A phase I study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06939999 (PRMT5 inhibitor) in patients with selected advanced or metastatic tumors with high incidence of splicing factor gene mutations.

BACKGROUND: Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) methylates multiple substrates dysregulated in cancer, including spliceosome machinery components. PF-06939999 is a selective small-molecule PRMT5 inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I dose-escalation and -expansion trial (NCT03854227) enrolled patients with selected solid tumors. PF-06939999 was administered orally once or twice a day (q.d./b.i.d.) in 28-day cycles. The objectives were to evaluate PF-06939999 safety and tolerability to identify maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended part 2 dose (RP2D), and assess pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics [changes in plasma symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) levels], and antitumor activities. RESULTS: In part 1 dose escalation, 28 patients received PF-06939999 (0.5 mg q.d. to 6 mg b.i.d.). Four of 24 (17%) patients reported dose-limiting toxicities: thrombocytopenia (n = 2, 6 mg b.i.d.), anemia (n = 1, 8 mg q.d.), and neutropenia (n = 1, 6 mg q.d.). PF-06939999 exposure increased with dose. Steady-state PK was achieved by day 15. Plasma SDMA was reduced at steady state (58%-88%). Modulation of plasma SDMA was dose dependent. No MTD was determined. In part 2 dose expansion, 26 patients received PF-06939999 6 mg q.d. (RP2D). Overall (part 1 + part 2), the most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events included anemia (28%), thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased (22%), fatigue (6%), and neutropenia (4%). Three patients (6.8%) had confirmed partial response (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, n = 1; non-small-cell lung cancer, n = 2), and 19 (43.2%) had stable disease. No predictive biomarkers were identified. CONCLUSIONS: PF-06939999 demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and objective clinical responses in a subset of patients, suggesting that PRMT5 is an interesting cancer target with clinical validation. However, no predictive biomarker was identified. The role of PRMT5 in cancer biology is complex and requires further preclinical, mechanistic investigation to identify predictive biomarkers for patient selection.

A Phase 1 study of ARQ 087, an oral pan-FGFR inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: ARQ 087 is an orally administered pan-FGFR inhibitor with multi-kinase activity. This Phase 1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ARQ 087 and defined the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumours received ARQ 087 administered initially at 25 mg every other day and dose-escalated from 25 to 425 mg daily (QD) continuous dosing. FGF19, 21, 23, and serum phosphate were assessed as potential biomarkers of target engagement. RESULTS: 80 patients were enrolled, 61 in dose-escalation/food-effect cohorts and 19 with pre-defined tumour types in the expansion cohort. The most common ARQ 087-related adverse events were fatigue (49%), nausea (46%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase (30%), and diarrhoea (23%). Four patients (5%) experienced grade 1 treatment-related hyperphosphataemia. Dose-limiting toxicity was reversible grade 3 AST increase. The RP2D was 300 mg QD. Pharmacokinetics were linear and dose-proportional from 25 to 325 mg QD, and were unaffected by food. Statistically significant changes (P-value<0.05) suggest phosphate and FGF19 levels as markers of target engagement. In 18 evaluable patients with FGFR genetic alterations, 3 confirmed partial responses (two intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA) with FGFR2 fusions and one urothelial cancer with FGFR2 and FGF19 amplification) and two durable stable disease at ⩾16 weeks with tumour reduction (FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCA and adrenocortical carcinoma with FGFR1 amplification) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: ARQ 087 had manageable toxicity at the RP2D of 300 mg QD, showed pharmacodynamics effects, and achieved objective responses, notably in patients with FGFR2 genetic alterations.

Antibody drug conjugates: lessons from 20 years of clinical experience.

Antibody drug conjugates are complex delivery systems for selective delivery of cytotoxic payloads. Yet despite the potential for this therapeutic platform and hundreds of clinical studies only three ADCs have been approved by regulatory agencies and only two are currently marketed. The difficulties for this class of compounds are both categorized and explored in this review, and potential solutions identified.

