Nursing and Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review of Worldwide Studies.

This scoping review aims to evaluate the characteristics of worldwide studies evolving the scope of nursing practice in Parkinson's disease (PD). We conducted a three-step search strategy using 11 databases and reference lists. Of the 4,174 screened studies we included 324 (8%). Most were published during 1978 to 2020, with significant increasing in publications from 2002 onwards and a forecast to double in the next 10 years (total expected = 614, ±62.2, R2 = .998). We identified studies involving nine contexts of nursing practice in PD, in four continents and 31 countries, most of them of observational design (47.2%), funded (52.2%), authored by nurses (70.1%), and related to Nursing care/Guidelines (32.1%), Educational/Research content (16.4%), Symptom management/Medication adherence (14.5%), and Family caregiving (11.1%). The worldwide studies evolving the scope of nursing practice in PD is growing in several health context. These results can guide future research and evidence-based practice involving the role of nurses in PD.

Rating scales for medication adherence in people living with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the review is to evaluate the measurement properties of rating scales that have been used to assess the components of medication adherence in patients with Parkinson's disease. INTRODUCTION: Drug therapy is a central strategy in the control of Parkinson's disease symptoms. Measuring behaviors related to medication adherence in patients with Parkinson's disease is vital to understanding the therapeutic response. Consequently, it is necessary to define which instrument offers the most reliable and valid screening. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider studies in English and Portuguese using structured rating scales to assess medication adherence in people with Parkinson's disease. Studies including data from patients with different diseases in addition to Parkinson's disease will be included only if data are clearly available for each disorder covered. Study protocols, letters to the editors, reviews, and studies with clinical judgment scales but no operationally defined anchor points will be excluded. METHODS: A three-step search strategy will be utilized. Databases will include MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS (BVS Portal), PsycINFO (APA PsycNet), CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), Embase, and Scopus (Elsevier). The search strategy will be presented using a PRISMA flow diagram. Eligible studies will be critically appraised for methodological quality using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Criteria for good measurement properties of the selected scales will be summarized narratively using COSMIN, the Movement Disorder Society Rating Scale Program Committee methodology, the World Health Organization concepts, and the ABC taxonomy of medication adherence. The certainty of the evidence will be determined using the modified GRADE recommendations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (CRD42021211099).