RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs) are rare but require a variety of operative techniques to repair including bone anchor fixation (BAF) when tissue tears off bony structures. This study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of BAF technique for blunt TAWH repair. Bone anchor fixation and no BAF repairs were compared, hypothesizing increased hernia recurrence with BAF repair. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the WTA blunt TAWH multicenter study was performed including all patients who underwent repair of their TAWH. Patients with BAF were compared to those with no BAF with bivariate analyses. RESULTS: 176 patients underwent repair of their TAWH with 41 (23.3%) undergoing BAF. 26 (63.4%) patients had tissue fixed to bone, with 7 of those reinforced with mesh. The remaining 15 (36.6%) patients had bridging mesh anchored to bone. The BAF group had a similar age, sex, body mass index, and injury severity score compared to the no BAF group. The time to repair (1 vs 1 days, P = .158), rate of hernia recurrence (9.8% vs 12.7%, P = .786), and surgical site infection (SSI) (12.5% vs 15.6%, P = .823) were all similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This largest series to date found nearly one-quarter of TAWH repairs required BAF. Bone anchor fixation repairs had a similar rate of hernia recurrence and SSI compared to no BAF repairs, suggesting this is a reasonable option for repair of TAWH. However, future prospective studies are needed to compare specific BAF techniques and evaluate long-term outcomes including patient-centered outcomes such as pain and quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Anclas para Sutura , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Abdominal/etiología , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, the acute management of rib fractures has changed significantly. In 2021, the Chest Wall injury Society (CWIS) began recognizing centers that epitomize their mission as CWIS Collaborative Centers. The primary aim of this study was to determine the resources, surgical expertise, access to care, and institutional support that are present among centers. METHODS: A survey was performed including all CWIS Collaborative Centers evaluating the resources available at their hospital for the treatment of patients with chest wall injury. Data about each chest wall injury center care process, availability of resources, institutional support, research support, and educational offerings were recorded. RESULTS: Data were collected from 20 trauma centers resulting in an 80% response rate. These trauma centers were made up of 5 international and 15 US-based trauma centers. Eighty percent (16 of 20) have dedicated care team members for the evaluation and management of rib fractures. Twenty-five percent (5 of 20) have a dedicated rib fracture service with a separate call schedule. Staffing for chest wall injury clinics consists of a multidisciplinary team: with attending surgeons in all clinics, 80% (8 of 10) with advanced practice providers and 70% (7 of 10) with care coordinators. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have dedicated rib fracture research support, and 35% (7 of 20) have surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF)-related grants. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have marketing support, and 30% (8 of 20) have a web page support to bring awareness to their center. At these trauma centers, a median of 4 (1-9) surgeons perform SSRFs. In the majority of trauma centers, the trauma surgeons perform SSRF. CONCLUSION: Considerable similarities and differences exist within these CWIS collaborative centers. These differences in resources are hypothesis generating in determining the optimal chest wall injury center. These findings may generate several patient care and team process questions to optimize patient care, patient experience, provider satisfaction, research productivity, education, and outreach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de las Costillas , Traumatismos Torácicos , Pared Torácica , Humanos , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Pared Torácica/cirugía , Atención al Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH) occur in <1 % of trauma patients. Optimal repair techniques, such as mesh reinforcement, have not been studied in detail. We hypothesize that mesh use will be associated with increased surgical site infections (SSI) and not improve hernia recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of the Western Trauma Association blunt TAWH multicenter study was performed. Patients who underwent TAWH repair during initial hospitalization (1/2012-12/2018) were included. Mesh repair patients were compared to primary repair patients (non-mesh). A logistic regression was conducted to assess risk factors for SSI. RESULTS: 157 patients underwent TAWH repair during index hospitalization with 51 (32.5 %) having mesh repair: 24 (45.3 %) synthetic and 29 (54.7 %) biologic. Mesh patients were more commonly smokers (43.1 % vs. 22.9 %, p = 0.016) and had a larger defect size (10 vs. 6 cm, p = 0.003). Mesh patients had a higher rate of SSI (25.5 % vs. 9.5 %, p = 0.016) compared to non-mesh patients, but a similar rate of recurrence (13.7 % vs. 10.5%, p = 0.742), hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Mesh use (OR 3.66) and higher ISS (OR 1.06) were significant risk factors for SSI in a multivariable model. CONCLUSION: Mesh was used more frequently in flank TAWH and those with a larger defect size. Mesh use was associated with a higher incidence and risk of SSI but did not reduce the risk of hernia recurrence. When repairing TAWH mesh should be employed judiciously, and prospective randomized studies are needed to identify clear indications for mesh use in TAWH.