A Multi-Center Comparison of Orthopaedic Attending and Resident Learning Styles.

OBJECTIVE: Effective education of orthopedic residents requires an understanding of how they process information. To date however no literature has described resident learning styles based on the updated Kolb Learning Style Inventory (KLSI) v4.0. The purpose of this study is to identify common learning styles amongst orthopedic residents and attendings and evaluate the effect that race, gender, and resident/attending status have on learning styles. DESIGN: The KLSI v4.0 and a demographic survey were distributed to 103 orthopedic attendings and residents at two academic centers during the 2019 to 2020 academic year. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were reported. Learning styles based on gender, race, attending versus resident status, and institution were evaluated. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. SETTING: This is a multi-center study performed at two academic, university based orthopedic surgery departments. PARTICIPANTS: Orthopaedic surgery residents and attending surgeons. RESULTS: At both institutions, the combined response rate for the KLSI v4.0 was 66% and 68% for the demographic surgery. The three most common learning styles recorded were: Deciding (26.5%), Acting (17.6%), and Thinking (17.6%). Learning styles were compared by gender, race, attending and/or resident status, and institution with no statistically significant difference found between any of the comparisons (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The majority of orthopedic surgeons have Deciding, Acting, or Thinking learning styles, which are categorized by motivation to achieve goals, disciplined and logical reasoning, and the use of theories and models to solve problems. However, not all residents and attendings utilize these common learning styles. A mismatch in learning styles between residents and attendings could result in poor educational experiences. Understanding the learning styles of orthopedic surgeons has implications for improving evaluation interpretation, mentorship pairing, quality of life, and resident remediation.

A track record of diversity: Medical schools ranked by successful black applicants to orthopaedic residencies.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery is the least diverse surgical subspecialty in medicine. However, to date, there is no literature that shows which medical schools have successfully contributed to improving orthopaedic surgeon diversity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify the top U.S. medical schools that have successfully matched black applicants into orthopaedic surgery residencies and juxtapose this ranking to the current top medical schools as ranked by the U.S. News and World Report (USNWR). METHODS: The J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society (JRGOS) database was queried for all orthopaedic surgeons, fellows, and residents who identified as black or multi-racial with black being one of the included races, yielding 938 physicians, of which 672 met our inclusion criteria. From this list, a ranking of the top 20 medical schools was generated. RESULTS: The top five medical schools ranked in the JRGOS database are Howard University College of Medicine (HUCOM), Meharry Medical College, Harvard Medical School (HMS), the University of Pennsylvania, and Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM). In addition, 10 (50%) of the medical schools ranked in the top 20 by the JRGOS database were also ranked by the USNWR. When ranking medical schools for black female applicants, HUCOM, MSM, HMS are the top three programs. Lastly, a ranking by region identified that the northeast contained the highest number of ranked medical schools. CONCLUSION: There are both historically black and non-historically black medical schools which have a proven track record of producing a significant number of future black orthopaedic surgery residents.

Surgical Outcomes of Obese Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis From Endemic Areas of Obesity in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Obesity rates continue to rise among children and adolescents across the globe. A multicenter research consortium composed of institutions in the Southern US, located in states endemic for childhood obesity, was formed to evaluate the effect of obesity on pediatric musculoskeletal disorders. This study evaluates the effect of body mass index (BMI) percentile and socioeconomic status (SES) on surgical site infections (SSIs) and perioperative complications in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). METHODS: Eleven centers in the Southern US retrospectively reviewed postoperative AIS patients after PSF between 2011 and 2017. Each center contributed data to a centralized database from patients in the following BMI-for-age groups: normal weight (NW, 5th to <85th percentile), overweight (OW, 85th to <95th percentile), and obese (OB, ≥95th percentile). The primary outcome variable was the occurrence of an SSI. SES was measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with higher scores indicating a lower SES. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-one patients were included in this study (256 NW, 235 OW, and 260 OB). OB and OW patients presented with significantly higher ADIs indicating a lower SES (P<0.001). In addition, SSI rates were significantly different between BMI groups (0.8% NW, 4.3% OW, and 5.4% OB, P=0.012). Further analysis showed that superficial and not deep SSIs were significantly different between BMI groups. These differences in SSI rates persisted even while controlling for ADI. Wound dehiscence and readmission rates were significantly different between groups (P=0.004 and 0.03, respectively), with OB patients demonstrating the highest rates. EBL and cell saver return were significantly higher in overweight patients (P=0.007 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: OB and OW AIS patients have significantly greater superficial SSI rates than NW patients, even after controlling for SES. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Outcomes of Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Ribs in Children With Early-Onset Scoliosis Secondary to Cerebral Palsy.

Purpose Patients who have neuromuscular scoliosis, such as cerebral palsy (CP), often develop spinal deformities that negatively impact quality of life. The vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) was designed for thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS), but it has also been utilized in patients with CP with restrictive lung disease and spine deformity. Few studies report on VEPTRs in neuromuscular scoliosis; however, none reports on their utilization specifically in patients with CP. Our purpose was to assess if VEPTRs can improve spinal deformity and TIS in these patients. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with CP and scoliosis treated with a VEPTR between 2008 and 2017. Eight patients were eligible for this study. The mean follow-up was four years. Outcomes evaluated were Cobb angle, pelvic obliquity, space available for lung ratio (SAL), T1-S1 height, and complication rates. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used for statistical significance. Results There were significant postoperative improvements in Cobb angle, pelvic obliquity, and T1-S1 height, but no statistical difference in SAL. Prior to final fusion, the mean number of VEPTR lengthening procedures was 3. The mean time from index surgery to final fusion was 3.7 years. The most common complications were infection (62.5%) and wound dehiscence (25%). Only 25% of patients did not have a complication. Conclusion VEPTRs demonstrated significant improvement in almost all parameters and may be valuable in improving TIS in patients with CP. The complication and reoperation rates were similar to those of VEPTRs used for other pathological conditions.