Ultrasound accuracy for brachial plexus pathology.

AIM: To determine (a) the accuracy of ultrasound in detecting brachial plexus pathology and (b) outline the advantages and limitations of ultrasound compared to MRI for imaging the brachial plexus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: cases with clinically suspected brachial plexus pathology were evaluated first by ultrasound, followed by MRI. Patients with prior brachial plexus imaging were excluded. The final diagnosis was based on a combination of ultrasound, MRI, clinical follow-up, and surgical findings. The accuracy of the ultrasound was assessed by comparing the ultrasound and the final diagnoses. The mean clinical follow-up time following ultrasound was 1.8 ± 1.4 years. RESULTS: Ninety-two (64%) of the 143 cases had normal brachial plexus ultrasound and MRI examinations. Fifty-one (36%) of 143 cases had brachial plexus pathology on MRI, comprising post-radiation fibrosis (n=25, 49%), nerve sheath tumor (n=11, 21%), traumatic injury (n=7, 14%), inflammatory polyneuropathy (n=4, 8%), malignant infiltration (n=2, 4%), desmoid fibromatosis (n=1,2%), and neuralgic amyotrophy (n=1, 2%). Overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for brachial plexus pathology was 98% (140/143), with three discordant cases (neuralgic amyotrophy n=1, inflammatory neuropathy n=1, postradiation fibrosis n=1) regarded as normal on ultrasound assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of ultrasound for identifying brachial plexus pathology were 94%, 100%, 100%, and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound identifies brachial plexus pathology with high accuracy and specificity, showing comparable diagnostic efficacy to MRI. Ultrasound can serve as an effective first-line imaging investigation for suspected brachial plexus pathology.

Ultrasound-guided lymph node sampling: accuracy of FNAC, end-cutting (Franseen), and side-cutting (Temno) needle biopsy techniques.

AIM: To compare technical success, diagnostic accuracy, and histological yield of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), side-cutting (Temno) needle biopsy, and end-cutting (Franseen) needle biopsy for ultrasound-guided sampling of groin and axillary lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 270 abnormal groin and axillary nodes were sampled using one of the three techniques. Nodes with a maximum length of <2.5 cm underwent FNAC or Franseen biopsy, while nodes >2.5 cm underwent Temno biopsy. Mean size of nodes sampled by FNAC (21.2 mm) and Franseen (19.7 mm) were similar while nodes sampled by Temno were larger (34.4 mm, p<0.0001). RESULTS: Technical success rates of FNAC (82/93, 88%), Franseen (105/111, 95%), and Temno (59/66, 89%) biopsies were similar (p>0.05 for all). Lymphoid tissue yield by FNAC (mean total area 1.51 mm2) was less than that by Franseen (7.14 mm2, p=0.002) or Temno biopsy (19.44 mm2, p<0.0001). Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was lower for FNAC (22/30, 73%) than Franseen (25/26, 96%, p=0.02) or Temno biopsy (32/32, 100%, p=0.002). For malignant nodes, determining the likely organ of origin was also lower for FNAC (7/30, 23%) than Franseen (19/26, 73%, p=0.0002) or Temno biopsy (29/32, 91%, p<0.0001), with a similar pattern observed in the identification of lymphoma. CONCLUSION: For similarly sized nodes, Franseen biopsy provided more lymphoid material, a higher diagnostic accuracy for malignancy including lymphoma, and better identification of the likely organ of origin than FNAC. Routine use of Franseen biopsy is advocated rather than FNAC for percutaneous sampling of lymph nodes not suitable for side-cutting needle biopsy.

Reliability of shear wave ultrasound elastography for neck lesions identified in routine clinical practice.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) in the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 176 neck lesions (40 thyroid, 56 lymph nodes, 46 salivary, 34 miscellaneous) identified in a routine US clinic underwent SWE by one or two blinded radiologists. For this study, SWE required the operator to acquire three 10 second dynamic colour-coded SWE cineloops per lesion, select one static image per cineloop, and place circular regions-of-interest within the entire lesion and stiffest part to generate 3 SWE measurements per static image. For logistical reasons, one radiologist evaluated all 176 lesions and the other evaluated 58 lesions. Both radiologists also reviewed 27 archived cineloops independently to assess SWE excluding practical technique. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and coefficients of repeatability (CORs). RESULTS: Test-retest ICCs for the radiologist evaluating 176 lesions were 0.78 - 0.85 (fair-excellent agreement), CCCs were 0.85 - 0.88 (substantial agreement), and CORs were 14.9 - 36.1 kPa. For both radiologists evaluating 58 lesions, intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs were 0.65 - 0.78 and 0.72 - 0.77 respectively. For SWE excluding practical technique, inter-rater ICCs were 0.97 - 0.98 (excellent agreement). ICCs differed according to tissue, being higher in thyroid lesions than lymph nodes (p < 0.001), and higher in benign than malignant lesions (p values < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of SWE is fair to excellent according to ICCs. SWE reliability is influenced appreciably by acquisition technique. Nevertheless, CORs for SWE are not negligible. To determine whether these results are acceptable clinically, further research is required to establish SWE stiffness values of normal and pathological tissues in the neck.