Patients Undergoing Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Have Less Pain and Require Fewer Opioid Pain Medications Compared to Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Early Postoperative Period: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Recovery after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has many similarities; however, recently surgeons have suggested patients undergoing rTSA have a less difficult postoperative course with less pain compared with aTSA patients. Given the heightened awareness to postoperative pain control and opioid consumption, as well as the expanding indications for rTSA, we sought to determine the differences in pain and opioid consumption between aTSA and rTSA patients in a 12-week postoperative period. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who underwent a primary aTSA or rTSA from January 2013 to April 2018 at a single institution. Patients with recorded visual analog scale (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were included for analysis. Revision arthroplasties were excluded. VAS scores were recorded preoperatively and at standard 2-week, 6-week, and 12-week postoperative time points. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, except where Bonferroni corrections were applied. RESULTS: A total of 690 patients underwent TSA (278 aTSA, 412 rTSA). Preoperatively, aTSA and rTSA patient groups had similar VAS scores (6 vs 6, P = 0.38). Postoperatively, the aTSA group had a higher VAS at the 6-week visit, compared with rTSA patients (2.8 vs 2.2, P = 0.003). aTSA patients remained on opioids at a higher rate at the 2-week (62.4% vs 45.6%, P = < 0.001) time period. aTSA patients needed more opioid prescription refills before the 2-week (61.7% vs 45.5%, P = <0.001) and 6-week (40.4% vs 30.7%, P = 0.01) follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar preoperative VAS and rates of preoperative opioid use, aTSA patients required more opioid medication refills and remained on opioids for a longer duration in the early postoperative period to achieve similar postoperative pain control as indicated by similar VAS. This study suggests that the recovery from rTSA is less difficult compared with aTSA as indicated by VAS and opioid consumption.

Outpatient versus inpatient shoulder arthroplasty outcomes using an updated patient-selection algorithm: minimum two-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated the safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), with the majority of studies focusing on 90-day outcomes and complications. Patient selection algorithms have helped appropriately choose patients for an outpatient TSA setting. This study aimed to determine the outcomes of TSA between outpatient and inpatient cohorts with at least a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients older than 18 years who underwent a TSA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up in either an inpatient or outpatient setting. Using a previously published outpatient TSA patient-selection algorithm, patients were allocated into three groups: outpatient, inpatient due to insurance requirements, and inpatient due to not meeting algorithm criteria. Outcomes evaluated included visual analog scale (VAS) pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, range of motion (ROM), strength, complications, re-admissions, and re-operations. Analysis was performed between the outpatient and inpatient groups to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of outpatient TSA with midterm follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 779 TSA were included in this study, allocated into the outpatient (N = 108), inpatient due to insurance (N = 349), and inpatient due to algorithm (N = 322). The average age between these groups was significantly different (59.4 ± 7.4, 66.5 ± 7.5, and 72.5 ± 8.7, respectively; P < 0.0001). All patient groups demonstrated significant improvements in preoperative to final patient-outcomes scores, ROM, and strength. Analysis between cohorts showed similar final follow-up outcome scores, ROM, and strength, with few significant differences that are likely not clinically different, regardless of surgical location, insurance status, or meeting patient-selection algorithm. Complications, reoperations, and readmissions between all three groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: This study reaffirms prior short-term follow-up literature. Transitioning appropriate patients to outpatient TSA results in similar outcomes and complications compared to inpatient cohorts with mid-term follow-up.

Outpatient vs. inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: complication rates, clinical outcomes, and eligibility parameters.