First-in-human phase I study of copanlisib (BAY 80-6946), an intravenous pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of copanlisib, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase I dose-escalation study including patients with advanced solid tumors or NHL, and a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients received three weekly intravenous infusions of copanlisib per 28-day cycle over the dose range 0.1-1.2 mg/kg. Plasma copanlisib levels were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. Biomarker analysis included PIK3CA, KRAS, BRAF, and PTEN mutational status and PTEN immunohistochemistry. Whole-body [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) was carried out at baseline and following the first dose to assess early pharmacodynamic effects. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were evaluated serially. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients received treatment. The MTD was 0.8 mg/kg copanlisib. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were nausea and transient hyperglycemia. Copanlisib exposure was dose-proportional with no accumulation; peak exposure positively correlated with transient hyperglycemia post-infusion. Sixteen of 20 patients treated at the MTD had reduced (18)FDG-PET uptake; 7 (33%) had a reduction >25%. One patient achieved a complete response (CR; endometrial carcinoma exhibiting both PIK3CA and PTEN mutations and complete PTEN loss) and two had a partial response (PR; both metastatic breast cancer). Among the nine NHL patients, all six with follicular lymphoma (FL) responded (one CR and five PRs) and one patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had a PR by investigator assessment; two patients with FL who achieved CR (per post hoc independent radiologic review) were on treatment >3 years. CONCLUSION: Copanlisib, dosed intermittently on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, was well tolerated and the MTD was determined to be 0.8 mg/kg. Copanlisib exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and promising anti-tumor activity, particularly in patients with NHL. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00962611; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00962611.

A phase I, first in human study of FP-1039 (GSK3052230), a novel FGF ligand trap, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) play important roles in multiple cancers by supporting tumor growth and angiogenesis. FP-1039 (GSK3052230) is a FGF ligand trap consisting of the extracellular domain of FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) fused with the Fc region of IgG1. FP-1039 binds and neutralizes multiple FGFs that normally bind FGFR1. The primary objective of this phase I study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of FP-1039. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors for which standard treatments were ineffective were treated with weekly doses of FP-1039 for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks observation. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects received a mean of 6 infusions of FP-1039 at doses ranging from 0.5 to 16 mg/kg weekly, with no maximally tolerated dose identified. Grade 3 or greater treatment emergent adverse events were uncommon. Four dose-limiting toxicities were reported at doses of 0.75 mg/kg (urticaria), 1 mg/kg (intestinal perforation and neutropenia), and 16 mg/kg (muscular weakness). Drug exposure was dose proportional, and the terminal elimination half-life was 2.6-3.9 days following a single dose. Target engagement as measured by low free plasma FGF2 levels was achieved. FGF pathway dysregulation was uncommon. No objective responses were observed. CONCLUSION: In nonselected cancer patients with advanced disease, treatment with FP-1039 was well tolerated and toxicities associated with small molecule drugs that inhibit FGFR tyrosine kinases, including hyperphosphatemia, were not observed. Further studies of FP-1039 in patients selected for FGF pathway dysregulation, who are most likely to benefit, are now underway.

A phase IB trial of the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) in combination with everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: This phase Ib trial investigated the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase II dose and schedule of the MEK inhibitor trametinib in combination with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetic (PK) characterization and evaluation of clinical activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 67 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in this open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study. Dose escalation followed a 3 + 3 design. Patients were assigned to one of 10 different cohorts, involving either daily dosing with both agents or daily dosing with trametinib and intermittent everolimus dosing. This included an expansion cohort comprising patients with pancreatic tumors. PKs samples were collected predose, as well as 1, 2, 4, and 6 h post-dose on day 15 of the first treatment cycle. RESULTS: Concurrent treatment with trametinib and everolimus resulted in frequent treatment-related adverse events, including mucosal inflammation (40%), stomatitis (25%), fatigue (54%), and diarrhea (42%). PK assessment did not suggest drug-drug interactions between these two agents. Of the 67 enrolled patients, 5 (7%) achieved partial response (PR) to treatment and 21 (31%) displayed stable disease (SD). Among the 21 patients with pancreatic cancer, PR was observed in 1 patient (5%) and SD in 6 patients (29%). CONCLUSIONS: This study was unable to identify a recommended phase II dose and schedule of trametinib in combination with everolimus that provided an acceptable tolerability and adequate drug exposure.

