Use and effectiveness of quitlines for smokers with diabetes: cessation and weight outcomes, Washington State Tobacco Quit Line, 2008.

INTRODUCTION: Having diabetes and smoking increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. However, cessation-related weight gain, a common side effect during quitting, can further complicate diabetes. Evidence-based telephone quitlines can support quitting but have not been studied adequately in populations with chronic diseases such as diabetes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use and effectiveness of a tobacco quitline among tobacco users with diabetes. Cessation-related weight concerns and weight gain were also assessed. METHODS: We administered a telephone-based follow-up survey to tobacco users with and without diabetes 7 months after their enrollment in a quitline. We collected and analyzed data on demographics, tobacco use, dieting, weight concern, quitting success (7- and 30-day point prevalence), and weight gain. We computed summary statistics for descriptive data, χ(2) and t tests for bivariate comparisons, and multivariable analyses to determine correlates of cessation. RESULTS: Tobacco users with diabetes used the quitline in a greater proportion than they were represented in the general population. Quit rates for those with and without diabetes did not differ significantly (24.3% vs 22.5%). No significant differences existed between groups for weight gain at follow-up, regardless of quit status. However, participants with diabetes reported more weight gain in previous quit attempts (34.2% vs 22.4% gained >20 lbs, P = .03). Weight concern was a significant correlate of continued smoking, regardless of diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that quitlines are effective for participants with diabetes, but tailored interventions that address weight concerns during cessation are needed.

Results from an outreach program for health systems change in tobacco cessation.

INTRODUCTION: Washington state has experienced a dramatic reduction in adult smoking prevalence (22.4% in 1999 to 14.8% in 2010) because of a comprehensive tobacco control effort that includes a proactive health professional education and an outreach program. The outreach program uses academic detailing and online tools to increase routine identification and treatment of tobacco users. This article summarizes outcomes from the first 2 years of the program. METHOD: Outcome measures include the frequency of contact with providers, changes in the percentage of callers reporting that they had heard about the Quit Line from a health professional, and changes in provider Quit Line fax referrals. Data are compared between Initial, Expanded, and Never Outreach Counties. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2010, a total of 629 unique health care organizations and 3,989 unique health professionals received services. Between 2007 and 2010, the ratio of health professional "How Heard Abouts" to total Quit Line registrations increased by 142.6% and 95.4% in Initial and Expanded Outreach Counties, whereas Never Outreach Counties showed an 11.2% increase. Fax referrals to the Quit Line increased by 132% and 232% in Initial and Expanded Outreach Counties whereas they declined by 39% in Never Outreach Counties. DISCUSSION: Results suggests that health professionals can be an important and reliable source of referrals to a treatment resource such as a tobacco quitline. A field-based outreach program using academic detailing principles can be used to increase treatment referrals and holds application for other chronic disease areas and quality improvement programs.