Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Malar J ; 19(1): 336, 2020 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains the top infectious disease threat facing the U.S. military in many forward operating environments. Compliance with malaria chemoprophylaxis remains a critical component in preventing malaria in the deployed Service Member. Studies of previous military operations show that compliance is consistently higher with weekly versus daily dosing regimens. Current FDA approved weekly chemoprophylaxis options have contraindications that can limit prescribing. The combination of chloroquine (CQ) with azithromycin (AZ) has previously been shown to be an efficacious treatment option for malaria, has pharmacokinetics compatible with weekly dosing, and has shown synergy when combined in vitro. METHODS: In this open label study, 18 healthy volunteers, aged 18-50 years (inclusive), were randomly assigned to receive either 300 mg CQ or 300 mg CQ and 2 gm azithromycin (CQAZ) of directly observed therapy, weekly for 3 weeks prior to undergoing mosquito bite challenge with chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Volunteers that remained asymptomatic and had no evidence of parasitaemia continued to receive weekly post-exposure chemoprophylaxis for 3 weeks following malaria challenge. The primary endpoint was the number of volunteers that remained asymptomatic and had no evidence of parasitaemia 28 days after the malaria challenge. RESULTS: All 6 (100%) volunteers randomized to the CQ control group became symptomatic with parasitaemia during the 28-day post-challenge period. Only 1/12 (8.3%) of volunteers in the CQAZ group developed symptoms and parasitaemia during the 28-day post-challenge period. However, after chemoprophylaxis was discontinued an additional 6 volunteers developed parasitaemia between days 28-41 after challenge, with 4 of 6 experiencing symptoms. 80% of subjects in the CQAZ group experienced treatment related gastrointestinal adverse events (including 13% that experienced severe nausea) compared to 38% in the CQ group. A comparison of the pharmacokinetics in the CQAZ group demonstrated higher azithromycin Cmax (p = 0.03) and AUC (p = 0.044) levels in those volunteers who never became parasitaemic compared to those who did. CONCLUSION: Given the high rate of side effects and poor efficacy when administered for 3 weeks before and after challenge, the combination of weekly chloroquine and azithromycin is a suboptimal regimen combination for weekly malaria chemoprophylaxis. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03278808.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Azitromicina/efectos adversos , Cloroquina/efectos adversos , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Combinación de Medicamentos , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
3.
J Infect Dis ; 220(11): 1761-1770, 2019 10 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549155

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Plasmodium vivax malaria requires a 2-week course of primaquine (PQ) for radical cure. Evidence suggests that the hepatic isoenzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is the key enzyme required to convert PQ into its active metabolite. METHODS: CYP2D6 genotypes and phenotypes of 550 service personnel were determined, and the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a 30-mg oral dose of PQ was measured in 45 volunteers. Blood and urine samples were collected, with PQ and metabolites were measured using ultraperformance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Seventy-six CYP2D6 genotypes were characterized for 530 service personnel. Of the 515 personnel for whom a single phenotype was predicted, 58% had a normal metabolizer (NM) phenotype, 35% had an intermediate metabolizer (IM) phenotype, 5% had a poor metabolizer (PM) phenotype, and 2% had an ultrametabolizer phenotype. The median PQ area under the concentration time curve from 0 to ∞ was lower for the NM phenotype as compared to the IM or PM phenotypes. The novel 5,6-ortho-quinone was detected in urine but not plasma from all personnel with the NM phenotype. CONCLUSION: The plasma PK profile suggests PQ metabolism is decreased in personnel with the IM or PM phenotypes as compared to those with the NM phenotype. The finding of 5,6-ortho-quinone, the stable surrogate for the unstable 5-hydroxyprimaquine metabolite, almost exclusively in personnel with the NM phenotype, compared with sporadic or no production in those with the IM or PM phenotypes, provides further evidence for the role of CYP2D6 in radical cure. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02960568.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/metabolismo , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/metabolismo , Genotipo , Primaquina/metabolismo , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/farmacocinética , Análisis Químico de la Sangre , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Espectrometría de Masas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal Militar , Fenotipo , Plasma/química , Primaquina/administración & dosificación , Primaquina/farmacocinética , Estados Unidos , Urinálisis , Orina/química , Adulto Joven
4.
Infect Immun ; 87(3)2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30559218