Effect of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone on the QT interval in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Abiraterone is the active metabolite of the pro-drug abiraterone acetate (AA) and a selective inhibitor of CYP17, a key enzyme in testosterone synthesis, and improves overall survival in postdocetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This open-label, single-arm phase 1b study was conducted to assess the effect of AA and abiraterone on the QT interval. METHODS: The study was conducted in 33 patients with mCRPC. Patients received AA 1,000 mg orally once daily + prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were collected in triplicate using 12-lead Holter monitoring. Baseline ECGs were obtained on Cycle 1 Day-1. Serial ECG recordings and time-matched pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples were collected over 24 h on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1. Serial PK blood samples were also collected over 24 h on Cycle 1 Day 8. RESULTS: After AA administration, the upper bound of the 2-sided 90 % confidence interval (CI) for the mean baseline-adjusted QTcF change was <10 ms; no patients discontinued due to QTc prolongation or adverse events. No apparent relationship between change in QTcF and abiraterone plasma concentrations was observed [estimated slope (90 % CI): 0.0031 (-0.0040, 0.0102)]. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant effect of AA plus prednisone on the QT/QTc interval in patients with mCRPC.

A phase II study of YM155, a novel small-molecule suppressor of survivin, in castration-resistant taxane-pretreated prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: YM155, a small-molecule survivin suppressor, showed modest single-agent activity in a phase I study of heavily pretreated patients. This study was conducted to determine the activity of YM155 in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who received prior taxane therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received 4.8 mg/m(2)/day of YM155 over 168-h continuous i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Study end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, objective tumor response, safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Two of 32 (6.2%) assessable patients had a PSA response and 2 additional patients had PSA decrements >50% but not confirmed. One of 16 (6.2%) patients also had a partial response per RECIST V1. Median PFS and OS were 3.1 and 11.2 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were fatigue (63%), nausea (40%), anorexia (31%), constipation (31%), fever (26%) and vomiting (26%). CONCLUSIONS: YM155 has modest activity in taxane-pretreated CRPC with 25% of patients having prolonged stable disease (≥18 weeks). The regimen appears to be well tolerated. Based on the mechanism of action and preclinical evidence of synergy with docetaxel (Taxotere), YM155 combined with docetaxel is being evaluated in patients with CRPC.

Erlotinib 'dosing-to-rash': a phase II intrapatient dose escalation and pharmacologic study of erlotinib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the anticancer activity of erlotinib in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose dose is increased to that associated with a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity (i.e., target rash (TR)); to characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of higher doses of erlotinib. METHODS: Patients initially received erlotinib 150 mg per day. The dose was successively increased in each patient to that associated with a TR. Anticancer activity was evaluated. Plasma, skin, and hair were sampled for PK and PD studies. RESULTS: Erlotinib dose escalation to 200-475 mg per day was feasible in 38 (90%) of 42 patients. Twenty-four (57%) patients developed a TR, but 19 (79%) did so at 150 mg per day. Five (12%) patients, all of whom developed a TR, had a partial response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.61, 4.14); median PFS was 3.5 months and 1.9 months, respectively, for patients who did and did not experience a TR (hazard ratio, 0.51; P=0.051). Neither rash severity nor response correlated with erlotinib exposure. CONCLUSION: Intrapatient dose escalation of erlotinib does not appreciably increase the propensity to experience a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity, or appear to increase the anticancer activity of erlotinib in NSCLC.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of lexatumumab (HGS-ETR2) given every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Lexatumumab (HGS-ETR2) is a fully human agonistic mAb to the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 2 that activates the extrinsic apoptosis pathway and has potent preclinical antitumor activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 1, dose escalation study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs) and immunogenicity of lexatumumab administered i.v. every 14 days in patients with advanced solid tumors. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received lexatumumab over five dose levels (0.1-10 mg/kg). Most (26 of 31) received four or more cycles of treatment. One patient at 10 mg/kg experienced a possibly related dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 hyperamylasemia. Nine patients achieved stable disease. One patient with chemotherapy-refractive Hodgkin's disease experienced a mixed response. Lexatumumab PKs were linear up to 10 mg/kg. At the 10 mg/kg dose, the mean (+/-standard deviation) t(1/2b) was 13.67 +/- 4.07 days, clearance was 4.95 +/- 1.93 ml/day/kg, V(1) was 45.55 ml/kg and V(ss) was 79.08 ml/kg, indicating that lexatumumab distributes outside the plasma compartment. No human antihuman antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Lexatumumab can be safely administered every 14 days at 10 mg/kg. The PK profile supports this schedule. Further evaluation of lexatumumab at this dose schedule is warranted, including combination trials with other agents.

