Cartilaginous Eustachian tube length and carotid canal dehiscence in children: a radiological study.

PURPOSE: The use of Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) for Eustachian tube dysfunction is increasing in adults but to a lesser extent in children. Despite growing experience, concerns remain that BET could theoretically cause carotid artery rupture, which may be more likely if there is carotid canal dehiscence adjacent to the bony Eustachian tube. This radiological study aims to assess the prevalence of carotid canal dehiscence and length of cartilaginous Eustachian tube in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 75 consecutive computed tomography scans of the petrous temporal bones performed in children were identified (150 carotid canals/Eustachian tubes). Two independent raters measured the length of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube and thickness of carotid canal wall. RESULTS: 8% of carotid canals had radiological dehiscence. Prevalence of carotid canal dehiscence on either side per child was 12%. Mean cartilaginous Eustachian tube length was 24.5 mm (SD 3.1 mm) and the minimum measured was 14.1 mm. The minimum length measured in a child over 3 years old (n = 65) was 18.1 mm. The mean thickness of bone of the carotid canal was 0.7 mm (SD 0.27 mm). There was a positive relationship between age and Eustachian tube length (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.622, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid canal dehiscence in children has a low prevalence. Variation in the length of the cartilaginous Eustachian tube is low but is correlated with age. More research is required to define the indications, safety, efficacy and technical aspects of BET in children.

Streamlining grommet pathways for otitis media with effusion and hearing loss in children: our experience.

BACKGROUND: Grommet insertion is a common surgical procedure in children. Long waiting times for grommet insertion are not unusual. This project aimed to streamline the process by introducing a pathway for audiologists to directly schedule children meeting National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Clinical Guideline 60 ('CG60') for grommet insertion.Method and resultsA period from June to November 2014 was retrospectively audited. Mean duration between the first audiology appointment and grommet insertion was 294.5 days (median = 310 days). Implementing the direct-listing pathway reduced the duration between first audiology appointment and grommet insertion (mean = 232 days; median = 231 days). There has been a reduction in the time between the first audiology appointment and surgery (mean difference of 62.5 days; p = 0.024), and a reduction in the time between second audiology appointment and surgery (28 days; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Direct-listing pathways for grommet insertion can reduce waiting times and expedite surgery. Implementation involves a simple alteration of current practice, adhering to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Clinical Guideline 60. The ultimate decision regarding surgery still rests with ENT specialists.

Scars and satisfaction: do smaller scars improve patient-reported outcome?

Thyroidectomy has few complications, as a result, many patients are concerned about the prominence of their scar. Performing thyroid surgery through excessively small incisions in order to maximise cosmesis may increase the likelihood of complications. This study investigates the relationship between conventional approach thyroidectomy scar length and patient satisfaction. A validation of self-measurement of neck circumference and thyroidectomy scar was carried out with the measurements taken by patients compared with those taken by an investigator. One hundred consecutive patients who had undergone conventional thyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy within 24 months were invited to measure their scars and neck circumference, and to score their satisfaction on a Likert scale of 1-10. Spearman's correlation was calculated for the relationship between absolute and relative scar length, and patient satisfaction. Thirty-four patients entered the preliminary study and 80 patients entered the main study (80% response rate). Measurements by patients and investigators were closely associated: Spearman's Rank correlation coefficient for neck circumference and for scar length were ρ = 0.9, p < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.93, p < 0.0001 respectively. No significant correlation was evident between scar length and patient satisfaction (ρ = 0.068, p = 0.55), or between relative scar length ratio and patient satisfaction (ρ = -0.045, p = 0.69). Mean scar length was 6.96 cm [standard deviation (SD) 2.70], and mean satisfaction score 8.62 (SD 2.04). Thyroidectomy scar length appears to have no association with patient satisfaction. Thyroid surgery should, therefore, not be performed through unnecessarily small incisions for purely aesthetic reasons.