Next-Generation Sequencing Somatic and Germline Assay Troubleshooting Guide Derived From Proficiency Testing Data.

CONTEXT.­: Next-generation sequencing-based assays are increasingly used in clinical molecular laboratories to detect somatic variants in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies and to detect constitutional variants. Proficiency testing data are potential sources of information about challenges in performing these assays. OBJECTIVE.­: To examine the most common sources of unacceptable results from the College of American Pathologists Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics, Hematological Malignancies, Solid Tumor, and Germline surveys and provide recommendations on how to avoid these pitfalls and improve performance. DESIGN.­: The College of American Pathologists next-generation sequencing somatic and germline proficiency testing survey results from 2016 to 2019 were analyzed to identify the most common causes of unacceptable results. RESULTS.­: On somatic and germline proficiency testing surveys, 95.9% (18 815/19 623) and 97.8% (33 890/34 641) of all variants were correctly identified, respectively. The most common causes of unacceptable results related to sequencing were false-negative errors in genomic regions that were difficult to sequence because of high GC content. False-positive errors occurred in the context of homopolymers and pseudogenes. Recurrent errors in variant annotation were seen for dinucleotide and duplication variants and included unacceptable transcript selection and outdated variant nomenclature. A small percentage of preanalytic or postanalytic errors were attributed to specimen swaps and transcription errors. CONCLUSIONS.­: Laboratories demonstrate overall excellent performance for detecting variants in both somatic and germline proficiency testing surveys. Proficiency testing survey results highlight infrequent, but recurrent, analytic and nonanalytic challenges in performing next- generation sequencing-based assays and point to remedies to help laboratories improve performance.

Cutaneous intralymphatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma arising in a patient with multiple rounds of breast implants.

Primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and breast implant-associated ALCL (BIA-ALCL) are rare subtypes of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative ALCLs originating from skin and breast implants, respectively. Herein, we report a unique case of cutaneous ALK-negative ALCL occurring in the skin of left medial breast from a patient with multiple rounds of bilateral breast implants and a history of breast carcinoma. The lymphoma cells are entirely confined to the lymphatic channels in the dermis, and the patient has no other areas of skin abnormality, no lymphadenopathy, peri-implant fluid accumulation, or masses from the bilateral capsules of implants. The differential diagnosis and its relationship with breast implants are further explored.

A Primer on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy: What Does It Mean for Pathologists?

CONTEXT.­: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) technology has shown great promise in both clinical and preclinical models in mediating potent and specific antitumor activity. With the advent of US Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR-T therapies for B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, CAR-T therapy is poised to become part of mainstream clinical practice. OBJECTIVE.­: To educate pathologists on CAR-T and chimeric antigen receptor-derived cellular therapy, provide a better understanding of their role in this process, explain important regulatory aspects of CAR-T therapy, and advocate for pathologist involvement in the delivery and monitoring of chimeric antigen receptor-based treatments. Much of the focus of this article addresses US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies; however, more general issues and future perspectives are considered for therapies in development. DESIGN.­: A CAR-T workgroup, facilitated by the College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee and consisting of pathologists of various backgrounds, was convened to develop a summary guidance paper for the College of American Pathologists Council on Scientific Affairs. RESULTS.­: The workgroup identified gaps in pathologists' knowledge of CAR-T therapy, including uncertainty in the role of the clinical laboratory in supporting CAR-T therapy. The workgroup considered these issues and summarized the findings to assist pathologists to become stakeholders in CAR-T therapy administration. CONCLUSIONS.­: This manuscript serves to both educate pathologists on CAR-T therapy and serve as a point of initial discussions in areas of CAR-T science, clinical therapy, and regulatory issues as CAR-T therapies continue to be introduced into clinical practice.

Comparison of commonly used solid tumor targeted gene sequencing panels for estimating tumor mutation burden shows analytical and prognostic concordance within the cancer genome atlas cohort.

