The Effect of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy on Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Molecular Subtype.

BACKGROUND: The effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on patient outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial. We aimed to establish a model to identify the subsets benefiting from PMRT and to examine the effect of PMRT according to molecular subtype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1118 cT1-4cN0-3M0 breast cancer patients treated with NAC and mastectomy. A nomogram predicting locoregional recurrence (LRR) was established based on 418 unirradiated patients, and X-tile analysis was performed to divide the patients into two risk groups. The effect of PMRT on LRR, distant recurrence (DR), and breast cancer mortality (BCM) was estimated for patients with different molecular subtypes in two risk groups. RESULTS: A nomogram predicting LRR was developed using six factors: histologic classification, lymphovascular invasion, ypT stage, ypN stage, estrogen receptor status, and Ki-67 expression. Our study found that PMRT correlated with lower 5-year LRR, DR, and BCM rates for the high-risk group; however, no significant improvement in these endpoints was observed in the low-risk group. Among patients with high risk, subgroup analysis showed that LRR control was improved after PMRT for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative/hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HER2-/HR+), HER2-positive (HER2+)/HR+, and HER2-/HR-negative (HR-) subtypes, with hazard ratios of 0.113 (95% confidence [CI] 0.034-0.379; p < 0.001), 0.159 (95% CI 0.038-0.671; p = 0.017), and 0.243 (95% CI 0.088-0.676; p = 0.007), respectively, but not for the HER2+/HR- subtype (p = 0.468). CONCLUSIONS: We built a nomogram showing favorable risk quantification and patient stratification. Patients in the high-risk group benefited from PMRT, but patients in the low-risk group did not. PMRT may show different benefits for each molecular subtype.

Weekly taxane-anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Extensive studies have confirmed the efficacy of taxanes in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy on breast cancer. However, few studies have assessed the efficacy of weekly taxane-anthracycline regimens on locally advanced breast cancer. This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a weekly taxane-anthracycline regimen with those of tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive 4-6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tri-weekly 5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen or weekly paclitaxel-epirubicin (PE) regimen. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Other endpoints included the clinical tumor response, breast-conserving surgery rate, and adverse events. RESULTS: Between March 2010 and September 2013, 293 patients were randomized to the FEC (n = 151) and PE (n = 142) arms. The overall clinical response rate was significantly higher in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (76.06% vs. 59.95%, P = 0.001). Consistently, the post-chemotherapy pathologic T and N stages were significantly lower in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (P < 0.001). However, the pCR rate was similar in the two arms (10.61% vs. 12.31%, P = 0.665). Overall, 36 (27.27%) patients in the FEC arm and 6 (35.28%) in the PE arm were qualified for breast-conserving surgery. Most adverse events were comparable in both arms, with more severe neutropenia in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (11.97% vs. 5.96%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with locally advanced breast cancer, weekly PE was not superior to FEC in terms of pCR. However, weekly PE has a higher response rate and superior down-staging effects. On this account, the PE regimen may be considered an alternative option for locally advanced breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm the efficacy of this regimen on locally advanced breast cancer. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR-TRC-10001043, September 21, 2014.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in a Chinese population.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent regulator of angiogenesis and thereby involved in the development and progression of solid tumours. Associations between three VEGF gene polymorphisms (-634 G/C, +936 C/T, and +1612 G/A) and breast cancer risk have been extensively studied, but the currently available results are inconclusive. Our aim was to investigate associations between three VEGF gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Chinese Han patients. We performed a hospital-based case-control study including 680 female incident breast cancer patients and 680 female age-matched healthy control subjects. Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis was performed to detect the three VEGF gene polymorphisms. We observed that women carriers of +936 TT genotypes [odds ratio (OR) =0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28, 0.76; P=0.002] or 936 T-allele (OR=0.81, 95% CI= 0.68, 0.98; P=0.03) had a protective effect concerning the disease. Our study suggested that the +1612G/A polymorphism was unlikely to be associated with breast cancer risk. The -634CC genotype was significantly associated with high tumor aggressiveness [large tumor size (OR=2.63, 95% CI=1.15, 6.02; P=0.02) and high histologic grade (OR=1.47, 95% CI= 1.06, 2.03; P=0.02)]. The genotypes were not related with other tumor characteristics such as regional or distant metastasis, stage at diagnosis, or estrogen or progesterone receptor status. Our study revealed that the VEGF -634 G/C and +936 C/T gene polymorphisms may be associated with breast cancer in Chinese Han patients.