Pancreas Transplantation: Small-Center Experience in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a High-Incidence Region.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplantation (PT) is the best option of care for patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: From July 2005 to September 2014, we performed 27 PT from deceased donors (24 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations [SPKT] and 3 pancreas transplantations alone) in a region with a high incidence of T1DM. RESULTS: Enteric drainage and systemic venous derivation were accomplished for all PT. Cold and warm ischemia times were 291 ± 70 minutes and 32 ± 9 minutes, respectively. The rate of early re-operations was 33%, mainly because of bleeding occurrence. Mean donor age was 31 ± 11 years; all patients had ABO compatibility and negative cross-match. With a mean follow-up time of 2.3 years, no death was registered. Graft survival of PT was 96.7%, with 1 graft loss in the SPKT group (3.7%) after acute rejection. Nine patients were submitted successfully to re-operation for no life-threatening complications within 30 post-operative days. No early or late episode of vascular thrombosis, pancreatitis, or pancreatic fistula was observed. All patients with a functioning graft had excellent metabolic control, with mean glycosylated hemoglobin level at last follow-up of 5.5% and median fasting glucose level of 95 ± 13 mg/dL, comparable to that in the non-diabetic population. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, PT is an excellent therapeutic solution for patients with T1DM. Despite fewer than 5 PT performed per year, graft and patient outcomes were similar to those in high-volume centers.

Long-term clinical impact of vesicoureteral reflux in kidney transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether the presence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after renal transplantation compromises long-term graft function. The aim of this study in renal allograft recipients with a history of late recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) was to determine whether the presence of VUR conferred an increased risk of long-term graft dysfunction. METHODS: We included 37 renal allograft recipients, who were at least 2 years after transplantation and had a history of at least 1 recurrent UTI per year underwent voiding cystourethrograms (VCUG). The presence and severity of VUR were graded with severity scores ranging from G1 to G5. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients, 15 (41%) showed low grades of reflux (G1-3) on VCUG. Patient and graft survivals were not significantly different in the VUR group (n = 15) compared with the no VUR group (n = 22) at 1, 3, or 5 years. Renal function assessment by means of serum creatinine (Cr) concentration also demonstrated similar results in both groups at 1, 3, and 5 years: 5 y mean Cr: VUR 1.5 +/- 0.6 mg/dL versus no VUR 1.8 +/- 1.1 mg/dL (P = NS). No difference was also observed in the 2 groups in the number of UTI episodes for each patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with late UTIs, the presence of low-grade VUR did not affect long-term graft function. There was no indication for a operative repair of low-grade VUR.

Higher incidence of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients with low everolimus exposure.

Everolimus (EVL) has shown a potential to reduce nephrotoxicity associated with cyclosporine (CsA) while providing similar protection against rejection. We analyzed the incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE) among 20 cadaveric renal transplant recipients treated with the combination of EVL + CsA. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab induction given pretransplant and on day 4 posttransplant; EVL at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/day followed by concentration control to trough levels of 3 to 8 ng/mL by day 7; CsA at a starting dose of 4 mg/kg per day and then concentration controlled with C2 monitoring (C2 500-700 ng/mL); and steroids in a tapering regimen to reach 5 mg by day 30. The overall incidence of ARE was 25%. On postoperative day 7, patients with ARE showed significantly lower mean EVL trough concentrations compared with those not experiencing ARE (NO ARE: 2.2 +/- 2.1 ng/mL vs 4.8 +/- 2.4 ng/mL) (P = .05). The CsA C2 values were close to the lower end of the target range on day 3 (583 +/- 334 ng/mL). All rejecting grafts were functioning at 3 months posttransplantations, but mean serum creatinine was higher in the ARE group (ARE 2.2 +/- 0.7 mg/dL vs 1.1 +/- 0.2 NO ARE; P = .04). In conclusion, whenever EVL is used in combination with CsA to protect kidney transplant patients against the risk of acute rejection, a threshold of 3 ng/mL must be reached in the first week posttransplantation. We suggest careful monitoring of EVL exposure and increased EVL starting doses.

Incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients immunosuppressed with sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine.

Sirolimus (SRL) in combination with Cyclosporine A (CsA) and steroids has been shown to lower the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection episodes, allowing CsA sparing. We retrospectively compared the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among kidney transplant recipients (KTx) immunosuppressed with SRL + CsA versus CsA alone. Patients were divided into two groups: SRL + CsA (n = 38) versus CsA (n = 48). Mean follow-up was 53.9 +/- 17.1 months. Seventeen/86 subjects (19.8%) developed diabetes after transplantation (7 IFG, 8.1%; 10 PTDM, 11.6%). The incidence was significantly higher in SRL + CsA (12/38 patients, 31.6%) compared with CsA (5/43 patients, 10.4%) (P = .0144, odds ratio 3.97). More patients required treatment in the SRL + CsA compared to CsA alone cohort (13.2% vs 2.1%, P = .051): 4 pts (10.5%) became insulin- dependent among SRL+CsA, vs none in the CsA group. Use of OHD was similar in both groups (2.6% SRL + CsA vs 2.1% CsA). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex distribution, BMI, or serum creatinine at 1 to 3 and 5 years from transplantation. All PTDM patients are alive at follow-up, while two grafts were lost due to chronic renal allograft dysfunction. Within the limits of a small retrospective study, we observed that SRL in combination with CsA increased the diabetogenic potential of CsA. A possible explanation of our findings is that higher CsA doses were used in the early experience with SRL + CsA; therefore the higher incidence of PTDM that we observed in the SRL + CsA combination may be a sign of toxicity. Careful monitoring of blood levels is mandatory in the SRL + CsA combination to avoid pleiotropic toxicity.

Lymphocele after renal transplantation: the influence of the immunosuppressive therapy.

Lymphocele is a complication of renal transplantation, representing a lymphatic collection around the grafted kidney. The use of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus (SRL) has been associated with a significant increase in lymphocele formation. This complication has been related to the antiproliferative activity of SRL, which delays surgical wound repair and closure of injured lymphatic vessels. The aim of this study was to relate the incidence of lymphocele with immunosuppression among 158 renal transplant patients operated with routine closure of all the visible lymphatic vessels around the iliac vessels and at the renal hilum. The incidence of lymphocele was not significantly different among the various immunosuppressive regimens.

Comparison of oblique versus hockey-stick surgical incision for kidney transplantation.

The hockey-stick surgical incision is becoming more popular than the oblique incision for kidney transplantations. Both incisions are convenient and comfortable. Both have some drawbacks, such as muscle denervation for the former, or section of lateral muscles for the latter. In this retrospective study, we compared these incisions with regard to the incidence of long-term complications, such as postincisional hernia, relaxation of the abdominal wall, and a poor cosmetic result. One hundred patients (50 of each type) were evaluated at an average of 4.5 years after transplantation (3 months-15 years). Occurrence of incisional hernia was 16% in the former (8 cases) versus 4% in the latter (2 cases: X(2) = 4; P < .05). A major relaxation of the abdominal wall was found in 24% of the former (12 cases) versus 8% of the latter (4 cases) (X(2) = 4.76; P < .05). These complications were not correlated with age, sex, weight, side of transplant, or immunosuppressive drugs. In the former patients with hockey-stick incisions, the overall cosmetic results were poor, because in most cases the incision had been prolonged upward, above the transverse umbilical line, even as high as the costal arch. In 20% of the former patients with hockey-stick incisions, the scar had widened, particularly in the upper vertical branch of the J incision. We conclude that the final outcome of the oblique surgical incision was better than the hockey-stick incision because of the lower incidence of hernia and abdominal wall relaxation and the more favorable cosmetic results.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requiring surgical management are encountered more frequently in renal transplant recipients, presenting an important technical problem during the repair. The aim of the present study was to analyze the epidemiology and natural evolution of AAA among renal allograft recipients. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-four renal transplant recipients were periodically evaluated with abdominal aortic ultrasound tomography for AAA. The indication for surgery was a maximal diameter >5 cm. Renal function, graft, and patient survival were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 51 months. RESULTS: Four AAA were detected in 394 renal transplant recipients, a prevalence of 1.01%. All of the AAA were found in male recipients of mean age 59.2 +/- 5.5 years and mean time posttransplantation of 82.7 +/- 77.3 months. The mean follow-up period between diagnosis and indication for surgery was 14.2 +/- 10.8 months. Two patients underwent open repair with aneurysmectomy and conventional tube graft positioning, and 2 patients refused surgical repair. To preserve renal graft function during the aortic cross-clamping phase, cold perfusion with 4 degrees C Ringer acetate and local hypothermia with sterile ice were used. Renal function did not change after the operation (preoperative serum creatinine levels were 1.2 and 1.3 mg/dL; postoperative 1.3 and 1.5 mg/dL respectively). The 2 patients who underwent surgery are alive with excellent graft functioning after a follow-up of 1.5 and 7 years, respectively. The 2 patients who refused surgical treatment are dead. CONCLUSIONS: Yearly ultrasound screening for AAA must be recommended in renal transplant recipients as part of the routine posttransplantation follow-up. De novo AAA occurs in younger subject in the transplant population and shows a faster evolution.

Gonadal function and immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation.

UNLABELLED: End-stage renal disease is associated with disorders in hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function. Immunosuppressive therapies may influence the restoration of normal levels of gonadal hormones after renal transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the hormonal status of successful renal transplant recipients who were treated with different immunosuppressive agents. METHODS: Testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured in 59 male renal transplant recipients with stable graft function with serum creatinine <2.5 mg/dL. Patients were treated with three different immunosuppressive regimens: group I, calcineurin inhibitors (CI; n = 15), group II, sirolimus without calcineurin inhibitors (SRL; n = 15), group III, sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (SRL * CI; n = 29). RESULTS: Testosterone was significantly lower in group II versus group I (3.12 +/- 1.23 versus 4.39 +/- 1.53 ng/mL; P < .0197). Group III had higher testosterone values than group II, but lower than group I. FSH and LH were also higher in the SRL group, but the differences were not statistically significant, perhaps because of the small number of patients. No relationship was found between testosterone blood levels and age, posttransplant follow-up, renal function, time on dialysis, body mass index, steroid use, or posttransplant diabetes. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus seems to impair the improvement of gonadal function after renal transplantation. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these data before patients are advised of this potential side effect.

Severe limb lymphedema in sirolimus-treated patients.

We report two kidney transplant recipients who developed severe limb lymphedema under sirolimus (SRL) immunosuppression. The patients received SRL 10 and 2 mg/d to achieve target levels of 10 to 20 ng/mL with tapering doses of prednisone. Renal function and drug levels were monitored monthly. Patient 1 developed lymphedema of the left upper limb 3 years posttransplantation, after having been exposed to high SRL doses in the preceding 2 years (mean SRL dose-9.5 mg/d, mean trough level-26.3 ng/mL, mean serum creatinine-1.63 mg/dL). In patient 2 lymphedema of both upper and lower right limbs occurred 18 months posttransplantation (mean SRL dose-3.2 mg/d, mean trough level-8.8 ng/mL, mean serum creatinine-2.9 mg/dL). Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were also observed in both patients before SRL reduction/conversion. No signs of hematopoietic toxicity were observed. In both patients magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the limb was negative for vascular obstruction, and lymphoscintigraphy revealed lymphatic obstruction. In patient 1 lymphedema improved significantly following SRL reduction and lymphatic drainage massage therapy. Patient 2 was converted to cyclosporine (CsA) improving markedly after conversion. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia also improved significantly in both patients after reduction/conversion. We conclude that SRL may facilitate the occurrence of lymphatic obstruction by mechanisms that are presently unexplained. Lymphedema of the limbs in renal transplant recipients under SRL treatment, especially if on the same side as the hemodialysis access, should warn the transplant physician to rapidly reduce or withdraw SRL before the occurrence of complete obstruction.

[Assessment of the adequacy of health services in day hospital care: experience of an endocrine surgery day care unit at a university polyclinic]. / Valutazione di appropriatezza delle prestazioni sanitarie effettuate in regime di Day Hospital: l'esperienza di una unità di DH di chirurgia endocrina in un Policlinico Universitario.

The aim of the study was to assess the appropriateness of the provision of surgical treatment in the day hospital setting and at the same time to evaluate the efficacy of the service provided. The study was conducted on admissions to a day care unit operating in conjunction with the surgery division of a university hospital. The evaluation of appropriateness was carried out using explicit criteria, based on regional regulations and on guidelines drawn up by the Agency for Regional Health Services. The criteria related to the hospital bed equivalent Rotation Index and to the types of DRGs treated and services provided. Efficacy was assessed using the following para-meters: number of US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsies; techniques used; age, sex and nodule size; patient distribution by results of diagnostic examination; cytological classification; percentage of patients with complications. We also evaluated the possibility of transferring short-term (2-3 days) surgical admissions from ordinary regimens to the day care setting. The results of this study yield useful synthetic indicators for assessing the appropriateness both of the day care function as a whole and of individual operating units, providing both administrative and medical staff with a useful frame of reference for the planning of health-care management.