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intercostal nerve cryoablation is an adjunctive measure that has demonstrated pain control, decrease in opioid consumption, and decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients who undergo surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). METHODS: SSRF patients from January 2015 to September 2021 were retrospectively compared. All patients received multimodal pain regimens post-operatively and the independent variable was intraoperative cryoablation. RESULTS: 241 patients met inclusion criteria. 51 (21%) underwent intra-operative cryoablation during SSRF and 191 (79%) did not. Patients with standard treatment consumed 9.4 more daily MME (p = 0.035), consumed 73 percent more post-operative total MME (p = 0.001), spent 1.55 times as many days in the intensive care unit (p = 0.013), and spent 3.8 times as many days on the ventilator than patients treated with cryoablation, respectively. Overall hospital LOS, operative case time, pulmonary complications, MME at discharge, and numeric pain scores at discharge were no different (all p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Intercostal nerve cryoablation during SSRF is associated with fewer ventilator days, ICU LOS, total post-operative, and daily opioid use without increasing time in the operating room or perioperative pulmonary complications.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis following blunt solid organ injury. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients was performed for patients with blunt solid organ injury between 2009-2019. Enoxaparin was initiated when patients had <1g/dl Hemoglobin decline over a 24 h period. These patients were then categorized by initiation: ≤48 h and >48 h. RESULTS: There were 653 patients: 328 (50.2%) <48 h and 325 (49.8%) ≥48 h. Twenty-nine (4.4%) developed VTE. Patients in ≥48 h group suffered more frequent VTE events (6.5% vs 2.4%, p = 0.021). Non-operative failure occurred in 6 patients (1.9%) in ≥48 h group, and 5 patients (1.5%) < 48 h group. Blood transfusion following chemophrophylaxis initiation was required in 69 (21.3%) in ≥48 h group, and 46 (14.0%) in < 48 h group, occurring similarly between groups (p=0.021). CONCLUSION: Stable hemoglobin in the first 24 h is an efficacious, objective measure that allows early initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis in solid organ injury. This practice is associated with earlier initiation of and fewer VTE events.
Asunto(s)
Tromboembolia Venosa , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Enoxaparina/uso terapéutico , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioprevención , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated risk factors for recurrence of blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH). METHODS: Twenty trauma centers identified repaired TAWH from January 2012 to December 2018. Logistic regression was used to investigate risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: TAWH were repaired in 175 patients with 21 (12.0%) known recurrences. No difference was found in location, defect size, or median time to repair between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Mesh use was not protective of recurrence. Female sex, injury severity score (ISS), emergency laparotomy (EL), and bowel resection were associated with hernia recurrence. Bowel resection remained significant in a multivariable model. CONCLUSION: Female sex, ISS, EL, and bowel resection were identified as risk factors for hernia recurrence. Mesh use and time to repair were not associated with recurrence. Surgeons should be mindful of these risk factors but could attempt acute repair in the setting of appropriate physiologic parameters.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Pared Abdominal , Hernia Abdominal , Hernia Ventral , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Femenino , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Hernia Abdominal/cirugía , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Hernia Ventral/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients presenting at tertiary care hospitals may bypass local hospitals with adequate resources. However, many tertiary care hospitals frequently operate at capacity. We hypothesized that understanding patient geographic origin could identify opportunities for enhanced system triage and optimization and be an important first step for EGS regionalization and care coordination that could potentially lead to improved utilization of resources. METHODS: We analyzed patient zip code and categorized EGS patients who were cared for at our tertiary care hospital as potentially divertible if the southern region hospital was geographically closer to their home, regional hospital admission (RHA) patients, or local admission (LA) patients if the tertiary care facility was closer. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared for RHA and LA patients. RESULTS: Of 14 714 EGS patients presenting to the tertiary care hospital, 30.2% were categorized as RHA patients. Overall, 1526 (10.4%) patients required an operation including 527 (34.5%) patients who were potentially divertible. Appendectomy and cholecystectomy comprised 66% of the operations for potentially divertible patients. Length of stay was not significantly different (P = .06) for RHA patients, but they did have lower measured short-term and long-term mortality when compared to their LA counterparts (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: EGS diagnoses and patient geocode analysis can identify opportunities to optimize regional operating room and bed utilization. Understanding where EGS patients are cared for and factors that influenced care facility will be critical for next steps in developing EGS regionalization within our system.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Humanos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes , Quirófanos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Urgencias MédicasRESUMEN
