Managing pain in irritable bowel syndrome: current perspectives and best practice.

INTRODUCTION: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by chronic symptoms (>6 months) of abdominal pain in combination with a disturbed bowel habit. There is an association between the intensity of abdominal pain and the need for health care utilization. A bidirectionally disordered gut-brain interaction is central in the pathophysiology of IBS where a number of factors, gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal, can contribute to the illness experience. In order to treat abdominal pain in IBS, mapping these factors in a multidimensional clinical profile is helpful. AREAS COVERED: This review covers basic epidemiology and pathophysiology of abdominal pain in IBS, the diagnostic approach, and a multidimensional treatment model where the management of abdominal pain is in focus. EXPERT OPINION: A personalized treatment of abdominal pain in IBS is possible in patients who understand the diagnosis, the potential of therapies used, and where a good continuity in the patient-doctor relationship is established.

Prevalence and impact of disorders of Gut-Brain interaction in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiologic studies in Sweden have only covered some of the disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and are not representative of the general population. This study aimed to define the prevalence and impact of DGBI in Sweden. METHODS: We used Swedish data from the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study which include information on DGBI diagnoses, psychological distress, quality of life (QoL), healthcare utilization, and the impact of stress on GI symptoms. KEY RESULTS: The prevalence of having any DGBI was 39.1% (95% CI 37.0-41.2); esophageal disorders 6.1% (5.1-7.3), gastroduodenal disorders 10.7% (9.3-12.0), bowel disorders 31.6% (29.6-33.6), and anorectal disorders 6.0% (5.1-7.2). Subjects with a DGBI more commonly reported anxiety and/or depression, reduced mental and physical QoL, and more frequent doctor visits due to health problems. Subjects with a DGBI reported bothersome gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms to a greater extent and more than 1/3 had visited a doctor due to GI problems and of those 1/3 had seen multiple doctors. Prescription medications were available among 36.4% (31.0-42.0) who had bothersome GI symptoms and a DGBI, with sufficient symptom relief in 73.2% (64.0-81.1). Psychological factors and eating were reported to worsen GI symptoms and stress during the last month was greater in subjects with a DGBI. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: DGBI prevalence and its impact in Sweden is in line with global data, including increased healthcare utilization. GI symptoms are commonly affected by psychological factors and eating, and a high proportion of those on prescription medication report sufficient GI symptom relief.

Identification of irritable bowel syndrome in the Swedish National Patient Register: a validation study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: National patient registers are valuable in epidemiological studies. To ensure high-quality data for studies of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), this study aimed to validate the ICD-10 code for IBS in the Swedish National Patient Register. METHODS: The positive predictive values (PPV) for IBS defined by the Rome criteria were calculated based on a review of medical records of randomly selected individuals with a first-ever diagnostic listing of IBS in the Swedish National Patient register in the year 2005 (Rome II criteria) or 2010 (Rome III criteria). KEY RESULTS: 340 medical records were reviewed (172 from 2005 and 168 from 2010). The majority of patients were females (74%), and the mean age was 42 years. IBS used in any type of department had a PPV of 76% (95% confidence interval 71-80%), which increased to 80% (76-84%) when we included individuals likely to have IBS but where information about some aspects of the Rome criteria was lacking in the medical record. Two highly specialized gastroenterological departments had the best PPV, 96%, while departments of internal medicine in general had a PPV of 82% (80-95%). The PPV for the IBS subtype was 62% (55-67%). The PPVs were not significantly different comparing the two time periods investigated. CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: The validity of a register-based definition of IBS in the Swedish National Patient register is high and can be used to identify patients with IBS in observational research. The data source, i.e., type of hospital and department, influences reliability.

Post COVID-19 irritable bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The long-term consequences of COVID-19 infection on the gastrointestinal tract remain unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and post-COVID-19 disorders of gut-brain interaction after hospitalisation for SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN: GI-COVID-19 is a prospective, multicentre, controlled study. Patients with and without COVID-19 diagnosis were evaluated on hospital admission and after 1, 6 and 12 months post hospitalisation. Gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression were assessed using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: The study included 2183 hospitalised patients. The primary analysis included a total of 883 patients (614 patients with COVID-19 and 269 controls) due to the exclusion of patients with pre-existing gastrointestinal symptoms and/or surgery. At enrolment, gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent among patients with COVID-19 than in the control group (59.3% vs 39.7%, p<0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, constipation and hard stools were significantly more prevalent in controls than in patients with COVID-19 (16% vs 9.6%, p=0.019 and 17.7% vs 10.9%, p=0.011, respectively). Compared with controls, patients with COVID-19 reported higher rates of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) according to Rome IV criteria: 0.5% versus 3.2%, p=0.045. Factors significantly associated with IBS diagnosis included history of allergies, chronic intake of proton pump inhibitors and presence of dyspnoea. At the 6-month follow-up, the rate of patients with COVID-19 fulfilling the criteria for depression was higher than among controls. CONCLUSION: Compared with controls, hospitalised patients with COVID-19 had fewer problems of constipation and hard stools at 12 months after acute infection. Patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher rates of IBS than controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04691895.

Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: Results of the Prospective Controlled Multinational GI-COVID-19 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) have been reported with great variability and without standardization. In hospitalized patients, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of GI symptoms, factors associated with their occurrence, and variation at 1 month. METHODS: The GI-COVID-19 is a prospective, multicenter, controlled study. Patients with and without COVID-19 diagnosis were recruited at hospital admission and asked for GI symptoms at admission and after 1 month, using the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire. RESULTS: The study included 2036 hospitalized patients. A total of 871 patients (575 COVID+ and 296 COVID-) were included for the primary analysis. GI symptoms occurred more frequently in patients with COVID-19 (59.7%; 343/575 patients) than in the control group (43.2%; 128/296 patients) (P < 0.001). Patients with COVID-19 complained of higher presence or intensity of nausea, diarrhea, loose stools, and urgency as compared with controls. At a 1-month follow-up, a reduction in the presence or intensity of GI symptoms was found in COVID-19 patients with GI symptoms at hospital admission. Nausea remained increased over controls. Factors significantly associated with nausea persistence in COVID-19 were female sex, high body mass index, the presence of dyspnea, and increased C-reactive protein levels. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of GI symptoms in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is higher than previously reported. Systemic and respiratory symptoms are often associated with GI complaints. Nausea may persist after the resolution of COVID-19 infection.

Health care utilization of individuals with Rome IV irritable bowel syndrome in the general population.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is highly prevalent worldwide but mechanisms for healthcare seeking behaviours in this patient group are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To describe healthcare utilization and identify factors associated with seeking healthcare amongst IBS subjects in the general population. METHODS: An internet survey was completed by 6,300 individuals equally distributed between United States, United Kingdom and Canada. The Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire was used to identify subjects with IBS. Data on demographics, medical history, gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI symptoms, quality of life and health care consumption was collected. RESULTS: A total of 5,931 subjects were included; 274 (4.6%) IBS subjects and 5657 (95.3%) non-IBS controls. IBS subjects reported more doctor consultations for both GI and other health problems as well as increased use of medication and rate of abdominal surgery (appendectomy excluded). Having healthcare insurance or access to free public healthcare (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-15.44), followed by high frequency of bloating (AOR 2.65, 95% CI 1.42-4.93) and increasing age (AOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) were found to be independently associated with being an IBS consulter while doctor-diagnosed IBS subjects were more likely to be female and to report abdominal pain as their most bothersome GI symptom than other consulters with IBS. CONCLUSION: IBS subjects have higher healthcare utilization than non-IBS controls, medication use and abdominal surgery included. Furthermore, consulters with and without an IBS diagnosis differ in sex distribution and symptom profiles. Hence, awareness of the possibility of unnecessary medical and surgical treatment in IBS subjects and a sex-related diagnostic bias by doctors is warranted.

Prevalence and Progression of Recurrent Abdominal Pain, From Early Childhood to Adolescence.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the natural history of childhood recurrent abdominal pain (RAP). We investigated the prevalence and progression of childhood RAP and its association with Rome III abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders (AP-FGID) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) during adolescence. METHODS: We collected data from a prospective population-based birth cohort study of 4089 children, born from 1994 through 1996 in Sweden. We analyzed data from 2455 children with complete follow-up evaluation at ages 1, 2, 12, and 16 years and no parent-reported diagnoses of inflammatory bowel diseases or celiac disease at ages 12 or 16 years. A subpopulation of 2374 children who had answered questions based on the Rome III criteria at age 16 years was identified. We assessed RAP at 3 assessment points and defined it as parent-reported attacks of colic in early childhood (1-2 years) and as self-reported weekly abdominal pain at ages 12 years and 16 years. AP-FGID at age 16 years was defined according to the Rome III criteria. RESULTS: RAP was reported by 26.2% of children on at least 1 of 3 assessment points, of which 11.3% reported symptoms more than once. Children with RAP at 12 years had persistent symptoms at 16 years in 44.9% of cases and increased risks for RAP (relative risk, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.7-2.8), any AP-FGID (relative risk, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9-3.6), and IBS (relative risk, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.0-5.1) at 16 years. Early childhood RAP was not associated significantly with any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: RAP affects many children from early childhood through age 16 years, but most children do not have persistent symptoms throughout childhood. RAP at age 12 years is a risk factor for RAP, any Rome III AP-FGID, and IBS, at age 16 years.