RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The reduction, stabilization, and maintenance of alignment are the main goals in the surgical treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. The choice of the surgical strategy remains poorly standardized; anterior and/or posterior fusion could be performed; and none of the available clinical studies in the literature have shown significant differences in outcomes or complication rates. Vertebral anatomy, age, comorbidities, patient factors, and surgical experience may guide the treatment choice. METHODS: We present a case of a polytraumatized young woman with an unstable hangman's fracture type II, according to Levine-Edwards classification. We treated the fracture by using a plate with four holes to fix C2-C3 without discectomy and body fusion. RESULTS: We performed a small incision, such as those used for the fixation of odontoid screws, where the working angle allowed us to easily and quickly position the plate by using a minimally invasive approach. CONCLUSION: The stabilization alone, without discectomy and body fusion with the cage, in the same way favored the natural healing of the bone fracture. In our opinion, in some select cases, fixation of C2-C3 alone through a minimally invasive approach allows for bone healing with fewer risks and an easier surgery.