Osteoporosis management in patients with chronic kidney disease (ERCOS Study): A challenge in nephrological care.

Fracture risk assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been included in the CKD-MBD ("Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorders") complex in international and national nephrology guidelines, suggesting for the first time the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) if the results can influence therapeutic decision-making. However, there is very little information on actual clinical practice in this population. The main objective of the ERCOS (ERC-Osteoporosis) study is to describe the profile of patients with CKD G3-5D with osteoporosis (OP) and/or fragility fractures treated in specialized nephrology, rheumatology and internal medicine clinics in Spain. Fifteen centers participated and 162 patients (mostly women [71.2%] postmenopausal [98.3%]) with a median age of 77 years were included. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 36 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 38% of the included patients were on dialysis. We highlight the high frequency of prevalent fragility fractures [37.7%), mainly vertebral (52.5%) and hip (24.6%)], the disproportionate history of patients with glomerular disease compared to purely nephrological series (corticosteroids) and undertreatment for fracture prevention, especially in nephrology consultations. This study is an immediate call to action with the dissemination of the new, more proactive, clinical guidelines, and underlines the need to standardize a coordinated and multidisciplinary care/therapeutic approach to these patients in an efficient way to avoid current discrepancies and therapeutic nihilism.

Long-Term Outcomes of Incidental Liver Malignancies in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The pretransplant diagnosis of liver malignancies in nodular cirrhotic livers remains a diagnostic challenge despite current advances. Although the prognostic impact of incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) in liver transplant recipients is well documented, there are no data on the impact in simultaneous liver kidney transplant (LKT) recipients. METHODS: This is a single-center observational, retrospective study of all LKT performed from May 1993 to April 2022. Among these patients, demographic data, immunosuppressive therapy, rejection episodes, and prevalence of incidental HCC or iCC were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred eight LKTs were performed and 6 were excluded. There were 13 patients with incidental carcinomas in the explanted liver: one of them with both an HCC and iCC, one with an iCC, and the remaining with an HCC. One case of iCC died. No other recurrences occurred. There were no cases of incidental HCC nor iCC in patients with a hereditary or metabolic LKT indication. We found no differences in the 5-year patient survival, and death-censored kidney and liver graft survival rates for those LKT with an incidental HCC and those without it (76.9% vs 84.2%, P = .5; 100% vs 91.6%, P = .28; and 100% vs 94.7%, P = 0.39, respectively). Finally, there were no significant associations between explant carcinoma and rejections of the liver (7.7% vs 17.9%, P = .34) or kidney graft (0% vs 16.8%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Despite a high prevalence of incidental HCC or iCC, patient, kidney, and liver graft 5-year survival were unaffected by incidental HCC.

Outcomes in older kidney recipients from older donors: A propensity score analysis.

Background: The age of patients referred for kidney transplantation has increased progressively. However, the precise influence of age on transplant outcomes is controversial. Methods: Etrospective study in which graft and recipient survival were assessed in a cohort of ≥75 years old kidney recipients and compared with a contemporary younger one aged 60-65 years through a propensity score analysis. Results: We included 106 recipients between 60-65 and 57 patients of ≥75 years old with a median follow-up of 31 [13-54] months. Unadjusted one- and five-year recipient survival did not significantly differ between the older (91% and 74%) and the younger group (95% and 82%, P=0.06). In the IPTW weighted Cox regression analysis, recipient age was not associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.88 95%CI [0.81-4.37], P=0.14). Unadjusted one- and five-year death-censored graft survival did not significantly differ between both groups (96% and 83% for the older and 99% and 89% for the younger group, respectively, P=0.08). After IPTW weighted Cox Regression analysis, recipient age ≥75 years was no associated with an increased risk of graft loss (HR 1.95, 95%CI [0.65-5.82], P=0.23). Conclusions: These results suggest that recipient age should not be considered itself as an absolute contraindication for kidney transplant.

Osteoporosis, densidad mineral ósea y complejo CKD-MBD (II): implicaciones terapéuticas / Osteoporosis, bone mineral density and CKD-MBD (II): Therapeutic implications

La osteoporosis (OP) y la enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) influyen independientemente en la salud ósea. Numerosos pacientes con ERC presentan una disminución de densidad mineral ósea (DMO), un elevado riesgo de fracturas por fragilidad ósea y un incremento de su morbimortalidad. Con el envejecimiento de la población estos hechos no son dependientes solo de la «osteodistrofia renal» sino también de la OP asociada. Dado que la DMO tiene capacidad predictiva en pacientes con ERC (parte I), ahora analizaremos las implicaciones terapéuticas derivadas. Análisis post hoc de estudios aleatorizados han mostrado que fármacos como alendronato, risedronato, raloxifeno, teriparatida o denosumab tienen una eficacia comparable a la población general en pacientes con una disminución leve-moderada del filtrado glomerular (especialmente ERC-3). Estos estudios tienen limitaciones, pues incluyen mayoritariamente mujeres "sanas", sin diagnóstico conocido de ERC y habitualmente con parámetros normales de laboratorio; sin embargo, también existen datos positivos preliminares en estadios más avanzados (ERC-4) y más limitados en ERC-5D. Por todo ello, al menos en ausencia de alteraciones significativas del metabolismo mineral (i.e., hiperparatiroidismo severo), el beneficio potencial de dichos fármacos debería ser considerado en pacientes que presenten un riesgo de fractura elevado o muy elevado. Es novedad importante que las nuevas guías no condicionan su uso a la práctica de una biopsia ósea previa y que el beneficio/riesgo de estos fármacos podría estar justificado. Sin embargo, debemos considerar que la mayoría de estudios no son consistentes y tienen un bajo grado de evidencia, por lo que la indicación farmacológica (riesgo/beneficio) debe ser individualizada y prudente

Osteoporosis (OP) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) both independently affect bone health. A significant number of patients with CKD have decreased bone mineral density (BMD), are at high risk of fragility fractures and have an increased morbidity and mortality risk. With an ageing population, these observations are not only dependent on "renal osteodystrophy" but also on the associated OP. As BMD predicts incident fractures in CKD patients (part I), we now aim to analyse the potential therapeutic consequences. Post-hoc analyses of randomised studies have shown that the efficacy of drugs such as alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, teriparatide and denosumab is similar to that of the general population in patients with a mild/moderate decline in their glomerular filtration rate (especially CKD-3). These studies have some flaws however, as they included mostly "healthy" women with no known diagnosis of CKD and generally with normal lab test results. Nevertheless, there are also some positive preliminary data in more advanced stages (CKD-4), even though in CKD-5D they are more limited. Therefore, at least in the absence of significant mineral metabolism disorders (i.e. severe hyperparathyroidism), the potential benefit of these drugs should be considered in patients with a high or very high fracture risk. It is an important change that the new guidelines do not make it a requirement to first perform a bone biopsy and that the risk/benefit ratio of these drugs may be justified. However, we must also be aware that most studies are not consistent and the level of evidence is low. Consequently, any pharmacological intervention (risk/benefit) should be prudent and individualized

Osteoporosis, bone mineral density and CKD-MBD (II): Therapeutic implications. / Osteoporosis, densidad mineral ósea y complejo CKD-MBD (II): implicaciones terapéuticas.

Osteoporosis (OP) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) both independently affect bone health. A significant number of patients with CKD have decreased bone mineral density (BMD), are at high risk of fragility fractures and have an increased morbidity and mortality risk. With an ageing population, these observations are not only dependent on "renal osteodystrophy" but also on the associated OP. As BMD predicts incident fractures in CKD patients (partI), we now aim to analyse the potential therapeutic consequences. Post-hoc analyses of randomised studies have shown that the efficacy of drugs such as alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, teriparatide and denosumab is similar to that of the general population in patients with a mild/moderate decline in their glomerular filtration rate (especially CKD-3). These studies have some flaws however, as they included mostly "healthy" women with no known diagnosis of CKD and generally with normal lab test results. Nevertheless, there are also some positive preliminary data in more advanced stages (CKD-4), even though in CKD-5D they are more limited. Therefore, at least in the absence of significant mineral metabolism disorders (i.e. severe hyperparathyroidism), the potential benefit of these drugs should be considered in patients with a high or very high fracture risk. It is an important change that the new guidelines do not make it a requirement to first perform a bone biopsy and that the risk/benefit ratio of these drugs may be justified. However, we must also be aware that most studies are not consistent and the level of evidence is low. Consequently, any pharmacological intervention (risk/benefit) should be prudent and individualised.

Borderline rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical results of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) and ABO-compatible (ABOc) kidney transplantation (KT) are similar. Protocol kidney biopsies (PKB) of ABOi transplant recipients show positivity for C4d without evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), but little is known about the histologic progression. METHOD: We evaluated histologic parameters in PKB at 12 months and also compared clinical outcome at 1 year. This is a prospective observational study conducted between 2009 and 2013. We performed 146/30 ABOc/ABOi consecutive living-donor KT with PKB as well as additional indication biopsies. In the ABOi group, the desensitization protocol consisted of rituximab, plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, and immunoglobulins. RESULTS: In indication biopsies during the first year, T-cell-mediated rejection Banff ≥immunoadsorption was 8.2% vs 6.7% (P=.561) and ABMR 4.8% vs 13.3% (P=.095). At 1 year, PKB (ABOc/ABOi) showed differences in borderline rejection lesions (6.8% vs 23.3% [P=.012]) and in C4d positivity in the ABOi group (P=.001). Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) lesions (ABOc/ABOi) were 68.4% vs 63.2% (P=.348). Transplant glomerulopathy was 0.7% vs 3.3% (P=.373) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Our PKB ABOi series shows at 1 year more borderline lesions independent of ABO titers, HLA incompatibility, and the presence of antidonor antibody, but do not show more IFTA nor transplant glomerulopathy. No clinical differences were observed between ABOi and ABO transplants.

Cinacalcet treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients: an observational study in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Cinacalcet reduces intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), Ca and P serum levels in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). METHODS: This Spanish, multicenter, observational, retrospective study collected data from SHPT dialysis patients 12 weeks before and up to 72 weeks after starting cinacalcet in clinical practice. RESULTS: Data from 428 patients with uncontrolled SHPT despite receiving standard of care (29% with baseline iPTH 501-800 pg/ml; 51% with >800 pg/ml) were collected. Percentages of patients within National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative targets at baseline and 72 weeks were: iPTH, 0 versus 32.5% (p < 0.05); Ca, 40.1 versus 50% (p < 0.05); P, 47.7 versus 53.8% (p = 0.162). Vitamin D sterol use decreased from 53.3% at baseline to 36.7% at 72 weeks (p < 0.05). The mean ± SD cinacalcet dose at 72 weeks was 44.0 ± 25.8, 51.7 ± 31.3 and 57.1 ± 37.0 mg for patients with baseline iPTH 301-500, 501-800 or >800 pg/ml, respectively. The main adverse reactions were nausea (5.4%), dyspepsia (5.1%) and vomiting (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of cinacalcet improved the routine clinical management of SHPT in a large cohort of Spanish dialysis patients. Cinacalcet is effective and well tolerated regardless of disease severity, and maintains its efficacy over 72 weeks.