Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.

It is not clear which non-invasive method is most effective for predicting strength of the proximal femur in those at highest risk of fracture. The primary aim of this study was to compare the abilities of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived aBMD, quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-derived density and volume measures, and finite element analysis (FEA)-estimated strength to predict femoral failure load. We also evaluated the contribution of cortical and trabecular bone measurements to proximal femur strength. We obtained 76 human cadaveric proximal femurs (50 women and 26 men; age 74±8.8years), performed imaging with DXA and QCT, and mechanically tested the femurs to failure in a sideways fall configuration at a high loading rate. Linear regression analysis was used to construct the predictive model between imaging outcomes and experimentally-measured femoral strength for each method. To compare the performance of each method we used 3-fold cross validation repeated 10 times. The bone strength estimated by QCT-based FEA predicted femoral failure load (R2adj=0.78, 95%CI 0.76-0.80; RMSE=896N, 95%CI 830-961) significantly better than femoral neck aBMD by DXA (R2adj=0.69, 95%CI 0.66-0.72; RMSE=1011N, 95%CI 952-1069) and the QCT-based model (R2adj=0.73, 95%CI 0.71-0.75; RMSE=932N, 95%CI 879-985). Both cortical and trabecular bone contribute to femoral strength, the contribution of cortical bone being higher in femurs with lower trabecular bone density. These findings have implications for optimizing clinical approaches to assess hip fracture risk. In addition, our findings provide new insights that will assist in interpretation of the effects of osteoporosis treatments that preferentially impact cortical versus trabecular bone.

Comparison of hip fracture risk prediction by femoral aBMD to experimentally measured factor of risk.

Areal BMD (aBMD) derived from DXA is currently the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis. A biomechanical approach to fracture risk assessment comparing the ratio of applied load to bone strength, termed the factor of risk (Phi), may be useful to better identify patients at risk for fracture. We obtained 73 human cadaveric femurs (48 women and 25 men, aged 74.2+/-8.7 years, range 55-98 years), measured femoral neck (FN) aBMD by DXA, and mechanically tested the femurs to failure in a sideways fall configuration. The force applied to the hip during a sideways fall was estimated from height and weight, and accounted for trochanteric soft tissue thickness. Compared to men, women had significantly lower FN aBMD and femoral strength, and tended to have higher factor of risk for hip fracture Phi. Fifty-three of 54 (98%) specimens that had a FN aBMD T-score below -2.5 also had a Phi>1. However, 10/19 (53%) specimens with FN aBMD T-score above -2.5 also had Phi>1. These data indicate that whereas an aBMD-based diagnosis of osteoporosis is highly associated with fracture risk as assessed by the factor of risk, about 50% of individuals not designated as osteoporotic by aBMD testing would be at high risk for hip fracture should they experience a sideways fall. These findings strongly support the investigation of new biomechanically-based methods of fracture risk prediction.

Contribution of trochanteric soft tissues to fall force estimates, the factor of risk, and prediction of hip fracture risk.

UNLABELLED: We compared trochanteric soft tissue thickness, femoral aBMD, and the ratio of fall force to femoral strength (i.e., factor of risk) in 21 postmenopausal women with incident hip fracture and 42 age-matched controls. Reduced trochanteric soft tissue thickness, low femoral aBMD, and increased ratio of fall force to femoral strength (i.e., factor of risk) were associated with increased risk of hip fracture. INTRODUCTION: The contribution of trochanteric soft tissue thickness to hip fracture risk is incompletely understood. A biomechanical approach to assessing hip fracture risk that compares forces applied to the hip during a sideways fall to femoral strength may by improved by incorporating the force-attenuating effects of trochanteric soft tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the relationship between femoral areal BMD (aBMD) and femoral failure load in 49 human cadaveric specimens, 53-99 yr of age. We compared femoral aBMD, trochanteric soft tissue thickness, and the ratio of fall forces to bone strength (i.e., the factor of risk for hip fracture, phi), before and after accounting for the force-attenuating properties of trochanteric soft tissue in 21 postmenopausal women with incident hip fracture and 42 age-matched controls. RESULTS: Femoral aBMD correlated strongly with femoral failure load (r2 = 0.73-0.83). Age, height, and weight did not differ; however, women with hip fracture had lower total femur aBMD (OR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.19-3.56) and trochanteric soft tissue thickness (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.01, 3.31). Incorporation of trochanteric soft tissue thickness measurements reduced the estimates of fall forces by approximately 50%. After accounting for force-attenuating properties of trochanteric soft tissue, the ratio of fall forces to femoral strength was 50% higher in cases than controls (0.92 +/- 0.44 versus 0.65 +/- 0.50, respectively; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to compute a biomechanically based estimate of hip fracture risk by combining estimates of femoral strength based on an empirical relationship between femoral aBMD and bone strength in cadaveric femora, along with estimates of loads applied to the hip during a sideways fall that account for thickness of trochanteric soft tissues. Our findings suggest that trochanteric soft tissue thickness may influence hip fracture risk by attenuating forces applied to the femur during a sideways fall and provide rationale for developing improved measurements of trochanteric soft tissue and for studying a larger cohort to determine whether trochanteric soft tissue thickness contributes to hip fracture risk independently of aBMD.