RESUMEN
Castleman disease is an uncommon and heterogenous lymphoproliferative disorder which is classified as unicentric or multicentric depending on the number of lymph nodes involved. Each type has a different clinical presentation, aetiology, treatment and prognosis. We report the case of a young woman who presented with cervical lymphadenopathy and a retroperitoneal mass, and was diagnosed with unicentric Castleman disease and pheochromocytoma. We describe the diagnostic steps, the complications that developed, and the importance of the differential diagnosis in the evaluation of these patients. LEARNING POINTS: Castleman disease in an uncommon disease and should be considered in all patients with adenomegalies and systemic symptoms.Pheochromocytoma should not be overlooked in the differential diagnosis of a retroperitoneal mass.It is important that doctors consider these two diagnoses in patients with adenomegalies and a retroperitoneal mass due to the potential harmful impact of a missed diagnosis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Until recently, intravenous thrombolysis was the only reperfusion therapy with proven efficacy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, this treatment option has low recanalization rates in large-vessel occlusions. The search for additional treatments continued until 5 randomized trials (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, EXTEND-IA, SWIFT PRIME, and REVASCAT) revealed the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion. After 1 year of performing thrombectomy with stent retrievers in our tertiary hospital, we intended to answer the question: is it possible to achieve similar results in a "real-world" setting? METHODS: We analyzed data from our prospective observational registry, compared it with the trials aforementioned, and concluded that the answer is affirmative. RESULTS: Our study population of 77 patients, with a mean age of 68,2 years and 48,1% men, is comparable with these trials in much of selection criteria, baseline characteristics, and rate of previous intravenous thrombolysis (72,7%). Recovery of functional independence at 90 days was achieved in almost two thirds of patients, similarly to the referred trials. We devoted special emphasis on fast recanalization, keeping a simple image selection protocol (based on non-enhanced and computed tomography angiography) and not waiting for clinical response to thrombolysis in patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. We emphasize a successful recanalization rate of 87% and only 2,6% symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: In summary, mechanical thrombectomy seems to be a safe and effective treatment option in a "real-world" scenario, with results similar to those of the recent randomized controlled trials.