Mechanism-based receptor-binding model to describe the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of an anti-α5ß1 integrin monoclonal antibody (volociximab) in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Volociximab is a chimeric IgG(4) that is being developed as a novel first-in-class anti-angiogenic, α(5)ß(1) integrin inhibitor for the treatment of solid tumors. A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed to investigate the dynamic interaction between volociximab concentrations and free monocyte α(5)ß(1) integrin levels in cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty-one cancer patients from six dose cohorts (0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10, and 15 mg/kg) were included in the analysis. The fully integrated receptor-binding PK/PD model was developed and fit simultaneously to the PK/PD data. A Monte-Carlo parametric expectation-maximization method implement in S-ADAPT program was used to obtain estimates of population parameters and inter- and intra-subject variability. RESULTS: The PK/PD time profiles were well described by the model and the parameters were estimated with good precision. The model was used to simulate PK/PD time profiles for multiple dose regimens at various dose levels, and the results suggested that the monocyte α(5)ß(1) integrin binding was saturated (≤5% free) at week 16 in the majority of patients treated with volociximab doses ≥10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The developed model is useful for anticipating the drug exposures and extent of volociximab binding to peripheral monocyte α(5)ß(1) integrin in untested regimens and for optimizing the design of future clinical trials.

A phase I, pharmacokinetic and biologic correlative study of oblimersen sodium (Genasense, G3139) and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and antitumor activity of oblimersen sodium, an antisense oligonucleotide directed to the Bcl-2 mRNA, combined with irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, characterize the pharmacokinetic behavior of both oblimersen sodium and irinotecan, and examine Bcl-2 protein inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with escalating doses of oblimersen sodium administered by continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) days 1-8, and irinotecan administered intravenously on day 6 once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty patients received a total of 84 courses at doses ranging from 3 to 7 mg/kg/day for oblimersen sodium and from 280 to 350 mg/m2 for irinotecan. Febrile neutropenia and diarrhea limited escalation of oblimersen sodium and irinotecan to 5 mg/kg/day and 350 mg/m2, respectively. Other toxicities included nausea, vomiting, fever and fatigue. Steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved within 48 h of beginning oblimersen sodium treatment and the agent was undetectable 24 h after the discontinuation of the infusion. Reduction in levels of Bcl-2 protein in PBMC was documented following treatment with oblimersen sodium. One patient experienced a partial response and 10 additional patients had stable disease lasting 2.5-10 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination is well tolerated at the recommended phase II oblimersen sodium dose of 7 mg/kg/day CIVI days 1-8 with irinotecan 280 mg/m2 intravenously on day 6 every 3 weeks.

Phase I trial of a murine antibody to MUC1 in patients with metastatic cancer: evidence for the activation of humoral and cellular antitumor immunity.

BACKGROUND: BrevaRex mAb-AR20.5 is a murine anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibody generated to induce MUC1 antigen-specific immune responses through the formation of immune complexes with circulating MUC1 and/or MUC1-expressing tumor cells that may target these immune complexes (IC) to receptors on dendritic cells (DCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase I study focusing on safety and immunology evaluated 1, 2 and 4-mg doses. Seventeen patients with MUC1-positive cancers received intravenous infusions of the antibody over 30 min on weeks 1, 3, 5, 9, 13 and 17 of treatment. RESULTS: mAb-AR20.5 was well-tolerated, not associated with dose-limiting toxicity, and did not induce hypersensitivity reactions. Overall, five of 15 evaluable patients developed human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA), five developed anti-idiotypic antibodies (Ab2) and seven developed anti-MUC1 antibodies. Immune responses were most prominent in the 2-mg dose cohort for all parameters tested, and treatment-emergent MUC1-specific T-cell responses were detected in five of 10 evaluable patients treated with mAb-AR20.5. CONCLUSIONS: The injection of a murine antibody to MUC1 induces MUC1-specific immune responses in advanced cancer patients. Anti-MUC1 antibody increases correlated with decrease or stabilization of CA15.3 levels (P=0.03). The 2-mg dose of mAb-AR20.5 showed strongest biological activity, and will be evaluated in future efficacy trials.

Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules.

Temozolomide, an oral DNA methylator that inactivates the DNA repair enzyme O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT), has demonstrated anticancer activity on protracted schedules. Protracted schedules may lead to an 'autoenhancement' of temozolomide's inherent cytotoxic potential by cumulative reduction of the cell's capacity for AGAT-mediated DNA repair and resistance. This study was undertaken to characterise AGAT inactivation and regeneration in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients treated on two protracted temozolomide schedules. O(6)-alkyl guanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity was measured in the PBMCs of patients treated on two phase I protracted temozolomide studies. Patients were treated daily for either 7 days every 2 weeks (Schedule A) or 21 days every 4 weeks (Schedule B). The effects of various temozolomide doses (75-175 mg m(-2)), treatment duration (7-21 days), and temozolomide plasma levels on AGAT inactivation and regeneration, as well as the relation between AGAT inactivation and toxicity, were studied. O(6)-alkyl guanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in PBMCs was measured serially in 52 patients. Marked inactivation of AGAT occurred following 7 days of temozolomide treatment, with mean AGAT activity decreasing by 72% (P<0.0001). Similarly, mean AGAT activity decreased by 63 and 73% after 14 and 21 days of treatment, respectively (P<0.001 for both comparisons). O(6)-alkyl guanine-DNA alkyltransferase inactivation was greater after 7 days of treatment with higher doses of temozolomide than lower doses and remained markedly reduced 7 days post-treatment. However, AGAT inactivation following temozolomide treatment for 14 and 21 days was similar at all doses. On the continuous 21-day schedule, AGAT inactivation was significantly greater in patients who experienced severe thrombocytopenia than those who did not (90.3+/-5.5 vs 72.5+/-16.1%, P<0.045). In conclusion, protracted administration of temozolomide, even at relatively low daily doses, leads to significant and prolonged depletion of AGAT activity, which may enhance the antitumour activity of the agent.

A phase I dose-finding study of combined treatment with an antisense Bcl-2 oligonucleotide (Genasense) and mitoxantrone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Bcl-2 is a negative prognostic indicator in prostate cancer, implicated in the development of androgen independence and treatment resistance, and is overexpressed in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Genasense is a phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide complementary to the bcl-2 mRNA open reading frame that in preclinical studies has shown significant activity in inhibiting expression of Bcl-2, delaying androgen independence, and improving chemosensitivity in prostate and other cancer models. In this dose escalation study, we evaluated the combination of Genasense and mitoxantrone, a standard chemotherapy for patients with HRPC. DESIGN: Twenty-six patients with HRPC were treated at seven dose levels receiving Genasense at a dose ranging from 0.6 to 5.0 mg/kg/day and mitoxantrone from 4 mg/m(2) to 12 mg/m(2). Genasense was administered as a 14-day i.v. continuous infusion every 28 days with mitoxantrone given as an i.v. bolus on day 8. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Hematological toxicities were transient and included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia. Nonhematological toxicities included fatigue, fever, nausea, arthralgias, myalgias, and transient elevations in serum creatinine, none of which were severe. Two patients had >50% reductions in prostate-specific antigen. One patient, who received six cycles of Genasense at 1.2 mg/kg/day and a low dose (4 mg/m(2)) of mitoxantrone, also had symptomatic improvement in bone pain. Peripheral blood lymphocyte Bcl-2 protein expression decreased in five of five patients given Genasense at 5mg/kg/day (mean change from baseline, -12.8%; SD, 16.4%) as assessed by flow cytometry. Serum concentrations of Genasense given at doses of 3 mg/kg/day and greater, exceeded 1 microg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Genasense and mitoxantrone are well tolerated in combination, and mitoxantrone can be delivered at a standard dose with biologically active doses of Genasense without significant additional toxicity. This observation allays concerns about trials that combine Genasense with full doses of other cytotoxic agents seeking greater evidence of activity.

Preliminary phase I results of G3139 (bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide) therapy in combination with docetaxel in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

The transition from androgen-dependent to androgen-independent prostate cancer is accompanied by a number of molecular genetic changes, including overexpression of the bcl-2 gene. Overexpression of Bcl-2 protein decreases the pro-apoptotic response to such cellular insults as irradiation, chemotherapy, and androgen withdrawal. Reduction of Bcl-2 expression in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) preclinical models markedly increases the antitumor efficacy of docetaxel both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, a phase I/II pharmacokinetic and biologic correlative study has been initiated in patients with HRPC to examine whether docetaxel therapy can be enhanced with a therapeutic antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (G3139) directed at bcl-2 gene expression. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 15):67-70.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of NSC 655649, a rebeccamycin analog with topoisomerase inhibitory properties.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering NSC 655649, a water-soluble, rebeccamycin analog with topoisomerase inhibitory properties, as a brief intravenous (IV) infusion once every 3 weeks and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of NSC 655649, characterize its pharmacokinetic behavior, and seek preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of NSC 655649 administered over 30 to 60 minutes IV once every 3 weeks. An accelerated dose-escalation method was used to guide dose escalation. After three patients were treated at the first dose level, doses were escalated in increments that ranged up to 150% using single patient cohorts until moderate toxicity was observed, when a more conservative dose-escalation scheme was invoked. MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity did not exceed 20%. MTD was determined for both minimally pretreated (MP) and heavily pretreated (HP) patients. Plasma and urine were sampled to characterize the pharmacokinetic and excretory behavior of NSC 655649. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were treated with 130 courses of NSC 655649 at doses ranging from 20 mg/m(2) to 744 mg/m(2). Myelosuppression was the principal toxicity. Severe neutropenia, which was often associated with thrombocytopenia, was unacceptably high in HP and MP patients treated at 572 mg/m(2) and 744 mg/m(2), respectively. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were common but rarely severe. The pharmacokinetics of NSC 655649 were dose dependent and fit a three-compartment model. The clearance and terminal elimination half-lives for NSC 655649 averaged 7.57 (SD = 4.2) L/h/m(2) and 48.85 (SD = 23.65) hours, respectively. Despite a heterogeneous population of MP and HP patients, the magnitude of drug exposure correlated well with the severity of myelosuppression. Antitumor activity was observed in two HP ovarian cancer patients and one patient with a soft tissue sarcoma refractory to etoposide and doxorubicin. CONCLUSION: Recommended phase II doses are 500 mg/m(2) and 572 mg/m(2) IV once every 3 weeks for HP and MP patients, respectively. The absence of severe nonhematologic toxicities, the encouraging antitumor activity in HP patients, and the unique mechanism of antineoplastic activity of NSC 655649 warrant further clinical development.

Novel compounds in the therapy of breast cancer: opportunities for integration with docetaxel.

Increasingly, novel agents are being developed specifically at inhibition of growth factor receptors and events within the signal transduction pathway. These agents include the epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the farnesyl transferase inhibitors, and bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotides. Along with these new approaches to molecular targeting, it will be necessary to develop new study designs for drug evaluation. Target validation in both normal surrogate tissues and tumor tissue becomes increasingly relevant in early clinical trials. Furthermore, antitumor efficacy may no longer correlate with normal hematological or nonhematological toxicity, and it may be more appropriate in phase I trials to identify the maximum target inhibition dose rather than the maximum tolerated dose. Moreover, measures of cytoreduction, such as complete and partial response, may be less relevant than disease stabilization for some of these novel agents which have limited cytotoxic effects and would be considered cytostatic agents. Assessment of single-agent activity and the future role in conjunction with cytostatic agents represents the single most important challenge facing the clinical development of these molecular targeted therapies.

Other novel agents: Rationale and current status as chemopreventive agents.

Several novel targets are currently being evaluated both preclinically and clinically for the prevention of prostate cancer. Four divergent and novel approaches were discussed at the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop entitled, "New Clinical Strategies in Prostate Cancer Prevention." These interventions are further categorized into soy protein-based serine-protease inhibitors that reduce superoxide-induced DNA damage, and molecularly targeted approaches that are directed toward endothelin-1 expression/overexpression, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands, and insulinlike growth factors. Understanding each of these approaches has offered insights into the process of malignant transformation of prostatic epithelium, and further illustrates the difficulties of developing new agents in the treatment and prevention of prostate cancer. Close scrutiny of the clinical data emerging with these approaches, including validation of biologic endpoints, is required before large-scale prevention studies with these novel agents and targets can be considered.