RESUMEN

Seroepidemiological studies on the prevalence of antibodies to malaria antigens are primarily conducted on individuals from regions of endemicity. It is therefore difficult to accurately correlate the antibody responses to the timing and number of prior malaria infections. This study was undertaken to assess the evolution of antibodies to the dominant surface antigens of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum following controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) in malaria-naive individuals. Serum samples from malaria-naive adults, collected before and after CHMI with either P. vivax (n = 18) or P. falciparum (n = 18), were tested for the presence of antibodies to the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and the 42-kDa fragment of merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP-142) of P. vivax and P. falciparum using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Approximately 1 month following CHMI with either P. vivax or P. falciparum, >60% of subjects seroconverted to homologous CSP and MSP-1. More than 50% of the subjects demonstrated reactivity to heterologous CSP and MSP-142, and a similar proportion of subjects remained seropositive to homologous MSP-142 >5 months after CHMI. Computational analysis provides insight into the presence of cross-reactive responses. The presence of long-lived and heterologous reactivity and its functional significance, if any, need to be taken into account while evaluating malaria exposure in field settings.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Protozoos/inmunología , Eritrocitos/parasitología , Malaria Falciparum/inmunología , Malaria Vivax/inmunología , Plasmodium falciparum , Plasmodium vivax , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Anopheles/parasitología , Epítopos de Linfocito B , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Malaria Vivax/parasitología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mosquitos Vectores/parasitología , Proteínas Protozoarias/inmunología , Adulto Joven
5.
JCI Insight ; 2(1): e89154, 2017 01 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) sporozoite (SPZ) malaria vaccine, PfSPZ Vaccine, protected 6 of 6 subjects (100%) against homologous Pf (same strain as in the vaccine) controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) 3 weeks after 5 doses administered intravenously. The next step was to assess protective efficacy against heterologous Pf (different from Pf in the vaccine), after fewer doses, and at 24 weeks. METHODS: The trial assessed tolerability, safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of direct venous inoculation (DVI) of 3 or 5 doses of PfSPZ Vaccine in non-immune subjects. RESULTS: Three weeks after final immunization, 5 doses of 2.7 × 105 PfSPZ protected 12 of 13 recipients (92.3% [95% CI: 48.0, 99.8]) against homologous CHMI and 4 of 5 (80.0% [10.4, 99.5]) against heterologous CHMI; 3 doses of 4.5 × 105 PfSPZ protected 13 of 15 (86.7% [35.9, 98.3]) against homologous CHMI. Twenty-four weeks after final immunization, the 5-dose regimen protected 7 of 10 (70.0% [17.3, 93.3]) against homologous and 1 of 10 (10.0% [-35.8, 45.6]) against heterologous CHMI; the 3-dose regimen protected 8 of 14 (57.1% [21.5, 76.6]) against homologous CHMI. All 22 controls developed Pf parasitemia. PfSPZ Vaccine was well tolerated, safe, and easy to administer. No antibody or T cell responses correlated with protection. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated for the first time to our knowledge that PfSPZ Vaccine can protect against a 3-week heterologous CHMI in a limited group of malaria-naive adult subjects. A 3-dose regimen protected against both 3-week and 24-week homologous CHMI (87% and 57%, respectively) in this population. These results provide a foundation for developing an optimized immunization regimen for preventing malaria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02215707. FUNDING: Support was provided through the US Army Medical Research and Development Command, Military Infectious Diseases Research Program, and the Naval Medical Research Center's Advanced Medical Development Program.


