Reducing Biofilm Infections in Burn Patients' Wounds and Biofilms on Surfaces in Hospitals, Medical Facilities and Medical Equipment to Improve Burn Care: A Systematic Review.

Biofilms in burns are major problems: bacterial communities rapidly develop antibiotic resistance, and 60% of burn mortality is attributed to biofilms. Key pathogens are Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii. Purpose: identify current and novel interventions to reduce biofilms on patients' burns and hospital surfaces and equipment. Medline and Embase were searched without date or language limits, and 31 possible interventions were prioritised: phages, nano-silver, AgSD-NLs@Cur, Acticoat and Mepilex silver, acetic acid, graphene-metal combinations, CuCo2SO4 nanoparticles, Chlorhexidene acetate nanoemulsion, a hydrogel with moxifloxacin, carbomer, Chitosan and Boswellia, LED light therapy with nano-emodin or antimicrobial blue light + Carvacrol to release reactive oxygen species, mannosidase + trypsin, NCK-10 (a napthalene compound with a decyl chain), antimicrobial peptide PV3 (includes two snake venoms), and polypeptides P03 and PL2. Most interventions aimed to penetrate cell membranes and reported significant reductions in biofilms in cfu/mL or biofilm mass or antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentrations or bacterial expression of virulence or quorum sensing genes. Scanning electron microscopy identified important changes in bacterial surfaces. Patients with biofilms need isolating and treating before full admission to hospital. Cleaning and disinfecting needs to include identifying biofilms on keyboards, tablets, cell phones, medical equipment (especially endoscopes), sinks, drains, and kitchens.

A systematic review of injuries in gymnastics.

OBJECTIVES: To identify all studies of gymnastics injuries and assess injury rates, types, locations, and causes. METHODS: Seven electronic and two grey literature databases were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed titles/abstracts, abstracted data, and calculated average rates weighted by study size. RESULTS: One study (n = 963) of three Olympic games (2008,2012,2016) provided injury rates for females of 86.4/1000gymnasts and males 79.9. For 29 databases one study of males (n = 64) provided a rate of 8.8 injuries/1000hours/AE (AE = athletic-exposure) and three of females varied rates (8.5, 9.4, and 91). Three studies for males (n = 153) provided a weighted average rate of 1.4 injuries/1000hours/training, and for females six studies (n = 476) 1.5 injuries. Four studies of males (n = 286) provided a weighted average of 678 injuries/1000gymnasts per year and eight studies of females (n = 1,764) a rate of 306. Of 19 surveys, eight provided rates for females (n = 1,463) of 596 injuries/gymnast per year and two for males (n = 40) a rate of 1,036. In the Olympics injuries were preponderately lower limb (63%) then trunk (23%) and upper limb (14%); injury type was sprains (35%) followed by tendinopathy/arthritis/impingements (17%), contusions (10%), and fractures (7%). Five database studies provided injury location data for 274 males: averages weighted by study size were upper extremity 42.8%, lower extremity 33.6%, torso/spine 11.8%, and head/neck 4.9% and 12 studies with 843 females provided average rates for lower extremity 51%, upper extremity 30.8%, torso/spine 13% and head/neck 0.8%. Official gymnastics organizations' websites provide no readily available data about injury rates or methods of prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Studies need to collect comprehensive data for injury rates by training/competitions, gender, age, injury location/type/cause. Studies could assess whether trainers and physiotherapists monitoring gymnasts closely for injury risk would reduce injuries. Studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions in training, videotaping and performance feedback to reduce injury rates would be helpful.