RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are the most common autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). They present chronic relapsing courses that demand treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) to prevent inflammatory activity. Disease-modifying drugs lead to immunomodulation or immunosuppression through diverse mechanisms (e.g., shifting lymphocyte and cytokine profile, suppressing specific lymphocyte subpopulations). Thus, patients are more prone to infectious complications and associated worsening of disease. OBJECTIVE: To present feasible strategies for mitigating the infection risk of MS and NMOSD treated patients. METHODS: Targeted literature review concerning the management of infection risk with an emphasis on vaccination, therapy-specific measures, and particularities of the Brazilian endemic infectious diseases' scenario. CONCLUSION: We propose a vaccination schedule, infectious screening routine, and prophylactic measures based on the current scientific evidence. Awareness of emergent tropical diseases is necessary due to evidence of demyelinating events and possible parainfectious cases of MS and NMOSD.
ANTECEDENTES: A esclerose múltipla (EM) e a doença do espectro neuromielite optica (NMOSD) são as doenças autoimunes mais comuns do sistema nervoso central (SNC). Ambas apresentam curso crônico com recaídas (surtos) e exigem tratamento com drogas modificadoras de doenças (DMDs) para a prevenção de atividade inflamatória. As DMDs levam à imunomodulação ou imunossupressão através de diversos mecanismos (por exemplo deslocando e/ou suprimindo subpopulações linfocitárias ou alterando perfil de produção de citocinas). Desta forma, os pacientes com EM ou NMOSD são mais propensos a complicações infecciosas, as quais podem levar ao agravamento de suas doenças de base. OBJETIVO: Apresentar estratégias viáveis para mitigar o risco de infecção de pacientes com EM ou NMOSD sob tratamento. MéTODOS: Revisão bibliográfica focada em manejo de risco de infecção com ênfase em vacinação, medidas específicas de tratamento e particularidades de doenças infecciosas endêmicas do Brasil. CONCLUSãO: Propomos um calendário de vacinação, rotina de triagem infecciosa e medidas profiláticas baseadas em evidências científicas atuais. A conscientização das doenças tropicais emergentes é necessária devido a evidências de eventos desmielinizantes e possíveis casos parainfecciosos de EM e NMOSD.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Neuromielitis Óptica , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuromielitis Óptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Brasil , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades/complicacionesRESUMEN
Abstract Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are the most common autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). They present chronic relapsing courses that demand treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) to prevent inflammatory activity. Disease-modifying drugs lead to immunomodulation or immunosuppression through diverse mechanisms (e.g., shifting lymphocyte and cytokine profile, suppressing specific lymphocyte subpopulations). Thus, patients are more prone to infectious complications and associated worsening of disease. Objective To present feasible strategies for mitigating the infection risk of MS and NMOSD treated patients. Methods Targeted literature review concerning the management of infection risk with an emphasis on vaccination, therapy-specific measures, and particularities of the Brazilian endemic infectious diseases' scenario. Conclusion We propose a vaccination schedule, infectious screening routine, and prophylactic measures based on the current scientific evidence. Awareness of emergent tropical diseases is necessary due to evidence of demyelinating events and possible parainfectious cases of MS and NMOSD.
Resumo Antecedentes A esclerose múltipla (EM) e a doença do espectro neuromielite optica (NMOSD) são as doenças autoimunes mais comuns do sistema nervoso central (SNC). Ambas apresentam curso crônico com recaídas (surtos) e exigem tratamento com drogas modificadoras de doenças (DMDs) para a prevenção de atividade inflamatória. As DMDs levam à imunomodulação ou imunossupressão através de diversos mecanismos (por exemplo deslocando e/ou suprimindo subpopulações linfocitárias ou alterando perfil de produção de citocinas). Desta forma, os pacientes com EM ou NMOSD são mais propensos a complicações infecciosas, as quais podem levar ao agravamento de suas doenças de base. Objetivo Apresentar estratégias viáveis para mitigar o risco de infecção de pacientes com EM ou NMOSD sob tratamento. Métodos Revisão bibliográfica focada em manejo de risco de infecção com ênfase em vacinação, medidas específicas de tratamento e particularidades de doenças infecciosas endêmicas do Brasil. Conclusão Propomos um calendário de vacinação, rotina de triagem infecciosa e medidas profiláticas baseadas em evidências científicas atuais. A conscientização das doenças tropicais emergentes é necessária devido a evidências de eventos desmielinizantes e possíveis casos parainfecciosos de EM e NMOSD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Brazil faced a yellow fever(YF) outbreak in 2016-2018 and vaccination was considered for autoimmune rheumatic disease patients(ARD) with low immunosuppression due to YF high mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate, prospectively for the first time, the short-term immunogenicity of the fractional YF vaccine(YFV) immunization in ARD patients with low immunossupression. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 318 participants(159 ARD and 159 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) were vaccinated with the fractional-dose(one fifth) of 17DD-YFV. All subjects were evaluated at entry(D0), D5, D10, and D30 post-vaccination for clinical/laboratory and disease activity parameters for ARD patients. Post-vaccination seroconversion rate(83.7%vs.96.6%, p = 0.0006) and geometric mean titers(GMT) of neutralizing antibodies[1143.7 (95%CI 1012.3-1292.2) vs.731 (95%CI 593.6-900.2), p<0.001] were significantly lower in ARD compared to controls. A lower positivity rate of viremia was also identified for ARD patients compared to controls at D5 (53%vs.70%, p = 0.005) and the levels persisted in D10 for patients and reduced for controls(51%vs.19%, p = 0.0001). The viremia was the only variable associated with seroconvertion. No serious adverse events were reported. ARD disease activity parameters remained stable at D30(p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Fractional-dose 17DD-YF vaccine in ARD patients resulted in a high rate of seroconversion rate(>80%) but lower than controls, with a longer but less intense viremia. This vaccine was immunogenic, safe and did not induce flares in ARD under low immunosuppression and may be indicated in YF outbreak situations and for patients who live or travel to endemic areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT03430388).
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/inmunología , Fiebre Amarilla/prevención & control , Adulto , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Seroconversión , Fiebre Amarilla/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/terapia , Gripe Humana/orina , Gripe Humana/virología , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa InversaRESUMEN
Although, pleural (PT) and disseminated tuberculosis (DT) have been considered as extreme endpoints of the Th1-Th2 immunological spectrum of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, these conditions can occur together. The presence of PT and DT could be explained by (1) PT as primary condition, with progression of HIV infection possibly leading to dissemination of bacilli located in the pleura; (2) preexisting PT, with reinfection at lower LTCD4+ count explaining the DT form; (3) simultaneous acute PT and DT, considering immune compartmentalization phenomena in pleura. There are several important aspects of the immune response and its compartmentalization in co-infected patients with tuberculosis and HIV. PT and DT should not be always considered as extremes of the immunological response against M. tuberculosis, both diseases together may be explained after the understanding of compartmentalization of immune response. Associations between these entities are not so rare, while they remain incompletely explained. This brief review discusses several points of this contradictory association.
