Adenosine modulates transmission at the hippocampal mossy fibre synapse via direct inhibition of presynaptic calcium channels.

The modulation of synaptic transmission by presynaptic ionotropic and metabotropic receptors is an important means to control and dynamically adjust synaptic strength. Even though synaptic transmission and plasticity at the hippocampal mossy fibre synapse are tightly controlled by presynaptic receptors, little is known about the downstream signalling mechanisms and targets of the different receptor systems. In the present study, we identified the cellular signalling cascade by which adenosine modulates mossy fibre synaptic transmission. By means of electrophysiological and optical recording techniques, we found that adenosine activates presynaptic A1 receptors and reduces Ca2+ influx into mossy fibre terminals. Ca2+ currents are directly modulated via a membrane-delimited pathway and the reduction of presynaptic Ca2+ influx can explain the inhibition of synaptic transmission. Specifically, we found that adenosine modulates both P/Q- and N-type presynaptic voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and thereby controls transmitter release at the mossy fibre synapse.

Intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions: a novel principle in molecular medicine.

In 1980/81 Agnati and Fuxe introduced the concept of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions and presented the first experimental observations for their existence in crude membrane preparations. The second step was their introduction of the receptor mosaic hypothesis of the engram in 1982. The third step was their proposal that the existence of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions made possible the integration of synaptic (WT) and extrasynaptic (VT) signals. With the discovery of the intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions with the likely formation of receptor aggregates of multiple receptors, so called receptor mosaics, the entire decoding process becomes a branched process already at the receptor level in the surface membrane. Recent developments indicate the relevance of cooperativity in intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions namely the presence of regulated cooperativity via receptor-receptor interactions in receptor mosaics (RM) built up of the same type of receptor (homo-oligomers) or of subtypes of the same receptor (RM type1). The receptor-receptor interactions will to a large extent determine the various conformational states of the receptors and their operation will be dependent on the receptor composition (stoichiometry), the spatial organization (topography) and order of receptor activation in the RM. The biochemical and functional integrative implications of the receptor-receptor interactions are outlined and long-lived heteromeric receptor complexes with frozen RM in various nerve cell systems may play an essential role in learning, memory and retrieval processes. Intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions in the brain have given rise to novel strategies for treatment of Parkinson's disease (A2A and mGluR5 receptor antagonists), schizophrenia (A2A and mGluR5 agonists) and depression (galanin receptor antagonists). The A2A/D2, A2A/D3 and A2A/mGluR5 heteromers and heteromeric complexes with their possible participation in different types of RM are described in detail, especially in the cortico-striatal glutamate synapse and its extrasynaptic components, together with a postulated existence of A2A/D4 heteromers. Finally, the impact of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions in molecular medicine is discussed outside the brain with focus on the endocrine, the cardiovascular and the immune systems.

Receptor heteromerization in adenosine A2A receptor signaling: relevance for striatal function and Parkinson's disease.

Recently evidence has been presented that adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors form functional heteromeric receptor complexes as demonstrated in human neuroblastoma cells and mouse fibroblast Ltk- cells. These A2A/D2 heteromeric receptor complexes undergo coaggregation, cointernalization, and codesensitization on D2 or A2A receptor agonist treatments and especially after combined agonist treatment. It is hypothesized that the A2A/D2 receptor heteromer represents the molecular basis for the antagonistic A2A/D2 receptor interactions demonstrated at the biochemical and behavioral levels. Functional heteromeric complexes between A2A and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGluR5) have also recently been demonstrated in HEK-293 cells and rat striatal membrane preparations. The A2A/mGluR5 receptor heteromer may account for the synergism found after combined agonist treatments demonstrated in different in vitro and in vivo models. D2, A2A, and mGluR5 receptors are found together in the dendritic spines of the striatopallidal GABA neurons. Therefore, possible D2/A2A/mGluR5 multimeric receptor complexes and the receptor interactions within them may have a major role in controlling the dorsal and ventral striatopallidal GABA neurons involved in Parkinson's disease and in schizophrenia and drug addiction, respectively.