Asunto(s)
Malaria Falciparum/terapia , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Esporozoítos/efectos de los fármacos , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Masculino , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Esporozoítos/genética , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/uso terapéutico , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma/métodos
6.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 10(2): e0004423, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26919472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A vaccine to prevent infection and disease caused by Plasmodium vivax is needed both to reduce the morbidity caused by this parasite and as a key component in efforts to eradicate malaria worldwide. Vivax malaria protein 1 (VMP001), a novel chimeric protein that incorporates the amino- and carboxy- terminal regions of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and a truncated repeat region that contains repeat sequences from both the VK210 (type 1) and the VK247 (type 2) parasites, was developed as a vaccine candidate for global use. METHODS: We conducted a first-in-human Phase 1 dose escalation vaccine study with controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) of VMP001 formulated in the GSK Adjuvant System AS01B. A total of 30 volunteers divided into 3 groups (10 per group) were given 3 intramuscular injections of 15 µg, 30 µg, or 60 µg respectively of VMP001, all formulated in 500 µL of AS01B at each immunization. All vaccinated volunteers participated in a P. vivax CHMI 14 days following the third immunization. Six non-vaccinated subjects served as infectivity controls. RESULTS: The vaccine was shown to be well tolerated and immunogenic. All volunteers generated robust humoral and cellular immune responses to the vaccine antigen. Vaccination did not induce sterile protection; however, a small but significant delay in time to parasitemia was seen in 59% of vaccinated subjects compared to the control group. An association was identified between levels of anti-type 1 repeat antibodies and prepatent period. SIGNIFICANCE: This trial was the first to assess the efficacy of a P. vivax CSP vaccine candidate by CHMI. The association of type 1 repeat-specific antibody responses with delay in the prepatency period suggests that augmenting the immune responses to this domain may improve strain-specific vaccine efficacy. The availability of a P. vivax CHMI model will accelerate the process of P. vivax vaccine development, allowing better selection of candidate vaccines for advancement to field trials.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Malaria/inmunología , Malaria Vivax/prevención & control , Plasmodium vivax/inmunología , Proteínas Protozoarias/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Malaria/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Malaria/efectos adversos , Malaria Vivax/inmunología , Malaria Vivax/parasitología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Protozoarias/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Protozoarias/efectos adversos , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
7.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0131571, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26148007

RESUMEN

METHODS: In an observer blind, phase 2 trial, 55 adults were randomized to receive one dose of Ad35.CS.01 vaccine followed by two doses of RTS,S/AS01 (ARR-group) or three doses of RTS,S/AS01 (RRR-group) at months 0, 1, 2 followed by controlled human malaria infection. RESULTS: ARR and RRR vaccine regimens were well tolerated. Efficacy of ARR and RRR groups after controlled human malaria infection was 44% (95% confidence interval 21%-60%) and 52% (25%-70%), respectively. The RRR-group had greater anti-CS specific IgG titers than did the ARR-group. There were higher numbers of CS-specific CD4 T-cells expressing > 2 cytokine/activation markers and more ex vivo IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospots in the ARR-group than the RRR-group. Protected subjects had higher CS-specific IgG titers than non-protected subjects (geometric mean titer, 120.8 vs 51.8 EU/ml, respectively; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in vaccine efficacy of ARR-group over RRR-group was not achieved. Future strategies to improve upon RTS,S-induced protection may need to utilize alternative highly immunogenic prime-boost regimens and/or additional target antigens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01366534.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Malaria/inmunología , Malaria/inmunología , Malaria/prevención & control , Esporozoítos/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/inmunología , Formación de Anticuerpos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Pruebas Inmunológicas/métodos , Interferón gamma/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos
9.
PLoS One ; 8(2): e55571, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23457473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gene-based vaccination using prime/boost regimens protects animals and humans against malaria, inducing cell-mediated responses that in animal models target liver stage malaria parasites. We tested a DNA prime/adenovirus boost malaria vaccine in a Phase 1 clinical trial with controlled human malaria infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The vaccine regimen was three monthly doses of two DNA plasmids (DNA) followed four months later by a single boost with two non-replicating human serotype 5 adenovirus vectors (Ad). The constructs encoded genes expressing P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1). The regimen was safe and well-tolerated, with mostly mild adverse events that occurred at the site of injection. Only one AE (diarrhea), possibly related to immunization, was severe (Grade 3), preventing daily activities. Four weeks after the Ad boost, 15 study subjects were challenged with P. falciparum sporozoites by mosquito bite, and four (27%) were sterilely protected. Antibody responses by ELISA rose after Ad boost but were low (CSP geometric mean titer 210, range 44-817; AMA1 geometric mean micrograms/milliliter 11.9, range 1.5-102) and were not associated with protection. Ex vivo IFN-γ ELISpot responses after Ad boost were modest (CSP geometric mean spot forming cells/million peripheral blood mononuclear cells 86, range 13-408; AMA1 348, range 88-1270) and were highest in three protected subjects. ELISpot responses to AMA1 were significantly associated with protection (p = 0.019). Flow cytometry identified predominant IFN-γ mono-secreting CD8+ T cell responses in three protected subjects. No subjects with high pre-existing anti-Ad5 neutralizing antibodies were protected but the association was not statistically significant. SIGNIFICANCE: The DNA/Ad regimen provided the highest sterile immunity achieved against malaria following immunization with a gene-based subunit vaccine (27%). Protection was associated with cell-mediated immunity to AMA1, with CSP probably contributing. Substituting a low seroprevalence vector for Ad5 and supplementing CSP/AMA1 with additional antigens may improve protection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT00870987.


Asunto(s)
Adenovirus Humanos/genética , Antígenos de Protozoos/genética , Vacunas contra la Malaria/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Proteínas Protozoarias/genética , Vacunas de ADN/uso terapéutico , Adenovirus Humanos/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Antígenos de Protozoos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad Celular , Interferón gamma/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Malaria/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Malaria/genética , Vacunas contra la Malaria/inmunología , Malaria Falciparum/inmunología , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Masculino , Proteínas de la Membrana/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Plasmodium falciparum/inmunología , Proteínas Protozoarias/inmunología , Vacunas de ADN/efectos adversos , Vacunas de ADN/genética , Vacunas de ADN/inmunología , Adulto Joven
10.
Malar J ; 12: 29, 2013 Jan 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23342996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The development of an asexual blood stage vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum malaria based on the major merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1) antigen is founded on the protective efficacy observed in preclinical studies and induction of invasion and growth inhibitory antibody responses. The 42 kDa C-terminus of MSP1 has been developed as the recombinant protein vaccine antigen, and the 3D7 allotype, formulated with the Adjuvant System AS02A, has been evaluated extensively in human clinical trials. In preclinical rabbit studies, the FVO allele of MSP142 has been shown to have improved immunogenicity over the 3D7 allele, in terms of antibody titres as well as growth inhibitory activity of antibodies against both the heterologous 3D7 and homologous FVO parasites. METHODS: Two Phase 1 clinical studies were conducted to examine the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the FVO allele of MSP142 in the adjuvant system AS01 administered intramuscularly at 0-, 1-, and 2-months: one in the USA and, after evaluation of safety data results, one in Western Kenya. The US study was an open-label, dose escalation study of 10 and 50 µg doses of MSP142 in 26 adults, while the Kenya study, evaluating 30 volunteers, was a double-blind, randomized study of only the 50 µg dose with a rabies vaccine comparator. RESULTS: In these studies it was demonstrated that this vaccine formulation has an acceptable safety profile and is immunogenic in malaria-naïve and malaria-experienced populations. High titres of anti-MSP1 antibodies were induced in both study populations, although there was a limited number of volunteers whose serum demonstrated significant inhibition of blood-stage parasites as measured by growth inhibition assay. In the US volunteers, the antibodies generated exhibited better cross-reactivity to heterologous MSP1 alleles than a MSP1-based vaccine (3D7 allele) previously tested at both study sites. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the primary effector mechanism for blood stage vaccine targets is humoral, the antibody responses demonstrated to this vaccine candidate, both quantitative (total antibody titres) and qualitative (functional antibodies inhibiting parasite growth) warrant further consideration of its application in endemic settings. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Clinical Trials NCT00666380.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/inmunología , Antígenos de Protozoos/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Malaria/administración & dosificación , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Proteína 1 de Superficie de Merozoito/inmunología , Plasmodium falciparum/inmunología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Adulto , Formación de Anticuerpos , Reacciones Cruzadas/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Vacunas contra la Malaria/efectos adversos , Malaria Falciparum/inmunología , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Masculino
