Use and persistence of single and multiple inhaler triple therapy prescribed for patients with COPD in France: a retrospective study on THIN database (OPTI study).

INTRODUCTION: From 2018 single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) became available in France to treat moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given its simplified inhaler use compared with multiple inhaler triple therapy (MITT), this therapeutic option has the potential to offer benefit in terms of improved persistence and adherence. Given the lack of real-world evidence of the effectiveness of triple therapy, this study was designed to evaluate the use of MITT and SITT in France and compare persistence. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with COPD who initiated triple therapy between 1 July 2017 and 31 December 2019 were included from The Health Improvement Network, a large electronic medical database in France, which includes pharmacy data. A 60-day treatment gap defined discontinuation and thereby persistence. RESULTS: A total of 3134 patients initiated triple therapy for COPD in the study period, among them 485 with SITT. In 2019, the rate of use of SITT was 28.2%. The mean age (67.3 years) and sex (44.2% female) of patients initiating triple therapy was similar between MITT and SITT, and most patients had escalated from dual therapy (84.1%). However, SITT was more frequently initiated by a pulmonologist (59.8%) and a higher prevalence of comorbid asthma was observed for SITT (47.0% vs 37.9%). Persistence was assessed among patients who did not discontinue after a single dispensation of triple therapy (n=1674). Median persistence was 181 days for SITT and 135 days for MITT, and the covariate-adjusted HR for persistence was 1.47 (p<0.001) and the estimated persistence at 1 year was 33% for SITT compared with 18% for MITT. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that persistence was higher for the patients treated with SITT compared with MITT in France. Moreover, most patients initiated with triple therapy were previously treated with dual therapy and had exacerbations in the previous year.

Characteristics of Severe Non-Eosinophilic Asthma: Analysis of Data from 1075 Patients Included in the FASE-CPHG Study.

Purpose: Data on severe non-eosinophilic asthma are scarce. Moreover, as compared with eosinophilic asthma, non-eosinophilic asthma less frequently benefits from the latest therapeutic advances. This study aimed to highlight differences between non-eosinophilic and eosinophilic asthma as they may help the development of new therapeutic agents. Patients and Methods: Data from 1075 adult patients with severe asthma (GINA treatment: 4/5) collected during the cross-sectional non-interventional FASE-CPHG study were analyzed. Two groups of patients (EOS-/EOS+) were constituted based on blood eosinophil counts (cutoff value: 300 G/l). Characteristics of EOS- (N = 500) and EOS+ (N = 575) patients were described; EOS- patients were also described according to their allergic profile based on skin allergy or allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) assays (cutoff value: 150 IU/mL). Results: Percentages of patients with obesity (29%), allergen sensitization (57%), or ≥2 annual exacerbations in the last 12 months (68%) were similar in both groups. As compared with EOS+ patients, EOS- patients less frequently reported chronic rhinitis (41.1% vs 50.5%, p < 0.01) or nasal polyposis (13.6% vs 27.5%, p < 0.01), and more frequently reported GERD (45.2% vs 37.1%, p < 0.01), anxiety (45.5% vs 38.1%, p = 0.01), or depression (18.3% vs 13.3%, p = 0.02). EOS- patients had lower serum total IgE levels (median: 158 vs 319 IU/mL, p < 0.01) and were less frequently treated with long-term oral corticosteroid therapy (16.0% vs 23.7%; p < 0.01). Their asthma was more frequently uncontrolled (48% vs 40%, p < 0.01). Similar results were found with a cutoff value for blood eosinophil counts at 150 G/l. EOS- patients with allergic profile less frequently reported high serum IgE levels (35.6% vs 57.9%, p < 0.01). EOS- and EOS+ patients treated with long-term oral corticosteroids had similar profiles. Conclusion: In our patients with severe asthma, EOS- asthma was approximately as frequent as EOS+ asthma; EOS- asthma was frequently poorly controlled or uncontrolled, confirming the need for a better management. Allergy did not appear to worsen clinical profile.

Asthma burden according to treatment steps in the French population-based cohort CONSTANCES.

BACKGROUND: Data on health care consumption and costs of asthma in the French population are scarce. OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to describe the burden of asthma according to GINA treatment steps in the CONSTANCES cohort. METHODS: Data from 162,725 participants included between 2012 and 2019 were extracted. Participants were considered as current asthmatics if asthma was reported at inclusion and asthma symptoms and/or treatments were reported in 2019. Participants were classified in three categories according to GINA treatment steps. The results were compared to non-asthmatic participants matched with a propensity score calculated on age, sex, region of residence, precariousness score and year of inclusion. RESULTS: Among 162,725 participants aged 18-69 years, 6783 asthmatics (1566 not treated for asthma, 2444 + 251 GINA steps 1 + 2, 1054 + 1315 GINA steps 3 + 4, and 153 GINA step 5) were matched with 6783 controls. Average annual ambulatory cost and average annual hospitalization cost were respectively €1925 and €719 for asthmatics versus €1376 and €511 for participants without asthma (p < 0,0001). Cardiovascular risk factors, co-morbidities, visits and hospitalizations were higher for asthma participants as compared to controls and increased with GINA steps, as well as inpatient and outpatient costs. However, for cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbidities, differences were non-significant in multivariate analyses. Pharmacy costs were ten times higher for GINA step 5 participants than for GINA steps 1-2 participants: €3187 versus €393 (p < 0,0001). CONCLUSION: mean cost of asthma was estimated at €757 per patient/year and increased with GINA treatment step.

Health crisis: What opportunities for clinical drug research?

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the deployment of an unprecedented academic and industrial research effort, the sometimes redundant nature of which is regrettable, as is the lack of both national and international management. However, it must be noted that during this crisis, regulatory procedures were adapted and certain obstacles in the organisation of clinical research were partly removed to contribute to the deployment of trials as close as possible to patients and to facilitate monitoring and control procedures. The digitisation of certain processes and the decentralisation of certain activities were implemented under the cover of a mobilisation of the authorities and all institutional, academic and industrial players. While in the UK, the optimisation of resources through a single platform trial has made it possible to demonstrate or invalidate the efficacy of many treatments, in France the health crisis has highlighted the fragility of the organisation of clinical research, in particular a lack of coordination and funding, difficulties in implementing studies and a certain reluctance to share data. However, the crisis has also revealed the adaptability of the various stakeholders and has led to the improvement of several processes useful for the deployment of therapeutic innovation. Let us hope that the lessons learned during this crisis will allow for greater efficiency in the event of a new pandemic and, above all, that the progress made will continue to apply to all future clinical research activities.

Severe pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A prospective French multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: A small proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients present severe pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined by mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥35 mm Hg measured by right heart catheterization. Little is known about the characteristics of severe PH-COPD. The aim of the study based on a national registry was to describe this phenotype. METHODS: We prospectively included and followed patients with incident PH-COPD. Clinical, functional, hemodynamic data at inclusion and follow-up were retrieved. Survival assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis was the primary end-point. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, 99 patients from 13 French centers were included in the study (82 males; median age 66.0 years [interquartile range 62.0-72.0]). At inclusion, most patients had marked dyspnea (55.6% and 22.2% New York Heart Association class III and IV, respectively). During 12 months before inclusion, 42.9% had an exacerbation requiring a hospitalization. Pulmonary function tests showed a moderate obstructive pattern with median (interquartile range) FEV1 50.0 [35.0-63.0] % predicted and low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, median 20.0 [16.5-30.6] % predicted. The median values for PaO2 and PaCO2 on room air were 50.0 [44.8-62.0] and 36.0 [31.1-43.0] mm Hg. Median values of mPAP, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, cardiac index and pulmonary vascular resistance were 42.0 [37.0-48.0] mm Hg, 11.0 [9.0-14.0] mm Hg, 3.0 [2.4-3.6] L/min/m2, and 6.3 [4.2-7.9] WU, respectively. Mean restricted survival was 15.0 [13.9-16.0] months. CONCLUSIONS: Severe PH-COPD is characterized by moderate airway obstruction but marked dyspnea and marked hypoxemia, low DLCO and high mPAP. This phenotype is associated with poor prognosis.

Methotrexate and rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease.

QUESTION ADDRESSED BY THE STUDY: Methotrexate (MTX) is a key anchor drug for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common complication of RA. Whether MTX exposure increases the risk of ILD in patients with RA is disputed. We aimed to evaluate the association of prior MTX use with development of RA-ILD. METHODS: Through a case-control study design with discovery and international replication samples, we examined the association of MTX exposure with ILD in 410 patients with chronic fibrotic ILD associated with RA (RA-ILD) and 673 patients with RA without ILD. Estimates were pooled over the different samples using meta-analysis techniques. RESULTS: Analysis of the discovery sample revealed an inverse relationship between MTX exposure and RA-ILD (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.022), which was confirmed in the replication samples (pooled adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.79; p=0.009). The combined estimate using both the derivation and validation samples revealed an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.0006). MTX ever-users were less frequent among patients with RA-ILD compared to those without ILD, irrespective of chest high-resolution computed tomography pattern. In patients with RA-ILD, ILD detection was significantly delayed in MTX ever-users compared to never-users (11.4±10.4 years and 4.0±7.4 years, respectively; p<0.001). ANSWER TO THE QUESTION: Our results suggest that MTX use is not associated with an increased risk of RA-ILD in patients with RA, and that ILD was detected later in MTX-treated patients.

Effect of the Use of Intranasal Spray of Essential Oils in Patients with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: A Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Among allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms, nasal obstruction particularly affects the quality of life. Antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids are the most frequently prescribed symptomatic drugs, but their efficacy is often incomplete. Essential oils (EO) have shown an anti-inflammatory effect and potential in treating patients with AR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a hypertonic EO-based nasal spray on perennial AR (PAR) symptoms. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, non-randomized, multicentric trial included 43 patients with PAR sensitized to mites, not controlled for more than a year. All were treated with Puressentiel® Respiratory-Decongestant Nasal Spray for 30 days. Their usual treatment remained unchanged during the study period. Before and after treatment, each participant filled out a rhinitis questionnaire, the Allergic Rhinitis Control Test (ARCT). A nasal inspiratory peak flow (NIPF) was performed. RESULTS: The mean ARCT was 16.4 and 20.5 at D0 and D30, respectively (p < 0.001); the mean increase between D0 and D30 was 4.1 (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with controlled rhinitis after 30 days of treatment was 69.8 versus 14% before treatment (p < 0.001). The mean NIPF was 86.5 L/min and 105.1 L/min at D0 and D30, respectively (p < 0.001); the mean increase between D0 and D30 was 18.5 L/min. CONCLUSION: A hypertonic EO-based nasal spray could be a new and natural option in the management of PAR. It could also be used as an add-on therapy when nasal symptoms are not fully controlled.

Late viral or bacterial respiratory infections in lung transplanted patients: impact on respiratory function.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory infections are a major threat for lung recipients. We aimed to compare with a monocentric study the impact of late viral and bacterial respiratory infections on the graft function. METHODS: Patients, who survived 6 months or more following lung transplantation that took place between 2009 and 2014, were classified into three groups: a viral infection group (VIG) (without any respiratory bacteria), a bacterial infection group (BIG) (with or without any respiratory viruses), and a control group (CG) (no documented infection). Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and acute rejection were analysed 6 months after the inclusion in the study. RESULTS: Among 99 included lung recipients, 57 (58%) had at least one positive virological respiratory sample during the study period. Patients were classified as follows: 38 in the VIG, 25 in the BIG (among which 19 co-infections with a virus) and 36 in the CG. The BIG presented a higher initial deterioration in lung function (p = 0.05) than the VIG. But 6 months after the infection, only the VIG presented a median decrease of forced expiratory volume in 1 s; - 35 mL (IQR; - 340; + 80) in the VIG, + 140 mL (+ 60;+ 330) in the BIG and + 10 (- 84;+ 160) in the CG, p < 0.01. Acute rejection was more frequent in the VIG (n = 12 (32%)), than the BIG (n = 6 (24%)) and CG (n = 3 (8%)), p < 0.05, despite presenting no more CLAD (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a less severe initial presentation, single viral respiratory infections seem to lead to a greater deterioration in lung function, and to more acute rejection, than bacterial infections.

Impact of donor, recipient and matching on survival after high emergency lung transplantation in France.

INTRODUCTION: Since July 2007, the French high emergency lung transplantation (HELT) allocation procedure prioritises available lung grafts to waiting patients with imminent risk of death. The relative impacts of donor, recipient and matching on the outcome following HELT remain unknown. We aimed at deciphering the relative impacts of donor, recipient and matching on the outcome following HELT in an exhaustive administrative database. METHODS: All lung transplantations performed in France were prospectively registered in an administrative database. We retrospectively reviewed the procedures performed between July 2007 and December 2015, and analysed the impact of donor, recipient and matching on overall survival after the HELT procedure by fitting marginal Cox models. RESULTS: During the study period, 2335 patients underwent lung transplantation in 11 French centres. After exclusion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema, 1544 patients were included: 503 HELT and 1041 standard lung transplantation allocations. HELT was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 1.41 (95% CI 1.22-1.64; p<0.0001) in univariate analysis, decreasing to 1.32 (95% CI 1.10-1.60) after inclusion of recipient characteristics in a multivariate model. A donor score computed to predict long-term survival was significantly different between the HELT and standard lung transplantation groups (p=0.014). However, the addition of donor characteristics to recipient characteristics in the multivariate model did not change the hazard ratio associated with HELT. CONCLUSIONS: This exhaustive French national study suggests that HELT is associated with an adverse outcome compared with regular allocation. This adverse outcome is mainly related to the severity status of the recipients rather than donor or matching characteristics.

Pulmonary Arterial Histologic Lesions in Patients With COPD With Severe Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) during the course of COPD is a well-known phenomenon, with the prevalence depending on the severity of airway obstruction. When mean pulmonary pressure (mPAP) level at rest is ≥ 35 mm Hg or ≥ 25 mm Hg with low cardiac index, the term severe PH is used. For these patients, little is known on the underlying histologic lesions. Our objective was to describe these lesions. METHODS: From the explants of patients undergoing lung transplantation, we compared retrospectively three groups of patients with COPD: severe PH-COPD (n = 10), moderate PH-COPD (mPAP between 25 and 34 mm Hg without low cardiac index) (n = 10), and no PH (mPAP < 25 mm Hg) (n = 10). Histologic analysis of the explanted lungs examined the wall of medium-size arteries, the remodeling of microvessels, and the pulmonary capillary density using morphometric measurements performed on three sections per patient. RESULTS: Compared with the moderate PH group, the remodeling score of the microvessels was significantly higher (P = .0045) and the capillary density was lower (P = .0049) in the severe PH-COPD group. The alterations of the medium-size arteries, important in group 1 PH, seemed less discriminating. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe PH-COPD appear to have a specific histologic pattern, different from that observed in patients with COPD with moderate PH or without PH.

Diagnosis and management of α1-antitrypsin deficiency in Europe: an expert survey.

Despite recent improvements, α1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) remains a rarely diagnosed and treated condition. To assess the variability of AATD diagnosis/treatment in Europe, and to evaluate clinicians' views on methods to optimise management, specialist AATD clinicians were invited to complete a web-based survey. Surveys were completed by 15 physicians from 14 centres in 13 European countries. All respondents perceived the AATD diagnosis rate to be low in their country; 77% of physicians believed that ∼15% of cases were diagnosed. Low awareness was perceived as the greatest barrier to diagnosis. Spirometry was considered more practical than quantitative computed tomography (QCT) for monitoring AATD patients in clinical practice; QCT was considered more useful in trials. AAT therapy provision was reported to be highly variable: France and Germany were reported to treat the highest proportion (∼60%) of diagnosed patients, in contrast to the UK and Hungary, where virtually no patients receive AAT therapy. Most clinicians supported self-administration and extended dosing intervals to improve convenience of AAT therapy. This survey indicates that AATD diagnosis and management are highly heterogeneous in Europe; European cooperation is essential to generate data to support access to AAT therapy. Improving convenience of AAT therapy is an ongoing objective.

Tolerance to exposure to essential oils exposure in patients with allergic asthma.

Background: Essential oils are volatile compounds of plant origin increasingly used by allergic and/or asthmatic subjects to purify indoor air. The active compounds of essential oils belong to terpenes, the most widespread biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC). Although there is substantial literature showing associations between exposure to chemical VOCs and asthmatic symptoms and impaired respiratory function, the impact of essential oils in patients with asthma has never been studied. Objectives: To evaluate the safety of a purifying air spray containing 41 essential oils (PPAS) in patients with mild or moderate allergic asthma. Methods: This was a prospective open study in which 25 mild (19) and moderate (6) asthmatics were exposed to PPAS, one spray twice a day at 8 am and 8 pm in two different corners of a given subjects bedroom for 4 weeks. Before and after 4 weeks of exposure, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), lung function and methacholine challenge (PD20) were performed and asthma control was assessed by the 5 questions of the Asthma Control Test (ACT). The spray was weighed after the 4-week exposure to assess compliance. Results: FeNO was the primary endpoint and was thus analyzed in all (N = 25) subjects irrespective of the level of airflow obstruction. The results apply to all (N = 25) subjects in which FeNO could be measured at D1 and D30 (17 subjects). Mean (SD) FeNO amounted to 37.4 (16.6) and to 33.1 (18.7) ppm before and after PPAS exposure, respectively (p = 0.09). No significant change in lung function and methacholine responsiveness was noted after PPAS exposure, the mean PD20 amounting to 1179 (1124.42) µg (range 100-3200) before and to 1226 (1189.8) µg (p = 0.06) after. The mean ACT before and after PPAS exposure amounted to 20.9 (4.2) and 21 (5.15), respectively (p = 0.80). The mean weight of the PPAS bottles was 211.4 g (DS:0) before the first use and 171.41 g (DS: 29.8) at the end of the study. The average amount of PPAS used was 40.0 g (29.8). In the subgroup of subjects who used the highest quantities of essential oils (>40 g), as assessed by the mean weight of the bottle at the end of the study, FeNO after 30 days of exposure decreased more than in the entire group: 7.9 ppm vs 4.2 ppm (p = 0.07). Conclusion: No difference was noted on airway inflammation, lung function or asthma control in mild and moderate allergic asthmatics after exposure twice a day for one month, to a spray containing a mixture of 41 essential oils.

Donor Lung Sequence Number and Survival after Lung Transplantation in the United States.

RATIONALE: In the United States, an algorithm known as the "match-run" creates an ordered ranking of potential recipients for available lung allografts. A potential recipient's match-run position, or "sequence number," is available to the transplant center when contacted with a lung offer. Lung offers with higher sequence numbers may be interpreted as a crowd-sourced evaluation of poor organ quality, though the association between the sequence number at which a lung is accepted and its recipient's post-transplant outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the primary reasons provided when a lung offer was refused by a transplant center, transplant center and donor/organ factors associated with a higher sequence number at acceptance, and the association of the sequence number at acceptance with post-transplant mortality and graft failure. METHODS: Match-run outcomes for lung offers that occurred in the United States from May 2007 through June 2014 were merged with recipient follow-up data through December 2017. Associations between the sequence number at the time of acceptance and selected transplant center and donor characteristics were estimated using multivariable logistic and multinomial regression models. The associations between the final sequence number and recipient survival and graft survival were estimated using multivariable time-to-event models. RESULTS: Of 10,981 lung offer acceptances, nearly 70% were accepted by one of the top 10 ranked candidates. Higher median annual center volume and potential indicators of organ quality (e.g., abnormal chest radiograph or bronchoscopy) were associated with a higher sequence number at acceptance. There was weak evidence for a small positive relationship between the sequence number at acceptance and both mortality and graft failure. For example, the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for death associated with the log-sequence number at acceptance were 1.019 (95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.038) and 1.011 (95% confidence interval, 0.989-1.033), respectively. On the absolute scale, using the multivariable model, a 10-fold increase in the sequence number translated into a 0.8% absolute decline in the predicted 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of a donor lung offer at a later point in the match-run was associated with measurable indicators of organ quality, but not with clinically meaningful differences in post-transplant mortality or graft failure.

Risk of asthma onset after natural and surgical menopause: Results from the French E3N cohort.

BACKGROUND: The gender switch in asthma incidence around puberty has been put forward to suggest a role of sex hormones in asthma. However, there are limited and inconsistent findings on change in asthma incidence with menopause. We aimed to investigate the associations between menopause and asthma incidence, and interactions with overweight/obesity. METHODS: Asthma incidence was assessed in 67,872 women free of asthma at baseline (aged 41-68 years) and regularly followed up as a part of the French E3N cohort. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were derived from Cox models considering age as the time-scale, menopausal status as a time-varying covariate and taking into account menopausal treatment. RESULTS: During 843,243 person-years of follow-up, 1205 new-onset asthma cases were identified. Compared with pre-menopause, surgical menopause was associated with an increased risk of asthma onset (aHR = 1.33 [95%CI 1.01-1.75]) but no association was observed for natural menopause (aHR = 1.05 [0.84-1.32]). In women with natural menopause, a further analysis separating the transition through menopause and the later post-menopausal period did not show any change in asthma incidence with menopause in the total sample or in normal-weight women alone. However, in overweight/obese women, peri-menopausal and post-menopausal women had an increased risk of developing asthma compared with pre-menopausal women of the same age (aHR = 1.91 [1.00-3.66] and aHR = 2.08 [1.07-4.06] respectively). CONCLUSION: Surgical menopause was associated with an increased risk of asthma onset. For natural menopause, no change in asthma incidence was observed in normal-weight women. However, overweight/obese women had an increased risk of developing asthma after natural menopause.

MUC5B Promoter Variant and Rheumatoid Arthritis with Interstitial Lung Disease.

BACKGROUND: Given the phenotypic similarities between rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) (hereafter, RA-ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, we hypothesized that the strongest risk factor for the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the gain-of-function MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950, would also contribute to the risk of ILD among patients with RA. METHODS: Using a discovery population and multiple validation populations, we tested the association of the MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950 in 620 patients with RA-ILD, 614 patients with RA without ILD, and 5448 unaffected controls. RESULTS: Analysis of the discovery population revealed an association of the minor allele of the MUC5B promoter variant with RA-ILD when patients with RA-ILD were compared with unaffected controls (adjusted odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 5.2; P=9.7×10-17). The MUC5B promoter variant was also significantly overrepresented among patients with RA-ILD, as compared with unaffected controls, in an analysis of the multiethnic case series (adjusted odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 4.2 to 7.3; P=4.7×10-35) and in a combined analysis of the discovery population and the multiethnic case series (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.9 to 5.8; P=1.3×10-49). In addition, the MUC5B promoter variant was associated with an increased risk of ILD among patients with RA (adjusted odds ratio in combined analysis, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.8 to 5.4; P=7.4×10-5), particularly among those with evidence of usual interstitial pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomography (adjusted odds ratio in combined analysis, 6.1; 95% CI, 2.9 to 13.1; P=2.5×10-6). However, no significant association with the MUC5B promoter variant was observed for the diagnosis of RA alone. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the MUC5B promoter variant was associated with RA-ILD and more specifically associated with evidence of usual interstitial pneumonia on imaging. (Funded by Société Française de Rhumatologie and others.).

Clinical and economic burden of severe asthma: A French cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and economic burden of severe asthma in France over 12 months. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the observational, prospective "Cohorte Obstruction Bronchique et Asthme" (COBRA) cohort, which has enrolled nearly 1000 asthma patients since 2007 from throughout France. Patients undergoing treatment with GINA step-4 or 5 medications uninterruptedly for 12 months (thus defining "severe asthma") were identified and their clinical data used to describe the clinical burden of asthma (exacerbations, symptoms outside exacerbations, and level of asthma control). Patients' utilization of healthcare resources was described and used to estimate the direct medical costs incurred to treat severe asthma. RESULTS: 155 patients were included in the present study. Over the 12-month period of interest, 128 (83%) patients experienced at least one asthma exacerbation, 22 (14%) patients were hospitalized for asthma, 133 (86%) patients experienced continuous symptoms outside exacerbations, and 77 (50%) patients experienced important limitations in daily life activities. The median number of asthma-related drugs used was 4. The mean estimated annual asthma-related cost was 8,222 euros (standard deviation, SD = 11,886), including 7,229 euros (SD = 11,703) for controller medications. CONCLUSION: Symptoms outside exacerbation periods are highly prevalent in severe asthma patients, for whom the main driver of medical costs is controller medication.