Background: Improvements in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), fast-track surgery, multimodal anesthesia, and rehabilitation protocols have opened up the possibility of outpatient care that is now routinely practiced at our European institution. The first objective of this study was to define the TSA outpatient population and to verify that outpatient management of TSA does not increase the risk of complications. The second objective was to determine patient eligibility parameters and the third was to compare functional outcomes and identify influencing factors. Methods: The study included 165 patients who had primary TSA (106 outpatient and 59 inpatient procedures). The operative technique was the same for both groups. Demographics, complications, readmissions, and revisions were collected. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California Los Angeles shoulder, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1.5, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Satisfaction and visual analog scale pain scores also were documented. Statistical analysis was completed using multivariate linear regression. Results: Outpatients were significantly younger and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores than inpatients. The rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations were not significantly different between groups. Outpatient surgery was not an independent risk factor for complications. At 1.5 months, better outcomes were noted in the outpatient group for all scores, and these reached statistical significance. Distance to home, dominant side, operative time, and blood loss were not associated with functional results. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that outpatient care was significantly associated with improved scores at 1.5 months and did not affect functional outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion: This study reports the results of routine outpatient TSA within a European healthcare system. TSA performed in an outpatient setting was not an independent risk factor for complications and seemed to be an independent factor in improving early functional results.

Artificial intelligence in shoulder and elbow surgery: overview of current and future applications.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is amongst the most rapidly growing technologies in orthopedic surgery. With the exponential growth in healthcare data, computing power, and complex predictive algorithms, this technology is poised to aid providers in data processing and clinical decision support throughout the continuum of orthopedic care. Understanding the utility and limitations of this technology is vital to practicing orthopedic surgeons, as these applications will become more common place in everyday practice. AI has already demonstrated its utility in shoulder and elbow surgery for imaging-based diagnosis, predictive modeling of clinical outcomes, implant identification, and automated image segmentation. The future integration of AI and robotic surgery represents the largest potential application of AI in shoulder and elbow surgery with the potential for significant clinical and financial impact. This editorial's purpose is to summarize common AI terms, provide a framework to understand and interpret AI model results, and discuss current applications and future directions within shoulder and elbow surgery.

Patient-selection algorithm for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty in ambulatory surgery center: a retrospective update.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) presents a safe alternative to inpatient arthroplasty, while helping meet the rapidly rising volume of shoulder arthroplasty needs and minimizing health care costs. Identifying the correct patient for outpatient surgery is critical to maintaining the safety standards with TSA. This study sought to update an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) TSA patient-selection algorithm previously published by our institution. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of TSAs was performed in an ASC at a single institution to collect patient demographics, perioperative risk factors, and postoperative outcomes with regard to reoperations, hospital admissions, and complications. The existing ASC algorithm for outpatient TSA was altered based on collected perioperative information, review of pertinent literature, and anesthesiology recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 319 TSAs were performed in an ASC in 298 patients over 7 years. Medically related complications occurred in 3 patients (0.9%) within 90 days of surgery, 2 of whom required hospital admission (0.6%) for acute kidney injury and pulmonary embolus. There were no instances of major cardiac events. Orthopedic-related complications occurred in 11 patients (3.4%), with hematoma development requiring evacuation and instability requiring revision being the most common causes. CONCLUSIONS: There was a low rate of perioperative complications and hospital admissions, confirming the safety of TSAs in an ASC setting. Based on prior literature and the population included, a pre-existing patient-selection algorithm was updated to better reflect increased comfort, knowledge, and data regarding safe patient selection for TSA in an ASC.

Muscle activation patterns during active external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an electrophysiological study of the teres minor and associated musculature.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative teres minor insufficiency has been identified as a risk factor for poor restoration of external rotation (ER) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). However, there has been little investigation regarding muscle activation patterns generating ER. This prospective study sought to determine the timing and activation levels of the shoulder girdle musculature during ER in well-functioning RTSAs with an intact teres minor using a lateralized design. METHODS: Patients who underwent RTSA ≥1 year previously with functional ER, an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score >70, superior rotator cuff deficiency, and an intact teres minor were identified. Electrophysiological and kinematic analyses were performed during ER in the modified neutral position (arm at side with 90° of elbow flexion) and in abduction (AB) (shoulder abducted 90° with 90° of elbow flexion). Dynamometer-recorded torque and position were pattern matched to electromyography during ER. The root-mean-square and integrated electromyography (in microvolts × milliseconds with standard deviation [SD]), as well as median frequency (MF) (in hertz with SD), were calculated to determine muscle recruitment. Pair-wise t test analysis compared muscle activation (P < .05 indicated significance). RESULTS: After an a priori power analysis, 16 patients were recruited. The average ASES score, visual analog scale pain score, and ASES subscore for ER in AB ("comb hair") were 87.7, 0.5, and 2.75 of 3, respectively. In AB, muscle activation began with the upper trapezius, middle trapezius, and latissimus dorsi, followed by the anterior deltoid activating to neutral. With ER beyond neutral, the teres major (9.6 µV × ms; SD, 9.2 µV × ms) initiated ER, followed by the teres minor (14.1 µV × ms; SD, 18.2 µV × ms) and posterior deltoid (11.1 µV × ms; SD, 9.3 µV × ms). MF analysis indicated equal contributions of the teres major (1.1 Hz; SD, 0.5 Hz), teres minor (1.2 Hz; SD, 0.4 Hz), and posterior deltoid (1.1 Hz; SD, 0.4 Hz) in ER beyond neutral. In the modified neutral position, the upper trapezius and middle trapezius were not recruited to the same level as in AB. For ER beyond neutral, the teres major (9.5 µV × ms [SD, 9 µV × ms]; MF, 1.1 Hz [SD, 0.5 Hz]), teres minor (11.4 µV × ms [SD, 15.1 µV × ms]; MF, 1.1 Hz [SD, 0.5 Hz]), and posterior deltoid (8.5 µV × ms [SD, 8 µV × ms]; MF, 1.2 Hz [SD, 0.3 Hz]) were activated in similar sequence and intensity as AB. No differences in muscle activation duration or intensity were noted among the teres major, teres minor, and posterior deltoid (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Active ER after RTSA is complex and is not governed by a single muscle-tendon unit. This study establishes a sequence, duration, and intensity of muscle activation for ER in well-functioning RTSAs. In both tested positions, the teres major, teres minor, and posterior deltoid function equally and sequentially to power ER.

Superior humeral head osteophytes are associated with rotator cuff insufficiency in glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The primary goal of this study was to investigate whether superior humeral head osteophyte (SHO) size is associated with rotator cuff insufficiency, including rotator cuff tear (RCT), supraspinatus tendon thickness, and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles. METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with glenohumeral osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. SHO size was determined by radiograph. MRI measured SHO and RCT presence, type, and size; supraspinatus tendon thickness; and fatty infiltration of rotator cuff musculature. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were included. Mean SHO size was 1.93 mm on radiographs and 2.13 mm on MRI. Risk ratio for a RCT was 1.14. For each 1-mm increase in SHO size on radiograph, supraspinatus tendon thickness decreased by 0.20 mm. SHO presence was associated with moderate-to-severe fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus with a risk ratio of 3.16. CONCLUSION: SHOs were not associated with RCT but were associated with higher risk of supraspinatus FI and decreased tendon thickness, which could indicate rotator cuff insufficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Comparison of triamcinolone and methylprednisolone efficacy and steroid flare reaction rates after shoulder corticosteroid injection: a prospective interrupted time series study.

BACKGROUND: A corticosteroid flare reaction is a well-described phenomenon that causes significant pain and dysfunction. The paucity of literature impedes decision making regarding which corticosteroid to use for shoulder injection. The purpose of this study was to compare methylprednisolone acetate (MPA) and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections in the glenohumeral joint and/or subacromial space in terms of efficacy and the incidence of steroid flare reactions. METHODS: In this prospective, interrupted time series, parallel study, patients received injections in the glenohumeral joint and/or subacromial space. MPA and TA were used during 2 discrete 3-month periods. The injections consisted of 2 mL of lidocaine, 2 mL of bupivacaine, and 80 mg of either MPA or TA. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded immediately before injection; 1-7 days after injection; and 3, 6, and 12 months after injection. The primary outcome was the incidence of a steroid flare reaction, defined as a post-injection increase in the VAS score by ≥2 points. The secondary outcome was injection failure, defined as a post-injection VAS score greater than the baseline score or the need for another intervention. We used linear mixed models with a patient-level random intercept to identify the mean VAS score change for TA injections in the first week after injection. RESULTS: MPA or TA shoulder injections were administered in 421 patients; of these patients, 15 received bilateral-joint injections whereas 406 received a single-joint injection, for a total of 436 injections (209 MPA and 227 TA injections). Pain scores in the first week after injection were available for 193 MPA and 199 TA injections. Significantly more patients in the MPA cohort reported flare reactions compared with the TA cohort (22.8% vs. 4.0%, P < .001) during the first week after injection. In the first week after injection, the mean VAS score of patients receiving TA injections was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.63) lower than that of patients receiving MPA injections when adjusted for age, sex, race, pain type, surgeon type, and injection site. At 3 months, surveys for 169 MPA and 172 TA injections were completed, with no significant difference in the rate of injection failure for MPA vs. TA (42.6% vs. 36.1%, P = .224). Treatment failure rates were significantly higher for MPA than for TA at 6 months (78.44% vs. 62.5%, P < .001) but not at 12 months (81.18% vs. 81.42%, P = .531.) CONCLUSION: TA injections resulted in a >5-fold reduction in steroid flare reactions, with statistically superior 6-month efficacy rates, compared with MPA injections. This study supports TA as a more viable corticosteroid option for shoulder injection.

Skeletally Immature Patients With Classic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Bone Bruise Patterns Have a Higher Likelihood of Having an Intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Compared With Skeletally Mature Patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in skeletally immature patients with an ACL bone contusion pattern has been sparsely investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether physeal status has an influence on the likelihood of sustaining an ACL tear when classic bipolar ACL bone bruising pattern is present. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging reports were queried for "contusion" on all patients between 6 and 22 years between 2015 and 2019. Images were reviewed to denote all intra-articular pathology and the physeal status of the femur and tibia. The primary outcome was the incidence of ACL tears in patients with the presence of bipolar bone contusions. Fischer exact testing was used to determine associations. RESULTS: Of 499 patients included, 269 of those had bipolar bone contusions. Patients with bipolar bone contusions and ACL tears had a shorter duration between injury and imaging date compared with patients with ACL tears without bipolar bone contusions (6.9 vs. 38.6 d, P =0.05). Patients with an open femoral physis had a higher likelihood of having an intact ACL despite the presence of bipolar bone contusions than patients with a closed femoral physis (10.8% vs. 1.0%, P <0.001). Of patients with bipolar bone contusions, those with an intact ACL were younger than patients with an ACL tear (14.6 vs. 16.4, P =0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Although bipolar bone contusions of the central lateral femoral condyle and posterior lateral tibial plateau are typically found after ACL injury, these bipolar contusions can be found concomitantly with an intact ACL and were more often found in relatively younger patients. Patients who have an open femoral physis have a higher likelihood to have an intact ACL despite the presence of bipolar bone contusions compared with patients who have a closed femoral physis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-cross-sectional.

The Incidence of Posterolateral Tibial Plateau and Central Lateral Femoral Condylar Impaction Fractures in a Pediatric and Young Adult Population.

BACKGROUND: Posterolateral tibial plateau and central lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures are known to occur in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. There have been no prior investigations into the incidence and morphology of posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures in the setting of ACL injury in a pediatric population. METHODS: Patients between 9 and 22 years of age with knee magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) performed demonstrating complete or partial ACL tear were included in this study. MRI reports were reviewed to denote the presence of posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, or lateral collateral ligament injury, meniscus tears, cartilage lesions. MRIs were reviewed by 2 fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons to denote the presence of posterolateral tibial plateau and central lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures and physeal status of femoral and tibial physes. Statistical analysis performed included χ 2 analysis and the Student t testing. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients with a primary ACL tear were identified. The mean age of patients included was 16.5 years (range: 9.0-21.5). The incidence of posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures was 83/328 (25.3%) while the incidence of lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures was 119/328 (36.3%). Bipolar impaction fractures occurred in 37/328 (11.3%). Of the 83 tibial impaction fractures identified, 82 were low-grade morphologic subtypes. Patients with lateral tibial plateau impaction fractures were older than those with no fracture (17.2±2.2 vs. 16.3±2.1, P =0.001). Only 3/38 (7.9%) patients with an open tibial physis sustained a tibial plateau impaction fracture compared with 80/290 (27.6%) with a closed tibial physis (χ 2 value: 6.9, P =0.009). There was no difference in proportion of patients with lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures based on femoral physeal status ( P =0.484). CONCLUSION: The incidence of posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures in the setting of ACL tear in a pediatric and young adult patient population appears to be lower while lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures occur more frequently when comparing to previously reported incidences found in adult populations in the literature. Furthermore, posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures occur less frequently in those with an open proximal tibial physis and high-grade posterolateral tibial plateau bone loss is exceedingly rare in pediatric and young adult patients. Lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures are associated with lateral meniscal tears and medial meniscal ramp lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-cross-sectional study.

Grit Score is Predictive of Increased Risk for Opioid Prescription Refill Following Primary Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

The grit score is used to measure passion and perseverance for long-term goals. We hypothesized that higher grit scores would predict improved 90-day outcomes and reduced opioid requirements after primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). Included were 103 patients. The median grit score was 3.9 (2.2-5.0). There was no statistically significant association between grit and morphine milligram equivalents prescribed or patient-reported pain control. Higher grit score was associated with a significant reduction in opioid prescription refill at 6 weeks, though this association was not seen at 2 or 12 weeks. The odds of requiring opioid medication 6 weeks after RCR increased 3.5 times per each 1.0 unit decrease in grit score. Patients with higher levels of grit, especially a score over 4.0, have a less difficult postoperative course after RCR. The grit score may help identify patients who are at increased risk for prolonged opioid use after RCR. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(3):177-181, 2023).

Delay in Knee MRI Scan Completion Since Implementation of the Affordable Care Act:: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The most impactful resolutions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) took effect on January 1, 2014. The clinical and economic effects are widely experienced by orthopaedic surgeons, but are not well quantified. We proposed to evaluate the effect of the ACA on the timing of MRI for knee pathology before and after implementation of the legislation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all knee MRIs done at our institution from 2011 to 2016 (3 years before and after ACA implementation). The MRI completion time was calculated by comparing the dates of initial clinical evaluation and MRI completion. The groups were subdivided based on insurance payer status (Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial payers). The cohorts were compared to determine differences in average completion time and completion rates at time intervals from initial clinic visit before and after ACA implementation. RESULTS: MRI scans of 5,543 knees were included, 3,157 (57%) before ACA implementation and 2,386 (43%) after. There was a 5.6% increase in Medicaid cohort representation after ACA implementation. Patients waited 14 days longer for MRIs after ACA implementation (116 versus 102 days). There were increased completion times for patients in the commercial payer (113 versus 100 days) and Medicaid (131 versus 96 days) groups. Fewer patients had received MRI after ACA implementation within 2, 6, and 12 weeks of their initial clinic visits. DISCUSSION: The time between initial clinical evaluation and MRI scan completion for knee pathology markedly increased after ACA implementation, particularly in the commercial payer and Medicaid cohorts. Additional studies are needed to determine the effect of longer wait times on patient satisfaction, delayed treatment, and increased morbidity. As healthcare policy changes continue, their effects on orthopaedic patients and providers should be closely scrutinized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective cohort study.

Opioid-sparing pain management protocol after shoulder arthroplasty results in less opioid consumption and higher satisfaction: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic has become a central focus in health care. In an effort to reduce opioid use, orthopedic surgeons use multimodal strategies to control postoperative pain. However, no clear consensus exists on ideal pain management strategies after shoulder arthroplasty, and most protocols are opioid-driven. This study sought to determine if patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty using a postoperative opioid-sparing pain-control regimen would have equivalent pain scores and satisfaction as patients using a traditional opioid-based regimen. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled and randomized into an opioid-sparing (OS) or a traditional opioid-based (OB) postoperative pain protocol. Both groups received opioid education, periarticular injection with liposomal bupivacaine, and preoperative and postoperative multimodal management (acetaminophen, celecoxib, and gabapentin). The OB group was discharged with 40 oxycodone tablets and standard icing, whereas the OS group received ketorolac during admission, continuous cryotherapy, and discharged with 10 oxycodone tablets for rescue. Patients were queried regarding levels of pain and opioid consumption at days 1-7 and at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was recorded at 1, 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12 weeks postoperatively. Complications, readmissions, and reoperations were recorded. RESULTS: In 78 patients, no difference in VAS pain scores were seen at any time between groups. The OS group consumed less oral morphine equivalents (OME) from inpatient hospitalization to 12 weeks postoperatively (P < .05). Total OME consumption was reduced by 213% for the OS vs. the OB group (112 vs. 239; P < .0001). The OS group consumed fewer opioid pills at all time points (P < .05). A 395% reduction in number of opioid pills consumed in the first 12 weeks postoperatively was seen in the OS vs. the OB group (4.3 vs. 17.0; P < .0001). Significantly more patients in the OS group discontinued opioids by 2 weeks postoperatively (86.1% vs. 58.5%; P = .011), and 94.4% in the OS group discontinued opioids by 6 weeks postoperatively. The OS group was more satisfied with pain management at 1 and 6 weeks (P = .05). No difference in ROM, ASES or SANE scores, complications, readmissions, or reoperations were seen between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a nearly 4-fold reduction in opioid pain pill consumption and earlier cessation of opioids with an OS pain management protocol. Patients also reported higher satisfaction with this pain management strategy.

Frozen Shoulder Manipulation with the FEAR Technique: A Retrospective Case Series with Minimum Two-Year Follow-up.

Conservative treatment of adhesive capsulitis fails in up to 30% of patients. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has been shown to be safe and effective, although complications (iatrogenic fracture, glenohumeral dislocation, rotator cuff tears, nerve injuries) have been reported. This study details a novel technique, FEAR (Forward elevation, Extension, Adduction/abduction, and internal and external Rotation), and its results. Medical records review identified 100 patients with a diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis who had at least 6 weeks of physical therapy, with or without corticosteroid injection, with persistence of pain and loss of motion loss. An Institutional Review Board approved phone survey obtained Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, functional scores, and range of motion, with 43 available for survey. At average 5-year follow-up, 81% had excellent (≥ 90) scores and 77% were pain-free. Patients with diabetes and male patients had significantly lower SANE scores at follow-up. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):096-099, 2022).

Safety and short-term outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in an ambulatory surgery center.

BACKGROUND: A scarcity of literature exists comparing outcomes of outpatient anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). This study was performed to compare early outcomes between the 2 procedures in a freestanding ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and to determine if the addition of preoperative interscalene nerve block (ISNB) with periarticular liposomal bupivacaine injection (PAI) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) would improve outcomes over PAI alone. METHODS: Medical charts of all patients undergoing outpatient primary aTSA or rTSA at 2 ASCs from 2012 to 2020 were reviewed. A total of 198 patients were ultimately identified (117 aTSA and 81 rTSA) to make up this retrospective cohort study. Patient demographics, PACU outcomes, complications, readmissions, reoperations, calls to the office, and unplanned clinic visit rates were compared between procedures. PACU outcomes were compared between those receiving ISNB with PAI and those receiving PAI alone. RESULTS: Patients undergoing rTSA were older (61.1 vs. 55.7 years, P < .001) and more likely to have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 (51.9% vs. 41.0%, P = .050) compared to patients having aTSA. No patient required an overnight stay. Time in the PACU before discharge (89.1 vs. 95.6 minutes, P = .231) and pain scores at discharge (3.0 vs. 3.0, P = .815) were similar for aTSA and rTSA, respectively. One intraoperative complication occurred in the aTSA group (posterior humeral circumflex artery injury) and 1 in the rTSA group (calcar fracture) (P = .793). Ninety-day postoperative total complication (7.7% vs. 7.4%), shoulder-related complication (6.0% vs. 6.2%), medical-related complication (1.7% vs. 1.2%), admission (0.8% vs. 2.5%), reoperation (2.6% vs. 1.2%), and unplanned clinic visit (6.0% vs. 6.1%) rates were similar between aTSA and rTSA, respectively (P ≥ .361 for all comparisons). At 1 year, there were 8 reoperations and 15 complications in the aTSA group compared with 1 reoperation and 8 complications in the rTSA group (P = .091 and P = .818, respectively). Patients who had ISNB spent less time in PACU (75 vs. 97 minutes, P < .001), had less pain at discharge (0.2 vs. 3.9, P < .001), and consumed less oral morphine equivalents in the PACU (1.2 vs. 16.6 mg, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Early postoperative outcomes and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups, and all patients were successfully discharged home the day of surgery. The addition of preoperative ISNB led to more efficient discharge from the ASC with less pain in the PACU.

Effect of deltoid volume on range of motion and patient-reported outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff-intact and rotator cuff-deficient conditions.

BACKGROUND: Deltoid muscle function is paramount to the success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of deltoid volume on shoulder range of motion and patient-reported outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff-intact and rotator cuff-deficient conditions. METHODS: Retrospective review of records identified 107 patients who met inclusion criteria. The rotator cuff integrity was evaluated by two musculoskeletal-trained radiologists. Volumetric deltoid measurements were calculated from preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Satisfactory outcomes were defined as forward elevation of at least 135°, external rotation of at least 35°, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores of at least 70. RESULTS: Mean total deltoid muscle volume was significantly higher in patients with satisfactory forward elevation (57.8 ± 18.1 cm³) versus unsatisfactory forward elevation (48.6 ± 19.5 cm³) (p = 0.013). When separated by rotator cuff integrity, total deltoid volume was significantly higher (p = 0.030) in patients who achieved satisfactory forward elevation in the rotator cuff-deficient group but not the rotator cuff-intact group (p = 0.533). DISCUSSION: Preoperative deltoid volume directly correlated with achieving satisfactory forward elevation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff-deficient conditions and may be one factor in determining the ability to achieve satisfactory outcomes in the rotator cuff-deficient patient.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of hybrid glenoid fixation with a central porous titanium post: analysis of 713 consecutive shoulders.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid glenoid component fixation represents an emerging technology in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) design. However, there is a paucity of larger-scale studies reporting the outcomes following implantation of these components. This study aimed to determine the outcomes following primary TSA using hybrid glenoid component fixation with a central porous titanium post. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2 institutional databases identified patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent primary elective hybrid TSA between 2009 and 2018 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Outcomes evaluated included the visual analog scale pain score, range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, complications, and implant survivorship free from reoperation or revision. Postoperative imaging was assessed for glenoid radiolucent lines and evidence of aseptic glenoid component loosening (AGL). RESULTS: A total of 713 shoulders in 666 patients with a mean age of 61 ± 6 years were included in the study at a mean follow-up period of 4.3 years (range, 2.0-9.1 years); male shoulders comprised 50.9% of shoulders. Notable clinical improvements were observed with respect to the visual analog scale pain score (7.0 to 1.4, P < .001), active forward elevation (91° to 155°, P < .001), active external rotation (21° to 50°, P < .001), and the ASES score (38.6 to 82.7, P < .001), with all exceeding the substantial clinical benefit threshold for TSA. The active internal rotation score also showed significant improvement (3.1 to 5.7, P < .001). Glenoid radiolucent lines were identified in 57 TSAs (8.2%), with 1 radiographically loose glenoid component (0.1%). There were 54 complications (7.6%), with postoperative rotator cuff tear as the most common complication (n = 15, 2.1%); only 4 cases (0.6%) of glenoid-related complications (AGL) were observed. The Kaplan-Meier rate of survival free from revision surgery was 98.7% at 1 year, 98.5% at 2 years, and 96.7% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid glenoid component fixation of anatomic TSA with a central porous titanium post demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, range of motion, and ASES scores. Although AGL remains a concern, only 0.6% of TSAs sustained glenoid-related complications at a mean follow-up period of 4.3 years and the rate of survivorship free from revision was 96.7% at 5 years. These favorable clinical findings support the theoretical advantages of hybrid glenoid fixation; however, large comparative investigations with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these results.

Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Changes in healthcare policy have driven many hospital-based surgeries to the outpatient environment. Multiple studies have shown outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a safe alternative to the inpatient setting. This systematic review evaluates patient selection, perioperative protocols, complications, costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes of outpatient TSA and compares these with their inpatient counterparts. METHODS: The Emnbase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases were queried on April 30, 2020, for outpatient TSA studies, identifying 232 articles, with 21 meeting inclusion criteria. This involved 25,808 and 231,408 patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient TSA, respectively. Failed same-day discharge, readmissions, revision surgeries, cost, and complications among outpatient TSA were aggregated when raw numbers were available. Statistical significance for comparisons among outpatient and inpatient TSA within individual studies was alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: Ten studies evaluated same-day discharge rate, with 440 of 446 patients (98.7%) meeting the goals. Fourteen studies evaluated readmissions, revision surgeries, and complications, with readmissions in 238 of 6,133 patients (3.9%), revision surgeries in 32 of 1,484 patients (2.1%), and complications in 376 of 4,977 patients (7.6%). Readmission rates were similar between inpatients and outpatients, with only one study finding more readmissions after inpatient TSA. Complications were more common in inpatient TSA in five studies. Outpatient TSA demonstrated a charge reduction of $25,509 to $53,202 per patient, and patient satisfaction after outpatient TSA was "good to excellent" in more than 95% of patients. Patient selection for outpatient TSA used patient age, medical comorbidities, social support, living proximity to location of surgery, and lack of preoperative opioid use. DISCUSSION: Outpatient TSA in appropriately selected patients is a safe and cost-effective alternative to inpatient TSA. However, the literature is limited to national database or small retrospective studies. Large prospective, cohort studies are necessary to further assess differences in complication profiles between outpatient and inpatient TSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; systematic review.

Preoperative opioid usage predicts markedly inferior outcomes 2 years after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has proved to be a highly effective treatment for rotator cuff-deficient conditions and other end-stage shoulder pathologies. With value-based care emerging, identifying predictive factors of outcomes is of great interest. Although preoperative opioid use has been shown to predict inferior outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair, there is a paucity of data regarding its effect on outcomes after RTSA. We analyzed a series of RTSAs to determine the influence of preoperative opioid use on clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review of primary RTSA patient data revealed 264 patients with ≥2 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Patients were classified as preoperative opioid users (71 patients) if they had taken narcotic pain medication for a minimum of 3 months prior to surgery or as opioid naive (193 patients) at the time of surgery. Assessments included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, strength, and range of motion, as well as complications and revisions. Radiographs were analyzed for signs of loosening or mechanical failure. The Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests were used for comparisons between groups. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 69.9 years, and the mean follow-up time was 2.8 years. Opioid users were significantly younger (66.1 years vs. 70.7 years, P < .001) at the time of surgery and had significantly higher preoperative rates of mood disorders, chronic pain disorders, and disability status (all P < .05). Postoperatively, opioid users had inferior visual analog scale pain scores (2.59 vs. 1.25, P < .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (63.2 vs. 75.2, P < .001), active forward elevation (P < .001), and internal and external rotational shoulder strength (all P < .05) compared with opioid-naive patients. Periprosthetic radiolucency (8.45% vs. 2.07%, P = .026) and subsequent revision arthroplasty (14.1% vs. 4.66%, P = .014) occurred more frequently in opioid users than in opioid-naive patients. Both groups improved from baseline preoperatively to most recent follow-up in terms of functional outcomes and pain. CONCLUSION: Preoperative opioid use portended markedly inferior clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RTSA. Additionally, opioid users had significantly increased rates of periprosthetic radiolucency and revision. Preoperative opioid use appears to be a significant marker for adverse outcomes after RTSA.