Effects of clazosentan on cerebral vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: two randomized phase 3 trials in Japanese patients.

OBJECTIVE: Clazosentan has been investigated globally for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The authors evaluated its effects on vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality following aSAH in Japanese patients. METHODS: Two similar double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies were conducted in 57 Japanese centers in patients with aSAH, after aneurysms were secured by endovascular coiling in one study and surgical clipping in the other. In each study, patients were randomly administered intravenous clazosentan (10 mg/hr) or placebo (1:1) starting within 48 hours of aSAH and for up to 15 days after aSAH. Stratified randomization based on World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade was performed using a centralized interactive web response system. Vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality within 6 weeks post-aSAH, including new cerebral infarcts and delayed ischemic neurological deficits as well as all-cause mortality, were the first primary endpoint in each study. The second primary endpoint was all-cause morbidity (new cerebral infarct or delayed ischemic neurological deficit from any causes) and all-cause mortality (all-cause morbidity/mortality) within 6 weeks post-aSAH. The incidence of individual components of the primary morbidity/mortality endpoints within 6 weeks and patient outcome at 12 weeks post-aSAH (including the modified Rankin Scale scores) were also evaluated. The above analyses were also performed in the population pooled from both studies. RESULTS: In each study, 221 patients were randomized and 220 were included in the full analysis set of the primary analysis (109 in each clazosentan group, 111 in each placebo group). Clazosentan significantly reduced the incidence of vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality after aneurysm coiling (from 28.8% to 13.6%; relative risk reduction 53%; 95% CI 17%-73%) and after clipping (from 39.6% to 16.2%; relative risk reduction 59%; 95% CI 33%-75%). All-cause morbidity/mortality and poor outcome (dichotomized modified Rankin Scale scores) were significantly reduced by clazosentan after preplanned study pooling. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar to those reported previously. CONCLUSIONS: Clazosentan significantly reduced the combined incidence of vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality post-aSAH with no unexpected safety findings. Clinical trial registration nos.: JapicCTI-163368 and JapicCTI-163369 (https://www.clinicaltrials.jp).

Clinical benefit of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) add-on therapy to methotrexate treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis was observed following CZP discontinuation: 2-year results of the C-OPERA study, a phase III randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical impact of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy added to the first year of 2-year methotrexate (MTX) therapy, compared with 2-year therapy with MTX alone. METHODS: MTX-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognostic factors were eligible to enter Certolizumab-Optimal Prevention of joint damage for Early RA (C-OPERA), a multicentre, randomised, controlled study, which consisted of a 52-week double-blind (DB) period and subsequent 52-week post treatment (PT) period. Patients were randomised to optimised MTX+CZP (n=159) or optimised MTX+placebo (PBO; n=157). Following the DB period, patients entered the PT period, receiving MTX alone (CZP+MTX→MTX; n=108, PBO+MTX→MTX; n=71). Patients who flared could receive rescue treatment with open-label CZP. RESULTS: 34 CZP+MTX→MTX patients and 14 PBO+MTX→MTX patients discontinued during the PT period. From week 52 through week 104, significant inhibition of total modified total Sharp score progression was observed for CZP+MTX versus PBO+MTX (week 104: 84.2% vs 67.5% (p<0.001)). Remission rates decreased after CZP discontinuation; however, higher rates were maintained through week 104 in CZP+MTX→MTX versus PBO+MTX→MTX (41.5% vs 29.3% (p=0.026), 34.6% vs 24.2% (p=0.049) and 41.5% vs 33.1% (p=0.132) at week 104 in SDAI, Boolean and DAS28(erythrocyte sedimentation rate) remission. CZP retreated patients due to flare (n=28) showed rapid clinical improvement. The incidence of overall adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In MTX-naïve patients with early RA with poor prognostic factors, an initial 1 year of add-on CZP to 2-year optimised MTX therapy brings radiographic and clinical benefit through 2 years, even after stopping CZP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01451203.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of epratuzumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a phase 1/2 randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 1/2 study (NCT01449071) assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of epratuzumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus despite standard of care. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to placebo or one of four epratuzumab dose regimens (100 mg every other week [Q2W], 400 mg Q2W, 600 mg every week [QW], or 1200 mg Q2W) administered during an initial 4-week dosing period. Adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen of 20 patients completed the study. All placebo patients and 13 of 16 epratuzumab patients reported ≥1 AE, 2 of 16 epratuzumab patients reported a serious AE. C(max) and AUC(τ) increased proportionally with dose after first and last infusion, t(1/2) was similar across groups (∼13 days). Epratuzumab treatment was associated with decreased CD22 mean fluorescence intensity in total B cells (CD19(+)CD22(+)) and unswitched memory B cells (CD19(+)IgD(+)CD27(+)). Small-to-moderate decreases were observed in total B cell (CD20(+)) count. CONCLUSIONS: Epratuzumab was well-tolerated, with no new safety signals identified. The pharmacokinetics appeared linear after first and last infusions. Treatment with epratuzumab was associated with CD22 downregulation and with small-to-moderate decreases in total B cell count.

