Long-term outcomes of PDT for centrally-located early lung cancers with tumor diameters > 2.0 cm.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is used for the treatment of centrally-located early lung cancers (CLELCs) and is recommended for tumors ≤ 1.0 cm in diameter. We previously reported that PDT using talaporfin sodium, second-generation photosensitizer, for tumors > 1.0 cm but ≤ 2.0 cm in diameter was able to achieve a therapeutic outcome comparable to that of tumors with a diameter of ≤ 1.0 cm. However, the effectiveness of PDT using talaporfin sodium for tumors > 2.0 cm in diameter remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective analysis of cases in which PDT was performed for flat-type CLELCs with tumor diameters of > 2.0 cm. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed seven cases (eight lesions) with tumor diameters > 2.0 cm and no evidence of extracartilaginous invasion or lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: All the patients underwent multiple PDT sessions. The PDT treatment results over the study period were partial response in one case (14.3 %), stable disease (SD) in three cases (42.9 %), and progressive disease (PD) in three cases (42.9 %). At the time of writing this report, five of seven cases (71.4 %) are still undergoing treatment. The duration of SD-the time from the start of treatment until the criteria for PD were met (SD or better maintained)-ranged from 7 to 52 months (mean, 25.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: "Maintenance PDT" for CLELCs > 2.0 cm in diameter has the potential to inhibit tumor progression in the long term while maintaining quality of life, rather than simply aiming only for a quick radical cure.

New Technique for Introducing a Surgical Stapler during Robot-Assisted Lobectomy for Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The da Vinci Si version robot lacks a vascular stapler that can be controlled by the operating surgeon at the surgical console when dividing pulmonary vessels. Therefore, to initiate and safely perform robotic anatomical lobectomy for lung cancer, it is important to develop a safe method for introducing a surgical stapler. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of the first 42 consecutive patients who underwent robotic lobectomy for lung cancer at Nippon Medical School Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020. RESULTS: Up to case 18, we performed robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) lobectomy by using a four-arm approach with two assistant ports. For dividing pulmonary vessels, the surgical stapler was introduced through the assist ports. However, since this is not the port position usually used in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), there were many difficult situations. For RATS lobectomy case 19 and all subsequent cases, we utilized a total port approach that uses three robotic arms and two assistant ports. To resect the pulmonary vessels or bronchi with endoscopic staplers, the port for the robotic arm was removed and the endoscopic staplers were placed through a 12-mm Xcel bladeless port. This change reduced operation time, blood loss, and robotic arm interference. No patient developed intraoperative complications during RATS lobectomy. CONCLUSION: The present total port approach, with three robotic arms, appears to be feasible for introducing surgical staplers during RATS with the da Vinci Si robotic system.