Interactions among adenosine deaminase, adenosine A(1) receptors and dopamine D(1) receptors in stably cotransfected fibroblast cells and neurons.

The role of adenosine deaminase in the interactions between adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors was studied in a mouse fibroblast cell line stably cotransfected with human D(1) receptor and A(1) receptor cDNAs (A(1)D(1) cells). Confocal laser microscopy analysis showed a high degree of adenosine deaminase immunoreactivity on the membrane of the A(1)D(1) cells but not of the D(1) cells (only cotransfected with human D(1) receptor cDNAs). In double immunolabelling experiments in A(1)D(1) cells and cortical neurons a marked overlap in the distribution of the A(1) receptor and adenosine deaminase immunoreactivities and of the D(1) receptor and adenosine deaminase immunoreactivities was found. Quantitative analysis of A(1)D(1) cells showed that adenosine deaminase immunoreactivity to a large extent colocalizes with A(1) and D(1) receptor immunoreactivity, respectively. The A(1) receptor agonist caused in A(1)D(1) cells and in cortical neurons coaggregation of A(1) receptors and adenosine deaminase, and of D(1) receptors and adenosine deaminase. The A(1) receptor agonist-induced aggregation was blocked by R-deoxycoformycin, an irreversible adenosine deaminase inhibitor. The competitive binding experiments with the D(1) receptor antagonist [(3)H]SCH-23390 showed that the D(1) receptors had a better fit for two binding sites for dopamine, and treatment with the A(1) receptor agonist produced a disappearance of the high-affinity site for dopamine at the D(1) receptor. R-Deoxycoformycin treatment, which has previously been shown to block the interaction between adenosine deaminase and A(1) receptors, and which is crucial for the high-affinity state of the A(1) receptor, also blocked the A(1) receptor agonist-induced loss of high-affinity D(1) receptor binding. The conclusion of the present studies is that the high-affinity state of the A(1) receptor is essential for the A(1) receptor-mediated antagonistic modulation of D(1) receptors and for the A(1) receptor-induced coaggregates of A(1) and adenosine deaminase, and of D(1) and adenosine deaminase. Thus, the confocal experiments indicate that both A(1) and D(1) receptors form agonist-regulated clusters with adenosine deaminase, where the presence of a structurally intact adenosine deaminase bound to A(1) receptors is important for the A(1)-D(1) receptor-receptor interaction at the level of the D(1) receptor recognition.

The selective mGlu(5) receptor agonist CHPG inhibits quinpirole-induced turning in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats and modulates the binding characteristics of dopamine D(2) receptors in the rat striatum: interactions with adenosine A(2a) receptors.

In 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats, the selective mGlu(5) receptor agonist (RS)-2-Cholro-5-Hydroxyphenylglycine (CHPG, 1-6 microg/10 microl intracerebroventricularly) significantly inhibited contralateral turning induced by quinpirole and, to a lesser extent, that induced by SKF 38393. The inhibitory effects of CHPG on quinpirole-induced turning were significantly potentiated by an adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist (CGS 21680, 0.2 mg/kg IP) and attenuated by an A(2A) receptor antagonist (SCH 58261, 1 mg/kg IP). In rat striatal membranes, CHPG (100-1,000 nM) significantly reduced the affinity of the high-affinity state of D(2) receptors for the agonist, an effect potentiated by CGS 21680 (30 nM). These results show the occurrence of functional interactions among mGlu(5), adenosine A(2A), and dopamine D(2) receptors in the regulation of striatal functioning, and suggest that mGlu(5) receptors may be regarded as alternative/integrative targets for the development of therapeutic strategies in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Evidence for adenosine/dopamine receptor interactions: indications for heteromerization.

