Histological diagnostic discrepancy and its clinical impact in bone and soft tissue tumors referred to a sarcoma center.

Histological diagnosis of sarcomas (malignant bone and soft tissue tumors) is challenging due to their rarity, morphological diversity, and constantly evolving diagnostic criteria. In this study, we aimed to assess the concordance in histological diagnosis of bone and soft tissue tumors between referring hospitals and a tertiary sarcoma center and analyzed the clinical impact of the diagnostic alteration. We analyzed 628 consecutively accessioned specimens from 624 patients who visited a specialized sarcoma center for treatment. The diagnoses at referring hospitals and those at the sarcoma center were compared and classified into four categories: agreed, disagreed, specified, and de-specified. Of the 628 specimens, the diagnoses agreed in 403 (64.2%) specimens, whereas some changes were made in 225 (35.8%) specimens: disagreed in 153 (24.3%), specified in 52 (8.3%), and de-specified in 20 (3.2%) cases. The benign/intermediate/malignant judgment changed for 92 cases (14.6%). The diagnostic change resulted in patient management modification in 91 cases (14.5%), including surgical and medical treatment changes. The main inferred reason for the diagnostic discrepancies was a different interpretation of morphological findings of the tumor, which accounted for 48.9% of the cases. This was followed by the unavailability of specialized immunohistochemical antibodies and the unavailability of genetic analysis. In summary, our study clarified the actual clinical impact of diagnostic discrepancy in bone and soft tissue tumors. This may underscore the value of pathology consultation, facilitating access to specialized diagnostic tools, and continued education. These measures are expected to improve diagnostic precision and ultimately benefit patients.

Asian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor / Journal of the Korean Cancer Association, 대한암학회지

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors originating in the gastrointestinal tract. With the introduction of molecular-targeted therapy for GISTs which has yielded remarkable outcomes, these tumors have become a model of multidisciplinary oncological treatment. Although Western clinical guidelines are available for GISTs, such as those published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), the clinical situations in Asian countries are different from those in Western countries in terms of diagnostic methods, surgical approach, and availability of new targeted agents. Accordingly, we have reviewed current versions of several GIST guidelines published by Asian countries (Japan, Korea, China, and Taiwan) and the NCCN and ESMO and discussed the areas of dissensus. We here present the first version of the Asian GIST consensus guidelines that were prepared through a series of meetings involving multidisciplinary experts in the four countries. These guidelines provide an optimal approach to the diagnosis and management of GIST patients in Asian countries.

A simple and safe method for gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the hemidouble-stapling technique: efficient purse-string stapling technique.

AIM: To describe a simple technique for intracorporeal circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. METHODS: After the stomach and duodenum were mobilized, gastrotomy was established in the anterior gastric wall. An anvil, which was secured with a suture needle, was inserted completely through the gastrotomy. The needle was advanced to the greater curvature of the gastric wall to enable penetration of the central rod into the gastric wall. Subsequently, the stomach was cut using a linear stapler to secure the anvil on the stomach and was sequentially transected using another linear stapler to achieve distal gastrectomy. Circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy was then performed intracorporeally using the hemidouble-stapling technique, while handling the shaft of the instrument via the umbilical incision. The jejunal stump was closed using a linear stapler. RESULTS: Gastrojejunostomies were successfully performed in 20 gastric cancer patients using this technique. None of the patients showed anastomotic leakage and/or stenosis. There were no mortalities in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrojejunostomy performed using the above-mentioned technique was safe and simple. The most important feature of the technique was the elimination of the need for purse-string suture placement, as well as the achievement of better cosmesis using the transumbilical approach.