A phase 3 study (PATHWAY) of palbociclib plus tamoxifen in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy is approved for treating patients with hormone-receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer; however, data on palbociclib combined with tamoxifen are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib-tamoxifen in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. This double-blind phase 3 study included 184 women who were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive palbociclib-tamoxifen or placebo-tamoxifen. Pre/perimenopausal women also received goserelin. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Median PFS was 24.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1-32.4) with palbociclib-tamoxifen and 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.4-14.6) with placebo-tamoxifen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85; P = 0.002). Palbociclib-tamoxifen improved PFS in patients who were treated with first-line or second-line endocrine therapy and pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal patients. Though OS data are still immature (median not reached in both groups), an overall risk reduction of 27% (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44-1.21) with palbociclib-tamoxifen was observed at the time of PFS analysis. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event with palbociclib-tamoxifen was neutropenia (89.0% [none were febrile] versus 1.1% with placebo-tamoxifen). There were no deaths owing to adverse events in either group. Among patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, palbociclib-tamoxifen resulted in significantly longer PFS than tamoxifen alone. Early OS data showed a trend favoring palbociclib-tamoxifen. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03423199. Study registration date: February 06, 2018.

A case of BIA-ALCL in which postoperative chest wall recurrence was highly suspected: the third reported case of BIA-ALCL in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare malignancy. Many cases of BIA-ALCL are identified based on the presence of late-onset effusion and/or masses. Importantly, the United States Food and Drug Administration noted that in all cases diagnosed in patients with textured implants, the patients either had a history of mixed implantation of smooth and textured devices or no clinical history was supplied for review. In Japan, the first case of BIA-ALCL was reported in 2019, and we encountered the third case in Japan in December 2021. There have been a total of five cases of BIA-ALCL previously reported at Japanese academic conferences (Japan Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Society. http://jopbs.umin.jp/medical/index.html ), of which only the first case has been published. Unlike the first case, this patient had clinical features that were highly suggestive of the postoperative chest wall recurrence of breast cancer, with a mass and rash on the skin. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 45-year-old woman who had undergone breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery of the right breast 8 years previously. The patient presented with a mass and skin rash inside the inframammary area, and we suspected a damaged silicone breast implant (SBI) or chest wall recurrence. We examined the mass by a core needle biopsy and made a pathological diagnosis of BIA-ALCL. Imaging findings suggested internal thoracic lymph node swelling and lymphoma infiltration beyond the capsule but no metastatic lesions (cStage III). After en bloc resection of the SBI and lymphoma, adjuvant systemic therapy was performed. CONCLUSION: We encountered the third case of BIA-ALCL in Japan. This was a case with clinically advanced stage of disease; however, the BIA-ALCL was found to be in remission.

TP53 signature predicts pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Observational and confirmational study using prospective study cohorts.

The TP53 signature is considered a predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response and prognostic factor in breast cancer. The objective of this study was to confirm TP53 signature can predict pathological complete response (pCR) and prognosis in cohorts of breast cancer patients who received NAC in prospective studies. Development cohorts (retrospective [n = 37] and prospective [n = 216] cohorts) and validation cohorts (NAC administered prospective study cohorts [n = 407] and retrospective perioperative chemotherapy (PC)-naïve, hormone receptor (HrR)-positive cohort [PC-naïve_HrR+ cohort] [n = 322]) were used. TP53 signature diagnosis kit was developed using the development cohorts. TP53 signature predictability for pCR and the relationship between recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and the TP53 signature were analyzed. The pCR rate of the mutant (mt) signature group was significantly higher than that of the wild-type (wt) signature group (odds ratio, 5.599; 95 % confidence interval = 1.876-16.705; P = 0.0008). The comparison of the RFS and OS between the HrR+ and HER2- subgroup of the NAC cohort and of the PC-naïve_HrR+ cohort indicated that the RFS and OS benefit of NAC was greater in the mt signature group than in the wt signature group. From post hoc analyses, the RFS and OS benefit from adding capecitabine to FEC+T as NAC might be observed only in the mt signature group. The TP53 signature can predict the pCR after NAC, and the RFS and OS benefit from NAC may be greater in the mt signature group than in the wt signature group.

Mutation spectra of the BRCA1/2 genes in human breast and ovarian cancer and germline.

Annotating genomic sequence alterations is sometimes a difficult decision, particularly in missense variants with uncertain pathogenic significance and also in those presumed as germline pathogenic variants. We here suggest that mutation spectrum may also be useful for judging them. From the public databases, 982 BRCA1/1861 BRCA2 germline missense variants and 294 BRCA1/420 BRCA2 somatic missense variants were obtained. We then compared their mutation spectra, i.e., the frequencies of two transition- and four transversion-type mutations, in each category. Intriguingly, in BRCA1 variants, A:T to C:G transversion, which was relatively frequent in the germline, was extremely rare in somatic, particularly breast cancer, cells (p = .03). Conversely, A:T to T:A transversion was most infrequent in the germline, but not rare in somatic cells. Thus, BRCA1 variants with A:T to T:A transversion may be suspected as somatic, and those with A:T to C:G as being in the germline. These tendencies of mutation spectrum may also suggest the biological and chemical origins of the base alterations. On the other hand, unfortunately, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were not distinguishable by mutation spectrum. Our findings warrant further and more detailed studies.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician's choice in previously treated Asian patients with HER2-low unresectable/metastatic breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the DESTINY-Breast04 study.

