otherwise wanted child. In both situations, planned and unintentional drug exposure during pregnancy, insufficient information is available on the clinical conditions relevant here and the specific drugs involved. Identification of potential teratogenic effects of a new drug takes place during the early development phase. However, animal models may not be representative of specifically human characteristics, e.g. deficiences in enzymes. Since drug treatment is generally best avoided during pregnancy, pharmacokinetic studies in this population are rare. However, physiological changes, known to be relevant for some drugs do occur during pregnancy. In order to improve knowledge on the pharmacokinetics of drugs in pregnancy, population pharmacokinetic approaches may represent a solution. Intensive efforts to investigate the efficacy and safety of drugs during pregnancy are necessary. Since controlled clinical trials are usually not feasible due to ethical reasons, intensified collection of case reports as well as epidemiological studies are warranted to gain sufficient information for the counselling of pregnant women.

[Detection and evaluation of adverse drug effects]. / Erfassung und Bewertung unerwünschter Arzneimittelwirkungen.

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur in about 5% of drug-treated patients. Hospital admissions are caused by ADRs in 5% of patients and roughly 2% of hospitalized patients will experience an ADR. The economic burden of ADRs can only be estimated. Type A reactions can be explained by the pharmacological action of the drugs, and are preventable in many cases. However, Type B reactions involving the immune system and/or idiosyncratic reactions occur rarely and most of them are not fully understood. Genotyping represents an elegant method to explain the presence of abnormal enzyme activities and allows prediction of adverse drug effects in individual cases. Typical time frames have been identified for the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions, although definite causality assessment is often impeded due to the absence or unavailability of specific laboratory tests and the impossibility of rechallenge. Diagnosis of an ADR is often difficult due to comorbidity and polypharmacy, thus causality assessment is often divergent even between specialists. In Germany, ADRs are reported preferably to the manufacturer of the suspicious drug and then collected and evaluated at the Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM. However, total number and quality of reported ADRs could be improved.

Valsartan: a novel angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist.

Valsartan is a highly selective, orally available antagonist of the angiotensin Type 1 (AT1) receptor. It is indicated for treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Experimental studies have confirmed the abolition or attenuation of angiotensin II (AII)-related effects, such as vasoconstriction, cell growth promotion and aldosterone release. In humans, valsartan is rapidly absorbed with maximal plasma concentrations occurring 1-2 h after oral administration. The elimination half-life comes to about 7-8 h, valsartan is metabolised to a negligible extent and most of the drug is excreted via the faeces. There is no dose adjustment required for patients with a creatinine clearance > 10 ml/min. The dose should not exceed 80 mg o.d. in patients with hepatic dysfunction, valsartan is not recommended for patients with severe hepatic dysfunction and/or biliary cirrhosis. At present, no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions have been observed. Valsartan produces persistent blood pressure reductions in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, the recommended starting dose is 80 mg o.d. If required, the dose may either be increased to 160 mg o.d. or hydrochlorothiazide may be added. In comparison to other antihypertensive drugs valsartan therapy leads to similar blood pressure reductions, while exhibiting a favourable tolerability profile. Preliminary studies suggest beneficial effects in patients with hypertensive end-organ damage such as renal disease and left ventricular hypertrophy. Furthermore, the drug is evaluated for its efficacy in heart failure and patients post-myocardial infarction.