Results after surgical treatment of liver metastases in patients with high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are generally characterized by synchronous metastases, high aggressiveness and a dismal prognosis. Current international guidelines do not recommend surgical treatment of liver metastases, however the existing data are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of curatively intended resection/radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases in patients with metastatic GEP-NEC. METHODS: 32 patients with a diagnosis of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (Ki-67 > 20%) and with intended curative resection/RFA of liver metastases, were identified among 840 patients from two Nordic GEP-NEC registries. Tumor morphology (well vs poor differentiation) was reassessed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses for the entire cohort and for subgroups. RESULTS: Median OS after resection/RFA of liver metastases was 35.9 months (95%-CI: 20.6-51.3) with a five-year OS of 43%. The median PFS was 8.4 months (95%-CI: 3.9-13). Four patients (13%) were disease-free after 5 years. Two patients had well-differentiated morphology (NET G3) and 20 patients (63%) had Ki-67 ≥ 55%. A Ki-67 < 55% and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were statistically significant factors of improved OS after liver resection/RFA. CONCLUSION: This study shows a long median and long term survival after liver surgery/RFA for these selected metastatic GEP-NEC patients, particularly for the group with a Ki-67 in the relatively lower G3 range. Our findings indicate a possible role for surgical treatment of liver metastases in the management of this patient population.

Treatment with high dose [(111)In-DTPA-D-PHE1]-octreotide in patients with neuroendocrine tumors--evaluation of therapeutic and toxic effects.

Carcinoid tumors and endocrine pancreatic tumors often express somatostatin receptors (sst). Tumor spread may be visualized by sst scintigraphy using [(111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide. In this study, tumor targeting therapy with [(111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide at high doses (6 GBq every third week) was used to treat patients with sst-expressing tumors. Five patients entered the protocol and three were evaluable for response, while all could be evaluated for toxicity. Two patient responded with a significant reduction in tumor markers (> 50%). The third patient showed increasing levels of tumor markers. Side effects were expressed as depression of bone-marrow function. In one patient a grade 4 reduction in platelet count was observed requiring several thrombocyte transfusions. In another two patients platelet counts decreased significantly. We conclude that treatment with [(111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide can be used in patients with neuroendocrine tumors but blood parameters have to be carefully monitored to avoid severe side effects.

In vivo cellular distribution and endocytosis of the somatostatin receptor-ligand complex.

Radioactive tumor targeting agents are highly interesting and for treatment of neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors, radiolabeled somatostatin analogues (including [(111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide) has been tried in a small number of patients with encouraging results. To increase our knowledge about the in vivo processing of administered [(111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide we have examined tumor and normal tissue material from a patient with a midgut carcinoid tumor. By ultrastructural autoradiography, silver grains indicating the presence of [(111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide could be identified within tumor cells, both in the primary tumor and in the mesenteric metastases. Silver grains were also found in leukocytes and in blood vessels. However, normal enterocytes did not show any specific radioligand uptake. This study indicates that the binding and endocytosis of [(111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide is a specific process that takes place in cells expressing somatostatin receptors. However, the importance of the number of somatostatin receptors and subtypes expressed will have to be further studied.

Carcinoid tumours.

Carcinoid tumours offer a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Although new biochemical markers and improved methods for tumour detection, including PET and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, have been developed during the last two decades many patients are still diagnosed at late stages of the disease. This is supported by the fact that the age of diagnosis is about the same today as it was 10 years ago. It is our opinion that plasma chromogranin A levels should be be determined in all patients which are investigated because of symptoms that might be connected to a neuroendocrine tumour. In cases with flushing or diarrhoea, U-5-HIAA should also be determined and these two tumour markers are enough to diagnose most patients with midgut carcinoid tumours. In patients with foregut or hindgut tumours other specific hormones should be included. For the localization procedure conventional radiological techniques including CT, MRI and ultrasound investigations should be supplemented with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Endoscopic ultrasound investigations might in the future be relevant for diagnosis of duodenal carcinoids, whereas gastric and rectal carcinoids are diagnosed by endoscopy. A combination of more aggressive surgery combined with medical treatment such as somatostatin analogues and alpha-interferon has significantly increased the survival rates in patients with classical midgut carcinoid tumours. Metastatic foregut and hindgut tumours are still a therapeutic challenge and it is important in the future to classify all carcinoid tumours based on specific tumour biology patterns. Such a tumour biology based treatment is a prerequisite for a more individually based therapy in the future.

Octreotide and interferon alfa: a new combination for the treatment of malignant carcinoid tumours.

24 patients with malignant carcinoid tumours received octreotide and interferon alfa (IFN-alpha). All the patients initially received octreotide 50-100 micrograms, twice daily. When progressive symptoms or increasing biochemical markers were observed, the daily dose was raised to a median 300 micrograms. If the initial dose proved ineffective or if no improvement was seen after escalation, IFN-alpha was added (median 9 MU subcutaneously per week). After the addition of IFN-alpha, 17 of the 22 patients (77%) with elevated urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid showed a significant (> 50%) reduction. Only 1 patient progressed and 4 had continuously stable biochemical disease. No significant reduction in tumour size was noted; in 5 patients, the tumour continued to grow despite decreasing hormone levels. 18 patients had carcinoid syndrome when IFN-alpha was added in 10 (56%) symptoms ameliorated. Thus, the addition of IFN-alpha is beneficial for patients with malignant carcinoid tumours that progress and/or who do not respond to octreotide.