Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Vet Rec ; 178(25): i-ii, 2016 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27313260

RESUMEN

As an undergraduate, George Tice developed an interest in farm animal medicine and planned to work in this area after qualifying, but he also wanted to experience working in Africa. Having achieved both, he joined Elanco and has worked in a variety of roles in Europe and the USA. So as not to lose direct contact with animals, however, he keeps a selection at home.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24995164

RESUMEN

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella are food-borne pathogens commonly associated with beef, and reliable methods are needed to determine their prevalence in beef and to ensure food safety. Retail ground beef was tested for the presence of E. coli O157:H7, STEC serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145, and Salmonella using the DuPont™ BAX® system method. Ground beef (325 g) samples were enriched in 1.5 L of TSB with 2 mg/L novobiocin at 42°C for 18 h, and then evaluated using the BAX® System real-time PCR assays for E. coli O157:H7 and STEC suite, and the BAX® System standard PCR assays for E. coli O157:H7 MP and Salmonella. Samples positive for STEC target genes by the BAX® System assays were subjected to immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and plating onto modified Rainbow Agar O157. Enrichments that were PCR positive for Salmonella were inoculated into RV broth, incubated for 18 h at 42°C, and then plated onto XLT-4 agar. Presumptive positive STEC and Salmonella colonies were confirmed using the BAX® System assays. Results of the BAX® System STEC assays showed 20/308 (6.5%) of samples positive for both the Shiga toxin (stx) and intimin (eae) genes; 4 (1.3%) for stx, eae, and O26; 1 (0.3%) for stx, eae, and O45; 3 (1%) for stx, eae, and O103; and 1 (0.3%) for stx, eae, and O145. There were also 3 samples positive for stx, eae, and more than one STEC serogroup. Three (1.0%) of the samples were positive using the BAX® System real-time E. coli O157:H7 assay, and 28 (9.1%) were positive using the BAX® System Salmonella assay. STEC O103 and E. coli O157:H7 were isolated from 2/6 and 2/3 PCR positive samples, respectively. Salmonella isolates were recovered and confirmed from 27 of the 28 Salmonella PCR positive samples, and a portion of the isolates were serotyped and antibiotic resistance profiles determined. Results demonstrate that the BAX® System assays are effective for detecting STEC and Salmonella in beef.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Carne/microbiología , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Toxina Shiga/genética , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/aislamiento & purificación , Adhesinas Bacterianas/genética , Animales , Bovinos , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Prevalencia , Salmonella/clasificación , Salmonella/genética , Serotipificación , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/clasificación , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/genética
3.
J AOAC Int ; 97(3): 868-75, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25051636

RESUMEN

A multilaboratory study was conducted to evaluate the ability of the DuPont BAX System Real-Time PCR Assay for Salmonella to detect the target species in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces. Internal validation studies were performed by DuPont Nutrition & Health on 24 different sample types to demonstrate the reliability of the test method among a wide variety of sample types. Two of these matrixes-pork and turkey frankfurters and pasteurized, not-from-concentrate orange juice without pulp-were each evaluated in 14 independent laboratories as part of the collaborative study to demonstrate repeatability and reproducibility of the internal laboratory results independent of the end user. Frankfurter samples were evaluated against the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service reference method as a paired study, while orange juice samples were evaluated against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration reference method as an unpaired study, using a proprietary media for the test method. Samples tested in this study were artificially inoculated with a Salmonella strain at levels expected to produce low (0.2-2.0 CFU/test portion) or high (5 CFU/test portion) spike levels on the day of analysis. For each matrix, the collaborative study failed to show a statistically significant difference between the candidate method and the reference method using the probability of detection statistical model.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Microbiología de Alimentos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Salmonella/genética
4.
J Food Prot ; 77(2): 180-8, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24490911