BACKGROUND: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a biomarker frequently reported by clinical laboratories, which is derived by quantifying of the number of single nucleotide or indel variants (mutations) identified by next-generation sequencing of tumors. TMB values can inform prognosis or predict the response of a patient's tumor to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Methods for the calculation of TMB are not standardized between laboratories, with significant variables being the gene content of the panels sequenced and the inclusion or exclusion of synonymous variants in the calculations. The impact of these methodological differences has not been investigated and the concordance of reported TMB values between laboratories is unknown. METHODS: Sequence variant lists from more than 9000 tumors of various types were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Variant lists were filtered to include only appropriate variant types (ie, non-synonymous only or synonymous and non-synonymous variants) within the genes found in five commonly used targeted solid tumor gene panels as well as an in-house gene panel. Calculated TMB was paired with corresponding overall survival (OS) data of each patient. RESULTS: Regression analysis indicates high concordance of TMB as derived from the examined panels. TMB derived from panels was consistently and significantly lower than that derived from a whole exome. TMB, as derived from whole exome or the examined panels, showed a significant correlation with OS in the examined data. CONCLUSIONS: TMB derived from the examined gene panels was analytically equivalent between panels, but not between panels and whole-exome sequencing. Correlation between TMB and OS is significant if TMB method-specific cut-offs are used. These results suggest that TMB values, as derived from the gene panels examined, are analytically and prognostically equivalent.

PREVALENCE OF MISMATCH REPAIR GENE MUTATIONS IN UVEAL MELANOMA.

PURPOSE: Uveal melanomas are associated with characteristic genetic changes. Germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes and microsatellite instability have been implicated in the development of numerous malignant neoplasms such as colon and ovarian cancers. The frequency of MMR defects in uveal melanomas has yet to be determined. METHODS: Here, we analyzed the frequency of MMR gene mutations in uveal melanoma specimens from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TGCA), and the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). RESULTS: We identified only two mutations in a MMR gene: one premature stop codon in the PMS gene within the UCSD cohort (0.5% frequency) and one in-frame deletion in MSH3 within the COSMIC database (0.8% frequency). We report copy number variation of MLH1 in monosomy 3 and show decreased mRNA expression of MLH1 in uveal melanoma specimens with monosomy 3. Expression levels of MLH1 were not found to correlate with the observed number of total mutations. CONCLUSION: Overall, we show that mutations in MMR genes in uveal melanoma specimens are exceedingly rare, and although one copy of MLH1 is lost in monosomy 3, it does not seem to have pathologic consequences in uveal melanoma pathogenesis.

Assessment of laboratories offering cell-free (cf) DNA screening for Down syndrome: results of the 2018 College of American Pathology External Educational Exercises.

PURPOSE: Summarize and interpret results from exercises distributed to laboratories offering cell-free (cf) DNA screening for Down syndrome. METHODS: The College of American Pathologists distributed three patient-derived plasma specimens twice in 2018. Sequencing platforms, test methods, results, and responses to supplemental questions were collected. Results were not graded but discrepancies were identified. RESULTS: Sixty-five laboratories from six continents enrolled; six provided no results. The most common methodology was shotgun/genome sequencing (39/56, 70%). Overall, 40% of the gestational or maternal age responses were incorrect but 45% of the errors were corrected by the next distribution. Fetal fractions from 54 responding laboratories generally agreed with the intended response. No genotyping errors occurred (40/40 for trisomy 21 and 226/226 for euploid challenges) but 10 additional tests failed (3.6%). All 213 fetal sex calls were correct. Participants reported their clinical text for a Down syndrome screen positive test; 39% were classified as inadequate or misleading. CONCLUSION: Patient-derived materials are suitable for all enrolled technologies/methodologies, but collecting material is challenging. Suggested clinical text includes the terms "screen positive" and "screen negative." Overall, laboratories performed well. Future efforts will focus on potential manufactured samples, clarifying results reporting and including additional chromosome abnormalities.

Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Interrater Agreement of Variant Classification Based on the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer.

This multi-institutional study was undertaken to evaluate interrater reliability of the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines for interpretation and reporting of oncology sequence variants and to assess current practices and perceptions surrounding these guidelines. Fifty-one variants were distributed to 20 participants from 10 institutions for classification using the new guidelines. Agreement was assessed using chance-corrected agreement (Cohen κ). κ was 0.35. To evaluate if data sharing could help resolve disagreements, a summary of variant classifications and additional information about each variant were distributed to all participants. κ improved to 0.7 after the original classifications were revised. Participants were invited to take a web-based survey regarding their perceptions of the guidelines. Only 20% (n = 3) of the survey respondents had prior experience with the guidelines in clinical practice. The main perceived barriers to guideline implementation included the complexity of the guidelines, discordance between clinical actionability and pathobiologic relevance, lack of familiarity with the new classifications, and uncertainty when applying criteria to potential germline variants. This study demonstrates noteworthy discordances between pathologists for variant classification in solid tumors when using the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. These findings highlight potential areas for clarification/refinement before mainstream clinical adoption.