Evidence has been obtained for adenosine/dopamine interactions in the central nervous system. There exists an anatomical basis for the existence of functional interactions between adenosine A(1)R and dopamine D(1)R and between adenosine A(2A) and dopamine D(2) receptors in the same neurons. Selective A(1)R agonists affect negatively the high affinity binding of D(1) receptors. Activation of A(2A) receptors leads to a decrease in receptor affinity for dopamine agonists acting on D(2) receptors, specially of the high-affinity state. These interactions have been reproduced in cell lines and found to be of functional significance. Adenosine/dopamine interactions at the behavioral level probably reflect those found at the level of dopamine receptor binding and transduction. All these findings suggest receptor subtype-specific interactions between adenosine and dopamine receptors that may be achieved by molecular interactions (e.g., receptor heterodimerization). At the molecular level adenosine receptors can serve as a model for homomeric and heteromeric protein-protein interactions. A1R forms homodimers in membranes and also form high-order molecular structures containing also heterotrimeric G-proteins and adenosine deaminase. The occurrence of clustering also clearly suggests that G-protein- coupled receptors form high-order molecular structures, in which multimers of the receptors and probably other interacting proteins form functional complexes. In view of the occurrence of homodimers of adenosine and of dopamine receptors it is speculated that heterodimers between these receptors belonging to two different families of G-protein-coupled receptors can be formed. Evidence that A1/D1 can form heterodimers in cotransfected cells and in primary cultures of neurons has in fact been obtained. In the central nervous system direct and indirect receptor-receptor interactions via adaptor proteins participate in neurotransmission and neuromodulation and, for example, in the establishment of high neural functions such as learning and memory.

Dopamine D1 and adenosine A1 receptors form functionally interacting heteromeric complexes.

The possible molecular basis for the previously described antagonistic interactions between adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)R) and dopamine D(1) receptors (D(1)R) in the brain have been studied in mouse fibroblast Ltk(-) cells cotransfected with human A(1)R and D(1)R cDNAs or with human A(1)R and dopamine D(2) receptor (long-form) (D(2)R) cDNAs and in cortical neurons in culture. A(1)R and D(1)R, but not A(1)R and D(2)R, were found to coimmunoprecipitate in cotransfected fibroblasts. This selective A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization disappeared after pretreatment with the D(1)R agonist, but not after combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists. A high degree of A(1)R and D(1)R colocalization, demonstrated in double immunofluorescence experiments with confocal laser microscopy, was found in both cotransfected fibroblast cells and cortical neurons in culture. On the other hand, a low degree of A(1)R and D(2)R colocalization was observed in cotransfected fibroblasts. Pretreatment with the A(1)R agonist caused coclustering (coaggregation) of A(1)R and D(1)R, which was blocked by combined pretreatment with the D(1)R and A(1)R agonists in both fibroblast cells and in cortical neurons in culture. Combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists, but not with either one alone, substantially reduced the D(1)R agonist-induced accumulation of cAMP. The A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization may be one molecular basis for the demonstrated antagonistic modulation of A(1)R of D(1)R receptor signaling in the brain. The persistence of A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization seems to be essential for the blockade of A(1)R agonist-induced A(1)R/D(1)R coclustering and for the desensitization of the D(1)R agonist-induced cAMP accumulation seen on combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists, which indicates a potential role of A(1)R/D(1)R heteromers also in desensitization mechanisms and receptor trafficking.

Adenosine A1 receptor-mediated modulation of dopamine D1 receptors in stably cotransfected fibroblast cells.

The antagonistic interactions between adenosine A1 and dopamine D1 receptors were studied in a mouse Ltk- cell line stably cotransfected with human adenosine A1 receptor and dopamine D1 receptor cDNAs. In membrane preparations, both the adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine and the GTP analogue guanyl-5'-yl imidodiphospate induced a decrease in the proportion of dopamine D1 receptors in a high affinity state. In the cotransfected cells, the adenosine A1 agonist induced a concentration-dependent inhibition of dopamine-induced cAMP accumulation. Blockade of adenosine A1 receptor signal transduction with the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine or with pertussis toxin pretreatment increased both basal and dopamine-stimulated cAMP levels, indicating the existence of tonic adenosine A1 receptor activation. Pretreatment with pertussis toxin also counteracted the effects of low concentrations of the A1 agonist on D1 receptor-agonist binding. The results suggest that adenosine A1 receptors antagonistically modulate dopamine D1 receptors at the level of receptor binding and the generation of second messengers.