RESUMEN

The "top-six" non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) most frequently associated with outbreaks and cases of foodborne illnesses have been declared as adulterants in beef by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Regulatory testing in beef began in June 2012. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the DuPont BAX System method for detecting these top six STEC strains and strains of E. coli O157:H7. For STEC, the BAX System real-time STEC suite was evaluated, including a screening assay for the stx and eae virulence genes and two panel assays to identify the target serogroups: panel 1 detects O26, O111, and O121, and panel 2 detects O45, O103, O145. For E. coli O157:H7, the BAX System real-time PCR assay for this specific serotype was used. Sensitivity of each assay for the PCR targets was ≥1.23 × 10(3) CFU/ml in pure culture. Each assay was 100% inclusive for the strains tested (20 to 50 per assay), and no cross-reactivity with closely related strains was observed in any of the assays. The performance of the BAX System methods was compared with that of the FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) methods for detection of the top six STEC and E. coli O157:H7 strains in ground beef and beef trim. Generally, results of the BAX System method were similar to those of the MLG methods for detecting non-O157 STEC and E. coli O157:H7. Reducing or eliminating novobiocin in modified tryptic soy broth (mTSB) may improve the detection of STEC O111 strains; one beef trim sample inoculated with STEC O111 produced a negative result when enriched in mTSB with 8 mg/liter novobiocin but was positive when enriched in mTSB without novobiocin. The results of this study indicate the feasibility of deploying a panel of real-time PCR assay configurations for the detection and monitoring of the top six STEC and E. coli O157:H7 strains in beef. The approach could easily be adapted for additional multiplex assays should regulations expand to include other O serogroups or virulence genes.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Carne/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex/métodos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Bovinos , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Inspección de Alimentos/métodos , Inspección de Alimentos/normas , Microbiología de Alimentos , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos
5.
J AOAC Int ; 94(5): 1490-505, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22165013

RESUMEN

In 2010, the BAX System PCR assay for Salmonella was modified to include a hot start functionality designed to keep the reaction enzyme inactive until PCR begins. To validate the assay's Official Methods of Analysis status to include this procedure modification, an evaluation was conducted on four food types that were simultaneously analyzed with the BAX System and either the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual or the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference method for detecting Salmonella. Identical performance between the BAX System method and the reference methods was observed. Additionally, lysates were analyzed using both the BAX System Classic and BAX System Q7 instruments with identical results using both platforms for all samples tested. Of the 100 samples analyzed, 34 samples were positive for both the BAX System and reference methods, and 66 samples were negative by both the BAX System and reference methods, demonstrating 100% correlation. No instrument platform variation was observed. Additional inclusivity and exclusivity testing using the modified test kit demonstrated the test kit to be 100% accurate in evaluation of test panels of 352 Salmonella strains and 46 non-Salmonella strains.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología de Alimentos/métodos , Salmonella/química , Salmonella/genética , Medios de Cultivo , Productos Lácteos/microbiología , Contaminación de Alimentos , Indicadores y Reactivos , Carne/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Estándares de Referencia , Salmonella enterica/química , Salmonella enterica/genética
6.
J AOAC Int ; 94(4): 1117-24, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21919346

RESUMEN

Evaluations were conducted to test the performance of the BAX System Real-Time PCR assay, which was certified as Performance Tested Method 031002 for screening E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef, beef trim, spinach, and lettuce. Method comparison studies performed on samples with low-level inoculates showed that the BAX System demonstrates a sensitivity equivalent or superior to the FDA-BAM and the USDA-FSIS culture methods, but with a significantly shorter time to result. Tests to evaluate inclusivity and exclusivity returned no false-negative and no false-positive results on a diverse panel of isolates, and tests for lot-to-lot variability and tablet stability demonstrated consistent performance. Ruggedness studies determined that none of the factors examined affect the performance of the assay. An accelerated shelf life study determined an initial 36 month shelf life for the test kit.


Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli O157/aislamiento & purificación , Microbiología de Alimentos/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Animales , Microbiología Ambiental , Humanos
7.
J AOAC Int ; 94(1): 172-8, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21391494

RESUMEN

The BAX System PCR assay for Salmonella detection in foods was previously validated as AOAC Research Institute (RI) Performance Tested Method (PTM) 100201. New studies were conducted on beef and produce using the same media and protocol currently approved for the BAX System PCR assay for E. coli O157:H7 multiplex (MP). Additionally, soy protein isolate was tested for matrix extension using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA-BAM) enrichment protocols. The studies compared the BAX System method to the U.S. Department of Agriculture culture method for detecting Salmonella in beef and the FDA-BAM culture method for detecting Salmonella in produce and soy protein isolate. Method comparison studies on low-level inoculates showed that the BAX System assay for Salmonella performed as well as or better than the reference method for detecting Salmonella in beef and produce in 8-24 h enrichment when the BAX System E. coli O157:H7 MP media was used, and soy protein isolate in 20 h enrichment with lactose broth followed by 3 h regrowth in brain heart infusion broth. An inclusivity panel of 104 Salmonella strains with diverse serotypes was tested by the BAX System using the proprietary BAX System media and returned all positive results. Ruggedness factors involved in the enrichment phase were also evaluated by testing outside the specified parameters, and none of the factors examined affected the performance of the assay.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología de Alimentos/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Salmonella/genética , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/instrumentación , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Bovinos , Escherichia coli O157/genética , Escherichia coli O157/aislamiento & purificación , Escherichia coli O157/patogenicidad , Microbiología de Alimentos/instrumentación , Humanos , Carne/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/instrumentación , Salmonella/patogenicidad , Proteínas de Soja , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Verduras/microbiología
8.
J AOAC Int ; 93(3): 928-35, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20629397

RESUMEN

Evaluations were conducted to test the performance of the BAX System PCR assay which was certified as Performance Tested Method 010902 for screening yeast and mold in yogurt, corn starch, and milk-based powdered infant formula. Method comparison studies performed on samples with low-level inoculates showed that the BAX System demonstrates a sensitivity equivalent to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual culture method, but with a significantly shorter time to obtain results. Tests to evaluate inclusivity and exclusivity returned no false-negative and no false-positive results on a diverse panel of isolates, and tests for lot-to-lot variability and tablet stability demonstrated consistent performance. Ruggedness studies determined that none of the factors examined affected the performance of the assay.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología de Alimentos , Hongos/aislamiento & purificación , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Levaduras/aislamiento & purificación , Fórmulas Infantiles , Yogur/microbiología , Zea mays/microbiología
9.
J AOAC Int ; 92(3): 989-94, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19610394

RESUMEN

In 2006, DuPont Qualicon introduced the BAX system Q7 instrument for use with its assays. To demonstrate the equivalence of the new and old instruments, a validation study was conducted using the BAX system PCR Assay for Salmonella, AOAC Official Method 2003.09, on three food types. The foods were simultaneously analyzed with the BAX system Q7 instrument and either the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual or the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook reference method for detecting Salmonella. Comparable performance between the BAX system and the reference methods was observed. Of the 75 paired samples analyzed, 39 samples were positive by both the BAX system and reference methods, and 36 samples were negative by both the BAX system and reference methods, demonstrating 100% correlation. Inclusivity and exclusivity for the BAX system Q7 instrument were also established by testing 50 Salmonella strains and 20 non-Salmonella isolates. All Salmonella strains returned positive results, and all non-Salmonella isolates returned a negative response.


Asunto(s)
Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonella/crecimiento & desarrollo
10.
J AOAC Int ; 92(6): 1902-5, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20166615

RESUMEN

A recent outbreak of Salmonella in peanut butter has highlighted the need for validation of rapid detection methods. A multilaboratory study for detecting Salmonella in peanut butter was conducted as part of the AOAC Research Institute Emergency Response Validation program for methods that detect outbreak threats to food safety. Three sites tested spiked samples from the same master mix according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA-BAM) method and the BAX System method. Salmonella Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) was grown in brain heart infusion for 24 h at 37 degrees C, then diluted to appropriate levels for sample inoculation. Master samples of peanut butter were spiked at high and low target levels, mixed, and allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for 2 weeks. Spike levels were low [1.08 most probable number (MPN)/25 g]; high (11.5 MPN/25 g) and unspiked to serve as negative controls. Each master sample was divided into 25 g portions and coded to blind the samples. Twenty portions of each spiked master sample and five portions of the unspiked sample were tested at each site. At each testing site, samples were blended in 25 g portions with 225 mL prewarmed lactose broth until thoroughly homogenized, then allowed to remain at room temperature for 55-65 min. Samples were adjusted to a pH of 6.8 +/- 0.2, if necessary, and incubated for 22-26 h at 35 degrees C. Across the three reporting laboratories, the BAX System detected Salmonella in 10/60 low-spike samples and 58/60 high-spike samples. The reference FDA-BAM method yielded positive results for 11/60 low-spike and 58/60 high-spike samples. Neither method demonstrated positive results for any of the 15 unspiked samples.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Microbiología de Alimentos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/métodos , Salmonella/química , Medios de Cultivo , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Salmonella enterica/química
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...