Characteristics and patients' portrayals of Norwegian social media memes. A mixed methods analysis.

Background: Despite reports on troublesome contents created and shared online by healthcare professionals, a systematic inquiry of this potential problem has been missing. Our objective was to characterize the content of healthcare-associated social media memes in terms of common themes and how patients were portrayed. Materials and methods: This study applied a mixed methods approach to characterize the contents of Instagram memes from popular medicine- or nursing-associated accounts in Norway. In total, 2,269 posts from 18 Instagram accounts were included and coded for thematic contents. In addition, we conducted a comprehensive thematic analysis of 30 selected posts directly related to patients. Results: A fifth of all posts (21%) were related to patients, including 139 posts (6%) related to vulnerable patients. Work was, however, the most common theme overall (59%). Nursing-associated accounts posted more patient-related contents than medicine-associated accounts (p < 0.01), but the difference may be partly explained by the former focusing on work life rather than student life. Patient-related posts often thematized (1) trust and breach of trust, (2) difficulties and discomfort at work, and (3) comical aspects of everyday life as a healthcare professional. Discussion: We found that a considerable number of Instagram posts from healthcare-associated accounts included patients and that these posts were diverse in terms of contents and offensiveness. Awareness that professional values also apply online is important for both healthcare students and healthcare providers. Social media memes can act as an educational resource to facilitate discussions about (e-)professionalism, the challenges and coping of everyday life, and ethical conflicts arising in healthcare settings.

Meningiomas and Somatostatin Analogs: A Systematic Scoping Review on Current Insights and Future Perspectives.

Meningioma is the most frequent brain tumor, and the incidence is ever-increasing. Though often benign and slow growth, recurrence rates are substantial and today's surgical and radiation-based treatment are not without complications. No drugs specific for meningiomas are hitherto approved and patients with inoperable or recurrent meningioma are left with few treatment options. Somatostatin receptors are previously detected in meningiomas and may inhibit growth when stimulated by somatostatin. Hence, somatostatin analogs could provide a targeted drug therapy. The aim of this study was to compile the current insights of somatostatin analogs for patients with meningioma. This paper adheres to the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search was conducted in the search databases PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Web of Science. Seventeen papers adhered to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and critical appraisal was conducted. The overall quality of evidence is low, as none of the studies were randomized or controlled. Various efficacy of somatostatin analogs is reported, and adverse effects are sparse. Due to the beneficial effects reported by some studies, somatostatin analogs may offer a novel last-option treatment for severely ill-patients. Nonetheless, only a controlled study, preferably a randomized clinical trial, could clarify the efficacy of somatostatin analogs.

Somatostatin Receptors in Human Meningiomas-Clinicopathological Aspects.

Meningiomas have high recurrence rates despite frequently benign histopathological appearances. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) may be reliable biomarkers that could identify patients with increased risk of recurrence. Even though SSTRs are previously detected in meningiomas, their associations to clinicopathological features remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of SSTRs in a large series of human meningiomas with long follow-up data. Immunohistochemistry was used to measure the expression of SSTR1-SSTR5 in tissue samples from 162 patients diagnosed with intracranial meningiomas of World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 or 2. Digital scoring and a manual staining index were applied to assess immunoreactivity. All SSTRs, except SSTR4, were upregulated in our series of meningiomas. SSTR1 (p = 0.036), SSTR2 (p = 0.036) and SSTR5 (p = 0.029) were associated with a higher malignancy grade. SSTR2 presented as the most reliable marker. Only SSTR2 was associated with time to recurrence (TTR) in univariate Cox regression analyses. Manual staining index was strongly correlated with digital scoring for all SSTRs (r > 0.65, p < 0.001). SSTRs, and especially SSTR2, are useful in the diagnostics of meningiomas, even though their prognostic value appears limited. Digital scoring is valuable to ensure reproducibility.