Osteoporosis therapy in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and osteonecrosis of the jaw.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in osteoporosis patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatic diseases, as well as to assess the prevalence of relevant dental, behavioral, and medical risk factors for MRONJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 198 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and osteoporosis therapy were recruited from a tertiary rheumatological/immunological referral center between June 2015 and September 2016. They were assessed using a structured interview. A maxillofacial surgeon later examined patients complaining of possible symptoms of osteonecrosis. In cases of osteonecrosis, dental records were obtained and evaluated. Preventive measures taken and dental as well as other clinical risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 198 patients, three suffered from osteonecrosis of the jaw, none of whom had any history of malignant disease or radiation therapy, resulting in a prevalence of 1.5%. Of these three patients, only one was given bisphosphonates intravenously (i.v.), whereas all three had been treated orally. All three diagnoses of MRONJ had been previously known to the patients and their maxillofacial surgeons. Two of the patients had rheumatoid arthritis, and one patient suffered from large vessel vasculitis. Long anti-osteoporotic treatment duration, low functional status, and low bone density of the femur were significantly associated with MRONJ development. CONCLUSION: Inflammatory rheumatic diseases constitute a risk factor for MRONJ in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Patients should be counseled accordingly and should be offered dental screening and regular dental check-ups.

T cells, natural killer cells, and γδT cells in a large patient cohort with rheumatoid arthritis: influence of age and anti-rheumatic therapy.

Objective: The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the distribution of natural killer (NK) cells and T-cell subsets, including γδT cells, in the peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a large real-life patient cohort, taking into account the patients' demographics, disease characteristics, and anti-rheumatic therapy.Method: The study recruited 508 RA patients between November 2013 and August 2015. Lymphocyte differentiation using eight-colour flow cytometry (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) of the peripheral blood was performed for all patients. Clinical data, including age, gender, disease duration, serostatus, disease activity, antibody status, immunosuppressive therapy including use of different biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and conventional synthetic DMARDs, were retrospectively assessed using electronic patient files. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of these variables on T-cell, NK-cell, and γδT-cell counts.Results: The median patient age was 61.0 years and 74.1% were female. The median disease duration of RA was 12.0 years. Median Disease Activity Score based on 28-joint count was 2.8 and 56.3% were treated with bDMARDs. There were no differences in immunosuppressive therapy between different age groups. While rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab had no influence on lymphocyte subdifferentiation, tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and age significantly influenced the numbers of T cells, T-helper cells, T-NK cells, NK cells, and γδT cells.Conclusion: Age and TNF-inhibition therapy influence lymphocyte subdifferentiation in patients with RA. It may be prudent to use age- and therapy-adjusted standard values for lymphocyte subsets during clinical trials and treatment of RA.

Addition or removal of concomitant methotrexate alters adalimumab effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis but not psoriatic arthritis.

Objective: Randomized trials have shown that concomitant methotrexate (MTX) augments the effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its benefit in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has not been demonstrated. The goal of this study was to examine whether the impact of concomitant MTX on therapeutic outcomes in patients with PsA was similar to its effects in RA. Methods: We used data from highly comparable and concurrent observational studies of patients with PsA (N = 1424) or RA (N = 3148) who initiated adalimumab therapy during routine clinical care. The 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and patient-reported pain scores were evaluated in patients who received 24 months of continuous treatment with adalimumab monotherapy or adalimumab + MTX and in patients who initiated or stopped concomitant MTX during ongoing adalimumab therapy. Results: Twenty-four months of continuous treatment with adalimumab + MTX was superior to adalimumab monotherapy in RA patients, while no significant difference was observed in patients with PsA. RA patients who added MTX during the study showed significant individual improvements in DAS28 and pain scores at 6 months after the change in therapy, while those who removed MTX had slight increases in disease activity. In contrast, in patients with PsA, neither initiation nor removal of MTX during continuous adalimumab therapy had a significant effect on therapeutic outcomes. Conclusion: Addition of MTX to adalimumab confers further therapeutic benefit in patients with RA, but not in those with PsA, suggesting differences in MTX effects in these two patient populations. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01078090, NCT01077258, NCT01111240.

Rituximab in routine care of severe active rheumatoid arthritis : A prospective, non-interventional study in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, effectiveness and onset of effect of rituximab (RTX) in routine clinical treatment of severe, active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study in rheumatological outpatient clinics or private practices in Germany. RTX-naïve adult patients were to receive RTX according to marketing authorisation and at their physician's discretion. Also according to their physician's discretion, patients could receive a second cycle of RTX (re-treatment = treatment continuation). Major outcome was the change in Disease Activity Score based on 28-joints count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) over 24 weeks and during 6 months of re-treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 1653 patients received at least one cycle RTX; 99.2% of these had received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) pre-treatment and 75.5% anti-tumor necrosis factor(TNF)­α pre-treatment. After a mean interval of 8.0 months, 820 patients received RTX re-treatment. Mean DAS28-ESR decreased from 5.3 at baseline to 3.8 after 24 weeks (-1.5 [95% confidence interval, CI: -1.6; -1.4]), and from 4.1 at start of cycle 2 to 3.5 at study end (change from baseline: -1.8 [95% CI: -2.0; -1.7]). Improvements in DAS28-ESR and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score occurred mainly during the first 12 weeks of RTX treatment, with further DAS28-ESR improvement until week 24 or month 6 of re-treatment. Improvements in DAS28-ESR and EULAR responses were more pronounced in seropositive patients. RF was a predictor of DAS28-ESR change to study end. Safety analysis showed the established profile of RTX. CONCLUSION: RTX was safe and effective in a real-life setting with rapid and sustained improvement in RA signs and symptoms.

[S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs]. / S2e-Leitlinie: Therapie der rheumatoiden Arthritis mit krankheitsmodifizierenden Medikamenten.

BACKGROUND: Medication-based strategies to treat rheumatoid arthritis are crucial in terms of outcome. They aim at preventing joint destruction, loss of function and disability by early and consistent inhibition of inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVE: Achieving consensus about evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in Germany. METHODS: Following a systematic literature research, a structured process among expert rheumatologists was used to reach consensus. RESULTS: The results of the consensus process can be summed up in 6 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. There are several new issues compared to the version of 2012, such as differentiated adjustments to the therapeutic regime according to time point and extent of treatment response, the therapeutic goal of achieving remission as assessed by means of the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) as well as the potential use of targeted synthetic DMARDs (JAK inhibitors) and suggestions for a deescalating in case of achieving a sustained remission. Methotrexate still plays the central role at the beginning of the treatment and as a combination partner in the further treatment course. When treatment response to methotrexate is inadequate, either switching to or combining with another conventional synthetic DMARD is an option in the absence of unfavourable prognostic factors. Otherwise biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs are recommended according to the algorithm. Rules for deescalating treatment with glucocorticoids and-where applicable-DMARDs give support for the management of patients who have reached a sustained remission. DISCUSSION: The new guidelines set up recommendations for RA treatment in accordance with the treat-to-target principle. Modern disease-modifying drugs, now including also JAK inhibitors, are available in an algorithm.

[Safety and efficacy of off-label use of biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases refractory to standard of care therapy : Data from a nationwide German registry (GRAID2)]. / Sicherheit und Wirksamkeitshinweise zum Off-label-Einsatz von Biologikatherapien nach Versagen konventioneller Therapien bei Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen : Ergebnisse eines nationalen Registers (GRAID2).

BACKGROUND: The German Registry of Autoimmune Diseases 2 (GRAID2) is a retrospective, non-interventional, multicenter registry study collecting data from patients with inflammatory, mainly rheumatic diseases refractory to standard of care therapy and treated with an off-label biologic therapy. The retrospective documentation comprised case history, diagnosis, course of disease (including safety and global efficacy). The objective was to evaluate the global clinical outcome and safety of off-label biologic therapy in clinical practice. RESULTS: Data from 311 patients with an overall observation period of 338.5 patient-years were collected. The mean patients age was 47.8 years with 56.9% females. The most frequently documented diagnoses comprised rejection prophylaxis/therapy after renal transplantation (NTX, 18.3%), ANCA-vasculitides (17.4%), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 10.3%), autoinflammatory fever syndromes (8.4%), autoimmune myositis (7.4%) and pemphigus (5.8%). Documented biologic therapies included rituximab (RTX, 70.1%), tocilizumab (TCZ, 9.3%), infliximab (IFX, 7.1%), anakinra (ANK, 5.5%), adalimumab (ADA, 3.5%), etanercept (ETA, 2.3%) and certolizumab (CTZ, 0.6%). After initiation of off-label biologic treatment, tolerability was assessed by the physicians as "very good"/"good" in 95.5%. Altogether, 275 adverse events were documented and of these, 104 were classified as serious adverse events and occurred in 62 patients. In 19 of these patients severe infections (30.6%) were documented, resulting in a rate of 5.6 severe infections per 100 patient years. A total of six deaths were documented, while five of these cases were rated as not related to the biologics treatment. Notably, the use of RTX in patients with small vessel vasculitides and of TCZ in patients with large vessel vasculitides prior to their approval support their relevance in clinical management of patients with severe diseases. CONCLUSION: The results of this registry together with data of GRAID1 provide evidence that use of off-label biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases refractory to conventional treatment did not result in any new safety signal already known for these compounds or subsequently shown by clinical trials in certain entities.