BACKGROUND: In the global phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 study (NCT03734029), the anti-human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with manageable safety compared with treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who had received 1-2 prior lines of chemotherapy. METHODS: This subgroup analysis examined the efficacy and safety of T-DXd versus TPC in 213 patients from Asian countries and regions who were enrolled in the DESTINY-Breast04 trial and randomized to T-DXd (n = 147) or TPC (n = 66). RESULTS: Median PFS with T-DXd and TPC was 10.9 and 5.3 months, respectively, in Asian patients with hormone receptor-positive mBC, and 10.9 and 4.6 months, respectively, in the overall Asian population. In both populations, median OS was not reached with T-DXd and was 19.9 months with TPC. The objective response rate was higher with T-DXd versus TPC in all Asian patients. Median treatment duration was 8.4 months with T-DXd and 3.5 months with TPC. The most common grade ≥ 3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events in Asian patients treated with T-DXd were neutropenia (16.3%), anemia (12.9%), and leukopenia (11.6%); the incidences of neutropenia and leukopenia were higher with TPC versus T-DXd. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis with T-DXd was 14.3%; the majority of events were grade 1-2. CONCLUSIONS: T-DXd demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits versus TPC in Asian HER2-low mBC patients, regardless of hormone receptor status, with no new safety signals. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03734029.

Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine + pertuzumab (T-DM1 + P) and docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (TCbHP) for HER2-positive primary breast cancer: results of the randomized phase 2 JBCRG20 study (Neo-peaks).

PURPOSE: The randomized phase 2 Neo-peaks study examined usefulness of neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine + pertuzumab (T-DM1 + P) following docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (TCbHP) as compared with the standard TCbHP regimen. We previously reported that pCR rate after neoadjuvant therapy tended to be higher with TCbHP followed by T-DM1 + P. We conducted an exploratory analysis of prognosis 5 years after surgery. METHODS: Neoadjuvant treatment with TCbHP (6 cycles; group A), TCbHP (4 cycles) followed by T-DM1 + P (4 cycles; group B), and T-DM1 + P (4 cycles; group C, + 2 cycles in responders) were compared. Group C non-responders after 4 cycles were switched to an anthracycline-based regimen. We evaluated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Data from 203 patients (50, 52, and 101 in groups A-C, respectively) were analyzed. No significant intergroup differences were found for DFS, DDFS, or OS. The 5-year DFS rates (95% CI) were 91.8% (79.6-96.8%), 92.3% (80.8-97.0%), and 88.0% (79.9-93.0%) in groups A-C, respectively. TCbHP followed by T-DM1 + P and T-DM1 + P with response-guided addition of anthracycline therapy resulted in similar long-term prognosis to that of TCbHP. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant therapy with T-DM1 + P, omission of adjuvant anthracycline may be considered, whereas treatment should be adjusted for non-pCR patients with residual disease. T-DM1 + P with response-guided treatment adjustment may be useful for minimizing toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR, UMIN000014649, prospectively registered July 25, 2014. Some of the study results were presented as a Mini Oral session at the ESMO Breast Cancer 2023 (Berlin, Germany, 11-13 May 2023).

TROPION-Breast03: a randomized phase III global trial of datopotamab deruxtecan ± durvalumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer and residual invasive disease at surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy.

Background: Despite advances in the treatment of early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy have a high risk of disease recurrence and worse survival outcomes than those who have pathological complete response (pCR). Improving outcomes in early TNBC remains an unmet need requiring new adjuvant treatment approaches. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a humanized anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody attached via a plasma-stable, cleavable linker to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, with activity observed in advanced TNBC. Objectives: TROPION-Breast03 is an ongoing phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd alone or combined with durvalumab versus standard-of-care therapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage I-III TNBC with residual invasive disease at surgical resection following neoadjuvant treatment. Methods and design: Eligible patients, aged ⩾18 years, will be randomized in a 2:1:2 ratio to receive Dato-DXd [6 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W); eight cycles] and durvalumab (1120 mg IV Q3W; nine cycles), Dato-DXd monotherapy (6 mg/kg IV Q3W), or investigator's choice of therapy (ICT; capecitabine, pembrolizumab, or capecitabine and pembrolizumab). The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for Dato-DXd and durvalumab versus ICT. Key secondary endpoints include safety, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival for Dato-DXd and durvalumab versus ICT and iDFS for Dato-DXd monotherapy versus ICT. Ethics: TROPION-Breast03 will be approved by the independent ethics committees or institutional review boards at each study site. All study participants will provide written informed consent. Discussion: TROPION-Breast03 will help define the potential role of Dato-DXd in the treatment of patients with early-stage TNBC who do not have pCR after neoadjuvant therapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05629585 (registration date: 29 November 2022).

