Deciphering the Akt1-HuD interaction in HuD-mediated neuronal differentiation.

The RNA-binding protein HuD/ELAVL4 is essential for neuronal development and synaptic plasticity by governing various post-transcriptional processes of target mRNAs, including stability, translation, and localization. We previously showed that the linker region and poly(A)-binding domain of HuD play a pivotal role in promoting translation and inducing neurite outgrowth. In addition, we found that HuD interacts exclusively with the active form of Akt1, through the linker region. Although this interaction is essential for neurite outgrowth, HuD is not a substrate for Akt1, raising questions about the dynamics between HuD-mediated translational stimulation and its association with active Akt1. Here, we demonstrate that active Akt1 interacts with the cap-binding complex via HuD. We identify key amino acids in linker region of HuD responsible for Akt1 interaction, leading to the generation of two point-mutated HuD variants: one that is incapable of binding to Akt1 and another that can interact with Akt1 regardless of its phosphorylation status. In vitro translation assays using these mutants reveal that HuD-mediated translation stimulation is independent of its binding to Akt1. In addition, it is evident that the interaction between HuD and active Akt1 is essential for HuD-induced neurite outgrowth, whereas a HuD mutant capable of binding to any form of Akt1 leads to aberrant neurite development. Collectively, our results revisit the understanding of the HuD-Akt1 interaction in translation and suggest that this interaction contributes to HuD-mediated neurite outgrowth via a unique molecular mechanism distinct from translation regulation.

Neuronal RNA-Binding Protein HuD Interacts with Translation Initiation Factor eIF3.

Translation initiation is the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis and is the main target of translation regulation. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key mediators of the spatiotemporal control of translation and are critical for cell proliferation, development, and differentiation. We have previously shown that HuD, one of the neuronal RBPs, enhances cap-dependent translation through the direct interaction with eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) and poly(A) tail using a HeLa-derived in vitro translation system. We have also found that translation stimulation of HuD is essential for HuD-induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. However, it remains unclear how HuD is involved in the regulation of translation initiation. Here, we report that HuD binds to eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) via the eIF3b subunit, which belongs to the functional core of mammalian eIF3. eIF3 plays an essential role in recruiting the 40S ribosomal subunit onto mRNA in translation initiation. We hypothesize that the interaction between HuD and eIF3 stabilizes the translation initiation complex and increases translation efficiency. We also showed that the linker region of HuD is required for the interaction with eIF3b. Moreover, we found that eIF3b-binding region of HuD is conserved in all Hu proteins (HuB, HuC, HuD, and HuR). These data might also help to explain how Hu proteins stimulate translation in a cap- and poly(A)-dependent way.

Regulation of CCR4-NOT complex deadenylase activity and cellular responses by MK2-dependent phosphorylation of CNOT2.

CCR4-NOT complex-mediated mRNA deadenylation serves critical functions in multiple biological processes, yet how this activity is regulated is not fully understood. Here, we show that osmotic stress induces MAPKAPK-2 (MK2)-mediated phosphorylation of CNOT2. Programmed cell death is greatly enhanced by osmotic stress in CNOT2-depleted cells, indicating that CNOT2 is responsible for stress resistance of cells. Although wild-type (WT) and non-phosphorylatable CNOT2 mutants reverse this sensitivity, a phosphomimetic form of CNOT2, in which serine at the phosphorylation site is replaced with glutamate, does not have this function. We also show that mRNAs have elongated poly(A) tails in CNOT2-depleted cells and that introduction of CNOT2 WT or a non-phosphorylatable mutant, but not phosphomimetic CNOT2, renders their poly(A) tail lengths comparable to those in control HeLa cells. Consistent with this, the CCR4-NOT complex containing phosphomimetic CNOT2 exhibits less deadenylase activity than that containing CNOT2 WT. These data suggest that CCR4-NOT complex deadenylase activity is regulated by post-translational modification, yielding dynamic control of mRNA deadenylation.

Translation Initiation Regulated by RNA-Binding Protein in Mammals: The Modulation of Translation Initiation Complex by Trans-Acting Factors.

Protein synthesis is tightly regulated at each step of translation. In particular, the formation of the basic cap-binding complex, eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) complex, on the 5' cap structure of mRNA is positioned as the rate-limiting step, and various cis-elements on mRNA contribute to fine-tune spatiotemporal protein expression. The cis-element on mRNAs is recognized and bound to the trans-acting factors, which enable the regulation of the translation rate or mRNA stability. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanism of how the assembly of the eIF4F complex is regulated on the cap structure of mRNAs. We also summarize the fine-tuned regulation of translation initiation by various trans-acting factors through cis-elements on mRNAs.

ARE-binding protein ZFP36L1 interacts with CNOT1 to directly repress translation via a deadenylation-independent mechanism.

Eukaryotic gene expression can be spatiotemporally tuned at the post-transcriptional level by cis-regulatory elements in mRNA sequences. An important example is the AU-rich element (ARE), which induces mRNA destabilization in a variety of biological contexts in mammals and can also mediate translational control. Regulation is mediated by trans-acting factors that recognize the ARE, such as Tristetraprolin (TTP) and BRF1/ZFP36L1. Although both proteins can destabilize their target mRNAs through the recruitment of the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex, TTP also directly regulates translation. Whether ZFP36L1 can directly repress translation remains unknown. Here, we used an in vitro translation system derived from mammalian cell lines to address this key mechanistic issue in ARE regulation by ZFP36L1. Functional assays with mutant proteins reveal that ZFP36L1 can repress translation via AU-Rich elements independent of deadenylation. ZFP36L1-mediated translation repression requires interaction between ZFP36L1 and CNOT1, suggesting that it might use a repression mechanism similar to either TPP or miRISC. However, several lines of evidence suggest that the similarity ends there. Unlike, TTP, it does not efficiently interact with either 4E-HP or GIGYF2, suggesting it does not repress translation by recruiting these proteins to the mRNA cap. Moreover, ZFP36L1 could not repress ECMV-IRES driven translation and was resistant to pharmacological eIF4A inhibitor silvestrol, suggesting fundamental differences with miRISC repression via eIF4A. Collectively, our results reveal that ZFP36L1 represses translation directly and suggest that it does so via a novel mechanism distinct from other translational regulators that interact with the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex.