Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: experience at an epilepsy centre.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. CONCLUSION: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications.

Estereoelectroencefalografía en la evaluación prequirúrgica de epilepsias focales refractarias: experiencia de un centro de epilepsia / Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: Experience at an epilepsy centre

Objetivo: La estereoelectroencefalografía (E-EEG) es una técnica de evaluación prequirúrgica en pacientes con epilepsia focal refractaria de difícil localización (EFRDL) que permite explorar con electrodos profundos regiones cerebrales de difícil acceso y la profundidad de la corteza. Esta técnica, en auge en centros internacionales, apenas se ha desarrollado en España. Describimos nuestra experiencia con la E-EEG en la evaluación de pacientes con EFRDL. Material y métodos: En los últimos 8 años, 71 pacientes con EFRDL fueron evaluados con E-EEG en nuestro centro. Analizamos prospectivamente los resultados obtenidos en la localización, los resultados quirúrgicos y las complicaciones asociadas a la técnica. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue de 30 años (rango 4-59 años), 27 pacientes eran mujeres (38%). La RM cerebral fue negativa en 45 pacientes (63,4%). Se implantaron 627 electrodos (mediana de 9 electrodos por paciente, rango 1-17), con un 50% de implantaciones multilobares. En 64 (90,1%) pacientes se localizó la zona epileptógena (ZE), siendo extratemporal o temporal plus en el 66% de los casos. En 55 pacientes de los 61 intervenidos el seguimiento fue superior al año: en el último año de seguimiento 32/55 pacientes (58,2%) estaban libres de crisis (Engel I) siendo los resultados favorables (Engel I-II) en el 76,4% de las intervenciones. Tres pacientes (4,2%) presentaron una hemorragia cerebral. Conclusión: La E-EEG permite localizar la ZE en pacientes en quienes anteriormente no era posible, ofreciendo unos resultados quirúrgicos superiores a otras técnicas invasivas y una tasa de complicaciones relativamente baja. (AU)

Objective: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. Material and methods: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. Results: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. Conclusion: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications. (AU)

[Treatment of epilepsy with perampanel: conversion from add-on therapy to monotherapy]. / Tratamiento de la epilepsia con perampanel: desde la terapia añadida a la conversión a monoterapia.

INTRODUCTION: Perampanel (PER) is an antiepileptic drug approved in Europe as add-on therapy for patients with focal onset seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) from the age of 4 years, and for primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures from 7 years of age. OBJECTIVE: Review current evidence on treatment with PER monotherapy after conversion from adjunctive therapy. DEVELOPMENT: Two retrospective multicentre studies in which PER was used as monotherapy show that low doses (6-8 mg/day) of PER were effective and well tolerated in a subgroup of patients with less severe epilepsies than patients who participated in clinical trials (where PER was used as add-on therapy). In these studies, the retention rate exceeded 90% at 3 months, and 70% at 6, and 12 months. The responder rate was > 75% at 3 months, and the rate of seizure-free patients exceeded 50% at 3 and 6 months, and 37% at 12 months. Compared to other observational studies and clinical trials where PER was used as add-on therapy, no adverse effects other than those already known were observed. Four other studies examining the effects of conversion to PER monotherapy in a small number of patients support these results. CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, conversion to PER monotherapy, at relatively low doses, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with focal and generalised tonic-clonic seizures.

TITLE: Tratamiento de la epilepsia con perampanel: desde la terapia añadida a la conversión a monoterapia.Introducción.El perampanel (PER) es un fármaco anticrisis epilépticas aprobado en Europa como terapia añadida para pacientes con crisis de inicio focal (con o sin crisis focal a bilateral tonicoclónica) desde los 4 años, y para las crisis tonicoclónicas generalizadas desde los 7 años. Objetivo. Revisar la evidencia existente sobre el tratamiento con PER en conversión a monoterapia. Desarrollo. Dos estudios multicéntricos retrospectivos en los que el PER se convirtió a monoterapia muestran que este fármaco en dosis bajas (6-8 mg/día) fue especialmente eficaz y bien tolerado en un subgrupo de pacientes con epilepsias menos graves que los pacientes que participaron en los ensayos clínicos en donde el PER se empleó como terapia añadida. En estos estudios, la tasa de retención superó el 90% a los tres meses y el 70% a los seis y a los 12 meses. La tasa de respondedores fue > 75% a los tres meses, y la tasa de pacientes libres de crisis llegó a superar el 50% a los tres y a los seis meses, y el 37% a los 12 meses. En comparación con otros estudios donde el PER se empleó como terapia añadida, no se observaron efectos adversos diferentes a los ya conocidos. Otros cuatro estudios que examinaron los efectos del PER en conversión a monoterapia en un número pequeño de pacientes apoyan estos resultados. Conclusiones. En la práctica clínica habitual, el PER es un tratamiento eficaz y bien tolerado cuando se usa en conversión a monoterapia, en dosis relativamente bajas, en pacientes con crisis focales y tonicoclónicas generalizadas.

Tratamiento de la epilepsia con perampanel: desde la terapia añadida a la conversión a monoterapia / Treatment of epilepsy with perampanel: conversion from add-on therapy to monotherapy

Introducción: El perampanel (PER) es un fármaco anticrisis epilépticas aprobado en Europa como terapia añadida para pacientes con crisis de inicio focal (con o sin crisis focal a bilateral tonicoclónica) desde los 4 años, y para las crisis tonicoclónicas generalizadas desde los 7 años. Objetivo: Revisar la evidencia existente sobre el tratamiento con PER en conversión a monoterapia. Desarrollo: Dos estudios multicéntricos retrospectivos en los que el PER se convirtió a monoterapia muestran que este fármaco en dosis bajas (6-8 mg/día) fue especialmente eficaz y bien tolerado en un subgrupo de pacientes con epilepsias menos graves que los pacientes que participaron en los ensayos clínicos en donde el PER se empleó como terapia añadida. En estos estudios, la tasa de retención superó el 90% a los tres meses y el 70% a los seis y a los 12 meses. La tasa de respondedores fue > 75% a los tres meses, y la tasa de pacientes libres de crisis llegó a superar el 50% a los tres y a los seis meses, y el 37% a los 12 meses. En comparación con otros estudios donde el PER se empleó como terapia añadida, no se observaron efectos adversos diferentes a los ya conocidos. Otros cuatro estudios que examinaron los efectos del PER en conversión a monoterapia en un número pequeño de pacientes apoyan estos resultados. Conclusiones: En la práctica clínica habitual, el PER es un tratamiento eficaz y bien tolerado cuando se usa en conversión a monoterapia, en dosis relativamente bajas, en pacientes con crisis focales y tonicoclónicas generalizadas.(AU)

Introduction: Perampanel (PER) is an antiepileptic drug approved in Europe as add-on therapy for patients with focal onset seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) from the age of 4 years, and for primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures from 7 years of age. Objective: Review current evidence on treatment with PER monotherapy after conversion from adjunctive therapy. Development: Two retrospective multicentre studies in which PER was used as monotherapy show that low doses (6-8 mg/day) of PER were effective and well tolerated in a subgroup of patients with less severe epilepsies than patients who participated in clinical trials (where PER was used as add-on therapy). In these studies, the retention rate exceeded 90% at 3 months, and 70% at 6, and 12 months. The responder rate was > 75% at 3 months, and the rate of seizure-free patients exceeded 50% at 3 and 6 months, and 37% at 12 months. Compared to other observational studies and clinical trials where PER was used as add-on therapy, no adverse effects other than those already known were observed. Four other studies examining the effects of conversion to PER monotherapy in a small number of patients support these results. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, conversion to PER monotherapy, at relatively low doses, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with focal and generalised tonic-clonic seizures.(AU)

Bisphenol A induces coronary endothelial cell necroptosis by activating RIP3/CamKII dependent pathway.

Epidemiological studies link long term exposure to xenoestrogen Bisphenol-A to adverse cardiovascular effects. Our previous results show that BPA induces hypertension by a mechanism involving CamKII activation and increased redox stress caused by eNOS uncoupling. Recently, CamKII sustained activation has been recognized as a central mediator of programmed cell death in cardiovascular diseases, including necroptosis. However, the role of necroptosis in cardiac response to BPA had not yet been explored. Mice exposed to BPA for 16 weeks showed altered heart function, electrical conduction, and increased blood pressure. Besides, a stress test showed ST-segment depression, indicative of cardiac ischemia. The hearts exhibited cardiac hypertrophy and reduced vascularization, interstitial edema, and large hemorrhagic foci accompanied by fibrinogen deposits. BPA initiated a cardiac inflammatory response, up-regulation of M1 macrophage polarization, and increased oxidative stress, coinciding with the increased expression of CamKII and the necroptotic effector RIP3. In addition, cell death was especially evident in coronary endothelial cells within hemorrhagic areas, and Evans blue extravasation indicated a vascular leak in response to Bisphenol-A. Consistent with the in vivo findings, BPA increased the necroptosis/apoptosis ratio, the expression of RIP3, and CamKII activation in endothelial cells. Necrostatin-1, an inhibitor of necroptosis, alleviated BPA induced cardiac dysfunction and prevented the inflammatory and hemorrhagic response in mice. Mechanistically, silencing of RIP3 reversed BPA-induced necroptosis and CamKII activation in endothelial cells, while inhibition of CamKII activation by KN-93 had no effect on RIP3 expression but decreased necroptotic cell death suggesting that BPA induced necroptosis is mediated by a RIP 3/CamKII dependent pathway. Our results reveal a novel pathogenic role of BPA on the coronary circulation. BPA induces endothelial cell necroptosis, promotes the weakening of coronary vascular wall, which caused internal ventricular hemorrhages, delaying the reparative process and ultimately leading to cardiac dysfunction.

Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: Experience at an epilepsy centre. / Estereoelectroencefalografía en la evaluación prequirúrgica de epilepsias focales refractarias: experiencia de un centro de epilepsia.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. CONCLUSION: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications.

Retrospective study of perampanel efficacy and tolerability in myoclonic seizures.

OBJECTIVES: Perampanel is an antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for add-on treatment of focal seizures (with or without generalization) and primary generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures. Our objective was to explore the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in patients with drug-resistant myoclonic seizures, after failure of other AEDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Data were collected from individual patient clinical files and analysed using appropriate descriptive statistics and inferential analyses. RESULTS: Data are reported for 31 patients with mean age 36.4 years, who had an average epilepsy duration of 18 years, previously taken an average of 5.03 AEDs, and were taking an average of 2.4 AEDs on perampanel initiation. Patients exhibited myoclonic, GTC, absence, tonic and focal seizures, and most had associated cognitive decline and/or ataxia. Median time on perampanel was 6 months, most common dose was 6 mg, and overall retention rate was 84%. The responder rate for myoclonic seizures was defined via reduction of days with myoclonic seizures per month. At 6 months, 15 (48.4%) of the 31 patients were classed as myoclonic seizure responders, 10 (32.3%) were myoclonic seizure free, and 39% saw improvements in functional ability. Of 17 patients with GTC seizures at baseline, 9 (53%) were responders at 6 months, and 8 (47.1%) were seizure free. The most frequent side effects were psychiatric disorders, instability, dizziness and irritability, and mostly resolved with dose reduction. Five patients discontinued perampanel due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel caused clinically meaningful improvements in patients with drug-resistant myoclonic seizures. It was generally well tolerated, but psychiatric and neurological side effects sometimes required follow-up and dose reduction.

