Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 48(6): 961-968, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1405159

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Introduction: Dismembered open pyeloplasty described by Anderson and Hynes is the "gold standard" for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The aim of our study was to compare the results of open (OP) vs laparoscopic (LP) vs robotic (RALP) pyeloplasty. Material and Methods: A multicenter prospective review was conducted of pyeloplasty surgeries performed at five high-volume centers between 2014 and 2018. Demographic data, history of prenatal hydronephrosis, access type, MAG3 renogram and differential renal function, surgery time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) were recorded. Access type was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. Results: A total of 322 patients were included: 62 OP, 86 LP, and 174 RALP. The mean age was 8.13 (r: 1-16) years, with a statistically significant lower age (mean 5 years) in OP (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the distribution of the side affected. Operative time was 110.5 min for OP, 140 min for LP, and 179 min for RALP (p < 0.0001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RALP group than in the other groups (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in postoperative complications and reoperations between the three groups. Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery for the management of UPJO in children is gaining more acceptance, even in patients younger than 1-year-old. Operative time continues to be significantly shorter in OP than in LP and RALP. Hospital stay was shorter in RALP compared to the other techniques. No differences were found in complication rates, type of complications, and reoperation rate.

2.
Int Braz J Urol ; 48(6): 961-968, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36083265

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Dismembered open pyeloplasty described by Anderson and Hynes is the "gold standard" for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The aim of our study was to compare the results of open (OP) vs laparoscopic (LP) vs robotic (RALP) pyeloplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter prospective review was conducted of pyeloplasty surgeries performed at five high-volume centers between 2014 and 2018. Demographic data, history of prenatal hydronephrosis, access type, MAG3 renogram and differential renal function, surgery time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) were recorded. Access type was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 322 patients were included: 62 OP, 86 LP, and 174 RALP. The mean age was 8.13 (r: 1-16) years, with a statistically significant lower age (mean 5 years) in OP (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the distribution of the side affected. Operative time was 110.5 min for OP, 140 min for LP, and 179 min for RALP (p < 0.0001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RALP group than in the other groups (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in postoperative complications and reoperations between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery for the management of UPJO in children is gaining more acceptance, even in patients younger than 1-year-old. Operative time continues to be significantly shorter in OP than in LP and RALP. Hospital stay was shorter in RALP compared to the other techniques. No differences were found in complication rates, type of complications, and reoperation rate.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Obstrucción Ureteral , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Riñón/fisiología , Pelvis Renal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
3.
Urology ; 152: 148-152, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359490

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty technique by subcoronal approach and glans preservation in distal penile urethral strictures with fossa navicularis involvement and to report safety, effectiveness, and cosmetic outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective database of patients treated at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires between January 2011 and December 2019. Main surgical steps: ventral subcoronal incision, dorsal dissection of glandelar urethra until piercing the tip of the glans, dorsal urethrotomy, and graft transposition. Low urinary tract symptoms, uroflowmetry, and urinalysis were assessed at follow-up. Simplified International Index Erectile Function and Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation were applied 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with a median age of 56.5 years (IQR 35.7-66.7) were included. Median stricture length was 5.5 cm (IQR 4-8.7). In 3 patients, Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications were reported. At 1 year, median peak flow was 18 mL/seg (IQR 12.7-27.4) and median mean flow 7.8 mL/seg (IQR 6.1-9.9). At 41.5 months follow-up (IQR 13.2-74), all patients were stricture free and had no changes in erectile function. Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation score ≥14 points was achieved by 14 patients (87.5%). CONCLUSION: For treatment of distal penile urethral strictures with fossa navicularis involvement, dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft by subcoronal approach and glans preservation is a feasible technique with excellent functional outcomes, minimal complications, and substantial cosmetic results.


Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Mucosa Bucal/trasplante , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Estética , Estudios de Factibilidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Pene/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/complicaciones , Estrechez Uretral/diagnóstico
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 45(2): 253-261, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1002195

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate safety, efficacy and functional outcomes after open vesicourethral re - anastomosis using different approaches based on previous urinary continence. Materials and Methods: Retrospective study of patients treated from 2002 to 2017 due to vesicourethral anastomosis stricture (VUAS) post radical prostatectomy (RP) who failed endoscopic treatment with at least 3 months of follow-up. Continent and incontinent patients post RP were assigned to abdominal (AA) or perineal approach (PA), respectively. Demographic and perioperative variables were registered. Follow-up was completed with clinical interview, uroflowmetry and cystoscopy every 4 months. Success was defined as asymptomatic patients with urethral lumen that allows a 14 French flexible cystoscope. Results: Twenty patients underwent open re-anastomosis for VUAS after RP between 2002 and 2017. Mean age was 63.7 years (standard deviation 1.4) and median follow-up was 10 months (range 3 - 112). The approach distribution was PA 10 patients (50%) and AA 10 patients (50%). The mean surgery time and median hospital time were 246.2 ± 35.8 minutes and 4 days (range 2 - 10), respectively with no differences between approaches. No significant complication rate was found. Three patients in the AA group had gait disorder with favorable evolution and no sequels. Estimated 2 years primary success rate was 80%. After primary procedures 89.9% remained stenosis - free. All PA patients remained incontinent, and 90% AA remained continent during follow-up. Conclusion: Open vesicourethral re - anastomosis treatment is a reasonable treatment option for recurrent VUAS after RP. All patients with perineal approach remained incontinent while incontinence rate in abdominal approach was rather low.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/métodos , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad
5.
Int Braz J Urol ; 45(2): 253-261, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30325608

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, efficacy and functional outcomes after open vesicourethral re - anastomosis using different approaches based on previous urinary continence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients treated from 2002 to 2017 due to vesicourethral anastomosis stricture (VUAS) post radical prostatectomy (RP) who failed endoscopic treatment with at least 3 months of follow-up. Continent and incontinent patients post RP were assigned to abdominal (AA) or perineal approach (PA), respectively. Demographic and perioperative variables were registered. Follow-up was completed with clinical interview, uroflowmetry and cystoscopy every 4 months. Success was defined as asymptomatic patients with urethral lumen that allows a 14 French flexible cystoscope. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent open re-anastomosis for VUAS after RP between 2002 and 2017. Mean age was 63.7 years (standard deviation 1.4) and median follow-up was 10 months (range 3 - 112). The approach distribution was PA 10 patients (50%) and AA 10 patients (50%). The mean surgery time and median hospital time were 246.2 ± 35.8 minutes and 4 days (range 2 - 10), respectively with no differences between approaches. No significant complication rate was found. Three patients in the AA group had gait disorder with favorable evolution and no sequels. Estimated 2 years primary success rate was 80%. After primary procedures 89.9% remained stenosis - free. All PA patients remained incontinent, and 90% AA remained continent during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Open vesicourethral re - anastomosis treatment is a reasonable treatment option for recurrent VUAS after RP. All patients with perineal approach remained incontinent while incontinence rate in abdominal approach was rather low.


Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía/métodos , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA