Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 77(4): 290-301, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516313

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Repetitive ambulatory doses of levosimendan are an option as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT), but evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this treatment is scarce. The objective of the LEVO-T Registry is to describe the profile of patients on the HT list receiving levosimendan, prescription patterns, and clinical outcomes compared with patients not on levosimendan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients listed for elective HT from 2015 to 2020 from 14 centers in Spain. RESULTS: A total of 1015 consecutive patients were included, of whom 238 patients (23.4%) received levosimendan. Patients treated with levosimendan had more heart failure (HF) admissions in the previous year and a worse clinical profile. The most frequent prescription pattern were fixed doses triggered by the patients' clinical needs. Nonfatal ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 2 patients (0.8%). No differences in HF hospitalizations were found between patients who started levosimendan in the first 30 days after listing and those who did not (33.6% vs 34.5%; P=.848). Among those who did not, 102 patients (32.9%) crossed over to levosimendan after an HF admission. These patients had a rate of 0.57 HF admissions per month before starting levosimendan and 0.21 afterwards. Propensity score matching analysis showed no differences in survival at 1 year after listing between patients receiving levosimendan and those who did not (HR, 1.03; 95%CI, 0.36-2.97; P=.958) or in survival after HT (HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.60-1.56; P=.958). CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive levosimendan in an ambulatory setting as a bridge to heart transplantation is commonly used, is safe, and may reduce HF hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Piridazinas , Humanos , Simendán/uso terapéutico , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Hidrazonas/uso terapéutico , Piridazinas/uso terapéutico
2.
Cureus ; 9(9): e1652, 2017 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29142800

RESUMEN

A 74-year-old male presented to the emergency department 46 days after undergoing an aortic valve replacement. He presented with nonspecific symptoms developed over the previous 15 days, with a new onset of a systolic panfocal murmur. Echocardiography revealed a great vegetation measuring 15 mm by 23 mm causing a severe obstruction of the bioprosthesis. The patient underwent an emergency surgical procedure due to his hemodynamic unsteadiness. During the procedure, we noted an obstruction of the left ventricle outflow tract with pseudoaneurysm of the aortomitral continuity. We debrided the aortic annulus, reconstructed the aortomitral continuity, and replaced the prosthesis, but the patient died. We present a rare fulminant case of Aspergillus endocarditis.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...