Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(6): 824-829, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538477

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. There remains an active debate over the effect of gastrointestinal (GI) reconstruction techniques, such as antecolic (AC) or transmesocolic (TMC) reconstruction, on DGE rates. This study compared the rates of DGE between AC reconstruction and TMC reconstruction after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and classic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained pancreatic surgery database in a single, high-volume center. Demographic, perioperative, and surgical outcome data were recorded from patients who underwent a PD or PPPD between 2013 and 2021. DGE grades were classified using the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgeons (ISGPS) criteria. Postoperatively, all patients were managed using an accelerated Whipple recovery protocol. RESULTS: A total of 824 patients were assessed, with 303 patients undergoing AC reconstruction and 521 patients undergoing TMC reconstruction. The risk of DGE was significantly greater in patients who received an AC reconstruction than in patients who received a TMC reconstruction (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.07-2.15; P < .05). In addition, AC reconstruction was shown to have a greater incidence of severe DGE (ISGPS grades B or C) than TMC reconstruction, with approximately a 2-fold increase in severe DGE (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.10-3.45; P < .05). Logistic regression and propensity score matching have found increased DGE incidence with AC reconstruction (OR: 1.69 and 1.73, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the correlation between GI reconstruction methods and DGE remains a subject of ongoing debate, our study indicated that TMC reconstruction may be superior to AC reconstruction in minimizing the development and severity of DGE for patients after PD.


Asunto(s)
Gastroparesia , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Gastroparesia/etiología , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Vaciamiento Gástrico , Píloro/cirugía , Colon/cirugía
2.
Anesth Analg ; 138(5): 1043-1051, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190344

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is not advised for patients with severe renal impairment, but has been shown in a variety of other populations to be superior to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The objective of this study was to determine if reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex versus reversal of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine results in a faster return to a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) ≥90% in patients with severe renal impairment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled trial at a large county hospital. A total of 49 patients were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included patients age ≥18, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III and IV, with a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, undergoing general anesthesia with expected surgical duration ≥2 hours and necessitating neuromuscular blockade. Subjects received either cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg or rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg for induction of anesthesia to facilitate tracheal intubation. Subjects were kept at moderate neuromuscular blockade during surgery and received either 2 mg/kg sugammadex or 50 µg/kg neostigmine with 10 µg/kg glycopyrrolate for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed with electromyography (TwitchView), and the TOFR was recorded every minute after administration of the reversal agent. The time from administration of neuromuscular reversal until the patient reached a TOFR ≥90% was recorded as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The mean time to recovery of TOFR ≥90% was significantly faster with sugammadex at 3.5 (±1.6) min compared with neostigmine at 14.8 (±6.1) min ( P < .0001; mean difference, 11.3 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-13.5 minutes). There were no major adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe renal impairment, neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium followed by reversal with sugammadex provides a significantly faster return of neuromuscular function compared to cisatracurium and neostigmine, without any major adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/efectos adversos , Neostigmina/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Rocuronio , Sugammadex , Adulto
3.
J Patient Saf ; 20(1): 45-47, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37922239

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: The rise of the #TheatreCapChallenge in 2017, which saw participants donning surgical caps labeled with their names and roles, promises to be a seemingly simple intervention aimed at improving operating theater communication and patient safety. This narrative review strives to expand upon the perceived and studied benefits of this intervention and address potential concerns that have arisen with the use of these name and role-labeled surgical caps.


Asunto(s)
Quirófanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente , Comunicación
4.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 47(7): 408-413, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35609890

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with refractory chronic migraine have poor quality of life. Intravenous infusions are indicated to rapidly 'break the cycle' of pain. Lidocaine infusions may be effective but evidence is limited. METHODS: The records of 832 hospital admissions involving continuous multiday lidocaine infusions for migraine were reviewed. All patients met criteria for refractory chronic migraine. During hospitalization, patients received additional migraine medications including ketorolac, magnesium, dihydroergotamine, methylprednisolone, and neuroleptics. The primary outcome was change in headache pain from baseline to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes measured at the post-discharge office visit (25-65 days after treatment) included headache pain and the number of headache days, and percentage of sustained responders. Percentage of acute responders, plasma lidocaine levels, and adverse drug effects were also determined. RESULTS: In total, 609 patient admissions met criteria. The mean age was 46±14 years; 81.1% were female. Median pain rating decreased from baseline of 7.0 (5.0-8.0) to 1.0 (0.0-3.0) at end of hospitalization (p<0.001); 87.8% of patients were acute responders. Average pain (N=261) remained below baseline at office visit 1 (5.5 (4.0-7.0); p<0.001). Forty-three percent of patients were sustained responders at 1 month. Headache days (N=266) decreased from 26.8±3.9 at baseline to 22.5±8.3 at the post-discharge office visit (p<0.001). Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse drug effects and all were mild. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine infusions may be associated with short-term and medium-term pain relief in refractory chronic migraine. Prospective studies should confirm these results.


Asunto(s)
Lidocaína , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores , Femenino , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Lidocaína/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Saudi J Anaesth ; 16(1): 76-81, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35261593

RESUMEN

Airway management in patients with obesity remains a complex and evolving topic that is becoming more pertinent given the increasing prevalence of obesity and bariatric surgery worldwide. Obesity is associated with increased morbidity and mortality secondary to anesthetic complications, especially related to airway management. Preoperative assessment is especially vital for the bariatric patient so that potential predictors for a difficult airway can be identified. There are several airway management strategies and techniques for the bariatric population that may help reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. This review aims to discuss assessment of the airway, ideal patient positioning, intubation techniques and devices, apneic oxygenation, optimal ventilation strategies, and extubation and post-anesthesia care.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...