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 54(2): 232-9, 2012 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22052893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to establish the efficacy of atovaquone-proguanil to prevent malaria with the goal of simulating weekly dosing in a human Plasmodium falciparum challenge model. METHODS: Thirty volunteers randomly received 1 of the following dose regimens: (1) 250 milligrams of atovaquone and 100 milligrams of proguanil (250/100 milligrams) 1 day prior to infectious mosquito challenge (day -1), (2) 250/100 milligrams on day 4 after challenge, (3) 250/100 milligrams on day -7, (4) 500 milligrams of atovaquone and 200 milligrams of proguanil (500/200 milligrams) on day -7 or, (5) 1000 milligrams of atovaquone and 400 milligrams of proguanil (1000/400 milligrams) on day -7. All regimens included matching placebo such that all volunteers received identical pill numbers. Six volunteers served as open-label infectivity controls. Volunteers underwent mosquito sporozoite challenge with P. falciparum 3D7 strain. Follow-up consisted of serial microscopy and close clinical monitoring for 90 days. RESULTS: Six of 6 infectivity controls developed parasitemia as expected. Two of 5 evaluable volunteers receiving 250/100 milligrams 7 days prior to challenge and 1 of 6 volunteers receiving 1000/400 milligrams 7 days prior to challenge were microscopically diagnosed with malaria. All other volunteers were protected. Atovaquone exposure (area under the curve) during liver stage development was low in 2 of 3 volunteers with prophylactic failure (423 and 199 ng/mL × days compared with a mean for protected volunteers of 1903 ng/mL × days), as was peak concentration (165 and 81 ng/mL compared with a mean of 594 ng/mL in volunteers with prophylactic success). Elimination half-life was short in volunteers with prophylactic failure (2.4, 2.0, and 3.3 days compared with a mean of 4.1 days in volunteers with prophylactic success). CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose atovaquone-proguanil provides effective malaria chemoprophylaxis against P. falciparum challenge at dosing intervals supportive of weekly dosing. Postexposure prophylaxis 4 days after challenge was 100% effective.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Atovacuona/administración & dosificación , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Proguanil/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Antimaláricos/farmacocinética , Área Bajo la Curva , Atovacuona/efectos adversos , Atovacuona/farmacocinética , Quimioprevención/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parasitemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Parasitemia/metabolismo , Parasitemia/prevención & control , Placebos , Proguanil/efectos adversos , Proguanil/farmacocinética , Esporozoítos/efectos de los fármacos
12.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 84(5): 825-9, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21540397

RESUMEN

A sensitive biomarker of malaria infection would obviate the need for placebo control arms in clinical trials of malaria prophylactic drugs. Antibodies to the 42-kDa fragment of merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1(42)) have been identified as a potential marker of malaria exposure in individuals receiving prophylaxis with mefloquine. We conducted an open-label trial to determine the sensitivity of seroconversion to MSP1(42), defined as a fourfold rise in enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) titer, among 23 malaria naïve volunteers receiving mefloquine prophylaxis and 6 controls after Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite challenge. All members of the control cohort but none of the mefloquine cohort developed patent parasitemia. Four of six controls but zero of the mefloquine cohort seroconverted to MSP1(42). We conclude that malaria infection during suppressive prophylaxis does not induce antibody response to the blood-stage antigen MSP1(42) in a malaria-naïve study population.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/biosíntesis , Antígenos de Protozoos/inmunología , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Mefloquina/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Protozoarias/inmunología , Adulto , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mefloquina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...