No effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on inflammatory markers in familial hypercholesterolemia: a randomized crossover trial.

Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have increased cardiovascular risk despite lipid-lowering therapy, and additional therapy is warranted. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) supplements have demonstrated an effect on cardiovascular endpoints in some clinical trials. Platelet-modifying and anti-inflammatory properties are among the proposed beneficial effects of n-3 PUFA. We investigated the effect of a high-dose n-3 PUFA supplement on platelet function and inflammatory markers in FH subjects. We performed a randomized, double-blind trial with a crossover design. Inclusion criteria were genetically verified heterozygous FH, stable disease, statin treatment >12 months, and age 18-75 years. Trial participants were allocated to two treatment periods in random order. The treatment periods (three months each) were separated by a three-month washout period. N-3 PUFA (1840 mg eicosapentaenoic acid and 1520 mg docosahexaenoic acid) and placebo (olive oil) were administered in four capsules daily. Endpoints were platelet function and inflammatory markers, assessed by platelet function analyzer, soluble markers P-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM), 27 cytokines, and hematological parameters. Thirty-four heterozygous FH individuals completed the trial. No treatment effect (p = 0.93) from n-3 PUFA on the platelet function analyzer was found (2 s, 95% CI [-13, 6]). In our FH population, n-3 PUFA did not influence the levels of P-selectin (-2.0, 95% CI [-5.0, 2.0], p = 0.41), VCAM (0, 95% CI [-14.2, 14.2], p > 0.99), ICAM (-27.0, 95% CI [-70.1, 16.5]; p = 0.21), cytokine levels, or hematological parameters. In statin-treated FH individuals, high dose n-3 PUFA supplement did not affect platelet function and inflammatory markers.Trial registration number: EUDRACTNR 2012-000505-68; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01813006HighlightsTrial studying the effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplements in familial hypercholesterolemia.High-dose omega-3 fatty acids supplements had no impact on platelet function.Cytokine levels were unchanged after three months of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation.No effect of omega-3 fatty acids on C-reactive protein was observed.

Reduced gut microbial diversity in familial hypercholesterolemia with no effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids intervention - a pilot trial.

Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) undergo an aggressive treatment with cholesterol-lowering drugs to prevent coronary heart disease. Recent evidence suggests an interplay between the gut microbiota, blood lipid levels and lipid-lowering drugs, but this has yet to be studied in individuals with FH. The objective of the study was to characterize the gut microbiota of individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia and examine if effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on blood lipids act through modification of the gut microbiome. The gut microbiota composition of individuals with FH (N = 21) and healthy controls (N = 144) was analyzed by extracting DNA from stool samples and sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. A subgroup (n = 15) of the participants received omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) supplementation or placebo in a crossover manner, and the effect of PUFAs on the gut microbiota was also investigated. Individuals with FH had a different gut microbiota composition compared to healthy controls, characterized by reduced richness (p = .001) and reduction of several genera belonging to Clostridia and Coriobacteriia. Patients using ezetimibe in addition to statins appeared to have lower richness compared to those only using statins (p = .01). Intervention with omega-3 PUFAs had negligible impact on the microbiota composition. Positive effects on blood lipids after intervention with omega-3 PUFA were not associated with baseline gut microbiota composition or gut microbial changes during treatment. Further, patients with FH have an altered gut microbiota compared to healthy controls, possibly driven by the use of ezetimibe.

Addition of marine omega-3 fatty acids to statins in familial hypercholesterolemia does not affect in vivo or in vitro endothelial function.

BACKGROUND: Prestatin trials reported positive effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) in cardiovascular disease, whereas recent studies and meta-analyses have not reproduced these results. The effect of n-3 PUFA in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a group with particularly high risk of cardiovascular disease, is not well established. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of n-3 PUFA in the early stage of atherosclerosis in FH patients by evaluating in vivo (peripheral arterial tonometry [PAT]) and in vitro (plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine and E-selectin) endothelial function. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study with 34 FH patients on statin treatment (mean age 46.6 years). In random order, all individuals were treated for 3 months with high-dose n-3 PUFA (2 g, ×2) and 3 months placebo (olive oil, 2 g ×2), separated by a 3-month washout period. Anthropometric data, blood samples, and PAT were collected at 4 time points. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in reactive hyperemia index measured by PAT after n-3 PUFA compared with placebo, median reactive hyperemia index after n-3 PUFA was 1.98 and after placebo 1.96 (P = .51). No significant changes were detected in the soluble endothelial marker asymmetric dimethylarginine (in 2 different assays) when comparing n-3 PUFA and placebo (P = .92 and .14, respectively). Finally, the level of E-selectin did not change significantly during the trial (P = .26). CONCLUSION: Addition of n-3 PUFA to standard lipid-lowering treatment in genetically verified FH patients did not affect the in vivo endothelial function or soluble endothelial markers.

Telemonitoring and Quality of Life in Patients after 12 Months Following a Pacemaker Implant: the Nordland Study, a Randomised Trial.

The purpose of this study was to analyse the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients followed up using a remote device-monitoring system (TM) compared to patients followed up through standard outpatient visits (HM), 12 months after the implantation of a pacemaker. This was a trial design that used the EuroQol-5D Questionnaire and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF). The HRQoL of a cohort of 50 consecutive patients randomly allocated to one of the two follow-up modalities was measured at baseline and then during follow-up, 12 months after the pacemaker implantation. Eventually, 23 patients were followed-up through standard outpatient visits, while 23 used a remote monitoring system. Results: The baseline clinical characteristics and health-related quality of life of the patients from both groups were observed to be statistically similar. Twelve months after the pacemaker implantation, both groups showed statistically significant improvements in the baseline parameters based on the MLHF. The patients followed up through hospital visits showed a greater increase in MLHF-HRQoL after 12 months, although the increase was not significantly greater than that of the TM group. Furthermore, the frequencies of emergency visits and re-hospitalisations did not differ between the groups.

Health-related quality of life on tele-monitoring for users with pacemakers 6 months after implant: the NORDLAND study, a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: With an ageing population and widening indications for pacemakers implantation, the number of persons carrying an implant is steadily increasing. The routine follow-up is thus a heavy burden for the respective NHS as well as for the patients and their relatives. Most of them of the studies have been performed in densely populated areas and nearby to the hospital. It is thus unknown whether these results could be applied also in rural areas such as Northern Norway with a more scattered population. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of tele-monitoring (TM) in patients with pacemakers regarding reliability, safety and health-related quality of life, compared to traditional follow-up in outpatient clinic in a setting where geographical effects could possible influence the results. METHODS: The NORDLAND study is a controlled, randomized, non-masked clinical trial in pacemaker patients, with data collection carried out during the pre-implant stage and after 6 months. Between August of 2014 and November of 2015, 50 patients were assigned to either a tele-monitoring group (n = 25) or a conventional hospital monitoring (HM) group (n = 25). The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) utilities and visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) were used to measure Health-Related Quality of Life. Baseline characteristics and number of hospital visits were also analyzed. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two study groups were similar for EQ-5D utilities (TM:0.81; HM:0.76; p = 0.47), EQ-5D VAS (TM: 64.00; HM:64.88; p = 0.86) and the MLHFQ (TM:20.20; HM:28.96; p = 0.07). At the 6 month follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups in EQ-5D utilities (TM: 0.81; HM: 0.76; p = 0.54) and EQ-5D VAS scores (TM: 72.71; HM: 59.79; p = 0.08). The MLHFQ score was improved in both groups (TM: -4.40; HM: -15.13; p <  0.001). The number of in-office visits was similar in both groups (TM: 1.24 vs HM: 1.12; P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The NORDLAND trial shows that HRQoL is improved after implant in both groups. Without significant differences with regards to effectiveness and safety. In addition, provides a scientifically rigorous method to the field of HRQoL evaluations in patients with pacemakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02237404 , September 11, 2014.

LDL apheresis activates the complement system and the cytokine network, whereas PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab induces no inflammatory response.

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is an extracorporeal treatment modality used in high-risk coronary patients. It may, however, induce complement activation and downstream inflammation due to bio-incompatibility. OBJECTIVE: We explored changes in soluble inflammatory markers when changing from LDL apheresis to the novel PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab. METHODS: Three patients with familial hypercholesterolemia participated. Blood samples (EDTA plasma) for complement activation and markers of inflammation were obtained before (baseline) and after LDL apheresis week at 0 and before biweekly administration of evolocumab at weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7. Complement activation was measured by ELISA and cytokines by multiplex technology. RESULTS: Complement activation products C3a and Bb were both significantly higher after LDL apheresis compared to baseline (P = .01), returned to baseline levels before administration of evolocumab and remained low through week 7. C4d was unchanged during LDL apheresis, whereas TCC was slightly higher after apheresis compared to baseline and week 7 without statistical difference. MCP-1 was higher after LDL apheresis compared to baseline (P = .04), returned to baseline levels before administration of evolocumab and remained low through week 7. There were minor changes for other cytokines including TNF, IFN-γ, MIP-1α, MIP-1ß, with some higher and some lower after apheresis; however, none of these changes were statistically significant. Fibrinogen and CRP were lower after LDL apheresis and had returned to levels comparable to baseline at week 7, statistically significant however only for fibrinogen. CONCLUSIONS: LDL apheresis activated the alternative complement system significantly as reflected by an increase in C3a and Bb. PCSK9 inhibition did not affect complement or cytokines during 7 weeks follow-up.

Transition from LDL apheresis to evolocumab in heterozygous FH is equally effective in lowering LDL, without lowering HDL cholesterol.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: LDL apheresis is effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C) and clinical endpoints, however, the treatment is invasive and time consuming. In the present study, we explored lipid profiles and quality of life in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) when altering the treatment regimen from weekly LDL apheresis to bi-weekly evolocumab treatment. METHODS: Three patients with FH and coronary artery disease, established in LDL apheresis for 135 ± 13(SD) months, participated. The patients were examined with blood sampling before and after LDL apheresis (week 0), and before evolocumab administration (week 1-7), quality of life was assessed (week 1, 3, 7). RESULTS: The historically highest, untreated LDL-C was 10.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L, during weekly LDL apheresis, 5.5 ± 0.9 mmol/L pre-apheresis and 1.2 ± 0.2 mmol/L post-apheresis (p = 0.02). One week after apheresis, LDL-C was 6.1 ± 0.7 mmol/L, after three (bi-weekly) injections of evolocumab, LDL-C was 5.0 ± 0.7 (p < 0.001). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was reduced from 1.0 ± 0.2 mmol/L pre- to 0.5 ± 0.1 mmol/L post-apheresis (p = 0.03), it increased after apheresis and remained constant during evolocumab treatment. Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) decreased from 484 ± 76 mg/L pre- to 142 ± 15 mg/L post-apheresis (p = 0.02), but increased during evolocumab treatment, with a small increase from week one to week seven (p < 0.01). There was a non-significant trend towards an increase in perceived health status (week 0; 57 ± 21, week three; 65 ± 9 and week seven; 77 ± 10). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we demonstrate reductions in LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides and Lp(a) during apheresis. Switching from LDL apheresis to evolocumab maintained the LDL-lowering effect but did not decrease HDL levels.