Improving Linkages Between Sexual and Reproductive Health and Substance Use Providers: The Partnership to Advance Integrated Referrals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Women of reproductive age with substance use (SU) disorders have lower rates of contraceptive use and higher rates of unintended pregnancy than women without SU disorders and are less likely to access treatment than men. Integration of SU and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, using a model known as Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), has been proven effective in reducing SU and improving health care equity. The SBIRT model includes screening, brief intervention (a short client-centered conversation providing an opportunity to identify/discuss concerns), and referral to treatment. The purpose of this study was to test whether an established quality improvement (QI) learning collaborative model could be used to support SU and SRH sites in implementing an SBIRT/SBIRT-like model to improve health outcomes for women. Five SRH sites and 4 SU sites across New York State participated in the Partnership to Advance Integrated Referrals (PAIR), an 18-month QI learning collaborative designed and implemented by Public Health Solutions. METHODS: Six standardized mixed-methods data collection tools were used over 18 months to gather process and outcome data from over 130 QI team members and site staff and over 5000 clients. RESULTS: By the end of PAIR, QI team members and site staff showed a reduction in bias, increased knowledge and comfort, increased rating of organizational practices related to client-centered care, and increased access to peer learning, information about best practices, and training and technical assistance. SU sites increased SRH screening from 47.9% in the first quarter of data collection to 67.4% in the final quarter and increased brief interventions from 92.5% in the first quarter to 100.0% in the final quarter. Similarly, SRH sites increased SU screening from 51.6% to 75.6% and increased brief interventions from 81.3% to 85.1%. The processes and outcomes were very different for the SU and SRH sites, and their varying successes and challenges are discussed. Making and verifying referrals remained challenging. CONCLUSIONS: The results of PAIR demonstrated the feasibility of SU and SRH sites implementing an SBIRT/SBIRT-like model when supported by a QI learning collaborative. Larger community and organizational challenges (COVID-19, staff turnover) still present barriers to improved reproductive health and SU outcomes for women.

"If You Don't Ask, I'm Not Going to Tell You": Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Inform Pregnancy Intention Screening Processes for Black and Latina Women in Primary Care.

BACKGROUND: Public health and medical professional organizations recommend screening women of reproductive age for pregnancy intention (PI) routinely in primary care. Existing PI screening tools may not address the complexity of intentions for women of color or lower socioeconomic status or be well-suited to primary care settings. This study sought to inform recommendations for carrying out PI screening meaningfully in primary care settings. METHODS: This community-based participatory research project united staff from a research institution, community health organization, and federally qualified health center in a predominantly Latina community in New York City. The Community Advisory Board members designed the research question, developed qualitative interview guides, and conducted in-depth interviews with 30 English- and Spanish-speaking female federally qualified health center patients ages 15 to 49. Community Advisory Board members developed an initial codebook using an inductive approach and refined themes throughout the coding process. After coding, Community Advisory Board members created a conceptual map representing relationships between key themes, and generated data-informed recommendations for PI screening practices that are relevant and feasible in the community context. RESULTS: Participants expressed a range of experiences with PI screening processes, depending on medical histories, attitudes, norms, and perceived benefits of screening. Three central themes emerged through frequency of occurrence, consistency in content, and relevance as reflected in concept mapping: agency, judgment and shame, and expertise versus authority. Recommendations included specific strategies and wording providers could use to explain the rationale and context for discussing PI. CONCLUSIONS: Future work should examine the experience and effectiveness of implementing these community-based participatory research-derived recommendations in primary care.

Building Community Capacity for Qualitative Research to Improve Pregnancy Intention Screening.