Post-hoc analysis showing better clinical response with the loading dose of certolizumab pegol in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) with and without loading dose (LD) in a post-hoc analysis of two Japanese clinical studies. METHODS: Data from the double-blind trials (DBT) J-RAPID and HIKARI, and their open-label extension (OLE) studies, were used. Patients randomized to CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) groups starting with LD (400 mg Weeks 0/2/4; LD group; J-RAPID: n = 82, HIKARI: n = 116) and patients randomized to placebo groups who subsequently started CZP Q2W without LD in the OLEs (No-LD group; J-RAPID: n = 61, HIKARI: n = 99) were analyzed. Efficacy and pharmacokinetics were assessed during 24 weeks. Adverse events were reported from all studies. RESULTS: In both trials, the LD groups showed more rapid initial ACR20/50/70 kinetics, and maintained higher ACR50/70 responses until 24 weeks, compared with the No-LD groups. Anti-CZP antibody development was less frequent in the LD groups (J-RAPID: 1.2% versus 4.9%; HIKARI: 17.2% versus 27.3%). Similar safety profiles were reported between LD and No-LD groups (any AEs: 281.8 versus 315.7 [J-RAPID], 282.6 versus 321.3 [HIKARI] [incidence rate/100 patient-years]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, including comparing DBT and OLE studies, these results suggest that a CZP LD improves clinical response in active rheumatoid arthritis without altering the safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of olokizumab in Asian patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis, previously exposed to anti-TNF therapy: Results from a randomized phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: This phase II, dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (NCT01463059) evaluated efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ), a humanized anti-interleukin 6 monoclonal antibody, in Asian patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had previously failed anti-TNF therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized to one of six treatment arms: placebo or OKZ (60 mg/120 mg/240 mg every four weeks [Q4W]; or 60 mg/120 mg every two weeks [Q2W]); stratified by country and number of prior anti-TNFs. Primary efficacy variable was Week 12 change from baseline (CFB) in DAS28 CRP for 4-week cumulative dose groups of OKZ and placebo; secondary efficacy variables were Week 12 ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 response rates. Patients continued MTX treatment from baseline, without additional csDMARDs. RESULTS: Of 119 randomized patients, 88.2% completed the study. Greater improvements in DAS28(CRP) mean CFB at Week 12 were observed in all OKZ 4-week cumulative dose groups (60 mg/120 mg/240 mg) versus placebo (p < 0.0001). Week 12 ACR20/ACR50 response rates were higher in all OKZ cumulative dose groups versus PBO (p < 0.05). Incidences of adverse events were similar across OKZ 4-week cumulative dose groups (76.9-84.4%) and placebo (82.8%) with no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: OKZ demonstrated improvements in efficacy variables versus placebo in Asian patients with moderately-to-severely active RA who had previously failed anti-TNF therapy. The safety profile was as expected for this class of drug.