RESUMEN
: Objective of our study is to determine whether decreased fibrinolytic activity or plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 4G/5G polymorphism influence the risk of venous thrombosis.Our case-control study included 100 patients with venous thrombosis, and 100 random controls. When patients were compared with random controls, unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Decreased fibrinolytic activity yielded a 2.7-fold increase in risk for venous thrombosis than physiological fibrinolytic activity (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.22-5.98), when comparing patients with random controls. Adjustment for several putative confounders did not change the estimate (OR 3.02; 95% CI 1.26-7.22). Analysis of venous thrombotic risk influenced by PAI-1 genotype, showed no influence of PAI-1 4G/5G gene variant in comparison with 5G/5G genotype (OR 0.57 95% CI; 0.27-1.20).Decreased fibrinolytic activity increased, whereas PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism did not influence venous thrombosis risk in this study.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidor 1 de Activador Plasminogénico/genética , Trombosis de la Vena/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Fibrinólisis , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo Genético , Trombosis de la Vena/sangre , Trombosis de la Vena/patología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) represents a common disorder involving genetic and acquired risk factors. It has been proposed that acquired risk factors are more important with aging than genetic factors, indicating different prevalence of prothrombotic mutations throughout the lifespan. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of the most frequent prothrombotic genetic risk factors (Factor V [FV] Leiden and Factor II [FII] G20210A mutations) in first-time DVT etiology in patients of different ages. METHOD: This retrospective study included 701 patients living in Serbia with diagnosed DVT as a first-time thrombotic event. RESULTS: Risk assessment for mutations as age-related markers showed no statistical difference (FV Leiden mutation-OR, 1.027; 95% confidence interval [CI], .87-1.22; P = .76 and FII G20210A mutation-OR, 0.940, 95% CI, .74-1.19; P = .61). Our results show similar mutation prevalence regardless of how old the patients were at the time of the first DVT occurrence. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that these 2 mutations cannot be used as prognostic marker for time-to-event first DVT in the Serbian population; however, further studies are required.