BACKGROUND: Community-based participatory research (CBPR), with an emphasis on co-learning and collaboration, holds promise for exploring the pregnancy intention (PI) screening needs of Latina patients and their health care providers. We describe a CBPR partnership exploring PI screening processes at a federally qualified health center in New York City, and lessons learned related to community participation, training, and collaboration between partners. METHODS: Stakeholders convened a community advisory board (CAB) to carry out CBPR. The CAB administered a biannual process evaluation to assess members' experiences with the project. RESULTS: Despite challenges, the CAB prioritized community participation, training, and collaboration. At three time points, members reported gaining research skills (93%, 100%, 100%), and believing in the project's potential to improve PI screening (100%, 100%, 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Building capacity for CBPR requires providing iterative training, navigating discrepancies between CAB members' interests and training needs, facilitating the meaningful participation of members with limited time and/or technical skills, and ensuring an equitable division of labor.

Primary care providers' responses to pregnancy intention screening challenges: community-based participatory research at an urban community health centre.

BACKGROUND: Incorporating pregnancy intention screening into primary care to address unmet preconception and contraception needs may improve delivery of family planning services. A notable research gap exists regarding providers' experiences conducting this screening in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To explore primary care providers' perceived challenges in conducting pregnancy intention screening with women of reproductive age and to identify strategies to discuss this in primary care settings. METHODS: This qualitative study emerged from a 2017 community-based participatory research project. We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 10 primary care providers who care for women of reproductive age at an urban federally qualified health centre. Analysis consisted of interview debriefing, transcript coding and content analysis with the Community Advisory Board. RESULTS: Across departments, respondents acknowledged difficulties conducting pregnancy intention screening and identified strategies for working with patients' individual readiness to discuss pregnancy intention. Strategies included: linking patients' health concerns with sexual and reproductive health, applying a shared decision-making model to all patient-provider interactions, practicing goal setting and motivational interviewing, fostering non-judgmental relationships and introducing pregnancy intention in one visit but following up at later times when more relevant for patients. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist for health centres to address pregnancy intention screening challenges, such as implementing routine screening and waiting room tools to foster provider and patient agency and sharing best practices with providers across departments by facilitating comprehensive training and periodic check-ins. Exploring providers' experiences may assist health centres in improving pregnancy intention screening in the primary care setting.

"Get It and Forget It:" online evaluation of a theory-based IUD educational video in English and Spanish.

OBJECTIVES: Get It & Forget It, an educational video about intrauterine devices (IUDs), was developed and evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: A feasibility study and a pre/post evaluation nested within a randomized trial were conducted to test change in knowledge about IUDs and intention to get an IUD after viewing a theory-driven dramatic video. Participants (n=315) completed surveys before and after watching the video. RESULTS: Knowledge about IUD effectiveness increased significantly (33% to 64%, p<.001), as did intention to use an IUD (18% to 36%, p<.001) postvideo. CONCLUSION: An online theory-driven video intervention can reach young women seeking information about long-acting contraception.

Association between symptoms of depression and contraceptive method choices among low-income women at urban reproductive health centers.

Among adult women of reproductive age, research has focused on depression symptoms after unintended pregnancy, or associated with hormonal contraceptive method use, with little focus on depression as a predictor of unintended pregnancy. This study was conducted to identify mental and behavioral health characteristics associated with use of less effective contraceptive methods. Choosing a less effective method of contraception places sexually active women who are not seeking pregnancy at increased risk of unintended pregnancy. Analysis was conducted using administrative data from family planning visits of 2,476 predominantly Latina and black women who received standardized behavioral and mental health screening as part of clinical care at eight reproductive health centers in New York City serving low-income women. Sociodemographic characteristics, method choice, and behavioral and mental health characteristics were compared between patients who screened positive for depression (using the PHQ-9) and those who did not. The primary outcome measure, contraceptive method choice, was dichotomized into two groups: more effective method or less effective method. In a multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for all behavioral health characteristics (binge drinking, illicit drug use, smoking, anxiety, and childhood or adult physical or sexual abuse) and birthplace, women screening positive for depression had significantly lower odds of choosing a more effective method of contraception (adjusted OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.87). These findings suggest that screening positive for depression may have an effect on contraceptive choice. Contraceptive counseling strategies should be individually tailored to promote decision-making and appropriate contraceptive choice, particularly among women with depression.