Maternal and fetal outcomes after planned cesarean or vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy: a comparison between 2 third level birth centers.

BACKGROUND: Twin pregnancy is associated with higher risks of adverse perinatal outcomes for both the mother and the babies. Among the many challenges in the follow-up of twin pregnancies, the mode of delivery is the last but not the least decision to be made, with the main influencing factors being amnionicity and fetal presentation. The aim of the study was to compare perinatal outcomes in two European centers using different protocols for twin birth in case of non-cephalic second twin; the Italian patients being delivered mainly by cesarean section with those in Belgium being routinely offered the choice of vaginal delivery (VD). METHODS: This was a dual center international retrospective observational study. The population included 843 women with a twin pregnancy ≥ 32 weeks (dichorionic or monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies) and a known pregnancy outcome. The population was stratified according to chorionicity. Demographic and pregnancy data were reported per pregnancy, whereas neonatal outcomes were reported per fetus. We used multiple logistic regression models to adjust for possible confounding variables and to compute the adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) for each maternal or neonatal outcome. RESULTS: The observed rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the Italian cohort: 85% for dichorionic pregnancies and 94.4% for the monochorionic vs 45.2% and 54.4% respectively in the Belgian center (p-value < 0.001). We found that Belgian cohort showed significantly higher rates of NICU admission, respiratory distress at birth and Apgar score of < 7 after 5 min. Despite these differences, the composite severe adverse outcome was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, neither the presentation of the second twin nor the chorionicity affected maternal and severe neonatal outcomes, regardless of the mode of delivery in two tertiary care centers, but VD was associated to a poorer short-term neonatal outcome.

The impact of placental anastomoses and umbilical cord insertions' sites on monochorionic twin pregnancy outcomes: Evidence from color-dye injection studies.

INTRODUCTION: Our knowledge of monochorionic pregnancies' complications is largely based on the extensive ongoing research on monochorionic placental structure. Previous studies on the concordance of umbilical cord insertions are limited. This study aimed to evaluate placental anastomoses and cord insertions as independent risk factors for neonatal adverse outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy from April 2021 to December 2022. Seventy-six women with a monochorionic pregnancy were enrolled at their first-trimester scan. After delivery, all placentas that were confirmed to be monochorionic were analyzed according to standard protocols, including those of complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. The primary outcomes were a Composite Monochorionic Pregnancy Outcome (CMPO) and a Composite Neonatal Adverse Outcome (CNAO). The secondary outcome was the birth weight discordance between the neonates. RESULTS: The CMPO occurred in 15.8 % pregnancies, and the CNAO occurred in 67.1 % pregnancies. The analysis confirmed a significant association between velamentous cord insertions and neonatal adverse events (p = 0.003). Also, a significant positive association (p = 0.0326) between twin birth weight discordance and discordance in twins umbilical cord insertions' sites was found. No significant association between the number and type of the anastomoses and both the CMPO or CNAO was detected. DISCUSSION: Our data suggest that the routine sonographic assessment of umbilical cords' insertion sites during the first trimester could be helpful in predicting fetal and neonatal adverse events. We believe that this sonographic assessment should start to be implemented in our routine care of monochorionic pregnancies.

Is There a Role for Bladder Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Non-Hunner Lesions Interstitial Cystitis?

INTRODUCTION: Bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is either Hunner lesion interstitial cystitis (HL IC) or non-Hunner lesion interstitial cystitis (N-HL IC), differing in the presence of HLs on cystoscopy. Cystoscopy is essential in diagnosing HL but are bladder biopsies useful in N-HL IC patients? Our objective was to assess bladder biopsy in patients with N-HL IC, evaluating whether the count of mast cells (MCs) and percentage of activated MCs could measure severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: diagnosis of BPS/IC by ESSIC definition; absence of HLs. Each patient had three bladder biopsies. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: χ2/Fischer's exact test; Wilcoxon signed-ranks test/Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance: p < 0.05. RESULTS: We separated 48 women into Group 1 with <50% of MCs activated and Group 2 with >50%. We compared the results of the O'Leary-Sant questionnaire between the two groups and did not find any correlation between the severity of the pathology and either the MC count in the detrusor or the percentage of activated MCs in the lamina propria or detrusor. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: These findings cast doubt on the usefulness of bladder biopsy for the evaluation of severity in N-HL IC.