Postoperative extended-volume external-beam radiation therapy in high-risk esophageal cancer patients: a prospective experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Extended-volume external-beam radiation therapy (RT) following esophagectomy is controversial. The present prospective study evaluates the feasibility of extended-volume RT treatment in high-risk esophagectomy patients with a cervical anastomosis receiving postoperative combined chemoradiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2006, 15 patients with resected esophageal cancer were prospectively accrued to this pilot study to evaluate the adverse effects of extended-volume RT. Postoperative management was carried out at London Regional Cancer Program. Eligibility criteria were pathology-proven esophageal malignancy (T3-4, N0-1), disease amenable to surgical resection, and esophagectomy with or without resection margin involvement. Patients with distant metastases (M1) and patients treated with previous RT were excluded. All 15 study patients received 4 cycles of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. External-beam RT was conducted using conformal computed tomography planning, with multi-field arrangement tailored to the pathology findings, with coverage of a clinical target volume encompassing the primary tumour bed and the anastomotic site in the neck. The radiation therapy dose was 50.40 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. The RT was delivered concurrently with the third cycle of chemotherapy. The study outcomes-disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)-were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related toxicities were assessed using the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: The study accrued 10 men and 5 women of median age 64 years (range: 48-80 years) and TNM stages T3N0 (n = 1), T2N1 (n = 2), T3N1 (n = 11), and T4N1 (n = 1). Histopathology included 5 adenocarcinomas and 10 squamous-cell carcinomas. Resection margins were clear in 10 patients. The median follow-up time was 19 months (range: 3.5-53.4 months). Before radiation therapy commenced, delay in chemotherapy occurred in 20% of patients, and dose reduction was required in 13.3%. During the concurrent chemoradiation therapy phase, 20% of the patients experienced chemotherapy delay, and 6.6% experienced dose reduction. No patient experienced treatment-related acute and chronic esophagitis above grade 2. Disease recurred in 40% of the patients (6/15), and median time to relapse was 24 months. No tumour recurred at the anastomotic site. The median DFS was 23 months, and the median OS was 21 months. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-volume external-beam RT encompassing the tumour bed and the anastomotic site is feasible and safe for high-risk T3-4, N0-1 esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy.

Using treatment interruptions to palliate the toxicity from concurrent chemoradiation for limited small cell lung cancer decreases survival and disease control.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We analyzed the impact on survival outcomes of treatment interruptions due to toxicity arising during the concurrent phase of chemotherapy/radiotherapy (ChT/RT) for our limited-stage small-cell cancer (LSCLC) population over the past 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 1999, 215 patients received treatment for LSCLC, consisting of six cycles of alternating cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin or epirubicin/vincristine (CAV; CEV) and etoposide/cisplatin (EP). Thoracic RT was started with EP at either the second or third cycle (85% of patients). RT dose was either 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks or 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, delivered to a target volume encompassing gross disease and suspected microscopic disease with a 2 cm margin. Treatment breaks arising during concurrent ChT+RT were used to manage severe symptomatic or hematologic toxicities. We used the interruptions in thoracic RT as the 'marker' for any concurrent break and measured 'break duration' by the total length of time (in days) RT was interrupted, since that also signaled that ChT could be re-initiated. Patient results were analyzed for the impact of interruptions/treatment prolongation on overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: For all patients, 2-year and 5-year overall and disease-specific survivals were 22.7 and 7.2, 27.6 and 9.3%, respectively; overall and disease-specific median survivals were 14.7 months each. A total of 56 patients (26%) had treatment breaks due to toxicity. Hematologic depression caused the majority of breaks (88%). The median duration of breaks was 5 days (range 1-18). Patients with and without interruptions were compared for a range of prognostic factors and were not found to have any significant differences. Comparing interrupted/uninterrupted courses, median survivals were 13.8 versus 15.6 months, respectively, and 5-year overall survivals were 4.2 versus 8.3%, respectively. There was a statistical difference between overall survival curves which favored the uninterrupted group (P=0.01). When comparing a series of prognostic variables, multivariable analysis found that the most significant factor influencing survival in the present study was the presence of treatment breaks (P=0.006). There was a trend for development of any recurrence in the patients with breaks (P=0.08). When controlling for the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the two groups, the rate of failure in the chest was higher in the patients with RT breaks (58 vs. 33%). The rate of failure in the brain was dependent on the use of PCI only. CONCLUSIONS: Interruptions in treatment to palliate the toxicity from concurrent chemoradiation result in poorer local control and decreased survival.

Thymidylate synthase expression in stage II and III colon cancer: a retrospective review.

This study is a retrospective analysis of thymidylate synthase (TS) levels in patients with stage II (T3 or T4) and III colon cancer. Two groups of patients were identified: one undergoing surgery alone (98 patients) and the second receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy (112 patients). TS analyses were carried out using the 106 monoclonal antibody and a published grading system dividing staining into high and low intensity. The distribution of patients with low versus high TS levels was similar in the two groups. There was no association between TS staining intensity and grade, stage or location of primary. Seventy-nine patients have relapsed: 46 (48%) in the surgery only group, 33 (30%) in the adjuvant therapy group (median follow-up: 51 and 61 months). Similar proportions relapsed when analyzed according to TS: in the surgery only group, 41% of patients with low TS, 48% with high TS; in the adjuvant group, 31% with low TS, 30% with high TS. In the surgery only group, a trend toward improved disease-free survival (DFS) was seen in the low TS group (84 versus 63% at 2 years, p = 0.08). No difference was seen in overall survival. There were no differences in DFS or overall survival in patients receiving adjuvant therapy according to TS intensity. The trend for worse outcome in patients with high TS is consistent with previous reports. The lack of difference in outcome for patients with low and high TS receiving chemotherapy suggests that high TS levels may predict greater benefit from adjuvant treatment.

Standard dose (Mayo regimen) 5-fluorouracil and low dose folinic acid: prohibitive toxicity?

Despite the perception that standard 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) (425 mg/m2 per day and 20 mg/m2 per day intravenously once daily x 5 every 4 or 5 weeks) is well tolerated, we have been impressed by toxicity seen and frequent need for dose modification. We performed a retrospective analysis to quantitate the proportion of patients experiencing toxicity and attempted to identify associated clinical characteristics. One hundred thirty-four patients received 5-FU/FA at standard doses described by the Mayo regimen. Patient characteristics were as follows: female 35%, median age 66 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 2, 96%. Sixty-eight percent received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Forty-seven patients (35%+/-8%) experienced significant toxicity and were unable to receive the second cycle as scheduled: 76% required dose reduction, 11% discontinued therapy (including two toxic deaths), 11% discontinued therapy during the first cycle, and 2% required dose delay. Logistic regression was used to explore the following as predictors of toxicity: age, sex, performance status, adjuvant versus metastatic setting, prior chemotherapy, prior radiation, mean corpuscular volume, red blood cell distribution width, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, and calculated creatinine clearance. No clinical characteristic was found to predict toxicity. Only high bilirubin approached statistical significance. We conclude that standard 5-FU/FA, when used in the general population, is associated with significant toxicity. Known clinical characteristics are not helpful in predicting toxicity. The lack of previous formal phase I evaluation of this regimen of 5-FU/FA raises concerns regarding its safety and generalizability in clinical practice.

Analysis of the clinical benefit of 5-fluorouracil and radiation treatment in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the palliative benefit of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiotherapy in patients with surgically unresectable localized pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five patients with locally advanced surgically unresectable symptomatic pancreatic cancer received 5-FU chemotherapy and local radiation therapy. They were retrospectively reviewed in regard to their clinical benefit response (a composite of measurement of pain assessment, weight, and Karnofsky performance status [KPS]), as well as radiological response, time to progression, and overall survival. RESULTS: Median survival for the 25 patients was 9 months and median progression-free survival was 6 months. Thirty-two percent of patients survived in excess of 1 year. Analgesic requirements increased >50% in 2 patients and KPS deteriorated in 10 patients. Of the 13 remaining patients, 2 sustained a >7% weight loss and 2 gained weight post-treatment. Six patients improved in one parameter of analgesic consumption, weight loss or KPS without deteriorating in any others. Thus, the clinical benefit response index for 5-FU-radiation was 6/25 (24%). In terms of tumor response, 8 patients (44%) demonstrated a reduction in tumor volume post-treatment, 4 of whom (22%) experienced a >50% reduction. Four additional patients had radiologically stable disease. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, the clinical benefit response index for 5-FU-radiation was 24%, a value similar to the 23.8% reported for single agent gemcitabine. The median survival of 7 months was also similar to the 5.65 months reported for gemcitabine. The radiological partial response rate of 22% and the 1-year survival of 32% were higher for 5-FU-radiation than the reported values for gemcitabine. A randomized trial would be necessary to compare 5-FU-radiation to gemcitabine directly; however, from this review it did not appear that the overall palliative benefit of 5-FU-radiation was inferior to gemcitabine.

High dose doxorubicin plus cisplatin in the treatment of unresectable mesotheliomas: report of four cases.

Only a very small proportion of all patients with mesotheliomas can be cured surgically. Both radiotherapy and standard chemotherapy are generally considered to be of only limited usefulness. In this paper, we report four patients with unresectable mesotheliomas treated with the combination of cisplatin 105-120 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 90 mg/m2. Toxicity was substantial, in that all four patients developed neutropenic sepsis and other grade 3 toxicity, but there were no treatment-related deaths. There were two patients with complete remissions (one persisting at > 4 years), one partial remission, and one stable disease with marked symptomatic improvement. This combination is toxic, but the anecdotal evidence of efficacy is suggestive that it may possibly be more active than lower doses of chemotherapy. It warrants further study in good performance status patients with unresectable mesotheliomas.

Duration of intravenous antibiotics for patients with neutropenic fever.

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy has consisted of intravenous antibiotic until resolution of both fever and neutropenia. We attempted to shorten the hospital stay by discontinuing intravenous antibiotics in blood culture negative patients who remained clinically stable and afebrile for 48 hours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Febrile neutropenic admissions of non-leukemic patients were reviewed. They were divided by three consecutive six month intervals into Group 1 (prior to initiation of the policy), Group 2 (after the policy was instituted), and Group 3 (to monitor the implementation of the policy after the initial six months). RESULTS: There were 134 admissions for neutropenic fever. Median duration of intravenous antibiotic for Group 1 was 7 days (95% Confidence Interval 6-9). It was significantly decreased to 5 days (4-6) and 4 days (3-5) for Groups 2 and 3 respectively (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001). Median duration of hospital stay for Group 1 was 10 days (7-13). It was also significantly decreased to 7 (5-8) and 6 days (5-7) for Groups 2 and 3 respectively (p = 0.04 and p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Early discontinuation of intravenous antibiotics in patients with negative blood culture who remain afebrile and clinically stable for 48 hours results in shorter duration of hospital stay with potential for reduction in hospital costs.

An automated microtechnique for selenium determination in human body fluids by flow injection hydride atomic absorption spectrometry (FI-HAAS).

The automation of a flow injection system for the hydride generation of selenium and its subsequent determination by atomic absorption spectrometry (FI-HAAS) is described. Pre-treatment of the sample and the details of the automated equipment are reviewed. For the FI-HAAS selenium analysis a volume of 350 microL of acid-digested sample solution is injected. The on-line generated hydride is delivery by the gas-liquid separator and is transported together with an Ar stream to the heated quartz cell for the atomic absorption determination. The absolute detection limit is 35 pg Se; the relative detection limit 0.10 micrograms/L Se. The absolute determination limit in real biological samples is 110 pg Se; the relative detection limit 0.31 micrograms/L Se. The accuracy of the method was evaluated via analysis of certified standard reference materials. Quality control was made by comparing FI-HAAS and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA), as an independent analytical method. Two acid-digestion procedures (in open vessels at atmospheric pressure and bomb-digestion in pressure vessels) were experimentally tested. To determine the effectiveness of the selenium reduction and the completeness of the selenium hydride formation a parallel selenium determination was carried out by means of ICP-AES and FI-HAAS analysis. FI-HAAS was applied for blood serum analysis of children undergoing long-term total parenteral nutrition, as well as of persons with high dietary selenium intake, and for human milk analysis.