Body mass index, fat free mass, uric acid, and renal function as blood pressure levels determinants in young adults.

AIM: We assessed some major determinants of blood pressure (BP) in young adulthood to plan a lifestyle changes policy METHODS: A cross sectional survey was held, involving 2373 high school people (age 18-21), measuring BP, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WCirc), fat free mass (FFM); alcohol and smoking habits were evaluated by a questionnaire. In a subset of this population (n = 60) uric acid (UA), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Smoking and not alcohol was correlated to systolic blood pressure (SBP) through quartiles (31.7%, 39.1%, 46.5%, 45.5%). Systolic BP was significantly correlated with FFM in the whole population (r = 0.51) as well as in SBP quartiles (r = 0.243, 0.138, 0.118, 0.204). FFM-SBP cluster analysis gave two centroids corresponding to sexes; females n = 998; coordinates (116.4 mmHg, 38.9 kg) and males n = 1068; coordinates (131.3 mmHg, 56.7 kg). In the n = 60 substudy a multiple linear regression model (multiple R = 0.741) with SBP as dependent variable and UA, FFM, BMI, eGFR as explicative ones, only UA (ß coefficent = 0.363, partial r = 0.240, P < 0.01) was the determinant of BP particularly in men. Moreover in the same group we found an inverse relationship between eGFR (albeit always in the normal range) and UA, as well as for women (r = -0.54, P < 0.01) and men (r = -0.43, P < 0.01) analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: A significant correlation exists between BP and FFM; UA has proven to be the most important SBP determinant. At variance with paediatric age UA was negatively correlated with renal function. Dietary intervention on UA and alcohol habits in young adults seems advisable to prevent hypertension.

[Evaluation of the appropriateness of prescribing non-invasive cardiologic tests]. / La valutazione dell'appropriatezza della prescrizione dei test cardiologici non invasivi.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the appropriateness of the prescription of echocardiography, exercise testing, Holter monitoring and vascular sonography for ambulatory patients, performed during 4 weeks in 21 outpatient laboratories in Tuscany and Umbria, Italy. METHODS: We collected the following data: the appropriateness of the prescription (according to the guidelines of the Italian Federation of Cardiology), the prescribing physician (cardiologist vs noncardiologist), the synthetic result (normal vs abnormal) and the clinical utility (useful vs useless) of each exam. RESULTS: We evaluated 5614 prescriptions (patients: 3027 males, 2587 females; mean age 63 years, range 14-96 years). The indication to the test was of class I (appropriate) in 45.3%, of class II (doubtfully appropriate) in 34.8% and of class III (inappropriate) in 19.9% of the cases. The test was abnormal in 58.3% of class I exams vs 17% of class III exams (p < 0.05). The test was useful in 72.4% of class I exams vs 17.1% of class III exams (p < 0.05). The test was prescribed by a cardiologist in 1882 cases (33.5%). Cardiologist-prescribed exams were of class I in 57.3%, of class II in 32.4% and of class III in 10.3% of the cases vs 39.2, 36.1 and 24.7% of non-cardiologist-prescribed exams (p < 0.05). Cardiologist-prescribed exams were abnormal in 53.4% of the cases vs 39% of those of non-cardiologists' (odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.58-1.97; p < 0.05). Cardiologist-prescribed exams were useful in 64.7% of the cases vs 44.4% of those of non-cardiologists' (odds ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 2.02-2.53; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In Tuscany and Umbria, Italy, less than half of the prescriptions for non-invasive diagnostic tests are appropriate: appropriately prescribed exams more often provide abnormal and useful results; cardiologist-prescribed exams are more often appropriate, abnormal and useful.