[Off-label biological therapies in patients with large vessel vasculitis and/or polymyalgia rheumatica : Safety and efficacy analysis of a nationwide German registry (GRAID2)]. / Off-label-Biologikatherapie bei Patienten mit Großgefäßvaskulitiden und/oder Polymyalgia rheumatica : Wirksamkeits- und Sicherheitsanalyse eines nationalen Registers (GRAID2).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and clinical outcome of biological therapies in patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) or polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) refractory to standard of care therapy in a real-life setting in Germany. METHODS: GRAID 2 (German Registry in Autoimmune Diseases 2) is a retrospective, noninterventional, multicenter registry collecting data from all patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases refractory to conventional therapy treated with an initial off-label biological between August 2006 and December 2013. The retrospective documentation comprised case history, diagnosis, course of disease including safety and overall efficacy. RESULTS: Data from 14 patients were collected, 11 with LVV (78.6%) and 3 with isolated PMR (21.4%). Ten patients were treated with tocilizumab (71.4%), while 3 patients received infliximab infusions (21.4%) and 1 patient was treated with rituximab (7.1%). All clinical as well as laboratory efficacy parameters improved substantially. After the first application, tolerability of biologicals was assessed as "very good"/"good" by the physicians in 92.3% of the patients. Altogether, 8 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 4 patients including 3 infections (1 urogenital infection, 2 diverticulitis) representing a rate of 23.6 infections per 100 patient-years. One of these infections (diverticulitis under infliximab treatment) was rated as serious AE, requiring ICU treatment representing a rate of serious AEs of 7.9 per 100 patient-years. No deaths occurred during the observation period. CONCLUSION: With known limitations of a retrospective database, the results of this survey confirm data of smaller case series and proof-of-concept studies and suggest a substantial response to biological therapies in patients with otherwise refractory LVV or PMR with no new safety signals.

Simple screening tools predict death and cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatic disease.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatic disease (RD) have an increased mortality risk compared with the general population, mainly due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to identify patients at high risk of CVD and mortality by comparing three screening tools suitable for clinical practice. METHOD: In this prospective, single-centre study, consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic autoimmune disease (SAI), or spondyloarthritides (SpA) including psoriatic arthritis underwent a comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment. Patients were predefined as being at high risk for cardiovascular events or death if any of the following were present: European Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) ≥ 3%, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) ≥ 200 pg/mL, or any pathological electrocardiogram pattern. RESULTS: The patient population (n = 764) comprised 352 patients with RA, 260 with SAI, and 152 with SpA. After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 6.0% of RD patients had died (7.0%, 7.2%, and 1.4% of patients in the RA, SAI, and SpA subgroups), and 5.0% had experienced a cardiovascular event (5.0%, 6.4%, and 2.8%, respectively). For all RD patients and the RA and SAI subgroups, NT-proBNP ≥ 200 pg/mL and SCORE ≥ 3% identified patients with a 3.5-5-fold increased risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events. Electrocardiogram pathology was associated with increased mortality risk, but not with cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP ≥ 200 pg/mL or SCORE ≥ 3% identifies RA and SAI patients with increased risk of cardiovascular events and death. Both tools are suitable as easy screening tools in daily practice to identify patients at risk for further diagnostics and closer long-term follow-up.