Specificity of electroclinical features in the diagnosis of ring chromosome 20.

BACKGROUND: Ring chromosome 20 (R20) syndrome is a chromosomal disorder characterized mainly by drug-resistant frontal lobe seizures, recurrent nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), and typical EEG features. The aim of this study was to investigate if this triad is common and specific to all patients with R20. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study (from 2000 to 2011), we selected patients who fulfilled at least two out of three criteria: drug-resistant frontal lobe seizures, recurrent NCSE, and characteristic electroencephalography (EEG) features. In all patients, diagnosis was based on karyotype analysis of at least 100 metaphases. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients who met at least two of the selected criteria: six patients (16.7%) with R20 and 30 (83.3%) without R20 (non-R20). All patients with R20 met all three criteria. Eleven (36.7%) patients without R20, however, also displayed the full triad. In 19 patients without R20 (63.3%), one of the three clinical features was missing: frontal lobe seizures were not resistant to antiepileptic drugs (AED) in four (13.3%), recurrent NCSE was missing in six (20%), and nine (30%) patients did not have typical EEG features. Based on this data, specificity was 63.3%, positive predictive value was 35.3%, and sensitivity and negative predictive values were 100%. Additionally, a review of all publications describing the R20 phenotype revealed that 81.98% of patients with R20 display the full electroclinical triad. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, all patients with R20 displayed the three electroclinical characteristics. This is in line with previous reports (presenting high sensitivity and negative predictive value). However, these features can also be observed in other epilepsies and are not specific to R20. Our findings suggest that in the presence of the full triad of symptoms, karyotype analysis focused on chromosome 20 should be conducted.

Validez de las escalas clínicas y de contenido del Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnesota-2 para el diagnóstico de crisis no epilépticas psicógenas / Validity of the clinical and content scales of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

Introducción: La utilidad del Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) para el diagnóstico de crisis no epilépticas psicógenas (CNEP) es controvertida. Este estudio analiza la validez de las escalas clínicas y, a diferencia de trabajos previos, las escalas de contenido. Métodos: Estudio transversal de 209 pacientes atendidos en la unidad de epilepsia. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística tomando como prueba de referencia la vídeo-electroencefalografía y como variables predictoras edad, sexo, cociente intelectual y las escalas clínicas (modelo A) o de contenido (modelo B) del MMPI-2. Los modelos se seleccionaron según el índice de Aikake y se compararon con el test de DeLong. Resultados: Se analizó a 37 pacientes con CNEP solas o combinadas con crisis epilépticas y 172 pacientes solo con crisis epilépticas. El modelo A, compuesto por sexo, hipocondría (Hs) y paranoia (Pa), mostró una sensibilidad del 77,1%, una especificidad del 76,8%, un porcentaje de clasificación correcta del 76,8% y un área bajo la curva (AUC) de 0,836 para el diagnóstico de CNEP. El modelo B, compuesto por sexo, preocupación por la salud (HEA) y miedos (FRS), mostró una sensibilidad del 65,7%, una especificidad del 78,0%, un porcentaje de clasificación correcta del 75,9% y un AUC de 0,840. El test de DeLong no detectó diferencias significativas. Conclusiones: El MMPI-2 presenta una validez moderada para el diagnóstico de CNEP en los pacientes remitidos a una unidad de epilepsia. El uso de las escalas de contenido no mejora de forma significativa los resultados obtenidos con las escalas clínicas

Introduction: The use of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) is controversial. This study examines the validity of the clinical scales and, unlike previous works, the content scales. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 209 patients treated in the epilepsy unit. We performed a logistic regression analysis, taking video-electroencephalography as the reference test, and as predictor variables age, sex, IQ and clinical (model A) or content scales (model B) of the MMPI-2. The models were selected according to the Aikake index and compared using the DeLong test. Results: We analyzed 37 patients with PNES alone, or combined with seizures, and 172 patients with seizures only. The model consisting of sex, Hs (hypochondriasis) and Pa (paranoia) showed a sensitivity of 77.1%, a specificity of 76.8%, a percentage of correct classification of 76.8%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.836 for diagnosing CNEP. Model B, consisting of sex, HEA (health concerns) and FRS (fears), showed a sensitivity of 65.7%, a specificity of 78.0%, a percentage of correct classification of 75.9% and an AUC of 0.840. DeLong's test did not detect significant differences. Conclusions: The MMPI-2 has a moderate validity for the diagnosis of PNES in patients referred to an epilepsy unit. Using content scales does not significantly improve results from the clinical scales

Validity of the clinical and content scales of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.

INTRODUCTION: The use of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) is controversial. This study examines the validity of the clinical scales and, unlike previous works, the content scales. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 209 patients treated in the epilepsy unit. We performed a logistic regression analysis, taking video-electroencephalography as the reference test, and as predictor variables age, sex, IQ and clinical (model A) or content scales (model B) of the MMPI-2. The models were selected according to the Aikake index and compared using the DeLong test. RESULTS: We analyzed 37 patients with PNES alone, or combined with seizures, and 172 patients with seizures only. The model consisting of sex, Hs (hypochondriasis) and Pa (paranoia) showed a sensitivity of 77.1%, a specificity of 76.8%, a percentage of correct classification of 76.8%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.836 for diagnosing CNEP. Model B, consisting of sex, HEA (health concerns) and FRS (fears), showed a sensitivity of 65.7%, a specificity of 78.0%, a percentage of correct classification of 75.9% and an AUC of 0.840. DeLong's test did not detect significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The MMPI-2 has a moderate validity for the diagnosis of PNES in patients referred to an epilepsy unit. Using content scales does not significantly improve results from the clinical scales.

Statin adherence and LDL cholesterol levels. Should we assess adherence prior to statin upgrade?

BACKGROUND: Adherence to statin therapy has been shown to be suboptimal. In statin-treated patients with residual elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels the physician must decide whether to switch to a more potent statin or try and achieve better adherence. We examined the association between adherence and LDL-C within low, moderate and high intensity statin groups in a "real world" setting. METHODS: We assessed annual adherence by the mean MPR (Medication Possession Ratio = number of purchased/prescribed daily doses) in unselected patient group. Statins were stratified (ACC/AHA Guideline) into low, moderate and high intensity groups. The impact of adherence on LDL levels was assessed by LOESS (locally weighted scatter plot smoothing). RESULTS: Out of 1183 patients 173 (14.6%) were treated with low, 923 (78.0%) with moderate and 87 (7.4%) with high intensity statins. Statin intensity was inversely associated with adherence (MPR 77±21, 73±22 and 69±21% for low, moderate and high intensity respectively, p=0.018). Non-adjusted LDL levels decreased with higher adherence: a 10% adherence increase resulted in LDL decrease of 3.5, 5.8 and 7.1mg/dL in low, moderate and high intensity groups. Analysis of the adherence effect on LDL levels adjusted for age, DM and ischemic heart disease showed that MPR above 80% was associated with an additional decrease in LDL levels only in the high intensity group. CONCLUSIONS: Increased adherence to statins beyond an MPR of 80% improves LDL levels only among patients given high intensity therapy. Switching from lower to higher intensity therapy may be more effective than further efforts to increase adherence.

Development of an analytical method for the determination of the misuse in sports of boldenone through the analysis of urine by on-line coupling liquid chromatography-gas chromatography-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry.

Boldenone (Bo), androsta-1,4-dien-17ß-ol-3-one, is an anabolic androgenic steroid not clinically approved for human application. Despite this, many cases are reported every year of athletes testing positive for Bo or its main metabolite 5ß-androst-1-en-17ß-ol-3-one (BoM). Recently the capability of different human intestinal bacteria to produce enzymes able to modify endogenous steroids in Bo has been demonstrated. When a urinary concentration of Bo and/or BoM between 5 and 30 ng/mL is measured a complementary analysis by gas chromatography combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS) must be carried out to discriminate the endogenous or exogenous origin. In the present work, a novel analytical method that couples LC-GC by means of the TOTAD interface with C-IRMS is described. The method is based on a first RPLC separation of unacetyled steroids, followed by acetylation and automated on-line LC-GC-C-IRMS, which includes a second RPLC clean-up of acetyl Bo and BoM, isolation of the two fractions in a fraction collector and their consecutive analysis by GC-C-IRMS. The method has been applied to the analysis of urine samples fortified at 5 and 10 ng/mL, where it has shown a good performance.

[Multicentric prospective randomized study evaluating the interest of intravaginal electro-stimulation at home for urinary incontinence after prior perineal reeducation. Interim analysis]. / Étude prospective multicentrique randomisée évaluant l'intérêt de l'électrostimulation intravaginale à domicile après rééducation périnéale pour incontinence urinaire. Analyse intermédiaire.

OBJECTIVES: Perineal reeducation of stress urinary incontinence is beneficial in 80% of cases. However, patients have to perform self-retraining exercises of the perineal muscles at home, in order to maintain the benefit of the physiotherapy. The aim of this study is to assess the benefit of GYNEFFIK(®), a perineal electro-stimulator, during this home-care phase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stress urinary incontinence (UI) or with mixed UI (composed predominantly of stress UI) that responded to physiotherapy were included in this study in two parallel groups. The groups followed a self-reeducation program, with or without GYNEFFIK(®) electro-stimulation sessions. The comparison of the two groups was based on the rate of women for whom the benefit of the initial perineal reeducation was maintained (defined as non-worsening ICIQ and Ditrovie scales' score). RESULTS: According to the protocol, an interim analysis was performed on 95 patients (i.e. almost half of the expected sample size) who had had at least one evaluation under treatment, among which 44 patients had finished the study. The therapeutic benefit of the initial perineal reeducation was maintained in 87.8% of the GYNEFFIK(®) patient group, while it was maintained in 52.2% (P=0.0001) in the usual care group (i.e. who did not use electro-stimulation). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Likewise, patient had a more favorable subjective impression when using GYNEFFIK(®) (83.7% versus 60.0% in the usual care group) as they felt that they improved during the study. In the GYNEFFIK(®) group, no increase in symptoms was reported, whereas almost one out of five patients in the usual care group felt that their condition had worsened.

Enantiomeric analysis of limonene and carvone by direct introduction of aromatic plants into multidimensional gas chromatography.

Analysis of chiral compounds in complex mixtures is achieved by multidimensional gas chromatography using heptakis-(2,3,6-tri-O-methyl)-ß-cyclodextrin stationary phase as the main column of the system to separate specific selected cuts containing components unresolved in the first dimension. The proposed procedure allows rapid analysis of both solid and liquid matrices by direct introduction, into the programmed temperature vaporizer (PTV) of a gas chromatograph, of either the plant material or the essential oil, respectively. A comparison between enantiomeric excesses data obtained, from plant leaves (or plant seeds) and the corresponding essential oils, by direct injection (i.e., without sample pretreatment or concentration step) into the multidimensional system is also included. Reported data demonstrate that no racemization occurs during analysis as identical enantiomeric excesses are obtained in both cases for specific chiral compounds.

