Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Lab ; 70(6)2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38868870

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are many methods for the detection of D-dimer in clinical laboratories. Immunoturbidimetric assays are widely used because of its high sensitivity and specificity [1-3]. However, this method may be affected by the interference of rheumatoid factor (RF), heterophilic antibodies, and other unknown proteins, and its falsity will increase, thus affecting clinical diagnosis. METHODS: This paper reports the cause analysis of a case of spurious D-dimer increase and four corresponding elimination methods: double dilution of the original specimen, detection of fibrin degradation product (FDP) level, addition of heterophilic blocking reagent, and comparison between different instruments. RESULTS: It was confirmed that there were special antibodies in the patient's body by four methods, which had non-specific reactions with D-dimer reagents, resulting in false increases of results. CONCLUSIONS: When the coagulation function results of patients show isolated increases in D-dimer, or the results are inconsistent with clinical symptoms, laboratory personnel should consider the possibility of interference factors, and conduct effective treatment to obtain correct test results, and thus reduce the occurrence of medical adverse events caused by inaccurate test results.


Asunto(s)
Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno , Humanos , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Inmunoturbidimetría/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Anticuerpos Heterófilos/sangre , Factor Reumatoide/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA