Evaluation of the pretransplantation phase of the hemopoietic stem cell program in a tertiary hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic decisions and clinical events during the pretransplantation phase of stem cell transplantation (SCT) may influence survival, quality of life, and efficiency of health expenses. However, there is a lack of relevant published data. AIMS: The aims of this study were to identify reasons why the procedure was not performed and to know the waiting time for SCT candidates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected pretransplantation data from 166 consecutive patients evaluated by the SCT Committee of a tertiary center between April 2005 and December 2006. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two of 166 patients were referred for the first time. Additionally, 14 were reconsidered as candidates for a subsequent SCT due to relapse, graft failure, secondary malignancy, or a multiple-graft program. One hundred forty-one were accepted for transplantation, whereas 25 were not. At the time of analysis, 22 patients were still awaiting SCT, 8 were delayed because they required additional courses of treatment, and 32 were excluded because of death (34.4%), poor stem cell mobilization (21.9%), patient refusal (15.6%), relapse/progression (9.4%), comorbidity (6.3%), or absence of a donor (6.3%). The median time between inclusion in the program and transplantation was 3.6 months (range, 0.27-13.43), and 5.7 months (P < .05) for unrelated allogeneic transplantation. No significant differences were observed in the diagnosis or hospital of origin. CONCLUSIONS: SCT was not performed in 22% of transplant candidates, mainly due to death, insufficient stem cell mobilization, patient refusal, or disease progression/relapse. The median time between inclusion in the SCT program and transplantation was 3 months, but longer among the unrelated allogeneic transplantations.

Preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes high morbidity and mortality among allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Preemptive therapy with oral valganciclovir or intravenous ganciclovir has replaced universal prophylaxis. We prospectively studied 19 consecutive adult recipients of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplants from May 2005 through February 2007 to analyze the safety and efficacy of preemptive therapy for the treatment of CMV infection. The antigenemia test was persistently negative in 8 patients (42%) and positive at least once in 11 (58%). Eight patients were treated with oral valganciclovir on an outpatient basis and they all became CMV negative after the first week of treatment. The other 3 patients received intravenous ganciclovir and were also CMV negative after the first week of treatment. No patient abandoned treatment, no severe secondary toxicity was noted, and there was no CMV-associated mortality.

Trasplante de progenitores hemopoyéticos e inducción de tolerancia inmunológica en las enfermedades autoinmunes / Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation and immune tolerance induction in autoimmune diseases

No disponible

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonographically (US) and stereotactically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 18 institutions, 442 women who underwent 22-25-gauge imaging-guided FNAB were enrolled. Definitive surgical, core-needle biopsy, and/or follow-up information was available for 423 (95.7%) of these women. The reference standard was established from additional clinical and imaging information for an additional six (1.4%) women who did not undergo further histopathologic evaluation. The FNAB protocol was standardized at all institutions, and all specimens were reread by one of two expert cytopathologists. RESULTS: When insufficient samples were included in the analysis and classified as positive, the sensitivity and specificity of FNAB were 85%-88% and 55.6%-90.5%, respectively; accuracy ranged from 62.2% to 89.2%. The diagnostic accuracy of FNAB was significantly better for detection of masses than for detection of calcifications (67.3% vs. 53.8%, P =.006) and with US guidance than with stereotactic guidance (77.2% vs. 58.9%; P =.002). CONCLUSION: FNAB of nonpalpable breast lesions has limited value given the high insufficient sample rate and greater diagnostic accuracy of other interventions, including core-needle biopsy and needle-localized open surgical biopsy.

Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: a multi-institutional prospective trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of stereotactic core-needle biopsy (CNB) of nonpalpable breast lesions within the context of clinically important parameters of anticipated tissue-sampling error and concordance with mammographic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CNB was performed in 1,003 patients, with results validated at surgery or clinical and mammographic follow-up. Mammographic findings were scored according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System with a similar correlative scale for histopathologic samples obtained at either CNB or surgery. Agreement of CNB findings with surgical findings or evidence of no change during clinical and mammographic follow-up (median, 24 months) for benign lesions was used to determine results. Three forms of diagnostic discrimination measures (strict, working [strict conditioned by tissue sampling error], applied [working conditioned by concordance of imaging and CNB findings) were used to evaluate the correlation of CNB, surgical, and follow-up results. RESULTS: Strict, working, and applied sensitivities were 91% +/- 1.9; 92% +/- 1.8, and 98% +/- 0.9, respectively; strict, working, and applied specificities were 100%, 98% +/- 0.8, and 73% +/- 0.9; strict, working, and applied accuracies were 97%, 96%, and 79%. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous stereotactic CNB is an accurate method to establish a histopathologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. Accuracy increases when additional surgery is performed for lesions with anticipated sampling error or when CNB findings are discordant with mammographic findings. An understanding of the interrelationship among these parameters is necessary to properly assess results.

Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted?

PURPOSE: To determine whether mammographic or histologic features can be used to predict which cases diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without invasion by means of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) will have invasive disease at surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1992 to March 1999, DCIS without invasion was diagnosed by means of SCNB in 59 patients. Seventeen (29%) were found to have invasive disease after surgery. The underestimation rate for SCNB was compared with that obtained by means of open surgical biopsy. Mammographic and histologic features of cases with and those without invasion were compared. RESULTS: All patients had calcifications on mammograms. There was no significant difference (P: =.26) between the underestimation rate for SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device and that for open surgical biopsy. No statistically significant differences between cases with and those without invasion were seen in patient age, mean number of core specimens, level of suspicion, size of lesion, distribution and morphology of the calcifications, presence of an associated mass or density, subtype of DCIS, nuclear grade, or presence of necrosis or desmoplasia. CONCLUSION: Mammographic and histologic features cannot be used reliably to predict cases that are underestimated with SCNB. However, SCNB with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device was as reliable as open surgical biopsy for diagnosing DCIS without invasion.

Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the mammographic and histologic features of cancerous lesions underestimated using 11-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 11-gauge vacuum suction biopsy was performed to identify lesions diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia or carcinoma. The histology of the core and surgical specimens was compared. Of 158 cases of cancer, underestimation occurred in 15 (9.5%). The mammographic and histologic features were assessed. RESULTS: Of 15 underestimated cases, six were atypical ductal hyperplasia that proved to be cancer (5 ductal carcinoma in situ and 1 invasive) and nine were ductal carcinoma in situ that proved to have invasion. The underestimation rate for calcifications was 16.3% (14/86) and for masses was 1.6% (1/64) (p = 0.007). Most (5/6) underestimated atypical ductal hyperplasia cases were reported as "markedly atypical," and four of nine underestimated ductal carcinoma in situ cases were reported as "possible invasion." No significant difference was seen in the number of core specimens obtained or the sizes of the lesions for underestimated cases versus accurately diagnosed cases. The percentage of calcifications retrieved was significantly different (p = 0.017). No underestimations were found among cases in which the entire mammographic lesion was removed at vacuum suction biopsy. CONCLUSION: The cancer underestimation rate with vacuum suction biopsy was 9.5%. The underestimation rate for calcifications (16.3%) was significantly higher than that for masses (1.6%) (p = 0.007). The percentage of the lesion removed was an important factor in reducing underestimation, as reflected by the percentage of calcifications retrieved and the instances of complete resolution of the lesion seen on mammography.