Unraveling C-to-U RNA editing events from direct RNA sequencing.

In mammals, RNA editing events involve the conversion of adenosine (A) in inosine (I) by ADAR enzymes or the hydrolytic deamination of cytosine (C) in uracil (U) by the APOBEC family of enzymes, mostly APOBEC1. RNA editing has a plethora of biological functions, and its deregulation has been associated with various human disorders. While the large-scale detection of A-to-I is quite straightforward using the Illumina RNAseq technology, the identification of C-to-U events is a non-trivial task. This difficulty arises from the rarity of such events in eukaryotic genomes and the challenge of distinguishing them from background noise. Direct RNA sequencing by Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) permits the direct detection of Us on sequenced RNA reads. Surprisingly, using ONT reads from wild-type (WT) and APOBEC1-knock-out (KO) murine cell lines as well as in vitro synthesized RNA without any modification, we identified a systematic error affecting the accuracy of the Cs call, thereby leading to incorrect identifications of C-to-U events. To overcome this issue in direct RNA reads, here we introduce a novel machine learning strategy based on the isolation Forest (iForest) algorithm in which C-to-U editing events are considered as sequencing anomalies. Using in vitro synthesized and human ONT reads, our model optimizes the signal-to-noise ratio improving the detection of C-to-U editing sites with high accuracy, over 90% in all samples tested. Our results suggest that iForest, known for its rapid implementation and minimal memory requirements, is a promising tool to denoise ONT reads and reliably identify RNA modifications.

Live-Cell Quantification of APOBEC1-Mediated RNA Editing: A Comparison of RNA Editing Assays.

APOBEC1 is a member of the AID/APOBECs, a group of deaminases responsible for the editing of C>U in both DNA and RNA. APOBEC1 is physiologically involved in C>U RNA editing: while hundreds of targets have been discovered in mice, in humans the only well-characterized target of APOBEC1 is the apolipoprotein B (ApoB) transcript. APOBEC1 edits a CAA codon into a stop codon, which causes the translation of a truncated form of ApoB. A number of assays have been developed to investigate this process. Early assays, poisoned primer extension and Sanger sequencing, have focused on accuracy and sensitivity but rely on extraction of the RNA from tissues and cells. More recently, the need to visualize the RNA editing process directly in live cells have led to the development of fluorescence-based tools. These assays detect RNA editing through reporters whose editing causes a change in cellular localization or a change in fluorescent properties. Here we review the available assays to quantify RNA editing, and we present the protocol for cytofluorimetric analysis using a double-fluorescent reporter.

A mark of disease: how mRNA modifications shape genetic and acquired pathologies.

RNA modifications have recently emerged as a widespread and complex facet of gene expression regulation. Counting more than 170 distinct chemical modifications with far-reaching implications for RNA fate, they are collectively referred to as the epitranscriptome. These modifications can occur in all RNA species, including messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). In mRNAs the deposition, removal, and recognition of chemical marks by writers, erasers and readers influence their structure, localization, stability, and translation. In turn, this modulates key molecular and cellular processes such as RNA metabolism, cell cycle, apoptosis, and others. Unsurprisingly, given their relevance for cellular and organismal functions, alterations of epitranscriptomic marks have been observed in a broad range of human diseases, including cancer, neurological and metabolic disorders. Here, we will review the major types of mRNA modifications and editing processes in conjunction with the enzymes involved in their metabolism and describe their impact on human diseases. We present the current knowledge in an updated catalog. We will also discuss the emerging evidence on the crosstalk of epitranscriptomic marks and what this interplay could imply for the dynamics of mRNA modifications. Understanding how this complex regulatory layer can affect the course of human pathologies will ultimately lead to its exploitation toward novel epitranscriptomic therapeutic strategies.