Utilidad de la resonancia magnética cerebral con secuencia de difusión y valor b alto en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob / Usefulness of high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

Introducción: los criterios diagnósticos actuales de la enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob (ECJ) probable incluyen la combinación de datos clínicos, electroencefalográficos y analíticos. En los últimos años se ha demostrado que la RM craneal con el uso de secuencias FLAIR y difusión (DWI) puede ser una herramienta útil en el diagnóstico de esta enfermedad. Describimos nuestra experiencia en la utilización de la DWI convencional (b: 1000s/mm2) y DWI con valor b alto (3000s/mm2) en el diagnóstico de la ECJ probable o definitiva. Pacientes y métodos: realizamos un análisis retrospectivo de los pacientes atendidos en nuestro hospital diagnosticados de ECJ probable o definitiva, desde el año 2002 al 2008. A todos ellos se les realizó una RM craneal con un protocolo que incluyó secuencias potenciadas en T1, T2, FLAIR y dos secuencias DWI, una con valor b convencional (1000s/mm2) y otra con valor b alto (3000s/mm2). Resultados: se atendieron a 7 pacientes con diagnóstico de ECJ probable o definitiva. En tres de ellos (43%) la secuencia FLAIR mostró cambios de señal compatibles con ECJ. En todos los pacientes en la secuencia DWI con valor b alto se observaron alteraciones características de la enfermedad, incluyendo dos casos (28%) en los que todas las secuencias realizadas, incluida la DWI convencional, fueron normales. Adicionalmente en los 7 casos (100%) las alteraciones radiológicas fueron más fáciles de identificar y más extensas con valores altos b de DWI (AU). Conclusión: la utilización de un valor b alto (3000s/mm2) en la secuencia DWI puede aumentar la sensibilidad de la RM craneal en el diagnóstico de la ECJ, permitiendo la detección de casos en los que la DWI convencional es normal

Background: current diagnostic criteria of probable Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) include a combination of clinical, EEG and analytic data. Recent data indicate that brain MRI including fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences can be a valid and reliable tool for the diagnosis of CJD. We describe our experience with high b-value (3000s/mm2) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with probable or definite CJD and compare it with standard b-value (1000s/mm2) DWI. Methods: we performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our Hospital Service between 2002 and 2008 with a final diagnosis of probable or definite CJD. Patients were examined using either a 1.5 Tesla or a 3 Tesla MRI. The MRI protocol included T1-weigthed spin-echo sequences, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, FLAIR and DWI sequences with high b-value and standard b-value. Results: during the study period there were 7 patients with probable or definite CJD. Only 3 patients (43%) showed changes on FLAIR sequence consistent with CJD. All the cases were detected with high b-value DWI, including 2 cases (28%) that would have been missed using standard b-value (1000s/mm2) DWI. In all the patients the changes were more conspicuous and extensive at high b-value DWI (b=3000s/mm2). Conclusion;: our data indicate that high b-value DWI may improve the sensitivity of brain MRI for the diagnosis of CJD, allowing the detection of some cases that would have been overlooked by conventional sequences (AU)

Usefulness of high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

BACKGROUND: current diagnostic criteria of probable Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) include a combination of clinical, EEG and analytic data. Recent data indicate that brain MRI including fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences can be a valid and reliable tool for the diagnosis of CJD. We describe our experience with high b-value (3000s/mm(2)) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with probable or definite CJD and compare it with standard b-value (1000s/mm(2)) DWI. METHODS: we performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our Hospital Service between 2002 and 2008 with a final diagnosis of probable or definite CJD. Patients were examined using either a 1.5 Tesla or a 3 Tesla MRI. The MRI protocol included T1-weigthed spin-echo sequences, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, FLAIR and DWI sequences with high b-value and standard b-value. RESULTS: during the study period there were 7 patients with probable or definite CJD. Only 3 patients (43%) showed changes on FLAIR sequence consistent with CJD. All the cases were detected with high b-value DWI, including 2 cases (28%) that would have been missed using standard b-value (1000s/mm(2)) DWI. In all the patients the changes were more conspicuous and extensive at high b-value DWI (b=3000s/mm(2)). CONCLUSION: our data indicate that high b-value DWI may improve the sensitivity of brain MRI for the diagnosis of CJD, allowing the detection of some cases that would have been overlooked by conventional sequences.

Síndrome de leucoencefalopatía posterior en relación con angiopatía amiloide / Posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome associated with amyloid angiopathy

No disponible

No disponible