GNAQ and PMS1 Mutations Associated with Uveal Melanoma, Ocular Surface Melanosis, and Nevus of Ota.

G protein mutations are common in uveal melanomas, and the vast majority target amino acid residue Q209 in either GNAQ or GNA11. The GNAQ R183Q mutation is found in a small fraction of uveal melanomas. We report a patient with an unusual presentation of uveal melanoma arising at an early age in the setting of congenital skin and ocular surface melanosis. A 34-year-old Hispanic female with congenital bilateral nevus of Ota and ocular surface melanosis presented with progressive loss of visual acuity and was found to have a juxtapapillary uveal melanoma. She was treated with brachytherapy, but the tumor relapsed. She underwent enucleation that revealed mixed spindle and epithelioid uveal melanoma cells with no extraocular or lymphovascular spread. Next-generation sequencing performed on DNA isolated from the enucleation specimen identified a GNAQ R183Q mutation and a PMS1 truncation mutation. Cytogenetic profiling revealed no monosomy 3. These findings raise the possibility that uveal melanomas bearing G protein R183 mutations may have distinct clinicopathologic profiles compared to those with Q209 mutations. Furthermore, this is the first reported case of a mutation in the mismatch repair gene PMS1 associated with uveal melanoma.

Library Preparation Using FFPE-Derived Tumor DNA for High-Throughput Hybridization-Based Targeted or Exome Sequencing.

The use of next generation sequencing (NGS) to profile tumor genomes for the presence of diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutically targetable variants is revolutionizing the practice of oncology and is increasingly utilized in clinical laboratory settings. Beginning with the isolation of DNA of sufficient quality and quantity from a tumor specimen, the creation of a library of genomic fragments representing the portion of the genome of interest, ranging from a few genes to the entire exome, is the first step required in the sequencing process. Fixed tumor tissue in the form of a tissue block is the most commonly encountered specimen for analysis in a clinical setting. Special precautions must be employed to ensure that material isolated from these specimens is suitable for use. Once DNA is obtained, one of the most commonly used methods for library preparation involves fluid phase hybridization-based capture of the genomic regions to be interrogated. This multistep process involves fragmentation of the DNA to a uniform size distribution, ligating adapter molecules which are labeled with specific barcodes to enable downstream sequencing and sample identification, and the use of a multiplexed pool of biotinylated single stranded RNA or DNA hybridization probes to recognize and capture the targeted genomic regions. Fragments which are not specifically captured during the hybridization process are removed via a series of wash steps, and a final low cycle amplification is used to prepare the library of captured fragments for sequencing. In this chapter, we provide a step-by-step guide to the preparation of fixed tissue-derived DNA libraries for sequencing via the Illumina process and highlight some of the precautions necessary when working with these types of specimens.

Annotation of Variant Data from High-Throughput DNA Sequencing from Tumor Specimens: Filtering Strategies to Identify Driver Mutations.

The use of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled the analysis of a wide spectrum of somatic mutations in tumors. This analysis can be carried out using various strategies including the use of small panels of focused, clinically actionable genes, large panels of cancer-related genes, whole exomes, and the entire genome. One of the main goals in these analyses is to identify key mutations in these tumors that drive the oncogenic process. Depending on the gene, mutations can have altering effects, such as loss of function mutations in tumor suppressor genes, to mutations that activate genes such as kinases involved with cell cycle progression or proliferation. Once the sequencing process is complete, and the alignment of the large collection of reads to the reference genome and variant calling has been carried out, one is left with a large collection of variants. The challenge then becomes assigning where the variant resides in the genome with respect to coding regions, splice site regions, regulatory regions, and what potential functional effect these variants may have on the resulting protein. Other helpful information includes determining if the variant has been identified before, and if so, the tumor type associated with the variant. In addition, if the tumor profiling experiment is not conducted with a matched specimen representing the inherited genome, various tools are helpful to determine if the variant is likely to be an inherited polymorphism or a somatic event. In this chapter, we review the various tools available for annotating variants to assist in filtering down and prioritizing the hundreds to thousands of variants down to the key variants likely to be driver mutations and relevant to the tumor being profiled.

miR-125a and miR-34a expression predicts Richter syndrome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia. It is characterized by the accumulation of CD19+/CD5+ lymphocytes and can have variable outcomes. Richter syndrome (RS) is a lethal complication in CLL patients that results in aggressive B-cell lymphomas, and there are no tests to predict its occurrence. Because alterations in microRNA expression can predict the development and progression of several cancers, we investigated whether dysregulation of specific microRNAs can predict RS in CLL patients. Thus, we compared microRNA expression levels in samples from 49 CLL patients who later developed RS with samples from 59 CLL patients who did not. We found that high expression of miR-125a-5p or low expression of miR -34a-5p can predict ∼50% of RS with a false positive rate of ∼9%. We found that CLL patients predicted to develop RS show either an increase of miR-125a-5p expression (∼20-fold) or a decrease of miR-34a-5p expression (∼21-fold) compared with CLL patients that are not predicted to develop RS. Thus, miR-125a-5p and miR-34a-5p can be valuable predictor markers of RS and have the potential to provide physicians with information that can indicate the best therapeutic strategy for CLL patients.

Gastric Medullary Carcinoma with Sporadic Mismatch Repair Deficiency and a TP53 R273C Mutation: An Unusual Case with Wild-Type BRAF.

Medullary carcinoma has long been recognized as a subtype of colorectal cancer associated with microsatellite instability and Lynch syndrome. Gastric medullary carcinoma is a very rare neoplasm. We report a 67-year-old male who presented with a solitary gastric mass. Total gastrectomy revealed a well-demarcated, poorly differentiated carcinoma with an organoid growth pattern, pushing borders, and abundant peritumoral lymphocytic response. The prior cytology was cellular with immunohistochemical panel consistent with upper gastrointestinal/pancreaticobiliary origin. Overall, the histopathologic findings were consistent with gastric medullary carcinoma. A mismatch repair panel revealed a mismatch repair protein deficient tumor with loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression. BRAF V600E immunostain (VE1) and BRAF molecular testing were negative, indicating a wild-type gene. Tumor sequencing of MLH1 demonstrated a wild-type gene, while our molecular panel identified TP53 c.817C>T (p.R273C) mutation. These findings were compatible with a sporadic tumor. Given that morphologically identical medullary tumors often occur in Lynch syndrome, it is possible that mismatch repair loss is an early event in sporadic tumors with p53 mutation being a late event. Despite having wild-type BRAF, this tumor is sporadic and unrelated to Lynch syndrome. This case report demonstrates that coordinate ancillary studies are needed to resolve sporadic versus hereditary rare tumors.

Duodenal-Jejunal Flexure GI Stromal Tumor Frequently Heralds Somatic NF1 and Notch Pathway Mutations.

PURPOSE: GI stromal tumors (GISTs) are commonly associated with somatic mutations in KIT and PDGFRA. However, a subset arises from mutations in NF1, most commonly associated with neurofibromatosis type 1. We define the anatomic distribution of NF1 alterations in GIST. METHODS: We describe the demographic/clinicopathologic features of 177 patients from two institutions whose GISTs underwent next-generation sequencing of ≥315 cancer-related genes. RESULTS: We initially identified six (9.7%) of 62 GISTs with NF1 genomic alterations from the first cohort. Of these six patients, five (83.3%) had unifocal tumors at the duodenal-jejunal flexure (DJF). Two additional patients with DJF GISTs had non-NF1 (KIT and BRAF) genomic alterations. After excluding one DJF GIST with an NF1 single nucleotide polymorphism, four (57.1%) of seven sequenced DJF tumors demonstrated deleterious NF1 alterations, whereas only one (1.8%) of 55 sequenced non-DJF GISTs had a deleterious NF1 somatic mutation (P < .001). One patient with DJF GIST had a germline NF1 variant that was associated with incomplete penetrance of clinical neurofibromatosis type 1 features along with a somatic NF1 mutation. Of the five DJF GISTs with any NF1 alteration, three (60%) had KIT mutations, and three (60%) had Notch pathway mutations (NOTCH2, MAML2, CDC73). We validated these findings in a second cohort of 115 GISTs, where two (40%) of five unifocal NF1-mutated GISTs arose at the DJF, and one of these also had a Notch pathway mutation (EP300). CONCLUSION: Broad genomic profiling of adult GISTs has revealed that NF1 alterations are enriched in DJF GISTs. These tumors also may harbor concurrent activating KIT and/or inactivating Notch pathway mutations. In some cases, germline NF1 genetic testing may be appropriate for patients with DJF GISTs.

A Report on Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Inherited Retinal Dystrophies by Targeted Genetic Analyses.

AIM: To test the utility of targeted sequencing as a method of clinical molecular testing in patients diagnosed with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD). METHODS: After genetic counseling, peripheral blood was drawn from 188 probands and 36 carriers of IRD. Single gene testing was performed on each patient in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certified laboratory. DNA was isolated, and all exons in the gene of interest were analyzed along with 20 base pairs of flanking intronic sequence. Genetic testing was most often performed on ABCA4, CTRP5, ELOV4, BEST1, CRB1, and PRPH2. Pathogenicity of novel sequence changes was predicted by PolyPhen2 and sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT). RESULTS: Of the 225 genetic tests performed, 150 were for recessive IRD, and 75 were for dominant IRD. A positive molecular diagnosis was made in 70 (59%) of probands with recessive IRD and 19 (26%) probands with dominant IRD. Analysis confirmed 12 (34%) of individuals as carriers of familial mutations associated with IRD. Thirty-two novel variants were identified; among these, 17 sequence changes in four genes were predicted to be possibly or probably damaging including: ABCA4 (14), BEST1 (2), PRPH2 (1), and TIMP3 (1). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted analysis of clinically suspected genes in 225 subjects resulted in a positive molecular diagnosis in 26% of patients with dominant IRD and 59% of patients with recessive IRD. Novel damaging mutations were identified in four genes. Single gene screening is not an ideal method for diagnostic testing given the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity among IRD cases. High-throughput sequencing of all genes associated with retinal degeneration may be more efficient for molecular diagnosis.

Erdheim-Chester disease with novel gene mutations discovered as an incidental finding in explanted liver of a patient with hepatitis C cirrhosis: A case report and literature review.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare form of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterized by xanthogranulomatous infiltration of foamy histiocytes frequently involving bone and other organ systems. We herein report a unique case of ECD discovered incidentally in an explanted liver in a 65-year-old male with end-stage liver disease secondary to hepatitis C cirrhosis. Histological examination and immunohistochemical studies in the explanted liver revealed prominent foamy histiocytes that were CD68 positive, but CD1a and S100 negative. Mutational hotspot analysis of the explanted liver using a panel of 47 most common cancer-related genes performed by next generation sequencing (NGS) revealed likely somatic mutations in the PDGFRA, PTEN, and HNF1A genes, but no BRAF codon 600 mutations were detected. The bone marrow showed similar findings as in the liver. Whole body PET and bone scans demonstrated increased heterogeneous uptake in bilateral humeral and femoral diaphysis, most compatible with ECD. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of ECD that involves mainly bone marrow and liver with novel genomic alterations. Our case highlights the diversity and complexity of this disease entity and the importance of multi-modality approach integrating clinical and radiologic features with histopathologic and molecular/genomic findings.

Nodal involvement by marginal zone B-cell lymphoma harboring t(14;22)(q32;q11) involving immunoglobulin heavy chain and light chain lambda as the sole karyotypically recognizable abnormality in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Recurrent non-random balanced chromosomal translocation, usually involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene or an immunoglobulin light chain gene and a proto-oncogene, which results in the overexpression of the latter under the control of an enhancer or promoter of the former, is a hallmark of many types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) of B-cell origin. However, translocations between IgH and the immunoglobulin (Ig) light chain lambda gene (IgL), namely, a t(14;22)(q32;q11), have rarely been described in B-cell NHL. Herein we report the first case of marginal zone B-cell lymphoma harboring a t(14;22)(q32;q11) as its sole genetic abnormality in a patient with a 12-year history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Other interesting findings of this case include: 1) the neoplastic B-cells lack expression of both surface and cytoplasmic Ig light chain as revealed by flow cytometry and 2) monoclonal rearrangement of Ig light chain kappa (IgK) only due to k-deleting element (kde) recombination event. This case illustrates the necessity of utilizing a multi-modality approach in the diagnosis of B-cell NHL.