The use of vena cava filters (VCF) is a common procedure utilized in the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE), yet VCFs have some significant and known complications, such as strut penetration and migration. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PE remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. It is estimated that as many as 900,000 individuals are affected by these each year with estimates suggesting that nearly 60,000-100,000 Americans die of DVT/PE each year. Currently, the preferred treatment for DVT/PE is anticoagulation. However, if there are contraindications to anticoagulation, an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter can be placed. These filters have both therapeutic and prophylactic indications. Therapeutic indications (documented thromboembolic disease) include absolute or relative contraindications to anticoagulation, complication of anticoagulation, failure of anticoagulation, propagation/progression of DVT during therapeutic anticoagulation, PE with residual DVT in patients with further risk of PE, free-floating iliofemoral IVC thrombus, and severe cardiopulmonary disease and DVT. There are also prophylactic indications (no current thromboembolic disease) for these filters. These include severe trauma without documented PE or DVT, closed head injury, spinal cord injury, multiple long bone fractures, and patients deemed at high risk of thromboembolic disease (immobilized or intensive care unit). Interruption of the IVC with filters has long been practiced and is a procedure that can be performed on an outpatient basis. There are known complications of filter placement, which include filter migration within the vena cava and into various organs, as well as filter strut fracture. This case describes a 66-year-old woman who was found to have a filter migration and techniques that were utilized to remove this filter.
Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar , Filtros de Vena Cava , Trombosis de la Vena , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/cirugía , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volume and outcomes of Acute Care Surgery patients, and we hypothesized that inpatient mortality would increase due to COVID+ and resource constraints. METHODS: An American College of Surgeons verified Level I Trauma Center's trauma and operative emergency general surgery (EGS) registries were queried for all patients from Jan. 2019 to Dec. 2020. April 1st, 2020, was the demarcation date for pre- and during COVID pandemic. Primary outcome was inpatient mortality. RESULTS: There were 14,460 trauma and 3091 EGS patients, and month-over-month volumes of both remained similar (p > 0.05). Blunt trauma decreased by 7.4% and penetrating increased by 31%, with a concomitant 25% increase in initial operative management (p < 0.001). Despite this, trauma (3.7%) and EGS (2.9-3.0%) mortality rates remained stable which was confirmed on multivariate analysis; p > 0.05. COVID + mortality was 8.8% and 3.7% in trauma and EGS patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Acute Care Surgeons provided high quality care to trauma and EGS patients during the pandemic without allowing excess mortality despite many hardships and resource constraints.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cirugía General , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Humanos , Centros Traumatológicos , Pandemias , Urgencias Médicas , COVID-19/epidemiología , Cuidados Críticos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been correlated with improved outcomes, including decreased length of stay (LOS). We hypothesized that an SSRF consultation service would increase the frequency of SSRF and improve outcomes. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed to compare outcomes before and after implementing an SSRF service. Primary outcome was time from admission to surgery; secondary outcomes included LOS, mortality and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed at discharge. RESULTS: 1865 patients met consultation criteria and 128 patients underwent SSRF. Mortality decreased (6.3% vs. 3%) and patients were prescribed fewer MME at discharge (328 MME vs. 124 MME) following implementation. For the operative cohort, time from admission to surgery decreased by 1.72 days and ICU LOS decreased by 2.6 days. CONCLUSION: Establishment of an SSRF service provides a mechanism to maximize capture and evaluation of operative candidates, provide earlier intervention, and improve patient outcomes. Additional study to determine which elements and techniques are most beneficial is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de las Costillas , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH) occur in approximately 15,000 patients per year. Limited data are available to guide the timing of surgical intervention or the feasibility of nonoperative management. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients presenting with blunt TAWH from January 2012 through December 2018 was conducted. Patient demographic, surgical, and outcomes data were collected from 20 institutions through the Western Trauma Association Multicenter Trials Committee. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-one patients with TAWH were identified. One hundred and seventy-six (62.6%) patients underwent operative hernia repair, and 105 (37.4%) patients underwent nonoperative management. Of those undergoing surgical intervention, 157 (89.3%) were repaired during the index hospitalization, and 19 (10.7%) underwent delayed repair. Bowel injury was identified in 95 (33.8%) patients with the majority occurring with rectus and flank hernias (82.1%) as compared with lumbar hernias (15.8%). Overall hernia recurrence rate was 12.0% (n = 21). Nonoperative patients had a higher Injury Severity Score (24.4 vs. 19.4, p = 0.010), head Abbreviated Injury Scale score (1.1 vs. 0.6, p = 0.006), and mortality rate (11.4% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.031). Patients who underwent late repair had lower rates of primary fascial repair (46.4% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.012) and higher rates of mesh use (78.9% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001). Recurrence rate was not statistically different between the late and early repair groups (15.8% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.869). CONCLUSION: This report is the largest series and first multicenter study to investigate TAWHs. Bowel injury was identified in over 30% of TAWH cases indicating a significant need for immediate laparotomy. In other cases, operative management may be deferred in specific patients with other life-threatening injuries, or in stable patients with concern for bowel injury. Hernia recurrence was not different between the late and early repair groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether the implementation of a dedicated multiprofessional acute trauma health care (mPATH) team would decrease length of stay without adversely impacting outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries. The mPATH team was comprised of a physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapist, nurse navigator, social worker, advanced care provider, and physician who performed rounds on the subset of trauma patients with these injuries from the intensive care unit to discharge. METHODS: Following the formation and implementation of the mPATH team at our Level I trauma center, a retrospective cohort study was performed comparing patients in the year immediately prior to the introduction of the mPATH team (n = 60) to those in the first full year following implementation (n = 70). Demographics were collected for both groups. Inclusion criteria were Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 8 on postinjury Day 2, all paraplegic and quadriplegic patients, and patients older than 55 years with central cord syndrome who underwent tracheostomy. The primary endpoint was length of stay; secondary endpoints were time to tracheostomy, days to evaluation by occupational, physical, and speech therapy, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The median time to evaluation by occupational, physical, and speech therapy was universally decreased. Injury Severity Score was 27 in both cohorts. Time to tracheostomy and length of stay were both decreased. Thirty-day readmission and mortality rates remained unchanged. A cost savings of US $11,238 per index hospitalization was observed. CONCLUSION: In the year following the initiation of the mPATH team, we observed earlier time to occupational, physical, and speech therapist evaluation, decreased length of stay, and cost savings in severe traumatic brain and spinal cord injury patients requiring tracheostomy compared with our historical control. These benefits were observed without adversely impacting 30-day readmission or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level III.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Traqueostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/economía , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/economía , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Traqueostomía/economía , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Emergent surgeries have different causes and physiologic patient responses than the same elective surgery, many of which are due to infectious etiologies. Therefore, we hypothesized that emergency cases have a higher risk of postoperative SSI than their elective counterparts. The ACS NSQIP database was queried from 2005 to 2016 for all cholecystectomies, ventral hernia repairs, and partial colectomies to examine common emergency and elective general surgery operations. Thirty-day outcomes were compared by emergent status. Any SSI was the primary outcome. There were 863,164 surgeries: 416,497 cholecystectomies, 220,815 ventral hernia repairs, and 225,852 partial colectomies. SSIs developed in 38,865 (4.5%) patients. SSIs increased with emergencies (5.3% vs 3.6% for any SSI). Postoperative sepsis (5.8% vs 1.5%), septic shock (4.7% vs 0.6%), length of stay (8.1 vs 2.9 days), and mortality (3.6% vs 0.4%) were increased in emergent surgery; P < 0.001 for all. When controlling for age, gender, BMI, diabetes, smoking, wound classification, comorbidities, functional status, and procedure on multivariate analysis, emergency surgery (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.19) was independently associated with the development of SSI. Patients undergoing emergency general surgery experience increased rates of SSI. Patients and their families should be appropriately counseled regarding these elevated risks when consenting for emergency surgery.
Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía/normas , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/normas , Femenino , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/normas , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Traumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture (IBR) requires surgical repair. Traditionally performed via laparotomy, experience with laparoscopic bladder repair (LBR) after blunt trauma is limited. Benefits of laparoscopy include decreased length of stay (LOS), less pain, early return to work, fewer adhesions, and lower risk of incisional hernia. The aim of this series is to demonstrate the potential superiority of LBR in select trauma patients. This is a retrospective review performed of all IBR patients from 2008 to 2016. Demographics, clinical management, outcomes, and follow-up were compared between LBR and open bladder repair (OBR) patients. Twenty patients underwent OBR, and seven underwent LBR. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or Injury Severity Score. There were no deaths or reoperations in either group. Average hospital length of stay and ICU days were similar between groups. There was one patient with UTI and one with readmission in each group. There were two incisional hernias and two bowel obstructions in the OBR group, with one patient requiring operative intervention. No such complications occurred in the LBR group. LBR for traumatic IBR can be safely performed in select patients, even in those with multiple extra-abdominal injuries.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Vejiga Urinaria/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotura/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugíaRESUMEN
The role of prophylactic vena cava filters (pVCFs) in trauma patients remains controversial. After 20 years of data collection and experience, we reviewed our venous thromboembolism guideline for the efficacy of pVCFs in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE). A retrospective cohort study was performed using our Level I trauma center registry from January 1997 thru December 2016. This population was then divided by the presence of pVCFs. Univariate analysis was performed comparing the incidence of PEs, deep vein thrombosis, and mortality between those with and without a pVCF. There were 35,658 patients identified, of whom 2 per cent (n = 847) received pVCFs. The PE rate was 0.4 per cent in both groups. The deep vein thrombosis rate for pVCFs was 3.9 per cent compared with 0.6 per cent in the no-VCF group (P < 0.0001). Given that there was no difference in the rates of PEs between the cohorts, the subset of patients with a PE were analyzed by their risk factors. Only ventilator days > 3 were associated with a higher risk in the no-pVCF group (0.2 vs 1.5%, P = 0.033). pVCFs did not confer benefit reducing PE rate. In addition, despite their intended purpose, pVCFs cannot eliminate PEs in high-risk trauma patients, suggesting a lack of utility for prophylaxis in this population.
Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Filtros de Vena Cava/estadística & datos numéricos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Sistema de Registros , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidad , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Trombosis de la Vena/mortalidad , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Ventiladores Mecánicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized that a pH of <7.0 on presentation would correlate with almost universal mortality in trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on a Level I trauma center registry from 2013 to 2014. Hospital mortality was the primary outcome, which was compared by pH cohort (<7.0 or ≥7.0) using standard univariate statistics and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 593 patients included in the analysis: 66 in <7.0, 527 in ≥7.0. Mortality was 3× higher in the <7.0 pH cohort (62.1 vs. 20.3%; p < 0.0001), however there was no threshold for a pH below which there was 100% mortality. After controlling for these confounding variables, initial pH was found to be an independent predictor of inpatient mortality: pH < 7.0 (OR 6.33, 3.29-12.19; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This data indicates that while patients with severe acidosis are at increased risk for mortality, a pH < 7.0 is still recoverable in select cases.