TROPION-Breast03: a clinical trial designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Dato-DXd, alone or in combination with durvalumab, in patients with triple-negative breast cancer who have cancer cells remaining at the time of surgery after initial systemic therapy Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), in which cells do not have estrogen or progesterone receptors or high levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype. TNBC is difficult to treat and associated with high risk of recurrence despite standard systemic therapy (treatment targeting the entire body), which can include chemotherapy alone or in combination with immunotherapy (treatment targeting the immune system). To reduce the risk of recurrence, standard systemic treatment is often followed by surgical removal of the patient's tumors and additional systemic treatment. Dato-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate, which is an anticancer drug (DXd) connected to an antibody (datopotamab) by a stable linker. Datopotamab binds to TROP2, a protein found on breast cancer cells, and is taken into the tumor cell where the linker breaks, releasing DXd to kill the cell. By delivering DXd directly to cancer cells, Dato-DXd reduces exposure in the rest of the body, reducing the risk of side effects. Since Dato-DXd can recruit immune cells to cancer sites, it may work better combined with durvalumab, a drug that blocks the activity of a protein called PD-L1, making cancer cells more susceptible to being killed by immune cells. The TROPION-Breast03 study will compare Dato-DXd, alone or combined with durvalumab, with standard-of-care therapy in patients with TNBC that has not spread to parts of the body away from the original tumor site(s), but with cancer cells remaining at the time of surgery after initial systemic therapy. It will assess how well each treatment works and describe any side effects. We plan to recruit 1,075 eligible adults who will be randomly assigned in a 2:1:2 ratio to: • Dato-DXd + durvalumab • Dato-DXd alone • Standard-of-care therapy • Patients will receive treatment until they complete the planned course of therapy (8 or 9 cycles), their cancer returns, side effects become unacceptable, or they choose to stop.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer, 2022 Edition: changes from the 2018 edition and general statements on breast cancer treatment.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer, 2022 Edition was published in June 2022. The guidelines were prepared while conforming as much as possible to the "Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0." edited by the Minds Manual Development Committee of the Japan Council for Quality Health Care in 2021. In addition, a survey of Japanese Breast Cancer Society members on the 2018 edition of the guidelines was conducted from February 19 to March 4, 2021. Based on the responses from over 600 members, original innovations were made to make the guidelines more user-friendly. The 2018 edition of the guidelines was developed to provide support tools for physicians and patients to utilize shared decision-making. The 2022 guidelines consist of two volumes: (1) an "Epidemiology and Diagnosis" section covering "Screening and Diagnosis", "Radiological diagnosis", and "Pathological diagnosis", and (2) a "Treatment" section covering "Surgical therapy", "Radiation therapy", and "Systemic therapy". We believe that this concise summary of the guidelines will be useful to physicians and researchers in Japan and overseas.

Relapsing eosinophilic pneumonia in a patient with recurrent breast cancer receiving abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy.

This report presents the case of a 42-year-old Japanese woman with recurrent hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who developed eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) during treatment with abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy. Seven years after a radical surgery and definite diagnosis of Stage I breast cancer, her cancer recurred with metastases to multiple organs. Initially treated with abemaciclib plus letrozole and goserelin for 3 months, she developed EP, which improved after the discontinuation of anti-cancer treatment and the administration of prednisolone. However, EP occurred again upon the reintroduction of endocrine therapy (i.e., letrozole and goserelin). It improved gradually with the suspension of endocrine therapy and the re-administration of prednisolone. This case underscores the need for further research into the prevention and management of EP in patients receiving abemaciclib with endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer.

Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been recognized as a marker of systemic inflammation with a prognostic impact in patients with various cancers, including breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between the preoperative NLR and breast cancer prognosis in the patients before and after menopausal age, and its relationship with other prognostic factors. METHODS: A total of 1868 patients with clinical Stage I-III primary breast cancer were enrolled. The associations between clinicopathological factors and the preoperative NLR were analyzed, and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. RESULTS: Statistical analyses stratified by the menopausal status revealed that a high NLR was significantly associated with worse RFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.001) in postmenopausal patients, but not in premenopausal patients. Although the postmenopausal patients with relapsed cancer tended to have higher NLR levels than those without relapse (P = 0.079), NLR levels of premenopausal patients with relapsed cancer were significantly lower than that of relapse-free patients (P = 0.024). In postmenopausal patients, a high NLR was only associated with worse RFS in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer (P < 0.001), in those managed without adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003); this association was not observed in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative NLR can be a useful prognostic marker, especially in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The relationships between the NLR and breast cancer prognosis may be more evident when patients are assessed according to their menopausal status.